Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Donald Trump May Have Just Won the White House
Source:
Barb Wire
URL Source: http://barbwire.com/2016/09/02/dona ... rump-may-just-won-white-house/
Published: Sep 2, 2016
Author: Bryan Lyman
Post Date: 2016-09-03 11:15:11 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 10672
Comments: 40
If conservatives who care about border security and true immigration reform are looking for a reason to vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, they just found it Donald Trump may have just won the White House. In a powerful, effective, and brilliant speech on the issue of illegal immigration delivered last night in Arizona, Trump laid out a view of true immigration reform that will secure our borders, protect our national security, protect American families in their own neighborhoods and communities, and above all, protect America’s cultural values. Trump’s plan is gloriously simple: let’s enforce the immigration laws we already have. This involves rapid deportation of anyone who is found to be in this country illegally, whether that person is apprehended by federal authorities or local authorities. Deporting criminal illegal aliens will be given the highest possible priority under Trump’s plan, to end the utterly foolish and dangerous policy of releasing aliens who are criminals twice over: once after they have been apprehended illegally trespassing on sovereign American soil, and a second time after they have committed an act of violence against someone who has the right to be here. Trump has pledged, starting on day one, to build an “impenetrable physical wall” along our southern border. European countries such as Hungary have proven that border fences properly patrolled work. Even Norway is in the process of building a wall to secure its northeastern border with Russia against illegal incursions. Fences work, and Trump is determined to prove it. To paraphrase Kevin Costner, if we build it, they – illegal aliens – won’t come. Although Trump did not address this mechanism specifically in his speech, there is a simple way to fund the building of this wall: taxing remittances, which represent money shipped to Mexico by Mexicans working in the United States. Remittances are the second largest component of the Mexican economy, after oil. A four-percent tax on the $25 billion a year that’s sent south of the border would raise $10 billion over the next ten years, more than enough to build the wall. Mexico has all the incentive one could ask for to keep this spigot running wide open. We can even offer to lift the tax once the wall is built. Trump pointed out that, according to The Boston Globe, under Hillary Clinton’s watch 13,000 criminal illegals were allowed to stay in the United States because their country of origin refused to take them back. Trump’s solution is brilliantly simple and devastatingly effective: no more visas for you. If you won’t take your criminals back, nobody from your country will be allowed to so much as set his foot down in America. That will fix that problem on day one. To fix the problem of illegals working in America and taking American jobs, Trump poses ramped up enforcement of E-Verify. If illegals cannot find jobs in America because their legal status cannot be verified, they will self-repatriate. They won’t have to be deported since they’ll take care of that themselves. (There are, by the way, no jobs Americans won’t do. I’ve worked most of the jobs the so-called experts tell us are beneath the dignity of the American worker. I worked in the fields doing stoop labor, I worked in a meatpacking plant, I worked as a car wash attendant, I worked as a janitor, and I slung hash to work my way through college.) Trump also proposes shutting off immigration from any country – including Syria – in which it is impossible to properly vet prospective immigrants. He also proposes a perfectly constitutional ideological test to determine if a wanna-be immigrant is bringing values that will enable him to assimilate seamlessly into American culture or whether he wants to bring fundamentally un-American ideals into our society. In addition, Trump pledges “to keep immigration levels, measured by population share, within historical norms.” This will ensure stability and consistency, and is similar to immigration policies adopted 100 years ago to ensure population balance and assimilation. Under Trump’s plan, no one will ever be able to obtain legal residency or citizenship by entering this country illegally. They will have to leave, return home, and go through proper channels. The days of unconstitutional executive amnesty will be over. Trump is exactly right. If his recipe is followed, “[P]eace and law and justice and prosperity will prevail. Crime will go down, border crossings will plummet, gangs will disappear, and welfare use will decrease. We will have a peace dividend to spend on rebuilding America, beginning with our inner cities.” Trump is also correct when he says, “But to fix our immigration system, we must change our leadership in Washington. There is no other way.” And he’s also correct that this election may be our last chance to make the change that’s required. We are getting close to the point where it will be too late if something dramatic isn’t done. Bottom line: if conservatives who care about border security and true immigration reform are looking for a reason to vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, they just found it. Poster Comment: Trump will bring back some honor and respect to the office of president. After the disgusting Clinton years, then Bush II it's long past time to show the world that America is truly a First Class Nation. At this time I, along with many others, find this evil administration and those before it with the exception of the Reagan years, beyond contempt. And, it's the damned Democrat party and NEVER the Democratic party.....there's nothing democratic about this collection of perverts and baby killers.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HomerBohn, make America Atzlan again, *Border Invasion* (#0)
