[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
911 Title: FEMA Investigator’s Shock 9/11 Claim: ‘Vault Contents Emptied Before Attack… They Knew It Was Going To Happen’
The attacks of September 11th, 2001 will forever be mired in doubt and suspicion by millions of people who saw the events live on their televisions. Almost immediately following the attacks theories began to emerge. Were the hijackers operatives for a Western intelligence service? How did a passport from one of the terrorists survive completely unscathed, only to be found later amidst the rubble of the Trade Centers? How did WTC Building 7 collapse even though it was never struck by an airplane? Why was President George H.W. Bush meeting with members of the Bin Laden family at the very moment of the attacks? Were the planes that hit the buildings actually commercial airliners or were they remotely operated drones? Why was the entirety of Ground Zero quickly sanitized and shipped to China for recycling before any investigation ever took place? And, what are the odds that on the very day terrorists used planes to attack the Pentagon and World Trade Centers, the U.S. military was holding exercises simulating hijackers crashing planes into buildings, a circumstance that led to total confusion across the United States and a complete failure of national defense? These questions and thousands more have been the subject of fervent debate for over a decade, and like the Kennedy assassination, may never have an official answer. But just as has been the case with the investigation of JFK’s murder, new details and evidence continue to emerge surrounding the events of that day. In a shocking report published by The Sun, former Federal Emergency Management Agency employee Kurt Sonnenfeld says he has evidence proving that certain insiders were privy to the attacks, perhaps even including President George W. Bush.
According to 911 Research, the vault under WTC 4 was reportedly owned by COMEX:
It is of note to mention that Sonnenfeld’s wife died under mysterious circumstances shortly after he carried out his investigation. The cause of death? A bullet to the back of the head. Sonnenfeld was charged with the murder but those charges were eventually dropped, at which point he fled to Argentina. He has since remarried and had two children. The U.S. Department of Justice is now attempting to extradite Sonnenfeld back to the United States where he is once again being charged with his wife’s murder. But Sonnenfeld says that the reasons behind the U.S. government’s push to bring him back to America are more nefarious than they are letting on, alluding to his intimate knowledge of the 9-11 Ground Zero crime scene as a potential reason for taking him into custody. We know for a fact that gold was being stored under Trade Center 4. Perhaps similar riches were being stored under WTC 6. That the vault was completely empty when Sonnenfeld carried out his investigation certainly suggests foreknowledge by highly placed insiders. Also Read: (2 images) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19. In a shocking report published by The Sun, former Federal Emergency Management Agency employee Kurt Sonnenfeld says he has evidence proving that certain insiders were privy to the attacks, perhaps even including President George W. Bush. New Horizon Press published, "The Spin Doctor: Hero or Cold-Blooded Killer?," by Denver Post Staff Writer Kirk Mitchell, which disputes Sonnenfeld's claims about the 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.
#2. To: Gatlin (#1) "The Spin Doctor: Hero or Cold-Blooded Killer?" ...Sonnenfeld was charged with the murder but those charges were eventually dropped... You must be keeping your handlers at Langley busy this weekend - real swell job they did writing the latest so-called expose that you posted.
#3. To: Deckard (#2) (Edited) ...Sonnenfeld was charged with the murder but those charges were eventually dropped... In 2002, after prosecutors in the office of former Denver District Attorney Bill Ritter dismissed the charges, due to insufficient evidence, Sonnenfeld moved to Argentina, where he was held for seven months in Villa Devoto, an infamous Buenos Aires prison, until a federal judge rejected the U.S. extradition request. The US government has been seeking Sonnenfeld's extradition from Argentina since 2004, but Sonnenfeld says that they want his extradition in order to eliminate him due to his video evidence that the U.S. government had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. Initially, the Argentine court refused the extradition request, saying they had not received sufficient assurances from Colorado that Sonnenfeld would not be executed. But Colorado assured Argentina that it would not seek the death penalty. On January 2, 2015, the Argentine Supreme Court announced its decision to extradite Sonnenfeld to the United States and on September 16, 2015, the Court approved the extradition. But on November 17, 2015, CBS's crime program, 48 Hours, provided documents to The Denver Post that detailed an executive decision by Argentina's president to block the extradition, citing human rights violations.
#5. To: Gatlin (#3) Why would he kill his wife? What was the alleged motive? On another note, you do know that Gary Webb was murdered, right? He did not commit suicide.
#14. To: Deckard (#5) Why would he kill his wife? What was the alleged motive? ...charges he shot Nancy in the head after the couple fought over his boozing, heroin abuse and hiring two hookers ...
#15. To: Gatlin (#14) charges he shot Nancy in the head Allegedly. Either way, it doesn't prove that the footage he shot was not authentic and his claims are not true. Still using the tactic of character assassination I see. I guess it's true - you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
#17. To: Deckard (#15) charges he shot Nancy in the head Come on ... GET FUCKING REAL! A "charge" is an "allegation." Both are a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof.
#19. To: Gatlin (#17) Both are a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof. Your own words.
Replies to Comment # 19. Both are a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof. Yes, and appropriately fitting to the situation. Show otherwise ...
End Trace Mode for Comment # 19. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|