This Dogma Won't Hunt: Feinstein, Durbin, Sanders, and the New Religious Test for Office So much for Article VI of the U.S. Constitution | ED STETZER Excerpt :
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is the most recent, joined by Dick Durbin, and preceded (most famously) by Bernie Sanders. In all cases, their comments are catching notice on the right and left, and appropriately so. Furthermore, the frequency with which we are seeing it occur is beginning to cause concern for those who hold to religious beliefs today.
Feinstein admonished Amy Barrett, a Trump nominee for a judgeship on the 7th Circuit, saying that Barretts Roman Catholic dogma lives loudly within her. Lest her words be out of context, here is the context of her statement:
Why is it that so many of us on this side have this very uncomfortable feeling that you know, dogma and law are two different things. And I think whatever a religion is, it has its own dogma. The law is totally different. And I think in your case, professor, when you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you, and thats of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for years in this country.
Dogma is defined by Merriam Webster as, a doctrine or body of doctrines concerning faith or morals formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church. In other words, these are things that people of faith have settled upon in terms of doctrines or beliefs.
This, perhaps, might remind us that dogma lived loudly in many of the nations founders. And it might also remind us of Article VI of the United States Constitution that no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Officer or public Trust under the United States.
More:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ed...t-feinstein-durban-sanders-and-new- relig.html
Click for Full Text!