Reagan was the most successful Reconquista Republican, who signed amnesty into law. He also presided over the US change from a productive business economy, to one based on the government providing most of the jobs. Just after the end of Reagan's second term, manufacturing had decreased and government had grown to such an extent that, there were more gov workers than manufacturing ones. It's been that way ever since. More government worker leaches, than productive manufacturing employees. The BLS has published seasonally-adjusted month-by-month employment data for both government and manufacturing going back to 1939. For half a century—from January 1939 through July 1989—manufacturing employment always exceeded government employment in the United States, according to these numbers. Then, in August 1989, the seasonally-adjusted employment numbers for government exceeded the employment numbers for manufacturing for the first time. That month, manufacturing employed 17,964,000 and government employed 17,989,000. Overall, a good article. But, the author should have stuck with what Trump DID address; because, once he builds the wall and sends the illegals back home,there will be no $25 billion a year to tax. Or, am I missing something...
What, exactly, did Reagan do to warrant an exclusion to your list? He promoted illegal immigration along with all others after him and ensured that social security funds could be raided by the US government.
"Transcript: Trump doesn't commit to deporting all illegals" - libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=47669
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. He doesn't say he won't. If illegals can't get a job and if they can't get government services, how many will hang around?
He doesn't say he won't. He used to say he would. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. In the primary. And he caught shit for that, didn't he? Right away the MSM painted his entire immigration plan as "tearing apart families in the middle of the night -- hard-working families that did nothing more than desire the American dream". You know the score -- run hard right in the primary, move to the center in the general. Oh, you never heard this? Huh. Here I thought you were somewhat familiar with politics.
Reagan forced the USSR into bankruptcy and cleaned up the mess left behind by the peanut-brained moron from Plain.
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Oh BULLSHIT! The USSR was already crumbling, and certainly their military infrastructure because of Afghanistan. But the problems from the Kremblin was not so much Afghanistan overreach but more about the quality of personnel within their own military recruits; drunk and non-loyal comrades are not worthy of and about a oppressor nation. All Reagan performed was stoke fear; further fear from an aggressor, world class nation ... the USA.
Ah, so Trump is just another politician after all, suckering the conservative base the way they've so often been suckered. Got it. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. They'd been crumbling for 70 years. You want to call it a coincidence that those 70 years came to an end on Reagan's watch, more fool you. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Nah, but he plays one. Pretty well, I'd say.
How are things over on the left side, Buckeroo? What a handle for a Hillary fan. Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
There aren't many on this website, but do you think the leftist loons and the sexually confused are over represented?
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Nah, but he plays one. Pretty well, I'd say. When it comes to suckering the base, very well. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Overrepresented where? A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Here
Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
No. The USSR was already crumbling. Ronnie just stumbled along at the right tyme from a historical perspective.
No. The USSR was already crumbling. Ronnie just stumbled along at the right tyme That is calling it a coincidence. Cling to your illusions. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. The only "sexually confused" posters here are the ones who are constantly accusing others of homosexual inclinations or acts - projecting their own desires. I don't think the few leftists contribute anything of value, but if A K A Stone wants to allow them, it's his forum. Why do you ask? A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Reagan was serving Job Creators who wanted plenty of cheap labor and cannon fodder.
