International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Muslim Rebels Were Behind The Chemical Attack And Now The Us Government Is Using It To Justify Bombing Syria
Source:
Shoebat
URL Source: http://shoebat.com/2017/04/07/what- ... g-it-to-justify-bombing-syria/
Published: Apr 7, 2017
Author: Walid Shoebat
Post Date: 2017-04-08 11:34:00 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 5643
Comments: 20
So what is the truth behind this chemical attack that never circulates the western media? Lets examine footage never seen before in the West and the evidence regarding the latest chemical attack narrative from Syria to see who really is behind these alleged ‘chemical attacks’. Firstly, lets start with the politics. It was Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who has called on US President Donald Trump to back up his harsh words against Syria with actions, following the deadly chemical attack this week that left scores of people, including children dead. “Trump said it was impossible to close your eyes against the Assad regime’s hateful actions. Thank you, but don’t limit yourself to comments, we need action,” Erdogan told Turkey’s Kanal 7 television. “If it truly is a matter of actions, then Turkey is ready to take its responsibilities. We will not back down,” he said. It was former US president Barack Obama who had also warned Syria that chemical attacks in the country’s civil war would cross a “red line”, but later refrained from taking military action against the regime. As we stated several times, in the U.S. parties change but foreign policy doesn’t. So Trump complied to the Islamist’s request from Turkey by sending cruise missiles which were fired from a U.S. Navy vessel in the Mediterranean Sea. Their target was the airfield which serves as the base for the warplanes suspected of carrying out the chemical attack. Two Republican senators are calling on President Donald Trump to take out Syria’s air force as part of a swift and forceful response. “Hit this guy,” Graham said of Assad. “You’ve got my full permission.” John McCain of Arizona, who spoke to Trump on Wednesday, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said in a statement Thursday that Syrian President Bashar Assad “has crossed a line” and “must pay a punitive cost for this horrific attack.” But what is the truth from the ground and what is going to be the results of all of this. Here, in Syria demonstrators that condemn the alleged chemical attack shout Al-Sha’b yurid Khilafa Islamiyeh. English: “the people want an Islamic Caliphate”: But what is the truth behind this chemical attack that never circulates the western media that we obtained from Middle Eastern sources? Khan Sheikhoun, where the attack happened was a hewn mountain with tunnels and impenetrable bunkers. Definitely a major hiding place for manufacturing weapon supplies for the Islamist rebels on a major scale. It is a “warehouse used to both produce and store shells containing toxic gas” as Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major-General Igor Konashenkov said. Photos of the place and a video combines both scenes from the attack. The old previous footage from Qatari TV aired on Al-Jazeera TV shows the inside of this fortress which no western media covered reveals this is a major weapon manufacturing depot: The warehouse was used to both produce and store shells containing toxic gas. John Gilbert, a senior science fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, said the victims seen in video and photographs from Khan Sheikhoun “showed symptoms consistent with the nerve agent sarin.” Doctors Without Borders, which supports medical clinics in rebel-held areas, said Wednesday that eight patients brought to Bab Al Hawa hospital, located near the Turkish border, had exhibited symptoms “consistent with exposure to a neurotoxic agent such as sarin gas or similar compounds.” A number of opposition activists in Khan Sheikhoun said their groups had had no rebel weapons facilities, though the town has long been a target of government warplanes. However, Syrian journalist Nizar Nayouf quoted an unnamed doctor who told him there had been a storage area for the rebels in town. “It contained a workshop … a section to store weapons and ammunition, and even foodstuffs and medical as well as logistical equipment,” said Nayouf in a message on social media Wednesday. Indeed, the old footage of the same place filmed by Qatari media which you have seen above reveals exactly that. Early U.S. assessments showed the use of chlorine gas and traces of the nerve agent sarin in the