[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: Police Unions Head To DC To Ask New President, Attorney General To Stop Making Cops Respect The Constitution from the what's-best-for-cops-vs.-what's-best-for-the-nation deptHere it comes -- the exact sort of response Trump was looking for when he issued his "Standing Up for Our Law Enforcement Community" edict during his first couple of days in office.
This is Trump's invitation to law enforcement agencies to come to him with their grievances. A promise that they will be heard, ABOVE the voices of the people they're supposed to be serving. And here they come, right on cue.
Police unions want DOJ consent decrees rolled back, heavily-altered, or done away with altogether. A review of DOJ consent decrees shows law enforcement agencies hit with them have participated in years of unconstitutional policing, engaging in everything from discrimination to routine deployment of excessive force. The decrees -- while seldom completely effective -- target pervasive mass violations of citizens' civil liberties. They address the symptoms and attempt to apply a cure. But the problems are deep-seated, based on years of us v. them policing and a culture that actively protects its worst members. Unions are part of the problem. They are definitely not part of the solution. In Philadelphia, the police union managed to derail an officer-involved-shooting investigation board recommended by the DOJ, removing all independent outside investigators and replacing them with police officers and police officials. The DOJ's long, thoroughly-damning report on what may be America's worst police force -- the Chicago PD -- notes that police unions have long stood in the way of improving the department.
The last thing most police unions want is more accountability. This is why union heads are in DC, talking to Trump. Consent decrees attempt to force law enforcement agencies to act constitutionally, which is apparently something officers (or at least their reps) are unwilling to do.
"Inartfully applied" just means "applied." The DOJ has "inartfully" attempted to get officers in numerous police departments to stop beating and tasing individuals simply because they weren't immediately compliant or responded disrespectfully. It has attempted to set a reasonable suspicion standard for police stops and searches. It has attempted to prevent officers from acting in a retaliatory manner against people exercising their First Amendment rights. It has attempted to scale back excessive removals of citizens' life and liberty by law enforcement officers. It has largely failed to do so because it encounters massive amounts of resistance, much of it led by police unions. And here come the unions to undo what little good has been done. The union reps say things like "inartfully applied decrees" and "wastes of money" but what they're really saying is they would rather not have to be limited by the rights of others. And, according to Trump's own statement, the President himself has little respect for the rights of non-badge-wearing individuals. The only good news is that -- despite Trump's "law and order" pitch and AG Sessions' general contempt for Americans and their rights -- it will take much more than some union sales pitches to undo consent decrees already in force. The Attorney General may be able to prevent the DOJ's Civil Rights division from pursuing nearly as many agreements in the future, but it's likely any attempt to scale back in-place agreements would face an uphill battle in federal court. But this very likely means the DOJ isn't going to be nearly as interested in investigating law enforcement agencies for the next four years. The DOJ handed out 24 consent decrees during the eight years Obama was in office. It issued less than half as many while Bush was president. A president who believes not liking the police is "wrong" isn't going to be too interested in having a government agency find even more reasons for people not to like police officers. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest "The DOJ handed out 24 consent decrees during the eight years Obama was in office." Uh-huh. And has crime increased or decreased in the cities covered by those consent decrees?
#2. To: misterwhite, more lawless police please (#1) The police are doing such a great job, they need more immunity 'n shiite! /s LYRICS Welcome to America's Most Livable City Please ignore the invisibles with me See Pittsburgh rebuilt it's economy But we still lead the Nation in black poverty Welcome to America's Most Livable City They call it Clipsburgh Pistolvania Welcome to America's Most Livable City Welcome to America's Most Livable City And downtown it's a bunch of new buildings
Welcome to America's Most Livable City Welcome to America's Most Livable City #3. To: Deckard (#0)
Police Unions Head To DC To Ask New President, Attorney General To Stop Making Cops Respect The Constitution Yet another horseshit headline.
The DOJ has "inartfully" attempted to get officers in numerous police departments to stop beating and tasing individuals simply because they weren't immediately compliant or responded disrespectfully. Anyone who respects the Obama Justice Department needs only look inward to explain why the President is now Donald Trump.
The only good news is that -- despite Trump's "law and order" pitch and AG Sessions' general contempt for Americans and their rights -- it will take much more than some union sales pitches to undo consent decrees already in force. What the community organizer and his imcompetent lackeys could do, the great President Donald Trump and his gallant band of competent patriots can undo. Just think of the savings that could be made in Chicago from not having to pick up and process dead bodies.
But this very likely means the DOJ isn't going to be nearly as interested in investigating law enforcement agencies for the next four years. Which will give them time to do their real job in a gallant, competent and patriotic constitutional manner.
#4. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited) Obviously you PAULTARDs are upset because O'bunghole isn't shitting on LE any longer... and those filthy urban jungle shitbags called Black Lies Matters no longer has presidential support... so it's back to YELLA paultard slanted fear mongering. lol I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح #5. To: misterwhite (#1) The "Consent degree" is designed for the Federal government to take over local policing. Anyone that supports the US Constitution has to know that Federalized local police is totally against the founders vision. It is also tyrannical, and the end of Liberty as we know it forever. Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|