[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

I AM A PROPHET and I prophesy
See other I AM A PROPHET and I prophesy Articles

Title: Conservative Christians pan 'prosperity gospel' Trump inaugural preacher
Source: Washington Examiner
URL Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c ... ral-preacher/article/2610564#!
Published: Jan 2, 2017
Author: W. James Antle III
Post Date: 2017-01-02 09:54:21 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 47968
Comments: 166

Prominent conservative Christians are up in arms about President-elect Trump's choice of a controversial televangelist to deliver one of the prayers at his inauguration on Jan. 20.

Florida's Paula White, age 50, will join Franklin Graham, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and other religious leaders in participating in the Trump inaugural festivities. Unlike the others, White is a proponent of the "prosperity gospel" — the belief that God blesses the faithful with health and wealth — who has come under attack for her theology, marital history and finances.

"Paula White is a trinity denying heretic," wrote conservative Christian commentator Erick Erickson. "She rejects the Council of Nicaea's creed that every Christian accepts. To reject the orthodoxy of the Nicene Creed is to reject Christianity itself."

"Paula White is a charlatan and recognized as a heretic by every orthodox Christian, of whatever tribe," echoed Russell Moore of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission.

"Paula White has a long history of bankruptcies, failed business ventures, and unsuccessful marriages, which makes her the perfect choice to deliver a prayer on behalf a president-elect who has proudly proclaimed that he's never felt the need to ask forgiveness from God for anything," complained Paula Bolyard in a post titled "Twice Divorced Paula White Praying at Trump Inaugural Exactly What We Expected."

White delivered the benediction on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July, where Trump was nominated for president.

The loudest voices against White are anti-Trump evangelicals who have been warning their coreligionists against the president-elect since the campaign. But many Christians regard the prosperity gospel as incompatible with Scripture and view pastors who promote it as likely to take financial advantage of their flocks.

White has drawn attention for her own lavish lifestyle, as the owner of expensive homes (including an apartment at Trump Towers) and cars. The Tampa Tribune reported that her broadcast business earned between $50,000 to $80,000 a week while a decade ago she and her then-husband were taking compensating ranging from $600,000 to $1.5 million a year.

Erickson argues that her theological problems go beyond the prosperity gospel to rejecting core Christian doctrines agreed upon across denominations, as evidenced by comments she made to worshippers that were captured on video.

"The President of the United States putting a heretic on stage who claims to believe in Jesus, but does not really believe in Jesus, risks leading others astray," he wrote. "Christians have an obligation to speak in defense of their faith. Trump letting this heretic pray in Jesus's name should offend every Bible believing Christian."

"I'd rather a Hindu pray on Inauguration Day and not risk the souls of men, than one whose heresy lures in souls with promises of comfort only to damn them in eternity," Erickson concluded. "At least no one would mistake a Hindu, a Buddhist, or an atheist with being a representative of Christ's kingdom."

In the "What We Believe" section of the website for White's ministry, she explicitly affirms a belief in the trinity.

While much of the organized Christian right supported Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio in the Republican primaries, Trump made peace with these organizations by promising to appoint conservative judges and generally hew to a socially conservative agenda.

Trump won 80 percent of white born-again or evangelical Christians, according to the exit polls. That was better than not only Mitt Romney, a Mormon, in 2012, but also evangelical George W. Bush in 2004.

But the president-elect had natural appeal to prosperity gospel preachers, as his own self-help advice is a more secularized version of that message. Trump's parents attended a church pastored by Norman Vincent Peale, the Methodist turned Reformed author of "The Power of Positive Thinking."

Peale's teachings were a precursor of sorts to the prosperity gospel. The preacher, who died in 1993, performed Trump's wedding to his first wife Ivana. Peale's successor presided over Trump's wedding to his second wife Marla Maples.

The prosperity gospel is also an opening to broaden Trump's appeal across racial lines, as the tradition has made inroads in the black church. White herself has led a megachurch with a predominantly black congregation.

White chairs Trump's evangelical advisory board. She has organized meetings between Trump and other pastors. White is one of six clergy scheduled to pray, speak or read at Trump's inaugural, including some who have disagreed with the president-elect on immigration.