The truth is: Ronnie didn't do anything other than arm the so-called "Freedom Fighters" otherwise known as the Mujahideen via the US_CIA. Once the USSR left Afghanistan, Ronnie left Afghanistan as his proxie war with USSR was considered a VICTORY in the USA and left his "Freedom Fighters" completely abandoned. Angered by US policies, the Mujahideen later morphed into the Taliban and other radical Muslim groups, such as Al-Qaeda and spawning ISIS. Yeah, some illusion. The ME has turned into a nightmare because folks like YOU do not understand the responsibility the USA has played in creating international turbulence through silly meddling policies.
Economy collapsed there AFTER imposing free market reforms and predatory privatisation during Yeltsin misrule.
Left side of what? Even your Rush Limbaugh is left of me.
Berlin Wall was removed during the early Clinton as a result of Gorbachev pressure on East German government. And Soviet Union fell apart because of Yeltsin later
Which has squat to do with what/who caused the USSR to fall. But don't let me stop you from changing the subject. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Ronnie did NOTHING to destroy the USSR. Get it? Ronnie impacted the decline of the USSR by aiding the Afghanistan Mujahideen is all. Ronnie's effort was minor in regards to toppling the USSR. His effort was major creating a ME crisis that persists to this day.
The rubble hadn't settled before Reagan left office, but significant chunks were already falling: http s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Union#1988
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Reagan directed his national security team to come up with the necessary tactics to implement his victory strategy. The result was a series of top- secret national security decision directives (NSDDs). * NSDD-32 declared that the United States would seek to "neutralize" Soviet control over Eastern and Central Europe and authorized the use of covert action and other means to support anti-Soviet groups in the region, especially in Poland. * NSDD-66 stated that it would be U.S. policy to disrupt the Soviet economy by attacking a "strategic triad" of critical resources--financial credits, high technology, and natural gas. The directive was tantamount to a "secret declaration of economic war on the Soviet Union." * NSDD-75 stated that the U.S. would no longer coexist with the Soviet system but would seek to change it fundamentally. America intended to roll back Soviet influence at every opportunity. A subset of the Reagan strategy was U.S. support of pro-freedom forces in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Angola, and Cambodia. A key decision was to supply Stinger ground-to-air missiles to the mujahideen in Afghanistan, who used them to shoot down the Soviet helicopters that had kept them on the defensive for years. [...] The same month, the President announced that development and deployment of a comprehensive anti-ballistic missile system would be his top defense priority. The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was called "Star Wars" by liberal detractors, but Soviet leader Yuri Andropov took SDI very seriously, calling it a "strike weapon" and a preparation for a U.S. nuclear attack. Moscow's intense opposition to SDI showed that Soviet scientists regarded the initiative not as a pipe dream but as a technological feat they could not match. A decade later, the general who headed the department of strategic analysis in the Soviet Ministry of Defense revealed what he had told the Politburo in 1983: "Not only could we not defeat SDI, SDI defeated all our possible countermeasures." - www.heritage.org/research...d-reagan-and-the-fall-of- communism A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Another failed Reagan program. Keep up the BS, pal ... because you are full of it.
This was the CIA "CONTRA" BS instilled by Ronnie. Another failed program.
The failures go on and on and on about Ronnie. The guy was just a salesman on a Borax commercials for Twenty Mule Team "old West" episodes.
Another failed Ronnie program which lead to USA intervention in Vietnam because of the so-called "domino effect." Total BS to this day.
Another red herring - freedom fighters didn't need to oust Communist governments, nor did SDI need to become fully operational, to destabilize the Soviet empire. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. The failures are about the Reagan exalting foreign intrigue and intervention into areas that has ZERO to do with US national security. Reagan's BS persists to this day as the country has become a fascist nation not just about internal government strategies of policing our own People but also the world. It is total BS that you subscribe to that Reagan was some sort of GREAT President. He was lead by the nose into meaningless intervention around the globe.
