Title: Reddit Bans ‘Pizzagate’ Investigation into D.C.-area Child Sex Ring — Labels it a ‘Witch Hunt’ Source:
Free Thought Project URL Source:http://thefreethoughtproject.com/re ... stigation/#dophkqfXGvO1q8oC.99 Published:Nov 24, 2016 Author:Jay Syrmopoulos Post Date:2016-11-25 10:12:35 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:4358 Comments:7
Yesterday, something very strange happened on Reddit, as the subreddit, r/Pizzagate was unceremoniously banned by the social media company with a disclaimer stating that the subreddit was banned specifically for the proliferation of personal and confidential information, noting that,We dont want witch hunts on our site.
The following notice was posted to the site:
Initially, Internet sleuths set out researching the Podesta emails to prove a pedophilia connection between convicted sex offender, Jeffery Epstein, and the Clintons, as Bill Clinton is known to have traveled on Epsteins private jet, nicknamed the Lolita Express, without Secret Service protection on numerous occasions a seemingly suspicious move given Epsteins proclivity for sex with underage girls.
While there was never any smoking gun found regarding Epstein and the Clintons, the Pizzagate subreddit began after the strange use of code words was discovered in use in the Podesta emails, which were released by WikiLeaks. There is no mistaking the use of coded messages within the Podesta emails, but their meaning remains speculative.
The video provided below is a comprehensive breakdown of the connections that underpin the reasoning behind the Pizzagate pedophilia claims:
In typical fashion, the government/elite propaganda arm of the media moved quickly to label any mention of Pizzagate as fake news in an attempt to divert legitimate attention away from the growing crowdsourced investigation.
The Washington Post, in an attempt to undermine any legitimate investigation farcically claimed that those investigating Pizzagate believe that a secret headquarters of a child sex-trafficking ring run by Hillary Clinton and members of her inner circle is located in the basement of a Washington D.C. pizza shop called the Comet Ping Pong Pizzeria.
Of course, the actual investigation is a broader foray into the seedy world of Washington, D.C.s political-elite connected pedophile rings. The intimation that those investigating Pizzagate simply believe that Hillary Clinton runs a child sex ring is meant to dissuade people from further, legitimate investigation based on the seeming absurdity of such a claim.
This was almost the exact same scenario as what took place in the United States in what became known as the Franklin child sex ring coverup. Once the FBI took over the investigation from state authorities, it turned into a witch hunt to persecute the child victims going so far as to charge them with perjury in a successful attempt to scare the other 70+ victims to recant their testimony regarding the child sex ring.
While the story received a measure of newspaper coverage, there was a complete blackout of the scandal by the mass media, thus most Americans have never heard about this scandal that reached all the way to the White House.
Revealingly, former Republican state Senator John Decamp was involved in producing a documentary about the massive child sex scandal, which was set to air on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994, only to be shelved just prior to being seen nationally. It was reported that powerful congressmen threatened restrictive legislation on the cable industry if the documentary were to air.
Subsequently, and almost immediately, an unknown individual purchased the rights to the documentary and ordered all copies be destroyed. A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired F.B.I. chief, Ted L. Gunderson.
Of course, mainstream media, working as the propaganda wing of the power-elite of U.S. society, has essentially declared the Franklin cover-up a conspiracy theory. Well let you decide.
Some very powerful people did not want you to watch the documentary below:
Deckard: do you believe that prostitution should be legal? Yes or no.
If it should be legal, then like any other private economic activity, it should be private, right?
What do you believe the age of consent should be? 18? 16? 15?
Wherever you believe the age of consent should be, coupled with a belief that prostitution should be legal, is the age and level at which people's sex lives cease to be the public's business, or yours.
Pedophilia could mean little kids - and that's really horrific. But it could mean emancipated 17 year old prostitutes, and that's not really pedophilia at all, other than in name.
You should gauge what you present based on your own view of what the laws SHOULD be, and be consistent about it.
I agree completely that it's good that people post articles they may not agree with, for discussion and comment.
I was addressing Deckard, specifically, because of a pattern I have discerned in his articles and the posts he makes about them.