White's second husband was the evangelist Randy White, with whom she partnered in ministry. Her current husband is Jonathan Cain, a member of the rock band Journey.


Poster Comment:

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-52) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#53. To: interpreter (#50)

And despite what you say, ISIS is definitely an army from the east. Where, pray tell, do you think Raqqa is? The "way" (or vector) formed by lining up Jerusalem with where the Euphrates keeps drying up and extending it eastward perfectly points to, and bisects Raqqa. Virtually any proposed interpretation of anything in the Revelation can easily be proven or disproven by the vectors Jesus has woven into the Revelation.

Al Raqqa is in Syria.

There's your first mistake. How is that even remotely connected to the kings of the east in Revelation 16?

Not even close.

So now the Euphrates is drying up in Syria?

Please get a map.

The small town of Raqqa next to Samarra Iraq is along the Tigris and not Euphrates river. If that is the Raqqa you were referring to. If so wrong river.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   3:14:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: redleghunter (#51)
(Edited)

Prove it. Show me where any credible historian, Church doctor or theologian made this claim.

Constantine saw a cross in the sky before the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. Compare this miniscule vision of one man to the utter carnage depicted and Glorious return of Christ in Revelation 19 as I posted.

You are a victim of your own low balling eisegesis. You make things to conform your predispositions.

What ancient church shares your eschatology? I'm curious.

Like I already said, ALL world history books used to say that (back when I went to school) but nowadays atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, etc. have forced many school districts and history-book publishers to rewrite history and take that out (because it offends them). Nonetheless, there are a few historians who still say much the same thing. For example, Robert Thorvat says,

"On the 28th of October, AD 312, Constantine The Great “faced off” with Maxentius in what became known as the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. Though no one probably realized this at the time, the Battle of the Milvian Bridge would become one of those historical turning points that would set world history down a new path whether for better or worse."

(Source: https://roberthorvat30.wordpress.com/2013/10/28/the-battle-of-the- milvian-bridge-on-this-day-in-history/)

Also, like I have already said, Constantine saw a Chi-Rho (the first 2 letters of Christ), and not a cross. You can see it too with any star- tracking software set to the evening of Oct. 27, 312 AD. The Chi-Rho is prominently displayed in all ancient Churches, usually directly above the "Holy of Holies" (where the communion bread and wine is prepared). It means "By this, conquer" just as Jesus told Constantine that night. And the entire Revelation, from beginning to end, is about Christians conquering the earth (and taking it back from the last three heads of Satan -- pagan Rome, Muslims and NAZI's).

And Revelation 19 is NOT the return of Christ. Nowhere in the Bible does it say Jesus returns twice. I don't care to give away any more of my book on LF. If you want to know who the 5th horseman is, you will have to buy my book, The Revelation: a Historicist View (out soon, or you can pre-order it from Westbow Press). But I will give you a clue. I'm predicting that the fifth horseman will join NATO in 2017, and complete the picture of the 24 Christian nations that will rule the earth for Jesus for the next 1000 years. Over the next few decades (or centuries) this tiny eastern-Europe nation (the smallest in NATO) that has never been defeated (by the Islamic hordes, or by the NAZI's or anyone) and has conquered to the end will be blessed by God and increase in size and power until it replaces the US as the most powerful nation on earth. (Hard to believe now, but that's what the Revelation indicates).

One of the ancient Churches that is OK with my book is my church (the Episcopalian/Anglican Church).

And when I first started studying the Revelation, I had no predispositions whatsoever, and studied it with a completely open mind (unlike futurists).

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   7:06:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: redleghunter (#53)

Al Raqqa is in Syria.

There's your first mistake. How is that even remotely connected to the kings of the east in Revelation 16?

Not even close.

So now the Euphrates is drying up in Syria?

Please get a map.

The small town of Raqqa next to Samarra Iraq is along the Tigris and not Euphrates river. If that is the Raqqa you were referring to. If so wrong river.

