[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
WORLD WAR III Title: Is Donald Trump an extremeist? In the light of comments made by Trump following the Brussels attacks you have to ask whether Trump is an extremist too, just as dangeruous as those he rails against. DONALD Trump reacted to the explosions that rocked Brussels on Tuesday by describing the it as a “disaster city” and warning that “this is just the beginning”. Speaking on NBC’s TODAY, Trump said: “Belgium is no longer Belgium. Belgium is not the Belgium you and I knew from 20 years ago, which was one of the most beautiful and safest cities in the world. “Belgium is a horror show right now. Terrible things are happening. People are leaving. People are afraid. This all happened because, frankly, there’s no assimilation.” Belgium is a country, not a city, but we’ll put that aside. Trump wasted no time in saying the terror attacks were more evidence that governments needed to crack down on extremists with any means possible — even using waterboarding — and that immigration policies had failed. “I would close up our borders,” he told Fox News. “We are taking in people without real documentation. We don’t know where they’re from or who they are. “We have to be very, very vigilant with who we let into this country,” Trump continued. “Brussels is a great example. Brussels was an absolutely crime-free city, one of the most beautiful cities in the world. And now you look at it and it’s just a disaster.” Trump, who has made immigration and security issues central to his 2016 presidential bid,reiterated his call for the US to bring back waterboarding to interrogate suspected terrorists. “I would use waterboarding,” he said on ABC’s Good Morning America. “And I would try to expand the laws to go beyond waterboarding.” He hasn't made the same remarks in regard to attacks in Turkey, does he believe a little muslim on muslim violence is ok but when it migrates it must be met with extreme force? What does this tell you about the man who would be king? Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3. He hasn't made the same remarks in regard to attacks in Turkey, does he believe a little muslim on muslim violence is ok but when it migrates it must be met with extreme force? What does this tell you about the man who would be king? That he is right on this one. The reality is that it is up to the so-called "rational, moderate" Muslims to take care of the fanatics within their ranks. Take a page from U.S. history, it wasn't the blacks or Jews that caged the KKK, it was white American Christians who rejected those maniacs, slapped them down, exposed them and muzzled them. It's time for the so-called peaceful, moderate Muslim to do the same with their fanatic brethren. With over 1 billion of these so-called moderate, peaceful, open minded Muslims around the globe you think they would have done something about it by now. But au contraire, this isn't happening. Instead of rooting out the disease the so- called moderate Muslim community provides their terrorists with cover and shelter and hides them from the authorities. Gee, I wonder what gives with these so-called moderate Muslims. They must really be the silent majority, the invisible majority - the non-existent majority.
Replies to Comment # 3. The reality is that it is up to the so-called "rational, moderate" Muslims to take care of the fanatics within their ranks. so whistle blowing is in vogue where you live? dog whisting more likely. You know as well as I do that for a muslim to out one of his own would place him in an unteniable situation, no, the muslim ethos is to keep silent, not do anything against a brother. Islam is like the mafia once you are in there is no escape. So instead of answering my question about blowhard Donald you want to blame the muslim community for the actions of a few. In the same way you blame the black community for the actions of a few? Why hasn't your black community stamped out the drug dealing and gansterism among them? Why hasn't your italian community stamped out the mafia? It is up to government and law enforcement to take care of fanatics no matter what racial or religious group they belong to and if that means they have to use different tactics, it is long overdue for them to be employed, but radical ideas like closing the borders and becoming island america is just idle rhetoric and twoodle and it tells you a lot about a person who speaks that way
#14. To: SOSO (#3) With over 1 billion of these so-called moderate, peaceful, open minded Muslims around the globe you think they would have done something about it by now. They have. Over a fourteen hundred year period they've rejoiced in silent collaberation over the killing of 300 million people necessary to expand their aggressive social psychosis.
#17. To: SOSO (#3) (Edited) Take a page from U.S. history, it wasn't the blacks or Jews that caged the KKK, it was white American Christians who rejected those maniacs, slapped them down, exposed them and muzzled them. Not true. It was mostly Jewish lawyers working with communist politicians. They took down the KKK by infiltrating FBI informers whose mission it was to take control of the various chapters (or whatever you call them),and to start random murders of innocent blacks. The FBI even supplied the dynamite. ANYBODY that thinks it was white Christians that bombed black Christian churches in the south in the 1950's knows nothing about the south of the 1950's. In fact,the church bombings and random murders were what killed the political power of the KKK because they horrified the very people the KKK needed to support them to remain a power. You have to be an idiot to think this "just happened". The Dims never cared about the KKK prior to the 30's because at least 99 percent of the KKK members and leadership were registered Dims,and they controlled the Dim Party in the south. What happened was Jews whose roots were in Communism that came from eastern Europe,including Soviet agents from the USSR,infiltrated the Dim Party in the 1930's,and pretty much controlled the FDR administration. The KKK were VERY rabid about their hatred for "Gawdless Communism and foreign agents taking over our country",and since they were THE power behind the Dim Thrones in the south and the south was building up both population and manufacturing due to WW-2,the Dims and their Jewish/Communist masters rightfully saw the KKK as a threat to their power. Suddenly their lock on the northeast and DC wasn't enough to protect them and their positions,so they had to take out the Klan to protect themselves. That's when MLK Jr suddenly popped up from out of no where fully funded and with press agents following him around,and that's when the church bombings and similar atrocities started happening.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|