attack. But who is the U.S. defending in their retaliation on Syria’s government and who is supplying these false narratives? They are defending Jaysh al-Islam (Arabic meaning Army of Islam), formerly known as Liwa al-Islam (Brigade of Islam). This is a coalition of Islamist and Salafist units involved in the Syrian Civil War. The group along with Ahrar ash-Sham are the main rebel groups supported by Saudi Arabia. Liwa al-Islam was established by Zahran Alloush, the son of Saudi-based religious scholar Mohammed Alloush who is currently residing in Turkey and is aided by it. One clue that reveal these knew of the attack prior to it happening was that Alloush blundered a tweet showing about the types of symptoms caused by the gas claiming it caused “heart failure for five hours”. It is possible however to have a coma because of the inhalation of chlorine gas and other chemicals. How he knew what chemical agent was used before any investigation remains a mystery. Also, another source of these leaked reports is the social media accounts of Syrian propaganda journalist Feras Karam, who writes for the Syrian oppositionist website Orient News. Karam before the day of the attack tweeted all journalists to prep for the major media campaign to expose Syria’s use of chemical attacks. How would he have known of an impending attack prior to the event remains a mystery. — فراس كرم – مراسل 📺 (@feraskaram01) April 4, 2017 Text of the tweet states “tomorrow is the campaign coverage the extent of the air raids in Hama and the use of poisonous chlorine against civilians” Dated April 3, 7:06 PM. This was definitely before when the chemical incident happened. All this plus other reports reveal Turkey was involved: So now we come to the million dollar question that no serious ‘analyst’ can answer. The Syrian government has achieved significant gains, while its rebel adversaries are largely in disarray. It has taken back the cities of Aleppo and Homs, and was on the cusp of negotiating issues of aid and reconstruction with world powers under the aegis of the U.N. Assad was getting a clean slate. Why would Assad risk it all by carrying out a chemical attack? Or is it that the rebels were done with and they needed an ace from under Turkey’s sleeve? In fact, just last week shoebat.com reported on how the US military, working in conjunction with Islamic rebel forces, has been blocking Syrian troops from attacking ISIS held territory. And now, a week later, the US attacks Syria. Coincidence? You decide. The same policies that were conducted in the last administration are being continued in the current one. Why? Because its part of a plan that was configured by the CIA all the way back in the 80s (more on this in a future article). As I wrote in 2014, the taking out of Soviet influenced leaders — such a Saddam — was planned out years in advance, before even George W. Bush was president. According to US Army General Wesley Clark, in 1991, Paul Wolfowitz told him that the US had 5-10 years to “clean up those old Soviet client regimes, Syria, Iran, Iraq, before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us. Clinton was president when this plan was being discussed, and when Bush was in office, Saddam was toppled. Under Obama, Gaddafi and Mubarak were taken out, and the Assad regime was greatly diminished. Again, the change of presidency did not alter policy. We did a video to demonstrate that in America, presidents change, policy doesn’t. 
غدا انطلاق حملة اعلامية لتغطية كثافة الغارات الجوية على ريف #حماة واستخدام #الكلور_السام بحق المدنيين.#ريف_حماة_يحترق
Syria reject allegations of using chemical arms by presstv
Poster Comment:
Interesting take from the Shoebat site.(2 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68, paraclete, Deckard (#0)
Another piece written on 4/6/17 at Shoebat, has another vid.
| Shoebat.com was the first to report that the first gas attack in Syria back in 2013 was done by the Islamist rebels. Our findings were confirmed three weeks later by Yosef Bodansky a conservative security expert and seconded by Seymor Hersh a left wing Jouranlist nearly six months later. Below is a video done by a Syrian apologist which is a more plausible explanation than anything we have seen on USA TV news and corresponds more what we have uncovered in our investigations in the past. He uses evidence and logic what might be the real truth on this Chemical/Gas attack. While we cannot confirm exactly what happened the US news media has provided no concrete evidence on who possessed the gas and was there any deliberate intent to bomb the Chemical weapon storage facility.
