[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Other
See other Other Articles

Title: Inquisitr Ltd. Complaint We Received.
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 12, 2016
Author: Bryant Gergeres
Post Date: 2016-05-12 21:40:45 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 8959
Comments: 34

Hello,

Please investigate the following complaint within 96 hours to avoid a disruption in service. If we do not receive a response, we are legally required to act.

Linode is in receipt of a verified complaint under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in connection with the below-pasted details from Bryant Gergeres, Authorized Agent of Inquisitr Ltd regarding materials that are allegedly infringing upon the complainant's intellectual property rights.

You must remove access to the material immediately. If you do not, Linode must remove or disable access to the material expeditiously under federal law; this will require us to power off your Linode in 96 hours unless you comply.

Whether you remove the content or we power off your Linode, you are legally permitted to file a counter-notice with us under the DMCA. This notice must comply with 17 USC 512(g)(3), and we are legally required to communicate it to the complainant on your behalf. If you choose to file counter notice, you may restore access to the material within a certain time period unless the complainant brings legal action; further instruction will be provided if you opt to do so. Do NOT restore access to the material until directed.

Please note that Linode has only passed on the complainant's notice and has not sought to determine whether the materials in the complaint do indeed infringe upon the complainant's intellectual property rights. The full text or the complaint as received by Linode follows.

Harold Phillips Linode Support Team

-----------

To Whom It May Concern,

My name is Bryant Gergeres and I am the authorized agent of Inquisitr Ltd. A website your company hosts (according to WHOIS information) is infringing on at least one copyright owned by my company.

Numerous articles were copied onto your servers without permission. All of the search returns at the following search link infringe upon our copyrights: libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/latestarticles.cgi

As you can see, there are several pages of results. Your client's Web site is automated to steal our content. With such a pervasive violation of my company's copyrights, I ask that, in addition to disabling the links copied below in this DMCA takedown request, you consider further action against your client's account.

A sample of the original articles found on page one of the above-copied search link, to which we own the exclusive copyrights, can be found at: 1. www.inquisitr.com/2216087...-the-path-of-degradation/ 2. www.inquisitr.com/2510140...e-says-its-illegal-video/ 3. www.inquisitr.com/1692212...vage-judged-new-commands/ 4. www.inquisitr.com/374041/...mas-passport-application/ 5. www.inquisitr.com/2494892...in-guangdong-china-video/ 6. www.inquisitr.com/225978/...-for-6-hours-after-death/ 7. www.inquisitr.com/366921/...el-with-alleged-mistress/ 8. www.inquisitr.com/2080866...d-at-university-of-texas/ 9. www.inquisitr.com/2453102...ishap-at-campaign-speech/ 10. www.inquisitr.com/1782509...st-like-the-nfl-patriots/

The unauthorized and infringing copies can be found at: 1.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=40556 2. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=42560 3. libertysflame.com/cgi- bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=36847 4. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=32880 5. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=42446 6. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=29699 7. libertysflame.com/cgi- bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=32774 8. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=39696 9. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=42138 10. libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=37308

This letter is official notification under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (”DMCA”), and I seek the removal of the aforementioned infringing material from your servers. I request that you immediately notify the infringer of this notice and inform them of their duty to remove the infringing material immediately, and notify them to cease any further posting of infringing material to your server in the future.

Please also be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to remove or disable access to the infringing materials upon receiving this notice. Under US law a service provider, such as yourself, enjoys immunity from a copyright lawsuit provided that you act with deliberate speed to investigate and rectify ongoing copyright infringement. If service providers do not investigate and remove or disable the infringing material this immunity is lost. Therefore, in order for you to remain immune from a copyright infringement action you will need to investigate and ultimately remove or otherwise disable the infringing material from your servers with all due speed should the direct infringer, your client, not comply immediately.

I am providing this notice in good faith and with the reasonable belief that rights my company owns are being infringed. Under penalty of perjury I certify that the information contained in the notification is both true and accurate, and I have the authority to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright(s) involved.

Should you wish to discuss this with me please contact me directly via email reply at bgergeres@gmail.com.

Best regards Bryant Gergeres Authorized Agent Inquisitr Ltd


Please use https://manager.linode.com/support/ticket/6213422 to respond to this ticket.

Thank you, Linode.com


Poster Comment: Here is the lie "Your client's Web site is automated to steal our content."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#9. To: A K A Stone, atrist formerly known as tater, chicom disinfo agent (#0)

www.inquisitr.com/2494892...in-guangdong-china-video/

Are these from the artist formerly know as tater? He's probably the only one here who would lovingly quote the chicom gov propaganda, in response to something Ron Paul said.

Hondo68  posted on  2016-05-12   22:29:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: hondo68, A K A Stone, All (#9) (Edited)

www.inquisitr.com/2494892...in-guangdong-china-video/
Are these from the artist formerly know as tater? He's probably the only one here who would lovingly quote the chicom gov propaganda, in response to something Ron Paul said.

