Title: Police officer unleashes dog to attack naked unarmed man. Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Dec 14, 2016 Author:Stupid cops own dashcam Post Date:2016-12-14 11:21:35 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:3749 Comments:17
"No I was just seeing how far you go in support of police brutality."
Police brutality? What's the police dog for? Petting?
The highly trained police dog was used as non-lethal force to subdue the uncooperative douchebag. A taser could have missed, been ineffective, or even killed the subject.
(Ooooh. That would have given you something to post about. Why did they taser him? Why not use the police dog? At least he'd be alive today.)
Police brutality? What's the police dog for? Petting?
To catch fleeing suspects. Not to attack unarmed people who are not a threat.
What are the guns for? To shoot them in the head? You kind of dodged that one.
So again should the police have been allowed to just shoot him in the head. I mean they have guns and the guns aren't for playing cops and robbers. They ar for shooting.
LE, under the use of force continuum, should use just enough force to gain control. IMHO, there was no need for the K9 officer to allow the dog to keep nawing on the arrestee, when there was a sufficient amount of officers present to get him cuffed without injury to officers.
Better yet, they should have tased his naked ass... make the idiot ride the lightening bolt. The route they took will cause CIVIL LIABILITY PAYOUT by taxpayers.
" LE, under the use of force continuum, should use just enough force to gain control. IMHO, there was no need for the K9 officer to allow the dog to keep nawing on the arrestee, when there was a sufficient amount of officers present to get him cuffed without injury to officers.
Better yet, they should have tased his naked ass... make the idiot ride the lightening bolt. The route they took will cause CIVIL LIABILITY PAYOUT by taxpayers. "