As everyone on earth knows (except you) Raqqa is the capital of the ISIS caliphate, and the "king" (or Caliph) of ISIS lives in Raqqa. And I never said Raqqa is on the Euphrates. I said it is east of the Euphrates. Why do you twist around everything I say and say I said something I didn't say? It is very irritating, and you need to stop it or else I'm not going continue this conversation.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   7:41:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: redleghunter (#52) (Edited)

Where are the commands of Christ to take up arms in His name for Christians to rule the world?

Luke 19:27 (and also in many verses in the Revelation).

And yes, Mohammed said much the same thing. The main difference is, and the Good News is, Christians win the battle for the earth, and the Muslims lose.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   7:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: interpreter (#54)

Like I already said, ALL world history books used to say that (back when I went to school) but nowadays atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, etc. have forced many school districts and history-book publishers to rewrite history and take that out (because it offends them). Nonetheless, there are a few historians who still say much the same thing. For example, Robert Thorvat says,

Ok so the answer is "no", you don't have a source.

I would think one church council or even renown theologian would share your view. Guess not.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   12:00:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: interpreter (#54)

And Revelation 19 is NOT the return of Christ. Nowhere in the Bible does it say Jesus returns twice.

Considering AD 312 was not the Return of Christ, means He is yet to come.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   12:02:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: interpreter (#56)

Where are the commands of Christ to take up arms in His name for Christians to rule the world?

Luke 19:27 (and also in many verses in the Revelation).

This is a parable.

Not surprising. Just about all error is extracted from a parable.

The parable is about reward and judgment at Christ's second coming.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   12:13:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: interpreter (#55)

As everyone on earth knows (except you) Raqqa is the capital of the ISIS caliphate, and the "king" (or Caliph) of ISIS lives in Raqqa. And I never said Raqqa is on the Euphrates. I said it is east of the Euphrates. Why do you twist around everything I say and say I said something I didn't say? It is very irritating, and you need to stop it or else I'm not going continue this conversation.

Lol of course I know Al Raqqa. I am still given intelligence briefs and have access to material you could only dream of. Why I find your geopolitical ramblings quite entertaining.

Al Raqqa is not kings of the East. ISIS did not have to cross any dry rivers to get there. There are plenty of bridges still intact. Those Syria- Iraq-Jordan rat lines go back centuries.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   12:21:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: interpreter (#55)

It is very irritating, and you need to stop it or else I'm not going continue this conversation.

If you cannot take criticism, perhaps you are in the wrong business.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   12:22:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: interpreter (#55)

He's whoopin you.

I'd take what his insight into the Bible over yours 7 days a week 365 days a year.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   12:24:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: redleghunter (#60)

Lol of course I know Al Raqqa. I am still given intelligence briefs and have access to material you could only dream of. Why I find your geopolitical ramblings quite entertaining.

Al Raqqa is not kings of the East. ISIS did not have to cross any dry rivers to get there. There are plenty of bridges still intact. Those Syria- Iraq-Jordan rat lines go back centuries.

As I have already said, the Revelation does not say anything about anyone crossing a dry river bed. The "way" of the demon possessed kings of the east is the vector formed by the epicenter of where Saddam Hussein dried up the Euphrates in conjunction with Jerusalem. When you draw a straight line between the two and extend it eastward, it points to, and bisects Baghdad, Raqqa, Kabul and Tehran like four sitting ducks in a row. The kings of Baghdad and Kabul are already dead and the king (or Caliph) of Raqqa/ISIS is next. After that we will probably have to deal with the king (or Ayatollah) in Tehran. And everyone knows a Caliph (and/or Ayatollah) is the muslim equivalent of a king, so I cant for the life of me figure out why you say what you say. I guess you just get a kick out of denying everything I say even when the whole world agrees with me (except you).

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   13:31:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: redleghunter (#61)

If you cannot take criticism, perhaps you are in the wrong business.

I can take criticism if there is even the slightest iota of truth behind it. Anything I say you automatically deny without any basis, and even when I state well known facts that everyone (including the CIA) accepts, you still automatically deny it. That's what is irritating.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   13:45:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: A K A Stone (#62)

He's whoopin you.

