[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Video and Audio
See other Video and Audio Articles

Title: WATCH: Cowardly Cop Mistakes Wallet for a Gun and Shoots Innocent Airman
Source: Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/fe ... allet-gun/#cJVPGzGlOBGICUMJ.99
Published: Mar 10, 2017
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2017-03-10 13:14:33 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 19023
Comments: 69

Lee County, AL — Fear, cowardice, dread, hate — training — one or more of these traits are present more often than not when a police officer shoots an unarmed person. And, in the dashcam video below, that assertion becomes apparent as Opelika police officer Phillip Hancock shot Airman Michael Davidson for no reason other than fear.

The incident happened on March 6, 2014, however, the dashcam was kept secret until a little more than three years to the date after the shooting. Hancock was responding to a minor accident in which Davidson had swiped the back of a tractor trailer and both parties were waiting for police to arrive after they had exchanged information.

When Hancock arrives on the scene, he immediately becomes aggressive with Davidson who was merely trying to get out of his car. Because Davidson was parked on a slope, opening his door was particularly difficult as it was much heavier at this angle. Instead of realizing this was a factor, Hancock, applying his training while experiencing high levels of fear and cowardice, escalated the situation to violence.

“Show me your hands,” screams Hancock as Davidson frantically tries to comply.

Davidson’s attorney’s, Brian Mosholder explains, as reported by WRBL, that Davidson’s wallet was in his left hand while pushing against the door to get it open, and then he reached back with his right hand. Soon after, Ofc. Hancock asks Davidson to show him his hands. Davidson brings his right hand through and up to his left hand, turned and got out of the vehicle as quickly as he could and put his hands out in front of him with his wallet in both hands and began to raise his hands. Soon after, the first shot is fired, which hits the ground. Then, Mosholder said Davidson’s hands went up and the second shot was fired, which hit Davidson.

“It’s very obvious from that part of the video that Officer Hancock is creating a situation that he wished had happened that would have justified this shooting,” Mosholder said. “When you look at the video, none of that happened. When you look at the video, in less than six seconds, from the time Michael Davidson opens his door, Officer Hancock shoots him, and he shoots him for absolutely no reason.”

After he was shot, the Airmen was seen writhing in pain on the ground — as the blood spot in the back of his jeans grew increasingly larger. Davidson was shot in the abdomen and suffered severe artery damage and “extensive internal bleeding,” according to the suit.

During the melee, the innocent truck driver was also in danger from this irresponsible cop’s fear as he fired rounds in his direction as well.

For the last three years, Davidson was hoping to seek justice against the man who shot him for no reason. However, as is the case in so many other police shootings, the shooting was found to be justified — because the cop expressed a justifiable reason to fear for his life.

“The City, the Chief of Police and its officer have always denied any wrongdoing,” a statement from the City of Opelika in response to the most recent court ruling read. “This case has now been analyzed by two federal courts … The judges have unanimously determined after a review of the evidence, which includes the dash cam video, there was no wrongdoing on behalf of the City, the Chief, or the involved officer. In reaching their respective decisions, these Federal Courts reviewed all of the evidence. Their opinions are clearly supported by all evidence.”

In affirming the district court’s ruling, according to oanow.com, the three-judge panel said it had reviewed the evidence, including dash cam video, and provided the following summary statement: “After careful consideration and review of a video recording of the shooting, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Davidson, we conclude that a reasonable officer in Hancock’s position would have feared for his life. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment based on qualified immunity in favor of Hancock on all claims.”

Below is the end result of too much fear pumped into cops during their training. Thankfully, Davidson lived, no thanks to the cops who let him bleed out for more than 5 minutes before providing any life saving methods — but he will never be the same again.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

Watching that video, I can in no way agree the cop had any legit claim to being in fear for his life. The guy getting out of the car did so in a very reasonable manner and never made any action to give the cop any legit concerns. He complied with the cops instructions as speedily as any reasonable person could manage but was shot anyway.

Those that claim otherwise are simply fostering a climate where cops should be feared at all times, and should have no problem with classes being given to school children about how to behave around a cop to avoid getting shot by them.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-10   13:39:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)

Watching that video, I can in no way agree the cop had any legit claim to being in fear for his life. The guy getting out of the car did so in a very reasonable manner and never made any action to give the cop any legit concerns. He complied with the cops instructions as speedily as any reasonable person could manage but was shot anyway.

Those that claim otherwise are simply fostering a climate where cops should be feared at all times, and should have no problem with classes being given to school children about how to behave around a cop to avoid getting shot by them. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the Southern District Court of Iowa in that the use of force by Ofc. Hancock was reasonable.

