[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Australian Efforts to Dump the United Nations Gain Momentum As the United Nations becomes increasingly radical in its assaults on liberty and national sovereignty, the movement for free nations to leave the dictator-dominated UN has now officially arrived in Australia. Speaking on the floor of Parliament in his inaugural address, newly elected Senator Malcolm Roberts (shown) with the One Nation party said Australian values were under threat from “insidious” institutions such as the unelected UN. To deal with it, he called for an “OzExit.” In a passionate defense of freedom, Roberts also blasted privately owned central banks and the incestuous relationship between global mega-banks and Big Government. The tide is already turning. Roberts said the historic Brexit vote, in which British voters decided to secede from the European Union, should be seen as a model worldwide as nations work to reclaim their sovereignty from globalist institutions. The Australian lawmaker, who represents the state of Queensland, joined a growing chorus of anti-UN voices stretching from the halls of the U.S. Congress to the Presidential Palace of the Philippines. “Australia's values and way of life are also at risk from insidious institutions such as the unelected swill that is the United Nations,” Roberts, who belongs to a pro-sovereignty, pro-borders political party, said on the floor of the legislature in his maiden speech. His comments promptly made headlines worldwide, from RT and the BBC to the Washington Post and the U.K. Express. He also blasted the increasingly totalitarian EU and other controversial institutions of what globalists call “global governance,” and celebrated the growing uprising against transnational government. “The people of the United Kingdom recently spoke, and I have great admiration for the way they broke free of that socialist, monolithic monster, the European Union,” he said. “The EU is a template for total socialist domination of Europe through unelected bodies, such as the IMF, forcing their frightening agenda on the people,” Roberts continued, referring to the radical International Monetary Fund currently being groomed to take a lead role in the global monetary regime. “It is also the UN's template, and Australia must leave the UN.” “We need an OzExit,” Roberts added, a reference to Australia exiting the UN. Roberts also blasted various UN schemes that seek to undermine liberty, property rights, and nationhood. “People are waking to the UN destroying our national sovereignty through implementation of the UN’s 1975 Lima declaration and 1992 Rio declaration for 21st century global governance, often known as Agenda 21 — more recently as Agenda 2030,” he said, referring to dangerous plots to empower the UN at the expense of nations and people that have been thoroughly exposed in this magazine and other publications. Based on Roberts' speech, it seems that Americans are facing many of the same dangers as Australians. Those UN schemes, he said, were “signed quietly by the then government and sneakily implemented by ministers of every government since under the guise of biodiversity to steal property rights, sustainability to pass regulations controlling people and climate change to push foreign control using unlawful agreements like the Paris sham.” The Obama administration and other U.S. administrations before it have engaged in similar lawlessness, with Obama recently using his pen to “ratify” the imploding UN Paris Agreement to shackle humanity under the guise of stopping “climate change.” The Constitution requires Senate ratification. “Let me say: the people of Australia are desperate to regain our sovereignty,” Roberts said, echoing growing sentiments expressed by voters across the Western world. “We need to rebuild our nation. Australians have had enough of foreign control, enough of tax and enough theft of our prosperity and future. Australia is on a precipice.” In his hard-hitting speech, his first as an Australian lawmaker, Roberts also vowed to work to restore Australia's Constitution and its national sovereignty. He then promised to fight against the crushing tax burden, and to push to devolve powers back to state and local government. Finally, he vowed to take on the establishment to do it. “We are not worried what the establishment says about us,” he continued. “We're not here for the establishment. We're here for everyday people and our nation.” His passion for politics was unleashed during the “grassroots uprising” among the Australian people against the “reviled and dishonest carbon dioxide tax,” Roberts said. Indeed, so massive was that uprising that the supporters of the tax were swept out of office in a landslide, with opponents of the tax dominating the election. After taking power, the newly elected government swiftly worked to abolish the hated scheme, vowing to reject UN “socialism masquerading as environmentalism.” Globalists were not amused, and worked fiendishly to undermine the government Australian voters put into power. Just a few days before former French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced that he, too, was a climate skeptic amid an effort to get re-elected after years of Socialist rule, Senator Roberts also took aim at the increasingly discredited man-made global-warming theory. “Like Socrates, I love asking questions to get to the truth. So I ask the question: over the last 130 years, what was the longest single temperature trend?” he asked. “Is not the inconvenient