No, he's looking like an idiot for denying even the most evident of facts about Iraq and ISIS when he's there looking straight at them. And just so he can construe and twist them to agree with his futurist view of the Revelation. He is pathetic.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   14:00:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: interpreter (#65) (Edited)

Your pastist view of revelation is telling. There was no thousand year reign. It's almost like when the beast antichrist comes you will think he is Jesus.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   14:06:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: interpreter (#64)

I state well known facts that everyone (including the CIA) accepts, you still automatically deny it. That's what is irritating.

You stated a lot of things.

Which are the well known facts that everyone including the CIA accepts?

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   14:08:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: A K A Stone (#67)

If the CIA sez "sumtine" I already know the CIA is an unreliable government agency. They have failed the American People all over the world and all over tyme, since their creation in 1948.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-01-05   14:15:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: interpreter (#64)

Anything I say you automatically deny without any basis, and even when I state well known facts that everyone (including the CIA) accepts, you still automatically deny it. That's what is irritating.

You are probably the only poster here on LF who trusts the CIA.

I had three direct encounters with the CIA in Iraq.

Masters of manipulation and chaos. They tried killing a key informant we were using and tried convincing my boss to kill an Iraqi politician. Then the crown jewel. They tried getting air support from me after fooling a US Army battalion they were US special forces. That little stunt went up 3 and 4 star channels when I got wind of it.

So please excuse me of trusting NOTHING from the CIA.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   14:53:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: All (#63)

PS I forgot to add that Saddam Hussein said the main reason he dried up the Euphrates was to bring about (or prepare the way for) the Battle of Ar Mageddon (which the Koran says Muslims will win). That's why he named the canal he dug to drain it the "Mother of All Battles River." So either way you look at it, Saddam prepared the way for (and the vector pointing to) the demon-possessed kings of the east. There was one king who actually crossed the dried up Euphrates and that was Saddam himself. So the prophecy was fulfilled three ways, as are most of the prophesies in the Revelation in order to leave no doubt about their fulfillment (except when it comes to die-hard futurists like the ones on this thread who incredulously and automatically deny ALL of the obvious fulfillments of EVERYTHING in the Revelation).

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   14:54:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: interpreter (#65)

Try being a man and ping me when you speak poorly of me.

You are a false prophet. Your comments are devoid of Christian charity.

I attacked your concepts, not you personally. Thank you for revealing yourself.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   14:56:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone (#66)

Your pastist view of revelation is telling. There was no thousand year reign. It's almost like when the beast antichrist comes you will think he is Jesus.

Hide and watch. The glorious 1000 year reign of the Church will begin either this year or next year.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   14:59:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: A K A Stone (#67)

You stated a lot of things.

Which are the well known facts that everyone including the CIA accepts?

For one thing, the CIA says the lower 50 miles of the Euphrates was dry for about 10 years, yet Redleg denies that it was ever dry. Also, the CIA (and everyone else on earth) says Raqqa is the capital of ISIS, and yet the Redleg incredibly denies that too.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   15:10:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: A K A Stone (#66)

Your pastist view of revelation is telling. There was no thousand year reign. It's almost like when the beast antichrist comes you will think he is Jesus.

Precisely. This theory of prophecy is very convenient for use by a one world leader who rises to claim he is "God."

All Historicist theologians believe the world will be converted via evangelism of the Gospel. Not the sword. Not even the dominionism movement believes this. They believe seizing political power through elections and evangelism will convince the world to become Christian. Still a far out view but they don't promote violence to obtain the Kingdom.

Every Biblical reference of the Return of Messiah or Day of The Lord, has God directly issuing justice with Revelation 19 depicting the conquering King Jesus Christ.

It goes back to Luke 4 where Jesus firmly establishes His Mission in the First Advent:

Luke 4: KJV

16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read.

17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,

18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,

19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.

20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him.

21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

Jesus partially read the prophecy from Isaiah 61. Let's look...

Isaiah 61: King James Version (KJV)

61 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;

3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified.

4 And they shall build the old wastes, they shall raise up the former desolations, and they shall repair the waste cities, the desolations of many generations.

5 And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.

6 But ye shall be named the Priests of the Lord: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.(KJV)

Notice where Jesus stops. The remainder of the Isaiah 61 prophecy will be fulfilled in His Second Advent.

Notice it is called the day of vengeance of our God.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   15:19:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: redleghunter (#71)

Try being a man and ping me when you speak poorly of me.

