New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Pamela Geller: The Coming Civil War
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... a-geller-the-coming-civil-war/
Published: Jun 23, 2017
Author: Pamela Geller
Post Date: 2017-06-23 08:40:32 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1201
Comments: 11
The left has been at war against America for decades. The right represents those of us who favor individual freedom and capitalism — and the left are those who want government controls and socialism.
Political violence became an essential and successful means of leftist warfare in the 60’s, the decade of destruction. The success of the violent “student rebellion” in 1964 and the so-called Free Speech Movement has set the table for the left’s warmongering and treason. It was clear from the outset that the “student revolution” violently ushered in at Berkeley in the mid-sixties would come to this. The left is evil, and they mean to destroy our way of life, our freedom and us. It took decades to norm their anti-Americanism, their hatred of freedom and individual rights, but they have reached their tipping point. And the long beaten and battered among us have had it.
Ayn Rand explained why the left is seeking nothing less than the breakdown of American society:
The attempt to solve social problems by means of physical force is what a civilized society is established to prevent. The advocates of mass civil disobedience admit that their purpose is intimidation. A society that tolerates intimidation as a means of settling disputes—the physical intimidation of some men or groups by others—loses its moral right to exist as a social system, and its collapse does not take long to follow.
Politically, mass civil disobedience is appropriate only as a prelude to civil war—as the declaration of a total break with a country’s political institutions.
The left is targeting the most powerful office in the world — the Presidency. But, as the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise and others at the Congressional baseball practice shows, they’re targeting everyone on the Right. There will be more of this.
President Trump was elected by Americans who oppose the left-wing coup and are fed up with living under the left’s oppressive boot. Trump is our proxy. We fought back the non-violent way — through the ballot box. From the moment he was elected, the left refused to accept the will of the people.
The Trump-Russia collusion story is nonsense, as its disseminators know better than anyone else. The object of the exercise is not to support the innuendo, but to launch an investigation which can provoke the White House into responses that might be construed as illegal. The intelligence leaks involved in framing the story alone are probably sufficient grounds to put several dozen senior officials in federal prison for double-digit terms. That consideration gauges the scale of the problem: the mutineers have committed multiple felonies, and their downside should the mutiny go wrong is not ignominious retirement but hard time at Leavenworth.
For the moment, the mutineers have the momentum. The Trump administration continues to run on a skeleton staff, with the vast majority of key positions still unoccupied. If my surmise is correct, it was unable to persuade the director of the FBI, the nation’s chief watchdog, to undertake vigorous countermeasures against the mutiny, for example, a comprehensive screening of electronic communications by the reporters who received leaks of classified materials.
The right has played nice for much too long. Last Friday night, Laura Loomer took to the stage in Central Park and interrupted the Broadway production of Julius Caesar, a play by William Shakespeare that had been politically altered to feature the assassination of U.S. President Donald Trump.
The Rebel reported: “At the moment when Trump was being gleefully murdered — an applause moment for America’s left-wing entertainment elites — Laura jumped on stage and condemned the play for normalizing political violence. Laura was arrested and held by police. The theatre company, by contrast, continues to produce their snuff show, glamorizing and normalizing violent terrorism in America.”
What’s the difference between Loomer taking to the stage and the actors hijacking the Hamilton stage to denigrate the Vice President of the United States? The audience didn’t come for that, either.
Laura was arrested for “trespassing,” but leftwing thugs and goons attack those on the right at demos in support of Trump and Israel. Freedom lovers are beaten at rallies against jihad and sharia by left-wing fascists who mockingly call themselves antifa (anti-fascists).
The deck is stacked against us. We must get off the defense.
Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (
so a card carrying commie then, no wait why does she espouse leftist ideas while opposing the left. This is what reading Ann Rand does, it confuses you. Read it long ago and I was confused for a long time.
Now she wants a witch hunt among the media, looking for leakers, while the leaker in chief twitters on. The right must not curtail freedom and whistle blowing, not yield to the leftist ideals of controlling the media.
#2. To: paraclete (#1)
This is what reading Ann Rand does, it confuses you. Read it long ago and I was confused for a long time.
You should have read it later when you, hopefully, had sufficient maturity, then later subscribed to the Ayn Rand newsletter.
#3. To: cranky (#0)
God bless Geller!
#4. To: paraclete (#1)
Now she wants a witch hunt among the media, looking for leakers, while the leaker in chief twitters on. The right must not curtail freedom and whistle blowing, not yield to the leftist ideals of controlling the media.
I would say "hear, hear" except for the bit about Trump. Technically he can declassify and release anything he wants to. If what he does is treasonous then there is a remedy for that in the constitution.
Still, I'll give it one, "hear!"
I find it ironic that the modern Jim Taggarts and their politician pals, along with the pundits who aren't Ellsworth a Toohey, go around quoting Rand. The one area that she nailed accurately -- the corruption of "public-private partnerships" -- is what they don't talk about. They love corporate run communism.
If only Pamela "Toohey" Geller would go defend her kind of freedom in her country.
#5. To: rlk (#3)
God bless Geller!
Aren't you an atheist? If so, then I applaud your statement. "Nothing bless Geller!"
Though I might be persuaded to pray for her metanoia.
#6. To: Anthem (#5)
Aren't you an atheist? If so, then I applaud your statement. "Nothing bless Geller!"
I'm a psychoanalytic, (in the broad sense of Dollard and Miller)logical positive, realist, who believes in the original concept of Bushido. I'll still give Geller a pat on the back in language all people understand.
#7. To: rlk (#6)
I'm not familiar with Dollard and Miller. I am a critic of scientism, specifically exclusive empiricism. I appreciate Bushido.
#8. To: rlk (#6)
Pat on the back and then some :-)
This woman possesses far more brass one than 99% of the men out there.
Her money line:
"The right has played nice for much too long."
But by "right," she means, "Conservative-constitutionalists whose vision of America mirrors that of our Founding Fathers."
She certainly doesn't mean, "Republicans" or the Globalist Riff-Raff(R.)
#9. To: Liberator (#8)
She's a con artist, selling a long con that will be corporate run global totalitarianism. We're almost there now.
Her similarity to the founders is limited to Hamilton, and even that is an insult to Hamilton.
Any anti-globalist sentiments she may have expressed will not stand up to an analysis of her political and economic advocacy.
#10. To: Anthem (#7)
I am a critic of scientism, specifically exclusive empiricism.
I don't even know what those big intimidating words mean.
#11. To: rlk (#10)
Oh. I am not sure what you mean by "logical positive" then. I jumped to the conclusion that you were referring to Logical Positivism.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]