truth this — that from the 1930s to the 1970s, during the period of the greatest industrialisation in human history, when our carbon dioxide output increased dramatically, atmospheric temperatures cooled for 40 years straight?”9 “Another inconvenient fact is that temperatures, statistically, have not been warming since 1995 — 21 years,” he continued, a reference to the great “hiatus” in warming. “Records show there have been warmer periods in Australia’s history than the current decade. Temperatures are now cooler than 130 years ago. This is the reverse of what we are blatantly told by the Bureau of Meteorology, which has manipulated cooling trends into false warming trends.” He also noted that changes in CO2 levels are a result of temperature changes, not a cause of it. And global warming would actually be beneficial, Roberts added. “The UN’s claim is absurd,” he continued. “Instead of science, activists invoke morality, imply natural weather events are unusual, appeal to authority and use name-calling, ridicule and emotion. They avoid discussing facts and rely on pictures of cute smiling dolphins. These are not evidence of human effect on climate.” It is clear that the man-made global-warming theory is a “scam,” he continued, blasting “extremist voices” in Parliament advocating the de-industrialization of Australia to deal with a phony problem. In his speech, Roberts also praised a wide range of prominent Australian climate skeptics and ridiculed alarmists for their failed predictions. “Again, and again, and again, climate activists have been warning us that we have just five years to act,” said Roberts, who has an honors engineering degree covering atmospheric gases. “Every time, nature has proven them wrong.” He also said it was time to restore the understanding that science is a method of inquiry, not a belief system. In an act of courage, Roberts referenced the establishment forces behind the curtain pulling the strings of the climate-alarmist movement, previously exposed in a U.S. Senate report that blasted the group as the “Billionaires Club.” Speaking to the Sydney Morning Herald in 2012 in his capacity as leader of the climate-skeptic Galileo Movement, he said that what passes as “climate science” has been captured by “some of the major banking families in the world” who form a “tight-knit cabal.” That has been obvious for quite some time, with “vampire squid” mega-bank Goldman Sachs and billionaire “bankster” families, including the Rockefeller dynasty, showering resources on global-warming zealots. In his September 13 maiden speech as senator, Roberts also took on the international banking cabal. “Worldwide, privately owned central banks have greed as their creed and cannot be trusted to work in a country’s best interests,” he said. “A royal commission into the banking sector and currency is just one tool needed to expose what the big international banks are doing to trash our country.” He also called for stopping the “manipulation of our economy so often exerted by the tight-knit international banking sector.” GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump has similarly taken on the Federal Reserve and its manipulation of interest rates. On the purpose of government itself, Roberts boldly defended Western civilization and its traditions of liberty and limited government. “In my view the purpose of great institutions such as this parliament, and broadly politics, is to protect life, protect property and protect freedom,” he declared. “Government has, sadly, transitioned, though, into a beast that only wishes to control people’s lives. And it has very curious bedfellows.... Big government in partnership with big banks is a disaster for ordinary Australians. One of the greatest threats to our liberty and life as we know it is the international banking sector.” Then he quoted U.S. President Andrew Jackson, who said, “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their own selfish purposes.” That, of course, holds true in all nations at all points in history. The Australian senator's comments come amid massive UN scandals and growing outrage about the UN all over the world. In the United States, there is an increasingly influential movement to have an “Amexit” from the UN. Legislation in Congress, dubbed the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 1205), would do just that, in addition to evicting the widely ridiculed “dictators club” from U.S. soil. As the UN becomes increasingly extreme — last week the UN's “human rights” boss even equated hundreds of millions of Western voters and their political leaders with ISIS — the movement for free nations to leave the UN will only accelerate. Americans hoping to get involved can call their members of Congress and educate opinion molders in the communities on the threat. The future of liberty and national independence hangs in the balance. Poster Comment: Get the US out of the UN, then when the Kenyan ex-U. S. president becomes Secretary General the main source of revenue will be cut off. The UN will have to relocate to Kenya! The tide has turned. If Hilda gets in the nation's military will be turned over to the UN. They are already half way there. Bypassing congress for a war declaration. There has not been a declaration of war by congress since WW2. It was JFK who turned over the plans for the US disarmament plan in 1961. These people can not be trusted with our money let alone our entire nation or the world. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Roberts sounds like a sane voice.
