[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: "Disarray": Team Trump laying off staffers in key swing states? We were destined to see a major Trump in disarray! piece from political media on a day when hes looking at a loss in Wisconsin, just like were destined to see Trump comeback! pieces two weeks from now when he wipes the floor with Cruz in New York. Even so, the layoffs reported here are odd. What possible reason could a billionaire candidate have to slash staff at a moment when hes desperate for people to help him organize his battle for delegates with Cruz? Even if he had the nomination locked up, why would he want to shed staffers in states like Ohio and Florida for which hell have to fight tooth and nail in November? One of the biggest worries among political pros in having Trump as nominee is that Democrats will run rings around him organizationally, given his strategy of trying to beat Cruzs superior GOTV operations through sheer media muscle. Now here he is stripping his already mediocre organization down further. Why the hell would he do that? Ive said this before but it cant be said enough: As well as hes done in the primaries thus far, imagine how well Trump could be doing if hed spent big money on organization and ads. Its not overstating it to say that Ted Cruz still has a chance at the nomination only because Trumps inattentiveness to campaign fundamentals (and frugality?) has permitted it. Only four of 11 Iowa staffers continued on after Trump lost that states caucuses in February. More recently, most of Trumps South Carolina, Florida and Ohio teams have not had their contracts renewed, according to a person familiar with the campaign, who said the lack of organization in Florida was putting Trump at a disadvantage in the delegate selection process
Multiple staffers and advisors left the campaign last month in protest of the way its management was treating its staff, a source familiar with the departures told POLITICO. I believe that Donald Trump has the backbone to fix this country, but if changes are not made soon at the top I am fairly convinced that he will lose, said one of the people who left the campaign. The person said morale among the campaign staff is sinking, attributing that to the layoffs, as well as Lewandowskis profanity-laced outburst on campaign calls. I dont think Mr. Trump knows whats happening on his campaign, the person said, adding everyone is in astonishment of whats going on. Its almost like theyre sabotaging themselves. The head of the data team was reportedly laid off a month ago and was replaced by his deputy, who hadnt spent much time on political strategy before joining Team Trump. If you believe Politico, some of the campaigns files are now inaccessible since the lead data guy left. Corey Lewandowski naturally denies that theres any disarray and that anyones ever objected to him cursing, although the fact that his role in the campaign is reportedly shrinking is further circumstantial evidence that strange things are afoot. Ah well. At least Trumps private mercenary force of security people is still on its game. Question for campaign pros: Assuming that Politicos theory of disarray is hyperbole, whats the logical explanation for laying off staffers during crunch time of a long primary with a general election on the horizon? Is the campaign running low on cash with Trump unwilling to pony up what he needs to make the delegate fight with Cruz more competitive? If so, isnt that another way of saying that he doesnt want to be president that badly? Im skeptical of that theory, but more people seem to be coming around to it every week: There is a lifelessness to the Trump campaign lately, a kind of refusal to stand up and do the hard work of reuniting a party that he has shattered or building an organization that can mount an effective national campaign. Hes barely begun building a fundraising network, per New York magazine, which hell surely need to keep pace with Democrats, even though hes been the national frontrunner for nearly a year and could find himself at the start of the general election campaign as soon as
tomorrow, really, if Wisconsin goes his way tonight. Is the explanation just that Trumps been winging it since the beginning and intends to keep doing so for the duration of the campaign? Thats a fine argument for delegate to choose him over Cruz on the floor in Cleveland. Semi-relatedly, heres a snapshot of Reuterss national tracking poll among likely Republican voters since January 1st. The orange line is Trump, the red line is Cruz. Whats different lately? I doubt youll see any of that Cruzmentum show up in New York two weeks from now, but if youre searching for evidence that his (likely) win in Wisconsin tonight is a sign of a broader national shift, there you have it. Poster Comment: Trump could have had this locked up a while back. He wouldn't be in this position at all if he hadn't hadn't a snit over being in the Iowa debate because he thought Megyn Kelly would spurt some blood at him or something. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
#3. To: TooConservative (#0)
(Edited)
Because all the free positive publicity is over,and if he keeps those people he is going to have to start digging into his own pocket to pay for them. Since he is getting ready to drop out to make things easier for his good friend Bubbette! Clinton,why spend the money? Especially when he might need it to start a 3rd Party run to further divide the non-Dim vote? I dont think Mr. Trump knows whats happening on his campaign, the person said, adding everyone is in astonishment of whats going on. Its almost like theyre sabotaging themselves. Gee,ya think?
Trump has always been playing at this, he was never in it to win. I stated a long time ago that he would not be putting up much of his money at all. Dollar Donald is a con artist that only risks OPM. "Since he is getting ready to drop out to make things easier for his good friend Bubbette! Clinton,why spend the money? Especially when he might need it to start a 3rd Party run to further divide the non-Dim vote?" I don't think that he will, no need, he already has accomplished his goal. The REP is toast in 2016 and may never get up off of the floor, at least as any meaningful political force.
You wuz right. 100%.
You wuz right. 100%. That's because I might be a witch.
I already figured out you're a witch but LF is so small, what choice do I have in fellow-chatters? Just don't hurl any abracadabras in my direction.
There are no replies to Comment # 21. End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|