politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: Carrie Fisher Says Donald Trump "Absolutely" Does Cocaine After Another Debate Full of Sniffles
Source:
Hollywood Reporter
URL Source: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne ... isher-says-donald-trump-937003
Published: Oct 10, 2016
Author: Ryan Parker
Post Date: 2016-10-10 17:33:10 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 1643
Comments: 12
This is not the first time the GOP presidential nominee has been accused of doing drugs.
Carrie Fisher says she knows why Donald Trump was sniffing so much during the second presidential debate — he does cocaine.
Fisher was asked through social media during the debate Sunday night if Trump was a "coke head" because of his audible, reoccurring sniffing.
"I'm an expert & ABSOLUTELY," the Star Wars actress responded on her verified Twitter account.
Fisher has been open about her prior drug use.
This is not the first time the GOP presidential nominee has been accused of doing drugs.
Howard Dean suggested during the first presidential debate that Trump perhaps used cocaine because he was sniffing so much then, too. Dean later apologized for the "innuendo."
Poster Comment:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Donald Trump "Absolutely" Does Cocaine
But, does he do less than Hillary?
I'm pretty sure Trump does less than Howard Dean did during his presidential run, or even while watching this debate.
Dang, these D&R Party space cadets make Gary Johnson look like an Eagle Scout by comparison!
Castle(C), Stein(G), Johnson(L)
#2. To: Willie Green (#0)
I hope Trump sues her out of existence.
Trump: "The three things I've always told my children to live by: No alcohol, no drugs, and no smoking".
To say Trump did drugs, in front of his children and 100 million Americans in a Presidential debate, is ludicrous and ignorant.
#3. To: misterwhite (#2)
I hope he does to. Reminds me whe Seanad claimed arsenio hall was a drug dealer who supplied prince with drugs. I'm surprised he didn't sue.
#4. To: Willie Green (#0)
personally i couldnt care less. he doesnt murder people and he doesnt protect rapists with pride, ill take the masogyinst coke head over the murderer anyday.
#5. To: Justified (#3) (Edited)
Hall did sue O'Connor. http://www.centrictv.com/entertainment/celebrity-news/articles/2016/05/06/arsenio-hall-files-lawsuit-over-accusation-he-was-princes
And Trump, if he has any honor in himself, should also do the same against his accuser making such a claim. We don't need another cokehead and drug dealer like Bill Clinton in the White House.
#6. To: goldilucky (#5)
http://www.centrictv.com/entertainment/celebrity-news/articles/2016/05/06/arsenio-hall-files-lawsuit-over-accusation-he-was-princes
Incomplete link. Correct below:
#7. To: nolu chan (#6)
Well, the court will bring up New York Times v. Sullivan and argue he's- a-public-figure-so-you-can-say-anything-about-him defense.
In 2011, Scalia rightfully argued that the change in the law (denying public figures protection) should have been done by the people, not the courts. Trump wants to go back to the way it was.
#8. To: hondo68 (#1)
Carrie is an utter failure. She was lousy in Star Wars playing Princess Lay- yah and her career went down even further so that today no one's heard of her.
Apparently she wants another ten minutes of fame by spreading specious rumors.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
#9. To: misterwhite (#7)
In 2011, Scalia rightfully argued that the change in the law (denying public figures protection) should have been done by the people, not the courts.
It is not a complete removal of protection, but the public figure must prove actual malice, i.e. he must prove the defamation was made knowing it was false, or in reckless disregard for the truth.
#10. To: Willie Green (#0)
Who cares what that washed up libtarded alcoholic has-been cunt has to say. RTD2 got more job offers, after Star Wars, than this bimbo bitch.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
#11. To: nolu chan (#9)
"but the public figure must prove actual malice, i.e. he must prove the defamation was made knowing it was false, or in reckless disregard for the truth."
Scalia's (and Trump's) point was that there are two standards and there shouldn't be. If the people want public figures to be treated differently, then the people should vote on it, not have it shoved down their throats by the court.
The current system isn't working, as evidenced by the dearth of libel cases settled in favor of the plaintiff. Plus, I think it would bring more accountibility to the press.
#12. To: nolu chan (#6)
Thank you, nolo chan, for correcting that.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]