Which has squat to do with what/who caused the USSR to fall. But don't let me stop you from changing the subject. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Communism imploded on its own demerits. Don't let that FACT stand in the way of you believing in a myth.
Cling to that coincidence delusion - it seems to afford you comfort.
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Just wanted your opinion. Got it. Liberals are a lot like Slinkys, they're good for nothing but they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
with the exception of the Reagan years
Government Workers Now Outnumber Manufacturing Workers by 9,932,000 
Castle(C), Stein(G), Johnson(L)
#2. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Although Trump did not address this mechanism specifically in his speech, there is a simple way to fund the building of this wall: taxing remittances, which represent money shipped to Mexico by Mexicans working in the United States. Remittances are the second largest component of the Mexican economy, after oil. A four-percent tax on the $25 billion a year that’s sent south of the border would raise $10 billion over the next ten years, more than enough to build the wall. Mexico has all the incentive one could ask for to keep this spigot running wide open. We can even offer to lift the tax once the wall is built.
#3. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Donald Trump may have just won the White House.
I sure hope so!
#4. To: HomerBohn (#0)
this evil administration and those before it with the exception of the Reagan years, beyond contempt.
#5. To: HomerBohn (#0)
#6. To: ConservingFreedom (#5)
"Transcript: Trump doesn't commit to deporting all illegals"
#7. To: misterwhite (#6)
(Edited)
"Transcript: Trump doesn't commit to deporting all illegals"
#8. To: ConservingFreedom (#7)
"He used to say he would."
#9. To: buckeroo (#4)
#10. To: HomerBohn (#9)
(Edited)
#11. To: misterwhite (#8)
You know the score -- run hard right in the primary, move to the center in the general.
#12. To: buckeroo (#10)
The USSR was already crumbling
#13. To: ConservingFreedom (#11)
"Ah, so Trump is just another politician after all ..."
#14. To: buckeroo (#10)
#15. To: ConservingFreedom (#11)
#16. To: misterwhite (#13)
"Ah, so Trump is just another politician after all ..."
#17. To: HomerBohn (#15)
There aren't many on this website, but do you think the leftist loons and the sexually confused are over represented?
#18. To: ConservingFreedom (#17)
#19. To: ConservingFreedom (#12)
You want to call it a coincidence that those 70 years came to an end on Reagan's watch
#20. To: buckeroo (#19)
"You want to call it a coincidence that those 70 years came to an end on Reagan's watch"
#21. To: HomerBohn (#15)
do you think the leftist loons and the sexually confused are over represented [here]?
#22. To: hondo68 (#1)
Reagan was the most successful Reconquista Republican, who signed amnesty into law.
#23. To: ConservingFreedom (#20)
(Edited)
Cling to your illusions.
#24. To: HomerBohn (#9)
Reagan forced the USSR into bankruptcy and cleaned up the mess left behind by
#25. To: HomerBohn (#14)
How are things over on the left side, Buckeroo?
#26. To: ConservingFreedom (#12)
You wantt to call it a coincidence that those 70 years came to an end on Reagan's watch, more fool you.
#27. To: buckeroo (#23)
Once the USSR left Afghanistan, Ronnie left Afghanistan as his proxie war with USSR was considered a VICTORY in the USA and left his "Freedom Fighters" completely abandoned. Angered by US policies, the Mujahideen later morphed into the Taliban and other radical Muslim groups, such as Al-Qaeda and spawning ISIS.
#28. To: ConservingFreedom (#27)
#29. To: A Pole (#26)
#30. To: buckeroo (#28)
#31. To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
"Star Wars"
#32. To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
Nicaragua
#33. To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
#34. To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
Cambodia
#35. To: buckeroo (#32)
Another failed program.
#36. To: ConservingFreedom (#35)
#37. To: buckeroo (#36)
The failures are about the Reagan exalting foreign intrigue and intervention into areas that has ZERO to do with US national security.
#38. To: ConservingFreedom (#37)
#39. To: buckeroo (#38)
#40. To: ConservingFreedom (#21)
Why do you ask?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]