[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Barack Backhands Bibi With Israel Resolution Did the community organizer from Harvard Law just deliver some personal payback to the IDF commando? So it would seem. By abstaining on that Security Council resolution declaring Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal and invalid, raged Bibi Netanyahu, President Obama failed to protect Israel in this gang-up at the UN, and colluded with it. Obamas people, charged Bibi, initiated this resolution, stood behind it, coordinated on the wording and demanded that it be passed. White House aide Ben Rhodes calls the charges falsehoods. Hence, we have an Israeli leader all but castigating an American president as a backstabber and betrayer, while the White House calls Bibi a liar. This is not an unserious matter. By standing with the sworn enemies of Israel to enable the passage of this destructive, one-sided anti-Israel rant and tirade, writes the Washington Times, Mr. Obama shows his colors. But unfortunately for Israel, the blow was delivered by friends as well as sworn enemies. The U.S. abstained, but Britain, whose Balfour Declaration of 191 7 led to the Jewish state in Palestine, voted for the resolution. As did France, which allied with Israel in the Sinai-Suez campaign of 1956 to oust Egypts Col. Nasser, and whose Mysteres were indispensable to Israels victory in the Six-Day War of 1967. Vladimir Putin, who has worked with Bibi and was rewarded with Israels refusal to support sanctions on Russia for Crimea and Ukraine, also voted for the resolution. Egypt, whose Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi was welcomed by Bibi after his coup against the Muslim Brotherhood president, and who has collaborated with Bibi against terrorists in Sinai and Gaza, also voted yes. China voted yes as did Ukraine. New Zealand and Senegal, both of which have embassies in Tel Aviv, introduced the resolution. Despite Israels confidential but deepening ties with Sunni Arab states that share her fear and loathing of Iran, not a single Security Council member stood by her and voted against condemning Israels presence in Arab East Jerusalem and the Old City. Had the resolution gone before the General Assembly, support would have been close to unanimous. While this changes exactly nothing on the ground in the West Bank or East Jerusalem where 600,000 Israelis now reside, it will have consequences, and few of them will be positive for Israel. The resolution will stimulate and strengthen the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel, which has broad support among U.S. college students, Bernie Sanders Democrats and the international left. If Israel does not cease expanding West Bank settlements, she could be hauled before the International Criminal Court and charged with war crimes. Already, J Street, the liberal Jewish lobby that backs a two-state solution in Palestineand has been denounced by Donald Trumps new envoy to Israel David Friedman as far worse than kapos, the Jewish guards at Nazi concentration campshas endorsed the resolution. The successful resolution is also a reflection of eroding support for Israel at the top of the Democratic Party, as a two-term president and a presidential nominee, Secretary of State John Kerry, were both behind it. Republicans are moving to exploit the opening by denouncing the resolution and the U.N. and showing solidarity with Israel. Goal: Replace the Democratic Party as the most reliable ally of Israel, and reap the rewards of an historic transfer of Jewish political allegiance. That Sen. George McGovern was seen as pro-Palestinian enabled Richard Nixon to double his Jewish support between 1968 and 1972. That Jimmy Carter was seen as cold to Israel enabled Ronald Reagan to capture more than a third of the Jewish vote in 1980, on his way to a 44- state landslide. Moreover, U.S. acquiescence in this resolution puts Bibi in a box at home. Though seen here as a hawk on the settlements issue, the right wing of Bibis coalition is far more hawkish, pushing for outright annexation of West Bank settlements. Others call for a repudiation of Oslo and the idea of an independent Palestinian state. If Bibi halts settlement building on the West Bank, he could cause a split in his Cabinet with rightist rivals like Naftali Bennett who seek to replace him. Here in the U.S., the U.N. resolution is seen by Democrats as a political debacle, and by many Trump Republicans as an opportunity. Sen. Chuck Schumer has denounced Obamas refusal to veto the resolution, echoing sentiments about the world body one used to hear on Americas far right. The U.N. said Schumer, has been a fervently anti-Israel body since the days (it said) Zionism is racism and that fervor has never diminished. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham says he will urge Congress to slash funding for the United Nations. If the folks over at the John Birch Society still have some of those bumper stickersGet the U.S. out of the U.N., and the U.N. out of the U.S.! they might FedEx a batch over to Schumer and Graham. May have some converts here. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Every country is alone against the rest of the world. This fantasy that others will protect and cherish your own land like the people that reside in it do is nonsense.
Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.
Very good point you make. What I notice is that the Ukraine voted for this resolution (as did Russia). I think this will make good political ammunition in extricating ourselves from any commitments to the Ukraine. John McCain stood with the Ukrainian Nazis in Ukraine, and the Ukrainian Nazis stood with Iran and Red China against Israel. Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
What does that tell you? The world has been telling Israel to get out of the West Bank since the unanimous passage of UN 242 in 1967 (the US voted in favor). And for 50 years, Israel has told the world to go fuck themselves.
And they should continue to do so. Maybe the Mossad could arrange to have one of theirs to caddy for the Fag In Chief. Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."Theodore Roosevelt-1907. I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
I have a sneaking suspicion that the same people voted for the resolution, knowing that the US was going to veto it. The reason, politics and the "brown stain" giving us the middle finger once more.
Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|