Remember ISIS and the rebels are on the run and close to defeat. Whether you sympathize with this situation or not it makes no sense why Assad would deliberatly use weapons of mass destruction and target innocent children. Assad is also a master propagandist, so it makes no political or military sense to deliberatly use these weapons or even target gas factories, however it makes perfect sense for the rebels to have the gas factory destroyed and have as many innocents killed while trying to blame Assad. They need US military intervention to help them oust Assad as currently they are on their last legs. We are no personal fan of either Assad or the Islamists but from a purely practical and politcial assessment Assad will bring stability to Syria, protect the Christian minority and keep the islamists at bay. It is a totally foolish policy to support Islamist rebels which is the official current policy of the US government |
#2. To: Tooconservative (#0)
"But what is the truth behind this chemical attack that never circulates the western media that we obtained from Middle Eastern sources?"
By "we obtained" I guess he means shoebat.com. From their "Middle Eastern sources", no less. Mid-eastern. Could that be like some guy in Baltimore?
Shoebat.com -- where I go to get my news. More like dingbat.com.
#3. To: Tooconservative (#1)
The gas wasn't too toxic as the medicos weren't wearing gloves. I don't believe any of this crap anymore. The invasion of Iraq was NWO-itis happily suffered by the Bushes. Hussein was the best friend that Iraqi Jews and Christians had and he kept the peace by regularly bombing Iran.
Lies, lies, lies emanating from that leftist think tank known as the CIA!
We caused the entire uproar in the Middle East by our incessant meddling. Who is America to meddle in any foreign affairs with a colossal debt that will never be repaid? Every major city in America is in a horrible state of decline with each looking like a war zone. Crime is exacerbated by roving gangs of negroes, muslims and illegal south of the border trash.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
#4. To: HomerBohn (#3)
"The gas wasn't too toxic as the medicos weren't wearing gloves."
He wasn't wearing a hazmat suit either. And for the same reason. They ain't got any.
They were doing well to wash the kids down in the middle of the street with a garden hose.
#5. To: Tooconservative (#1)
"But what is the truth behind this chemical attack that never circulates the western media that we obtained from Middle Eastern sources?"
These sources are Syrian Observatory of Human Rights based in Coventry,UK - Rami Abdul Rahman aka Osama Ali Suleiman. The main source of information on Syria for Western media and governments.
#6. To: All (#5)
Here is Rami in his office.
#7. To: HomerBohn (#3)
The gas wasn't too toxic as the medicos weren't wearing gloves. I don't believe any of this crap anymore.
I also didn't see signs of violent vomiting, diarrhea, etc. These are expected with sarin gas.
We really don't have adequate information. And I don't trust the Turkish autopsy of 3 bodies. If there even were such bodies and autopsies. Turkey, descending into a militaristic dictatorship, will do anything to knock Assad out of power so it can grab parts of Syria for itself and influence the rump state that is left over.
Similarly, I would put nothing past the Saudi intel operatives.
#8. To: A Pole (#5)
These sources are Syrian Observatory of Human Rights based in Coventry,UK - Rami Abdul Rahman aka Osama Ali Suleiman. The main source of information on Syria for Western media and governments.
Shoah.org.uk: EXPOSED: Syrian Human Rights Front is MI6-Funded Fraud, 2015
A one-man (Sunni) propaganda outlet to be approvingly quoted by Western media.
It is a front all right. A front for ISIS and al-Qaeda. And it is funded by the EU and by an unnamed EU country (supposedly Britain via its MI-6).
This is where the UN, the NYTimes, Times of London, everyone outside the Mideast, gets their info on Syrian deaths and casualties. It's completely ridiculous and a good cause for suspicion that this is a rigged propaganda machine that they don't even bother to disguise or gussy up to look more convincing.
We've seen this before with the fake Free Syrian Army. Before that, we saw the same pattern with expatriate groups in Libya, in Egypt, in Iraq, in Iran. This is a favorite pattern followed by the Western intel services.
