Title: *BRUTAL TRUTH DEBATE*: Christian vs. Muslim; Christ vs. Muhammad/Bible vs. Koran (Fascinating Listen) Source:
You Tube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVU3 ... ist&p=8DF2F55C1F8C5A75&index=2 Published:Feb 28, 2008 Author:Dave Hunt Post Date:2009-12-13 03:17:12 by Liberator Keywords:Christianity, Islam, debate Views:64045 Comments:164
This is a debate between Dave Hunt and Shabir Ally in Toronto Canada in 2008. Christianity vs. Islam.
Hunt's credentials and scholarship are impeccable as is his courage. As the author of over 4,000,000 books (of which three I own), you will see and hear him NOT mince any words about the deeply flawed Muhammad, and how deeply flawed the Koran is. No candy-coated PC-Speak here.
He compares and contrasts the Koran vs. Bible convincingly, with conviction and armed with facts. Chances are none of us will ever see another non-compromising debate of this kind ever.
This is Part 3 which blends seamlessly into Part 4, into Part 5 and so on. Hunt's politely yet firmly continues to delve into the stark differences between the two belief systems.
The golfers now seem to be coming at the commentator in the tower at the 18th green, wielding wedges and 9-irons, reminiscent of those with torches and pitchforks coming after Frankenstein's (that's "Frank-un-STEEEN's") monster.
I don't know how much longer I can hold out.
OH, THE HUMANITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it.
Some people certainly do hate non-Christians. As with any other form of hatred, their hatred is based upon an ignorant assumption that all people who follow a certain religion must be alike. This of course is not true for Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, or anyone else.
With this in mind, there is no doubt that many Christians have done a great deal to dishonor the religion they claim to follow. Lets return to an earlier post where we looked at the Crusades. Then there was forced conversions of the Jews. Furthermore, look at the 'heretics' burned alive to 'save' them. Look at the Christians, right now, on this site, who offer up their own hate to other posters.
No doubt there are Christians who have done a lot to be ashamed of. I am not ashamed of believing in the teachings of Jesus Christ, who taught love, not hatred. I am often ashamed to call myself a Christian, because of all the awful things some folks have done, and are still being doing, in His name.
All this is not uncommon to other forms of hatred. No group is all bad, but every group includes individuals who have done terrible things. If you point to those individuals, and blame their deeds on the entire group, you 'justify' the hatred. It is not really justified, of course, but that is how the process works when it is not objectively and compassionately applied by Christians.
Do you think the Lord Jesus Christ would be saddened by the hatred that some professed Christians have for the unsaved? Do you believe that the Lord Jesus Christ extends love and mercy to all people of the earth?
Do you believe that the Lord God loves all people?
Get off your high horse. You're no better than anyone else.
LOL - who said I was (?!?) And neither had MD.
Do you absolve "Christians" from the murders they have committed in the name of Christianity? Was it OK for them to slaughter millions in the name of Christianity?
NO "Christian" murders "In the Name of Jesus Christ" you ignorant twit. It's NOT part of His Gospel. Or haven't you gotten that memo yet?
I'm no apologist - not for anyone...
Oh YES YOU CERTAINLY ARE.
your denial of the historical events of slaughters and massacres that took place in the name of Christianity leads me to believe you feel they were right in doing the exact same thing you accuse all Muslims of being wrong for doing.
You must have confused ridicule with "denial."
You know - as I sift through this thread, your posts get more shrill, incoherent, and ignorant of history.
Commanding those to act "In the name of Jesus Christ" was the easiest way to control those in the Roman Empire since faux-"Christian" Emperor, Constantine. Later on Popes lorded over Kings. Whatever corrupt Popes and Vatican of a corrupted "Christianity" did centuries ago had either to do with defending their turf (against Mooslems) or expanding their turf. Or even because they were motivated by greed and power.
Do NOT confuse the righteous keepers of the faith and gospel of Jesus Christ with THEM. Many were forced to go underground.
Now let's NOT pretend as though ALL peoples, tribes, empires, and cultures throughout the ages haven't conducted themselves in the VERY same way - ESPECIALLY Islam. Yet you fail to mention other warring participants and their respective casualties and KIA. Your selective historical perspective makes it clear that you have an agenda; A PRO-MUSLIM agenda. Why keep denying it?
The difference is much Christianity has been realigned with Christ's original gospel and its culture progressed righteously and expeditiously over time, while the Cult of Muhammad's Islam was never righteous to begin with, nor have its adherents progressed beyond that of 7th century culture in any manner.
Religion does not breed evil, evil breeds evil.
Now here's something - were you to publicly criticize Islam in Saudi Arabia, the penalty for such "blasphemy" would be....DEATH, backed by several of the 20 passages of the Koran cited by Gary in post #9.