Not I, you dumbass. I know how to comply with copyright laws. Just so you will be a little smarter, but never as smart as I am, I will post some information to help you understand copyright ... what you can and can’t do when posting.

The following is excerpted from: Blogger Law - 12 Important U.S. Laws.

Copyright in the Web:

1. Copyright applies to the Web.

2. Your work is protected under copyright as soon as it’s created and protected for your lifetime, plus 70 years.

3. Copyright expires. When copyright expires, the work becomes public domain.

4. Ideas can’t be copyrighted, only the result tangible expression of the idea can. (updated)

5. You may use logos and trademarks in your works.

6. You may use copyrighted material under the “fair use” doctrine.

7. You may quote only limited portions of work. You may publish excerpts, not whole articles.

8. You have to ask author’s permission to translate his/her article.

9. The removal of the copyrighted material doesn’t remove the copyright infringement.

10. If something looks copyrighted, you should assume it is. (updated)

11. Advertising protected material without an agreement is illegal.

12. You may not always delete or modify your visitors’ comments.

You should never treat comments as though you own them by manipulating them or deleting them without having included a terms of service which gives you permission to do so. Consider that if you are allowing anonymous posts you will have no way of verifying the true owner of a comment when someone emails you asking for you to take a comment down. Consequently, you should make sure to at least collect basic identifying information before allowing someone to comment or post on your site.
13. User generated content is the property of the users.

14. Copyright is violated by using information, not by charging for it.

15. Getting explicit permission can save you a lot of trouble. 16.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-05-12   22:52:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Gatlin (#11)

6. You may use copyrighted material under the “fair use” doctrine.

7. You may quote only limited portions of work. You may publish excerpts, not whole articles.

Before LP started up, or maybe shortly thereafter, I researched the case that FR lost in the suit raised by the LATimes and, I think, the Washington Post.

From that I gleaned that what qualifies as "Fair Use" is not cut and dry. There are four basic criteria that are each weighed in favor of the plaintiff and defendant, and where the most weight falls is how the judge should rule.

Whether whole articles or only a portion is reproduced is only one of the 4 criteria, so it's possible to reproduce a whole article and still be on safe ground with Fair Use.

FR was using the entire articles, and though FR did lose the case, it was a close call with the 4 criteria evenly split between FR and the newspapers. Going against FR was it's pretty obvious for-profit practices of significant fundraising for site operations and, I think, advertising as well. LF has neither of those going on.

I will say that when posting articles that contain links to images from the source site, that there is a bandwidth draw on the source site to send those images to visitors that are reading the LF (or alternate) site, and that technically that could cause a monetary expense from the source site to support the bandwidth. However, these days bandwidth is so cheap there may not be any cost at all for the source site to support that, particularly on a forum that is not exactly competing with BBC or CNN. Still, for what it's worth.

I would certainly maintain that, in the case of LF, source sites benefit from the publicity of the links, so that these complaints may do the source site more harm than good.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-05-13   1:17:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Pinguinite (#15) (Edited)

From that I gleaned that what qualifies as "Fair Use" is not cut and dry.

This has always been the case. As I remember, the law was left intentionally vague so that it could be open for interpretation in each case.

I personally adopted a “truncated with remainder here” procedure for posting articles after the FR vs LA Times fiasco, thinking it was the safest way I could find. Whether that is correct or not can, of course, still be challenged.

From what I gleaned in the past about link the Stone posted concerning the Las Vegas trial … the newspaper was suing everyone because they thought they found a "money hole" and the judge put a stop to that. But that decision did not give a “blanket” lawful authorization to anyone to declare everything is fair use.

I am of the opinion that the situation here today was someone being an asshole or maybe having too much time on their hands. I believe that posting the articles here was of actual benefit to the asshole because it gave them wider dissemination and some “free reference advertising” … so to speak.

There are some posters who feel “fair use” gives them the right to post anything at any time they want to. One poster on LP even suggested to post WAPO articles on LP to intentionally challenge WAPO. I felt that was asinine. The was no need go looking for trouble, especially after WAPO had written to Sally.

Some people do crazy things in life sometimes … I guess that is life and they will continue to do crazy things. If there is a safe side, I will attempt to find the safe side and save a fight for something more important another day. I am a proponent of “energy conservation” … especially my energy.

Thanks for your informative post to me.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-05-13   8:42:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

#21. To: Gatlin (#20)

Some people do crazy things in life sometimes …

Yeah, too bad you never had any legal action taken against you for all the plagiarizing you did at LP.

The thing is, you probably still do it - you just haven't been caught lately.

Deckard  posted on  2016-05-13 10:41:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Gatlin (#20)

There are some posters who feel “fair use” gives them the right to post anything at any time they want to

Quite true. -- I say that we are here to discuss the news/opinions of the day, news that is publicly published and already paid for by subscribers.

The publishers have a copyright, protecting them from further use of their material, - for PROFIT.

No one here if PROFITING from our discussions.

Get it gatlin? -- I won't bet that you do..

tpaine  posted on  2016-05-13 10:50:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com