#9. To: TooConservative, sneakypete, ConservingFreedom, Willie Green, Vicomte13 (#8) (Edited)
This is where the UN, the NYTimes, Times of London, everyone outside the Mideast, gets their info on Syrian deaths and casualties. It's completely ridiculous and a good cause for suspicion that this is a rigged propaganda machine that they don't even bother to disguise or gussy up to look more convincing.
It is sufficient for the sheeple.
We need to remember that majority of populations has IQ below 101 by definition. You can recognize them by the phrase "it is a course (economy for example) 101. They never get to 201.
The IQ above which is possible independent thinking is about 120.
The reason why Russian propaganda is more efficient is because they do not believe in democracy. They target upper 5% (about 125+)
#10. To: All (#9)
The IQ above which is possible independent thinking is about 120.
There is a biological reason for that. For tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of years the tribe needed two leaders - chief and shaman. The biological optimum for the rest is 100 IQ - the biggest number of children = genes passed to the next generation. Too many smart people and you have chaos.
#11. To: Tooconservative, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#1)
They are defending Jaysh al-Islam (Arabic meaning Army of Islam), formerly known as Liwa al-Islam (Brigade of Islam). This is a coalition of Islamist and Salafist units involved in the Syrian Civil War. The group along with Ahrar ash-Sham are the main rebel groups supported by Saudi Arabia. Liwa al-Islam was established by Zahran Alloush, the son of Saudi-based religious scholar Mohammed Alloush who is currently residing in Turkey and is aided by it.
Under the leadership of ISIS McCain and his D&R Muslim Brotherhood Caucus.
Members including present and ex government officials - Lindsey Graham, Hillary Clinton, Marco Rubio, Joe Lieberman, Rinse Pubis, Paul Ryan, John Kerry, Dick "Turban" Durban, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, George W. Bush, Don Rumsfield, Dick Cheney, Barack Obama, Donald J. Trump (newbie), GHW Bush, Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and many more....
Whenever a budget appropriation for Radical Islamic Terrorists comes up they make sure it passes. The D&R Crime Syndicate loves the NWO War Of Global Terrorism (WOGT). The Military Industrial Complex that Ike Eisenhower warned us about, has evolved into a Global Islamic D&R Party Caliphate,
It seems that Ayatollah McCain, Rinse Pubis, Paul Ryan, and Ivanka have converted The Donald to the ROP.
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul#12. To: A Pole (#10)
The biological optimum for the rest is 100 IQ
An IQ of 100 is not "optimum."
It is merely the value that's assigned to the statistical mean of the standard Bell curve:
So statistically, an IQ of 100 is "average" and half the population is "above average" and half the population is "below average." And the standard deviation of the population is approximately 15 IQ points.
But there's nothing "optimal" about it... It's simply the way the statistical normal distribution is: "normal" not "optimal."
#13. To: Willie Green (#12)
You got it wrong. The curve is shaped by natural selection (to oversimplify a little). The margins left and right get reduced and center pushed up.
Naming the top "100" is conventional, it could be 1 or 0 as well
#14. To: A Pole (#13)
The curve is shaped by natural selection (to oversimplify a little). The margins left and right get reduced and center pushed up.
Meh... that affects the value of standard deviation... Maybe 13 instead of 15? (That would raise the center of the bell & pull in the ends just like you say)
Nevertheless 100 (or 1 or 0 if you prefer) is still the "mean" or "average" and not "optimal"... merely "normal"... That's why they call the bell curve the "normal distribution"
#15. To: A Pole (#13)
Besides, I actually believe that human intellect is much too complex to be adequately described by the traditional two-dimensional bell curve... A more valid statistical approach may be a multi-variate analysis that could yield a distribution that looks something like this:
#16. To: HomerBohn, Tooconservative (#3)
I don't believe any of this crap anymore.
Nobody believes any of this crap anymore.