Too bad our pitiful nation hasn't leaders with guts!
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
very fringe thinking, this is the first Australians have heard of any move to leave the UN
People hear what thet want to. Usually they are deaf to anything conflicting with their personal prejudices or agenda. If they can't refute the content of a threat to their their personal psyche, they attempt to dismiss it by labeling it fringe thinking. That allows primitive minds to believe they've rejected the substance of a proposition without venturing any content. If the process of ferocious name-calling catches on, they win the battle to live in ignorance, blindness, and distortion. In generations of people who have lived in comparative opulance and never had to grow up, it's a very popular technique for extending an eternal childhood.
The last thing in the world a major proportion of the self indulgent population of this country want to hear from is an adult with courage and integrity. They want to hear fancy fantasy and denial. Politically, they are interested in only one thing. Government subsidies to let them continue in a life style without responsibility or prudance. It's a fact that 50% of juveniles you meet on the street are born out of wedlock or deserted by playboy ex-husbands. Add to this an extensive recreational drug subculture and we have what is called an enormous social problem deteremined to perpetuate itself without adult criticism.
Not so, this fellow is truly on the fringe, more out there than his political leader who is against immigration, indigenous people and just about anything the mainstream is for. Look the UN may be an idea whose time has past, it has become intrusive as it projects a leftist agenda, and has failed to keep the peace. Most of us don't want big government, we want effective government solving the problems, not creating them
Do you need the U.N. to help you do that? What kind of problems are you attempting to solve anyway? If you want problem solvers we'll send you Obama and Hillary. They've screwed up everything they've touched for years while claiming that it's an attempt to solve problems. But their thinking is acceptable and out of the fringe.
I see where Roberts is coming from. It's thoroughly documented on a DVD entitled Agenda grinding America down that examines the tactics and strategy of the communist party and radical left for the last hundred years quite accurately. It can be obtained at AgendaDocumentary.com or at 1-877-527-2111. I obtained a copy a week ago at Amazon.
Not problems the UN should be helping with. What is the optimal population for the driest contenient on Earth. What is the true place of an indigenous people who want privilege without integration? On what terms should we allow foreign investment? should we accept the UN designation of a refugee? Why should we destroy our economy because the northern hemisphere has created a problem? We don't need your stuffups elected or pretenders, you have contributed nothing in the past twenty, thirty, fifty years
Not problems the UN should be helping with. What is the optimal population for the driest contenient on Earth. Etc. Etc. And so forth. A very elegant exercise in internet penmanship. The question is, how does any of it refute, or relate to, anything Roberts said? The best you can do is call him on "the fringe." So were the people who originally thought the earth wasn't flat or wasn't the center of the universe. Sonny, you want to be more important and impressive that the logic and quality of your arguments supports. Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles everything. Some think it is the voice of God. -- Mark Twain Dummys who hold that position assert that anyone differing with it is "the fringe."
The whole point is nothing Roberts said relates to the real issues, he was following his leader in attempting to shock and put forward an extremist view. People like him seldom get elected and so now he has a forum he will attempt to force his views. we have some very radical politicians and the system allows them to be elected where your system wouldn't. These people are far more right wing than Donald Trump, and while I agree with the concept of Australia for the Australians, they are devisive
My heavens. Australians are right wing and divisive. Our cup runneth over with nasty names to call people. You must be taking Hillary Clinton lessons.
Dilliary is a novice, in my country we gladly refer to bastards, dickheads and scumbags and I leave you to assign the tag to whoever fits the tag. You run at the thought of saying any thing more than mildly offensive, but honestly your current crop of politicians are dills and dullards and by definition their supporters must be seen in the same light. I know you are spoiled for choice but this is what money buys you. It doesn't buy you the best and the brightest but the lowest form of crap imaginable, people who will sell out to the lowest bidder. Now we have some very right wing people and there is truth in their argument, enough truth for enlightened debate. We also have some very left wing people, those who want us to hand the country over to gays and muslims without question, but I will echo the remarks of one of your own "only out of my cold dead hand"
Divide and conquer. That is the program of the left also. In fact that's the program of nearly everyone who has conquered.
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|