You are a false prophet. Your comments are devoid of Christian charity.

I attacked your concepts, not you personally. Thank you for revealing yourself.

How can anyone help but speak poorly of someone who denies virtually every fact about Iraq even when you are there looking straight at them? And no one in their right mind can possibly say I am a false prophet when EVERYTHING I have predicted in the last 25 years has come to pass. You cannot name one thing I have predicted that did not come true. And nothing, not one thing, that futurists have been predicting for 25+ years has ever come true as far as I know. So who is the false prophet(s)? In Old Testament days, all of today's futurists would have been stoned to death for making even one false prophecy, and definitely for making hundreds of them.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   15:28:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: interpreter (#73)

For one thing, the CIA says the lower 50 miles of the Euphrates was dry for about 10 years, yet Redleg denies that it was ever dry. Also, the CIA (and everyone else on earth) says Raqqa is the capital of ISIS, and yet the Redleg incredibly denies that too.

50 miles!? I crossed the Euprates in Sothern Iraq several times between 2003 and 2010. Also by Blackhawk and Chinook.

The canals and marsh land were a mess at times but not completely dry. The Iranians were using small boats in the marshes to smuggle in EFP IED components.

Revelation 16: KJV

12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.

13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.

14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.(KJV)

When the entire great river Euphrates dries up as indicated in Revelation 16, give me a holler. Also when the kings of the earth and of the whole world can cross the mud puddles you fixate over, give me a holler.

How you conclude the grubby death cult from Mosul funded and led by Al Douri is the sum total of the kings of the East, is quite a stretch.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   15:37:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: interpreter (#73)

For one thing, the CIA says the lower 50 miles of the Euphrates was dry for about 10 years, yet Redleg denies that it was ever dry. Also, the CIA (and everyone else on earth) says Raqqa is the capital of ISIS, and yet the Redleg incredibly denies that too.

link please sir.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   15:40:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: interpreter (#75)

How can anyone help but speak poorly of someone who denies virtually every fact about Iraq even when you are there looking straight at them? And no one in their right mind can possibly say I am a false prophet when EVERYTHING I have predicted in the last 25 years has come to pass. You cannot name one thing I have predicted that did not come true. And nothing, not one thing, that futurists have been predicting for 25+ years has ever come true as far as I know. So who is the false prophet(s)? In Old Testament days, all of today's futurists would have been stoned to death for making even one false prophecy, and definitely for making hundreds of them.

You are going off the rails here. Futurists believe the Second Coming is yet to come. Only you and full preterists believe the Second Coming is in the past. Every credal Christian church is awaiting the Return of Jesus Christ in Glory.

Sure there were individuals who predicted Armageddon in their time. They broke the very first rule of Acts 1:

Acts 1: KJV

6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?

7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.

9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.

10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;

11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey.(KJV)

Pretty simple. The mission given to the disciples was not to concern themselves with timing BUT the mission at hand...The spreading of the Gospel.

Please take this mission to heart.

Taking your minimalist approach to Biblical prophetic passages and geopolitics, anyone could self fulfill any sneeze by Putin. Your approach seeks only to glorify you and not God.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   15:53:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: redleghunter (#74) (Edited)

Yeah, you read the parts of Luke that you like, but you won't read Luke 19:27. Or the history books which say Jesus returned in 312 AD. Or Revelation 2:7, 2:11, 2:17, 2:26-29, 3:5-6, 3:12-13, 3:21-22, and many other verses in the Revelation that urge Christians to conquer. And the original Greek word means military conquest, yet many faulty Bibles substitute a much milder "overcome." To see what happens to those translators, see Rev 22:18- 19. If you want to know what the Revelation really says, you have to buy my book.

As for what Jesus said in Acts 1:7, that is no longer true. After the fact we now know the day, the hour and minute everything in the Revelation was fulfilled up until Rev 20.

And we are supposed to "self fulfill" everything in the Revelation. It's all up to us because God follows the Star Trek directive. He only only interferes with life on earth when he deems it to be necessary. The next interference will be a thousand years from now when we will have burned up the earth and killed everyone on it.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   16:11:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: redleghunter (#76) (Edited)

50 miles!? I crossed the Euprates in Sothern Iraq several times between 2003 and 2010. Also by Blackhawk and Chinook.

