Leak a document
See other Leak a document Articles
Title: Robin's Peoples Forum Found Supporting BABY KILLING and Cop who TAZERED HIS OWN SON!!! TAIPAN
Source:
00-Hotherp Reports
URL Source: http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi
Published: Sep 3, 2008
Author: Taipan
Post Date: 2008-09-03 23:42:39 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Wooten, Palen, Tazer, Abortion, depopulation
Views: 7318
Comments: 26
Here are the threads:
The Wooten thread:
http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=4228
The Abortion thread:
http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=4227
TAIPAN, The new 00-Hotherp
(1 image)Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Robin would kill her own kid if Obama told her to. If she hasn't already done so.
She doesn't feed her kids. She just sits on the net 24/7. When she goes to "work" she doesn't work she just sits and posts all day.
She is one of those NOW hags that can't get a man.
#2. To: Coral Snake (#0)
Robin claimed in the past that she was pro life. Yeah right. She never saw a kid she liked. Why do you think that she is so jealous of Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin is everything she isn't. Pretty, Smart, good morals, and good kids. Robin is a miserable little worm that is afraid to be challenged on any of her evil positions.
#3. To: Coral Snake (#0)
Yeah Little dirty Robin thinks cops should be allowed to tazer 11 year olds and get drunk while on duty. Why does the little bitch not point those facts out. It's because she has been drinking that Obama Kool Aid. I think she just wants to f@@k Obama. It is her fantasy. She thinks if she keeps pimping for him that it will come true. No one would touch that skank with a 10' pole.
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)
I know that with certain exceptions (Jhoffa) you don't ban people here so I will give Robin this little challenge. If she doesn't think that these little things our new 00-Hotherp TAIPAN is having me post here about her and her forum are true than COME HERE AND DEBATE THEM. Otherwise TAIPAN re starts the bites again next week with her forum as prime target.
And as for the issues of abortion and gun control if she is for them IN ANY WAY then she are either a WHITE PERSIAN CAT PETTER (DELIBERATELY AND MALICIOUSLY in favor of genocide and depopulation) or a KOOL-AID DRINKER (STUPIDLY and SHEEPLISHLY in favor of genocide and depopulation) THERE ARE NO OTHER CHOICES where these two issues are concerned.
Patriot City, home of Coral Snake's Bites of the Week
#5. To: Coral Snake (#4)
COME HERE AND DEBATE THEM. Otherwise TAIPAN re starts the bites again next week with her forum as prime target.
She has already signed up here in the past. She just never posted. I think she likes the comfort of being 100 percent in control. That way if she starts getting her ass handed to her she can delete and ban. When I posted over there she would actually send me messages trying to tell me what to post. Pathetic.
#6. To: Coral Snake, ferret mike, war, mininggold, cz82 (#0)
bump
#7. To: Coral Snake, Robin (#4)
Otherwise TAIPAN re starts the bites again next week with her forum as prime target
How long does it take for someone bitten by a snake to be incapacitated?
#8. To: A K A Stone (#1)
Try not to sound too bitter, Stone...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#9. To: A K A Stone (#1)
"She is one of those NOW hags that can't get a man."
And you hace so much bombastic immaturity and inconsideration for others, it's coming out of your ears, which you never use to listen with anyway.
I like Robin a whole lot more than you. By the way, I support NOW too.
#10. To: A K A Stone (#2)
"Robin claimed in the past that she was pro life."
One thing that escapes you Stone is that you have to cultivate empathy and civility if you are going to dialog with others in a constructive manner that works to build a consensus.
After dealing with your unyielding nastiness and vindictive shoot yourself in the foot fury, I still agree with much your view on abortion, but I would never stand in a picket line on the issue with the likes of you.
You are walking induced vomit waiting to happen way too much of the time. You are a chore to tolerate.
I knows two year olds that have better social skills than you.
#11. To: war (#8)
Try not to sound too bitter, Stone...
lol. Sometimes I say things to tweak you guys. Maybe go a little more extreme then I really am.
#12. To: A K A Stone (#11)
At this point, I doubt if war believes this like of bull crap either.
So, you are saying you have such a low opinion of people with whom you talk to, your 'joke' is how you belittle them and talk down at them.
You need a shrink, fink.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#11)
She has the site that she wants...just as you have the one that you want.
I will give you one thing...I used to believe that you were the worst moderator this side of JimRobs...Nolu puts you to shame.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#14. To: war (#13)
I will give you one thing...I used to believe that you were the worst moderator this side of JimRobs...Nolu puts you to shame.
I like Chan. I didn't know he was the moderator over at the scrotum.
I thought you fit in well there.
#15. To: A K A Stone (#14) (Edited)
I thought you fit in well there.