And speaking of intelligence, whole nations of relatively educated and intelligent citizen have gone to their ruin because they believed in crap and followed their betters into darkness. Ignorant nations have often fared better.
Intelligence UprisingAlarm within the U.S. intelligence community about Trump’s hasty decision to attack Syria reverberated from the Middle East back to Washington, where former CIA officer Philip Giraldi reported hearing from his intelligence contacts in the field that they were shocked at how the new poison-gas story was being distorted by Trump and the mainstream U.S. news media.
Former CIA officer Philip Giradi. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)
Giraldi told Scott Horton’s Webcast: “I’m hearing from sources on the ground in the Middle East, people who are intimately familiar with the intelligence that is available who are saying that the essential narrative that we’re all hearing about the Syrian government or the Russians using chemical weapons on innocent civilians is a sham.”
Giraldi said his sources were more in line with an analysis postulating an accidental release of the poison gas after an Al Qaeda arms depot was hit by a Russian airstrike.
“The intelligence confirms pretty much the account that the Russians have been giving … which is that they hit a warehouse where the rebels – now these are rebels that are, of course, connected with Al Qaeda – where the rebels were storing chemicals of their own and it basically caused an explosion that resulted in the casualties. Apparently the intelligence on this is very clear.”
Giraldi said the anger within the intelligence community over the distortion of intelligence to justify Trump’s military retaliation was so great that some covert officers were considering going public.
“People in both the agency [the CIA] and in the military who are aware of the intelligence are freaking out about this because essentially Trump completely misrepresented what he already should have known – but maybe he didn’t – and they’re afraid that this is moving toward a situation that could easily turn into an armed conflict,” Giraldi said before Thursday night’s missile strike. “They are astonished by how this is being played by the administration and by the U.S. media.”
www.zerohedge.com/news/20...er-intelligence-confirms- russian-account-syria
#17. To: randge (#16)
The government is untrustworthy and guilty of forcing an attack on America to get the nation back on its evil goal of finishing off the job of achieving a New World Order.
President Trump had better get back to the job of draining the swamp and protecting the nation, calling out and jailing the traitors and restoring order to society that's totally out of control.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
#18. To: All, A Pole (#15)
Hmmm... I wonder if anybody's ever tried to quantify the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Inventory & plot it on an X-Y axis...
And then somehow plot the corresponding IQ level on the Z-axis...
Hmmmm... I doubt that you'd have a single peak like shown in the previous 3-D plot...
No reason you couldn't have both high & low IQ people in each one of those 16 Meyers-Briggs categories... but how many of each? Where would the peaks & valleys be?
#19. To: Willie Green (#15)
Besides, I actually believe that human intellect is much too complex to be adequately described by the traditional two-dimensional bell curve
Good point. As I said, I oversimplify. To make a throughout presentation it would take several units and a lot of work and time.
The peak correlates to the greatest chance of survival. Let me give you example:
being more than 2 standard deviations from the peak to the left (retarded) it means that your chance to have and raise a child is reduced.
Being the same distance to the right (very intelligent) increases you chance of getting a PhD degree, but unfortunately it lowers you chance to have a child.
Both extremes are suboptimal, the middle gene sets will pass with greatest success.
#20. To: randge (#16)
Alarm within the U.S. intelligence community about Trump’s hasty decision to attack Syria reverberated from the Middle East back to Washington, where former CIA officer Philip Giraldi reported hearing from his intelligence contacts in the field that they were shocked at how the new poison-gas story was being distorted by Trump and the mainstream U.S. news media.
I still have the same problems with this. Where is any evidence to back up these claims? These dissidents haven't even leaked any info though obviously people can and do leak such info steadily. And the CIA by its nature does always have dissident views on most any situation.
So I do want to hear more. But not more rumors and "my sources tell me anonymously with no proof that blah-blah-blah".
This situation is as annoying as the huge stream of conflicting and incomplete reporting we got on Ukraine.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]