[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Julian Assange’s Internet ‘Intentionally Severed By A State Party,’ Wikileaks Says Julian Assange’s Internet ‘Intentionally Severed By A State Party,’ Wikileaks Says Peter Hasson Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s internet link was severed by a state party, the organization claimed in a tweet early Monday morning. Wikileaks claims to have activated “appropriate contingency plans.” The announcement came hours after Wikileaks published three cryptic tweets Sunday afternoon referencing Ecuador, US Secretary of State John Kerry and the United Kingdom’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Each tweet was accompanied by a string of jumbled numbers and letters. - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans. 12:33 AM - 17 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809 5:08 PM - 16 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks pre-commitment 2: Ecuador eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72 5:23 PM - 16 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74 5:25 PM - 16 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - Assange is currently residing in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, England, where he has remained since seeking political asylum in June 2012. (RELATED: Leaked Emails Show Clinton Campaign Struggling Over Gay Marriage Position) Kerry is currently in London as well for meetings with British, French and German foreign ministers regarding peace brokering attempts in Syria. Earlier this month, Assange claimed he was going to make a major announcement regarding Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on the balcony of the embassy, but canceled due to “security concerns.” Over the last week and a half, Wikileaks has steadily released thousands of emails from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s Gmail account. Wikileaks previously released hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee that showed party officials colluding against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. (RELATED: Wikileaks Cancels Major Clinton Revelation Amid ‘Security Concerns’) Critics of Wikileaks say the organization is acting as a front for Russian hackers, a charge Assange has denied. U.S. intelligence officials believe Russian hackers have been the source of the hacks. This is a developing story, check back for updates. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6. Im sure WikiLeaks have multiple contingency plans. What the demoncrats will try to do is muddy the water with bogus documents and then have proof that they fake tainting the whole lot(baby and the bath water theory). With the MSM as the demoncrats right arm they do not have to work hard to suppress. This is one of the reason why socialism is a bad for the peons. Where are all the people claiming that the demoncrats are for the people! Where are all the demoncrats for open and fair government! Again its been proven demoncrats are for the devil not the good people!
Replies to Comment # 6. Where are all the people claiming that the demoncrats are for the people! The problem you have is that, for all of the hatred of Democrats, nevertheless it is the Democrats who are for Social Security, Unemployment Benefits, Minimum Wage, Workers Comp, Section 8, Food Assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Universal Health Insurance, Universal Public Education - all of the financial supports of modern life that are necessary for the majority of the people to be able to make it. And Republicans strongly oppose all of those things. What Coulter said about Trump: "We know he's a lout - we're voting on policy" is also true for Democrats. Most Democrat voters know that the Democratic politicians are not saints. Most of them don't like Hillary and wish that it hadn't come down to this. Likewise, they didn't like Bill Clinton's sexcapades in the Oval Office. But when it comes down to it, a vote for Democrats is a vote to maintain the social safety net, while a vote for Republicans is a vote to kill the social safety net. And the social safety net is fundamental for the good of the people. THAT is why the people doggedly continue to vote Democrat, even though Democrat leaders are lousy individuals and often bad leaders. It's about fundamental policy. The Republicans oppose the best interests of a significant majority of the people, so they have to resort to all sorts of conspiracy theories and focus on the admittedly deficient personalities of Democrat leaders. If all of the smoke and fluff were removed and people just focused on policy, Democrats would win every election in a landslide.
#10. To: Justified (#6) What the demoncrats will try to do is muddy the water with bogus documents and then have proof that they fake tainting the whole lot(baby and the bath water theory). The 64 character strings released by Wikileaks are not keys to decrypt an encrypted file. Each is a hash to verify the authenticity of a file. Any change to any character in the associated file will cause the file to yield a different hash. If the file produces the same hash, it is authentic.
#18. To: Justified (#6) The Western media had no problem publishing Wikileaks obtained intelligence when Bush was in office. Huffpo and Dailykos were in glee with Bradley Manning giving up our nation's secrets to Asange.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 6. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|