He is very passionate about an eclectic variety of things. I'm having difficulty discerning what the underlying philosophy it all is.
There's an admirable zeal there, but it seems to be scattershot, at a variety of things, without a uniting thread in it. I like to see passion, but I'd like to see him make an argument FOR a system a structure, a belief set.
For example, a common thread of all of my comments, which often garner controversy and anger, is an unwavering knowledge of God's existence, and coupled with that a religious respect for the sacred nature of human life - all human life. I put life above law, above economics, above country, above party and above Constitution. The way I see it, when anything else is allowed to stand in place of the fundamental sanctify of life, men are worshipping and idol, they've fallen into evil, and I'm out with an axe chopping right at their idol. I know this makes people angry, and it's intended to, in part, to force them to face the contradiction in themselves, to put that rock under the collar that's just going to keep rubbing and chafing any thinking man until he addresses the issue.
You see this on the Civil War threads, as the subject comes up, and where I come down speaking of slavery and the economic system that drove it using exactly the same language as I speak of the Third Reich and the Soviet Union and Communist China.: people of wealth and power who arrogate unto themselves the "right" to force labor out of other human beings, on pain of torture and death, to further augment their own power and wealth, are evil - they are allies of Satan - and they deserve to die, whether they are Russian, or German, or British, or American.
They deserve to die, and if instead their whole national government structure stands up to protect them and advance their evil, the country itself deserves to be burnt to the ground to extirpate the evil. I don't SPARE my own country this judgment. God didn't spare ancient Israel either. They sinned. They would not do right. So he obliterated them.
This isn't a very happy line of discussion, because it's our own country we're talking about, and we have not fully resolved those issues in our own minds. Nevertheless I goad and goad on the subject, because there was only ever one right answer, under God's law, and Americans hold themselves out as Christians so they SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT back then, and certainly SHOULD NOW. So when they stand for evil instead, I just stand and fight and refuse to cede the ground. There's a consistency in what I say that, if you don't agree with it, it is nevertheless absurd to try to ascribe it to something else, something easier.
So, I see Deckard's passion, but I can't see the root of it. I don't see a core. I see a passionate desire to advocate for marijuana. A passionate belief in endless conspiracy on the part of everybody in government. A furious belief in gun rights. There's a full six-pack of ideas there, but what's missing, to my eyes, is the plastic thingie that holds them all together.
I don't know whether or not Deckard has thought it all through and systematized his beliefs so that a logical thread can be followed from thread to thread. I'm trying to encourage him to do that.
In my case, OF COURSE I am going to favor social welfare to prevent people from dying or subsisting in extreme poverty - poverty that I see as an overhang from slavery and segregation, mostly - though not entirely (I won't defend the crass and base nature of "black culture", because it seems to be based on nothing but drugs, teenage sexual desires turned into a social structure, and racism). My favoring of social welfare to fix a perennial problem is decried as socialism, or communism. It is not. It's Bible-based Catholic Christianity, nothing less.
I KNOW that this drives some people crazy, and I intend them too. I won't cede the "Christian" battlefield but instead insist on just exactly what YHWH and Jesus said, and I won't let Republican platitudes about "charity under God's law being entirely voluntary" because that is a complete lie. God imposed a TAX on Israel to pay for the poor. The tithe was for the feeding of Levites, and they were to use it to administer to the poor. It was a poor tax, and nothing about it was voluntary.
There's a uniformity behind my thought that always appears, and that makes my reactions predictable. If somebody is inclined to agree with me, he can follow my thoughts and understand them.
I see the passion in Deckard, and appreciate it, but I don't see the philosophy. I'm trying to urge him to present it, to make it clear. Then there will be something to discuss concretely.
I'm trying to urge him to bring out what he believes, the structure of it.
One subreddit got out of hand and got axed for injudicious posting and the owner getting contacted by lawyers. The topic of pizzagate was not entirely scrubbed. The pizzagate thread was an offshoot of r/TheDonald.
I was addressing Deckard, specifically, because of a pattern I have discerned in his articles and the posts he makes about them.
I now fully understand the meaning of your post. The root cause, core, of the great consternation he has about so many different subjects is quite complex.