It really doesn’t matter what YOU agree with, it changes nothing and has no consequences…. although you certainly have a right to your opinion.

What does matter and has consequences is that the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the Southern District Court of Iowa [and claimed otherwise] in that they ruled the use of force by Officer Hancock was reasonable.

The two courts watched the same video you did….then reviewed all evidence and heard complete testimonies before carefully arriving at their decision.

It is noteworthy to mention that you libertarian anarchists assholes have never cared what both a circuit court and an appeals court decides when it goes against your agenda….have you?

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-10   15:47:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Gatlin (#2)

The cops made a mistake and a man is dead. The cops should be fired at the least for being such a dumb ass. Possibly prosecuted and executed. I'd have to know more. But fired at the least for being to stupid to carry a gun.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-03-10   17:12:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)

The cops made a mistake …

And so did you….I will explain this later.

But first, you are only expressing your opinion, based on viewing a few short seconds of a video and after knowing the facts as explained to you by an author with an agenda, Matt Agorist.

You of course are entitled to your opinion. But fortunately, our system of justice does not make rulings based on a person’s opinion after viewing ONLY 5 SECONDS [between 00:21-00:26 on the video]

Now, Stone….I would like you to please pay close attention to some information I am going to share with you.

The cops made a mistake and a man is dead.

It will no doubt come as a great surprise to you to learn that Michael Edwards, the man you said was shot dead is back home in Texas in the process of completing community college, while working part-time jobs and taking care of his mother.

     [http://wrbl.com/2017/03/08/dashcam-video-of-2014-opelika-police- officer-involved-shooting-released/]

You now see what happens when you make a snap decision, pass quick judgment and come to the wrong conclusion when you don’t get the facts straight….don’t you?

The cops should be fired at the least for being such a dumb ass. Possibly prosecuted and executed. I'd have to know more. But fired at the least for being to stupid to carry a gun.

”I'd have to know more.”

Yep, we are in agreement about that.

You should have known more before you came to your conclusion.

You should know what the judges on the two different courts knew before you passed judgment based on viewing only 5 seconds of a video …

Please….PLEASE….don’t become a Deckard …

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-10   18:31:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Gatlin (#5)

based on viewing a few short seconds of a video

A few short seconds is all the time the cop gave the man.

The man was getting out of his car, holding a wallet for pete's sake.

If a cop can't tell the difference between a wallet and a gun or pisses his pants at the slightest perceived threat, then he has no business being a cop.

Not that it matters because cops can use the magic words "I feared for my life" and be exonerated of murder.

Oh and your "wallet gun"?

That's almost as absurd as the keychain gun you used to defend a school for suspending a student.

You really think that a guy who has just been in an accident and is trying to get out of his car is going to come out shooting?

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-10   20:30:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Deckard (#10)

You really think that a guy who has just been in an accident and is trying to get out of his car is going to come out shooting?

Bingo. The man was making a voluntary encounter with the police, unlike with traffic stops in which the stopped driver is not given any choice.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-11   2:50:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 27.

#28. To: Pinguinite (#27) (Edited)

Bingo. The man was making a voluntary encounter with the police, unlike with traffic stops in which the stopped driver is not given any choice.

Just seems obvious to me. The cop had no reason to "fear for his life". The man exiting the car was laboring to get the door open since it was tilted to the side - there is no possible way a person in that situation could open the door and exit in an aggressive manner, especially with a gun.

It was an accident scene and the cop's first priority should have been to check to see that everyone was OK.

Seems to me that the police have lost sight of their responsibilities and have been trained to view any situation as a threat to their own safety.

The fact that the courts sided with the police is really no surprise - that doesn't make them correct.

It amazes me that some posters here are so enamored with police that they will defy any semblance of logic in order to excuse their egregious behavior such as in this case.

I mean a freaking wallet gun? Give me a break.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-11 03:04:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Pinguinite (#27)

You really think that a guy who has just been in an accident and is trying to get out of his car is going to come out shooting?

Bingo.

Bingo….your ass !!!

This is not some stupid little game where you mark off numbers on cards.

The highway patrolman in Phoenix [Post #21 and other posts] did not really think the guy there who had just been in an accident and was trying to get out of his car [or had just already gotten out of his car] was going to come out shooting.

That highway patrolman is alive today. Had he been the responding officer present when Davidson jumped out of his vehicle with both hands grasping something dark in the same manner someone would be grasping a gun….do you think he would have said to Davidson: “Good evening, Sir – may I please see your registration and license?” Or he also have shot his stupid ass?

I am no libertarian idiot….I’ll go with the second choice.

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-11 08:14:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com