And it wasn't dry then because as soon we invaded Iraq the lower Euphrates was restored (by the swamp arabs who have lived there since the days of Adam and Eve). (And don't tell me George W didn't do a lot of good).

"Also when the kings of the earth and of the whole world can cross the mud puddles you fixate over, give me a holler."

I have repeatedly told you that the Revelation doesn't say anyone actually crosses the dried-up Euphrates, and I have repeatedly told you what the Revelation IS saying, and its double fulfillment yet you continue to post the same old crap like a broken record. What in the world is wrong with you?

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   16:44:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: A K A Stone (#77)

"For one thing, the CIA says the lower 50 miles of the Euphrates was dry for about 10 years, yet Redleg denies that it was ever dry. Also, the CIA (and everyone else on earth) says Raqqa is the capital of ISIS, and yet the Redleg incredibly denies that too."

link please sir.

See post #44

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   17:01:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: interpreter, redleghunter (#81)

From your source.

First the Title. Dwindle doesn't equal dry up.

"Iraq Suffers as the Euphrates River Dwindles"

Then these from the article you suggested.

"and years of misuse by Iraq and its farmers, the river is significantly smaller than it was just a few years ago." Recently, the Water Ministry announced that Turkey had doubled the water flow into the Euphrates, salvaging the planting phase of the rice season in some areas."

"The Sunni areas upriver seem to have enough water, Mr. Joda observed,"

"

"Throughout the marshes, the reed gatherers, standing on land they once floated over, cry out to visitors in a passing boat."

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   18:33:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: A K A Stone (#82)

From your source.

First the Title. Dwindle doesn't equal dry up.

"Iraq Suffers as the Euphrates River Dwindles"

Then these from the article you suggested.

"and years of misuse by Iraq and its farmers, the river is significantly smaller than it was just a few years ago." Recently, the Water Ministry announced that Turkey had doubled the water flow into the Euphrates, salvaging the planting phase of the rice season in some areas."

"The Sunni areas upriver seem to have enough water, Mr. Joda observed,"

"

"Throughout the marshes, the reed gatherers, standing on land they once floated over, cry out to visitors in a passing boat."

Exactly. The miracles in the Bible are of grand scale and put people in awe.

They testify of His Power and Glory.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-05   18:40:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: redleghunter (#83)

From your source. First the Title. Dwindle doesn't equal dry up.

"Iraq Suffers as the Euphrates River Dwindles"

Then these from the article you suggested.

"and years of misuse by Iraq and its farmers, the river is significantly smaller than it was just a few years ago." Recently, the Water Ministry announced that Turkey had doubled the water flow into the Euphrates, salvaging the planting phase of the rice season in some areas."

"The Sunni areas upriver seem to have enough water, Mr. Joda observed,"

"Throughout the marshes, the reed gatherers, standing on land they once floated over, cry out to visitors in a passing boat."

And none of that has anything whatsoever to do with what the CIA said. The 2nd and 3rd sources have to with a very brief drying up of the Euphrates in 2009 and 2012 or 2013 I think, but it is completely immaterial because those two instances have nothing to do with what the CIA said about the first drying up of the Euphrates which is what the Revelation is talking about. The CIA, my first source, says the Euphrates where Hussein dried it up was dry for at least 10 years, from 1994 to 2003 when the swamp Arabs restored it as soon as Hussein was toppled. Other sources say it went dry a year or two before the CIA picked up on it, but I figured I would quote the CIA because everyone believes the CIA (except the Redleg evidently). My main point is, it was dry on 9/11 when Ar Mageddon began. And the mid-point of where it dried up forms a vector with Jerusalem that very precisely points to the 4 demon-possessed kings of the east the Revelation is talking about. And no they don't cross the dried-up Euphrates but they do gather all the world to that spot. It is the epicenter of the Battle of Ar Mageddon. And a fellow Jew, Joel Rosenberg, is saying the exact same thing I am saying. All Jews know what Ar Mageddon means. Ar Mageddo means City of the Sanctuary, meaning a city (Baghdad) in the original sanctuary of God called the Garden of Eden where modern man was created. Also called Mesopotamia in the secular world it is where the first civilized man appeared. Adding an "n" to it means "and environs" (meaning the entire sanctuary which includes all of Iraq and Syria). And that is where all the world is being gathered to as we speak, just as prophesied.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   21:49:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: interpreter (#84)

And none of that has anything whatsoever to do with what the CIA said.