I'm 100% against censorship. I'm against it even more when there's only 2 people regularly posting on a site with only another 2-3 doing drive-bys. My parting shot there was that if I was going to be censored it may as well be on a site with more traffic.
Chan was a known quantity anyway...a lot of sleight of hand...Ann Coulter's books are all well footnoted too.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#16. To: war (#15)
I thought you fit in well there.I'm 100% against censorship. I'm against it even more when there's only 2 people regularly posting on a site with only another 2-3 doing drive-bys. My parting shot there was that if I was going to be censored it may as well be on a site with more traffic.
I don't begrudge Robin for some of her "censorship". She just want a forum where there isn't so much insults and cursing. I can respect that if she is consistent. I guess she isn't though.
#17. To: war (#15)
here's only 2 people regularly
I read your comment a bit ago and it was like 3 or 4.
The other day I told you to leave and you wouldn't be missed. I shouldn't have put it that way.
#18. To: A K A Stone (#16)
There were neither insults nor cursing. Nolu stated that it was illegal for the CIA to operate drones. I told him that he had no proof that the person actually operating the drone was CIA and not USAF.
He accused me of engaging in a "cross forum" war and censored the comment. Meanwhile, my response addressed both the article that he had posted and his subsequent comments.
IN a word, he's a pussy who can't stand the thought of someone seeing through and thus questioning his bullshit.
He won't come here any more because he knows he'll get crushed. And, believe me, he would get crushed. He didn't even have the balls to allow my comment "Please delete my account" to remain posted.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#19. To: war (#18)
How do you know it is him and not Robin?
I actually kind of like Chan. I don't agree with everything but he is a very meticulous poster.
#20. To: A K A Stone (#17)
I read your comment a bit ago and it was like 3 or 4.
Yea. I expanded it a bit...2 regular, Robin and Nolu, and and two semi - Destro and Mekon. I hadn't hit that site in quite some time until about 30 seconds ago to refresh my memory about the exchange. I had forgotten that he had deleted "Please delete my account" from my response.
This was the post that made him freak out:
#3. To: nolu chan (#1) (Edited)
Citation of the 2001 AUMF does not extend authority to the CIA (non-military) to do anything.
Cite your authority for this statement.
Thanks.
And while you are at it, cite your authority that the POTUS, as CIC, may not order an attack against any member of Al Qaeda operating outside of the US.
war posted on 2011-10-28 16:24:51 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This was his response to it. It underscores how thin skinned he is when his word isn't accepted in the same manner that you accept the word of God.
#4. To: war (#3)
Don't bother to attempt to waste my time here with your spam. To date, you have failed to cite any authority for your spam.
nolu chan posted on 2011-10-28 23:36:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#21. To: war (#20)
It underscores how thin skinned he is when his word isn't accepted in the same manner that you accept the word of God.
:)
That was a good one.
#22. To: A K A Stone (#19) (Edited)
...but he is a very meticulous poster.
Well...he does the old office lawyer trick of overwhelming you with information hoping that you'll capitulate. Unlike most of those with whom he argues, I actually took the time to read his stuff and at that point it became pretty easy to pick apart his arguments.
He and I first went at it over Lincoln blockading the Rio Grande on the US side of the border...he cited some treaty between the US and Mexico that had been signed years prior, by a Mexican government that no longer existed, and guaranteed Mexico free navigation of the Rio Grande but only on Mexico's side of the border which was a fact that was pointed out to him several times and ignored by him several times.
IIRC...anyway...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#23. To: A K A Stone (#21) (Edited)
Chyea...the Blind Squirrel Syndrome...{;^D
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
#24. To: A K A Stone (#5)
She [Robin] just never posted (here). I think she likes the comfort of being 100 percent in control. That way if she starts getting her ass handed to her she can delete and ban.
She sounds like your mentor, assuming what you posted about her is accurate - which it isn't.
#25. To: Fred Mertz (#24)
"She sounds like your mentor, assuming what you posted about her is accurate - which it isn't."
Robin is a pleasant and intelligent woman that is easy to get along with. She runs the place a wee bit too tightly for my taste, but she does everything with consistency, and one can always see what is coming if one knows how she feels about things.
Stone can't even manage the policy of some reciprocity of respect, calling her forum by a name some pre-teen age bully would use that is so obscene he makes himself the joke.
As usual Fred, you are right on the money here.
#26. To: A K A Stone (#19)
"How do you know it is him and not Robin?"
It is him and not Robin. I've known Robin for a long time and she did a good job as a moderator at another forum we both know. The problem with Nolu Chan came with his change in forum authority, and would go if he were to lose the moderator's screen.
Even then, his behavior follows a predictable pattern. Both work together to enhance the worst on both people. He's there because she's a busy person needing a moderator to manage the day to day. There is nothing unusual in that scenario, I've seen it happen in a lot of small forums.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]