[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: Melania Trump - An Apology
Source: Daily Mail Online
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/art ... 142/Melania-Trump-Apology.html
Published: Apr 12, 2017
Author: Daily Mail and Mailonline
Post Date: 2017-04-12 20:40:45 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 947
Comments: 12

The Mail Online website and the Daily Mail newspaper published an article on 20th August 2016 about Melania Trump which questioned the nature of her work as a professional model, and republished allegations that she provided services beyond simply modelling. The article included statements that Mrs. Trump denied the allegations and Paulo Zampolli, who ran the modelling agency, also denied the allegations, and the article also stated that there was no evidence to support the allegations. The article also claimed that Mr and Mrs Trump may have met three years before they actually met, and "staged" their actual meeting as a "ruse."

We accept that these allegations about Mrs Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them. We apologise to Mrs Trump for any distress that our publication caused her. To settle Mrs Trump's two lawsuits against us, we have agreed to pay her damages and costs. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: cranky (#0)

I read elsewhere they will pay her $3 million.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-12   20:45:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative (#1)

I read elsewhere they will pay her $3 million.

The daily news sez 2.9 mil and they claim it's a massive payoff by brit standards.

I say that was one of the crappiest court ordered apologies I've ever read.

cranky  posted on  2017-04-12   21:27:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: cranky (#2)

Even so, she won. And no other country has a court system like ours. She's very lucky to have won in Britain IMO.

You have to wonder if they were looking over Melania's shoulder, not wanting to anger Trump at England.

It reminds me of how Scottish courts let the Lockerbie bomber out of prison on "compassionate parole". British courts can be pretty corrupt is the point I'm making.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-13   9:45:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative (#3)

Even so, she won.

And, imho, she won a better apology than was forthcoming from the dm.

At the very least, something along the lines of 'and the daily mail hangs its head in shame'.

If it wasn't for steerage, the dm would have no class at all.

cranky  posted on  2017-04-13   10:32:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: cranky (#2)

"Mrs. Trump denied the allegations and Paulo Zampolli, who ran the modelling agency, also denied the allegations, and the article also stated that there was no evidence to support the allegations."

Yet ... we ran with it anyways.

This is responsible journalism? This is the mainstream media? These are the people we're supposed to trust?

I've seen obscure Internet blogs that were more factual.

The Daily Mail doesn't deserve first amendment protection. If we issued first amendment publishing licenses like we issue second amendment concealed carry licenses, I'd vote to revoke theirs for wanton and reckless abuse.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-04-14   13:26:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative (#1)

"I read elsewhere they will pay her $3 million."

She sued for $150 million. $3 million? That should cover her legal fees. Maybe.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-04-14   13:29:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#6)

$3 million? That should cover her legal fees. Maybe.

I think it was to cover her legal fees. What she was after was the apology.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-14   13:52:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tooconservative (#7)

"What she was after was the apology."

An apology and $150 million. She ended up with an apology and legal fees.

Which is better than a sharp stick in the eye, but the Daily Mail got away with the absolute minimum. They should have been made to squeal just a bit.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-04-14   14:42:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#8)

Trump will declare victory and walk away. And any other Melania gossip will no longer surface as long as Trump is prez. At least, not in NATO countries.

So we shouldn't care too much either IMO.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-14   14:44:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#9)

Use this as a springboard to overturn New York Times Co. v. Sullivan which requires a public figure to prove that the publisher acted with actual malice. In other words, eliminate the higher standard for a public figure.

Trump did talk about this on the campaign trail.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-04-14   14:55:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#10)

Use this as a springboard to overturn New York Times Co. v. Sullivan which requires a public figure to prove that the publisher acted with actual malice. In other words, eliminate the higher standard for a public figure.

I wouldn't. You end up with a system like the one in Britain that most often defends the rights of the guilty.

It was a major victory to win this in a Brit court. Hence my suggestion that fear-of-Trump may have played a role.

I kinda think Melania would have lost the lawsuit if Trump hadn't won the WH.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-14   15:31:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#11)

"I kinda think Melania would have lost the lawsuit if Trump hadn't won the WH."

Perhaps. Then again she could point to loss as due, in part, to the Daily Mail article -- entitling her to additional compensation.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-04-14   18:58:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com