Then why did you provide that as your link when I asked you for proof?

It was your link goofy.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   22:44:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: interpreter (#44)

1. A University of Texas map, based on aerial photos of Iraq and dated June 1994, shows the lower fifty miles of the Euphrates as being completely dry. It is included in a CIA report titled, “The Destruction of Iraq’s Marshes”

Again your source says partially dried up. Only fifty miles. Assuming your source is accurate.

The Length of the Euphrates is 1,740 miles. That means 2.8735632183908044 percent of it was dry.

The Bible says in Revelation 16:12-15King James Version (KJV)

12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up,

It doesn't say 2.8735632183908044 percent of it will dry up. It says it will dry up.

You're a joke and a clown.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-05   22:55:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: redleghunter (#58)

Considering AD 312 was not the Return of Christ, means He is yet to come.

So you are denying what all history books say? (Or at least what all history books used to say before atheists and the Satanic ACLU forced historians to rewrite history)?

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   23:47:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: A K A Stone (#85) (Edited)

Then why did you provide that as your link when I asked you for proof?

It was your link goofy.

I only provided the 2nd and 3rd links because the dates they said the Euphrates dried up corresponded to two additional bad things that happened when the Euphrates dried up. But they are by no means the main event. The main event is 9/11 which happened the first time the Euphrates dried up, and as documented in my first link Mr. Goofystone.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-05   23:57:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: A K A Stone, redleghunter (#86)

Man, Pebbles, you and redleg are getting smoked by Nostradamus Jr.

Thanks for the entertainment.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2017-01-06   0:08:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Fred Mertz (#89)

Stop eating the mushrooms where the dog takes a tinkle. The results are showing.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-06   0:25:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: A K A Stone (#86)

Again your source says partially dried up. Only fifty miles. Assuming your source is accurate.

The Length of the Euphrates is 1,740 miles. That means 2.8735632183908044 percent of it was dry.

The Bible says in Revelation 16:12-15King James Version (KJV)

12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up,

It doesn't say 2.8735632183908044 percent of it will dry up. It says it will dry up.

You're a joke and a clown.

You are a bald face liar. And I can easily prove it, but I dont have the map in question on my new computer, a laptop, and I guess I will have to retrieve my old desktop from my mini-warehouse and fire it up and post the UT/CIA map on LF just for you Mr. Goofy and for Mr. Red herring. But is a huge map and I'm not sure you will be able to read it after it is shrunk down enough to fit on this site, but it very plainly says that 50 miles of the Euphrates was COMPLETELY dry. And if you guys don't believe the CIA, you are completely hopeless and I am not going to continue this ridiculous conversation for another minute.

interpreter  posted on  2017-01-06   0:33:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: interpreter (#91)

And if you guys don't believe the CIA, you are completely hopeless and I am not going to continue this ridiculous conversation for another minute.

No I don't trust the CIA. They tried fooling Soldiers and Airmen into killing an innocent man and his family in Iraq.

redleghunter  posted on  2017-01-06   1:43:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: interpreter (#91)

You are a bald face liar.

Where did I lie. I quoted from your link. Then I did the math.

You are a stupid person. A clown. Someone to laugh at not be listened to. No serious person thinks highly of you.

You have never predicted anything correctly. Not once. Not even what time the sun rises.

You are so dumb you think that people seen in boats (your source) means it is dried up. Here is a clue for you dimwit. I* there is a boat on the river. There is water there.

Why would you need some alleged computer in some alleged warehouse? Don't you know how to use google to find maps? You're a clown and you're full of shit.

You don't lead people to christ. You lead them away. You make chrisians look stupid. But it is just you that is stupid. You are also a liar.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-06   9:17:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (94 - 166) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com