[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Pat Buchanan: Can Trump and Putin Avert Cold War II? In retaliation for the hacking of John Podesta and the DNC, Barack Obama expelled 35 Russian diplomats and ordered closure of their country houses on Long Island and Marylands Eastern shore. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that 35 U.S. diplomats would be expelled. But Vladimir Putin stepped in, declined to retaliate at all, and invited the U.S. diplomats in Moscow and their children to the Christmas and New Years party at the Kremlin. A soft answer turneth away wrath, but grievous words stir up anger, reads Proverbs 15:1. Great move, tweeted President-elect Trump, I always knew he was very smart! Among our Russophobes, one can almost hear the gnashing of teeth. Clearly, Putin believes the Trump presidency offers Russia the prospect of a better relationship with the United States. He appears to want this, and most Americans seem to want the same. After all, Hillary Clinton, who accused Trump of being Putins puppet, lost. Is then a Cold War II between Russia and the U.S. avoidable? That question raises several others. Who is more responsible for both great powers having reached this level of animosity and acrimony, 25 years after Ronald Reagan walked arm-in-arm with Mikhail Gorbachev through Red Square? And what are the causes of the emerging Cold War II? Comes the retort: Putin has put nuclear-capable missiles in the Kaliningrad enclave between Poland and Lithuania. True, but who began this escalation? George W. Bush was the one who trashed Richard Nixons ABM Treaty and Obama put anti-missile missiles in Poland. After invading Iraq, George W. Bush moved NATO into the Baltic States in violation of a commitment given to Gorbachev by his father to not move NATO into Eastern Europe if the Red Army withdrew. Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, says John McCain. Russia did, after Georgia invaded its breakaway province of South Ossetia and killed Russian peacekeepers. Putin threw the Georgians out, occupied part of Georgia, and then withdrew. Russia, it is said, has supported Syrias Bashar Assad, bombed U.S.-backed rebels and participated in the Aleppo slaughter. But who started this horrific civil war in Syria? Was it not our Gulf allies, Turkey, and ourselves by backing an insurgency against a regime that had been Russias ally for decades and hosts Russias only naval base in the Mediterranean? Did we not exercise the same right of assisting a beleaguered ally when we sent 500,000 troops to aid South Vietnam against a Viet Cong insurgency supported by Hanoi, Beijing and Moscow? Thats what allies do. The unanswered question: Why did we support the overthrow of Assad when the likely successor regime would have been Islamist and murderously hostile toward Syrias Christians? Russia, we are told, committed aggression against Ukraine by invading Crimea. But Russia did not invade Crimea. To secure their Black Sea naval base, Russia executed a bloodless coup, but only after the U.S. backed the overthrow of the pro-Russian elected government in Kiev. Crimea had belonged to Moscow from the time of Catherine the Great in the 18th century, and the Russia-Ukraine relationship dates back to before the Crusades. When did this become a vital interest of the USA? As for Putins backing of secessionists in Donetsk and Luhansk, he is standing by kinfolk left behind when his country broke apart. Russians live in many of the 14 former Soviet republics that are now independent nations. Has Putin no right to be concerned about his lost countrymen? Unlike Americas elites, Putin is an ethnonationalist in a time when tribalism is shoving aside transnationalism as the force of the future. Russia, it is said, is supporting right-wing and anti-EU parties. But has not our National Endowment for Democracy backed regime change in the Balkans as well as in former Soviet republics? We appear to be denouncing Putin for what we did first. Moreover, the populist, nationalist, anti-EU and secessionist parties in Europe have arisen on their own and are advancing through free elections. Sovereignty, independence, a restoration of national identity, all appear to be more important to these parties than what they regard as an excessively supervised existence in the soft-dictatorship of the EU. In the Cold War between Communism and capitalism, the single-party dictatorship and the free society, we prevailed. But in the new struggle we are in, the ethnonational state seems ascendant over the multicultural, multiethnic, multiracial, multilingual universal nation whose avatar is Barack Obama. Putin does not seek to destroy or conquer us or Europe. He wants Russia, and her interests, and her rights as a great power to be respected. He is not mucking around in our front yard; we are in his. The worst mistake President Trump could make would be to let the Russophobes grab the wheel and steer us into another Cold War that could be as costly as the first, and might not end as peacefully. Reagans outstretched hand to Gorbachev worked. Trump has nothing to lose by extending his to Vladimir Putin, and much perhaps to win. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
In my mind there is NO reason Russia and the United States cannot be great friends and allies. They have more of a mind to history and freedom from oppression than our British friends who are on a 100 path to becoming slaves to Islam. For every oppression of their neighbors by Russia and the USSR, the British Empire has one. What was that thing that England did to Germany after WW I if not oppression? That led directly to WW II, and a divided Middle East. Anyone remember the Boer war, where the British went to war with the farmers in S Africa? The prolonged enslavement of the Indian people, the Irish, the Scotch and Welsh. Britain actually invaded America and reignited a war in the early 19th century and burned much of DC and the White House. It is not that I hate England, I just don't hate Russia. Besides, we owe them one for opposing them in the war in Afghanistan, meant to destroy the Heroin crops. We built up the Mujahadin and now what do we have? America, meet the future, and it is with a Russo-American alliance. I for one am ready. Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.
I look at this as a last-ditch desperation move by 0bama in an attempt to provoke the Russians into a war - if that happens before Trump takes office, Obama will be able to remain in office. I think the Dems still have a few things up their sleeve that they will try and use to stop Trump from ever being sworn in as POTUS. The Demonclass seem to definitely want a war with Russia. They are heavily involved in drug running, arms dealing, medical supplies, food, rebuilding cities we blow up etc. I cannot think of a single Democrat politician I could vote for nationally. That is a very sad commentary on how far they have fallen. Of course there are not very many Repuklicans I could support either. I have great hope for Trump though. He is different from the rest, and that is good. I hope his combative nature never changes. Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|