[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: Mittens: GOP Establishment Chooses Mount Romney as Hill to Die on
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... ount-romney-as-hill-to-die-on/
Published: Mar 3, 2016
Author: Stephen K. Bannon & Rebecca Mansour
Post Date: 2016-03-03 14:00:22 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 7629
Comments: 41

Mittens: GOP Establishment Chooses Mount Romney as Hill to Die on

by Stephen K. Bannon & Rebecca Mansour
Breitbart
3 Mar 2016

After President Jeb, President Walker, President Christie, President Kasich, President Ryan, and President Rubio, the Republican establishment is now turning once again to the Adlai Stevenson of the GOP – Willard Mitt Romney.

Perhaps nothing is more symptomatic of the GOP establishment’s death drive than their continued embrace of the presidential aspirations of a man who shrank the party in 2012.

But then, these are the same Republican elites who are determined to grant amnesty to 40 million future Democrats. So, obviously party expansion and broad national victories are not their priorities. How else do you explain their bizarre desire to board the S.S. Mittanic one more time?

A full recounting of the unmitigated disaster that was the Romney campaign is beyond the scope of this op-ed. But let’s cut to the chase. Mitt Romney lost because he was unpalatable to working class Americans.

Sean Trende of RealClearPolitics explained in detail how Romney lost the election in large part because he couldn’t win over white working class voters.

That wasn’t an accident. It was by design. An August 2012 op-ed by Matthew Continetti in the Washington Free Beacon outlined the Obama campaign’s “voter suppression” strategy “to disillusion white voters without degrees in the Rust Belt and Mountain West.” Obama calculated that these working class voters would make Romney president if they voted Republican by the same 30-point margin as they did in 2010, but if they were demoralized and alienated by the GOP candidate, they would hand the election to Obama by simply sitting it out.

And that’s exactly what happened. It wasn’t very difficult to turn working class voters against the “King of Bain,” the man who perfected the art of the leveraged buyout which cannibalized industrial towns across America.

Of course, Romney did his best to pretend he was actually a venture capitalist. Among his much-touted job-creation successes was Sports Authority, which just filed for bankruptcy yesterday.

But the real business of Bain was private equity. They made a killing for their shareholders by buying out American companies, loading them with debt, bankrupting them, shuttering their factories, and shipping those jobs overseas. Unfortunately for the GOP establishment, the American electorate isn’t comprised of libertarian think tank pencil necks who worship at the Church of Ayn Rand.

If the demonization of Bain Capital wasn’t enough to finish Romney off in the eyes of working class voters, his “47 percent” comment did the trick. When you trash half of the electorate – a group that includes senior citizens living on fixed incomes, active duty military, and blue-collar Reagan Democrats – as freeloaders who don’t contribute to the country, that isn’t just bad retail politics, that’s downright offensive.

After slinking away in defeat four years ago, Romney is back again as the establishment’s St. George to slay the Trump dragon. But here’s the problem: While Romney shrank the GOP, Trump is expanding it. The primary race this year has blown out 2012 numbers. In three states alone, the Associated Press reports a massive voter increase of “386 percent in Virginia, 261 percent in Arkansas, 154 percent in Tennessee” from what it was just four years ago for Romney.

Trump’s populist, nationalist message is bringing back the disaffected working class voters Romney alienated. On Super Tuesday, Trump did his best among lower income voters making less than $30,000 a year. They’re coming out in droves – and it’s not just the white working class voters or even just working class voters in general. Trump’s base of support reflects every demographic.

As Trende writes, “Trump’s blue-collar populism could theoretically appeal to more Hispanic and especially African-American voters than Romney’s message did by cutting through identity politics and appealing on an economic level.”

That blue-collar populist message is centered on two working class grievances long ignored by the political establishment and their donor class patrons: 1) mass illegal immigration that unfairly pits American workers against cheaper foreign labor, and 2) bad trade agreements that gut American industry and send jobs overseas.

Trump is winning because he’s addressing these vital issues. For years now, average Americans have dialed out of politics because of the dryness and thinness of the political dialogue. Trump has cut right to the vital issues that Americans feel. He talks about building a wall to stop illegal immigration, renegotiating our trade policies to bring back millions of jobs from China and Mexico, and putting a temporary ban on Muslim migration to halt the spread of Islamic terrorism on our shores. His basic themes have driven the narrative back to things that matter to ordinary Americans outside of the Georgetown salons.

None of this is really good news for the financiers, consultants, and commentariat that comprise the GOP establishment.

The financiers, who want cheap labor and don’t care where it comes from or who it hurts, loathe Trump’s trade and immigration policies.

The consultant class would gladly torpedo any candidate who doesn’t need their racket, and a GOP frontrunner who wins seven states on Super Tuesday after spending only $1.6 million is an existential threat to their bottom line.

The commentariat is frantically hash-tagging #NeverTrump! Can you blame them? They built an industry predicated on their status as the self-appointed gatekeepers of authentic conservative thought. A populist paradigm shift upends their carefully crafted business model.

So, now the establishment will lift up their eyes unto the hills of Salt Lake City from whence cometh their help. And it looks as if Mount Romney is the hill they’ve chosen to die on.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#2. To: nolu chan (#0)

If the demonization of Bain Capital wasn’t enough to finish Romney off in the eyes of working class voters, his “47 percent” comment did the trick.

Yes, Bain Capital and Rmoney turned my stomach.

I can't recall whether he 'gave' his five sons 10 or 100 million each. Either way, it doesn't fly with the Average Joe like me.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2016-03-03   14:41:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Fred Mertz (#2)

I can't recall whether he 'gave' his five sons 10 or 100 million each.

Re an inheritance from Fred Trump, the amount has little relevance in the grand scheme of things.

Donald Trump was born June 14, 1946.

Fred Trump died June 25, 1999 when Donald Trump was 53 years old.

Whatever Donald Trump inherited, he was 53 years old before it happened. Donald Trump did not start his business at age 53, in 1999 based on an inheritance.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-03-03   18:11:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: nolu chan (#12)

Whatever Donald Trump inherited, he was 53 years old before it happened. Donald Trump did not start his business at age 53, in 1999 based on an inheritance.

When Donald Trump turned 21 he inherited a trust fund from his grandfather than had been managed for him since birth that was worth 12 MILLION in cash in the late 60's,plus 15 THOUSAND pieces of NYC rental property.

That was 12 MILLION in cash in 1967 dollars.

In other words,a successful going business that had been operating for decades,and pissed it all away when he sold it all to get the money to buy the hotel and casino that went bankrupt. He doesn't own a single piece of the rental property today that he inherited back then.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-03-03   20:28:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: sneakypete (#16)

When Donald Trump turned 21 he inherited a trust fund from his grandfather than had been managed for him since birth that was worth 12 MILLION in cash in the late 60's,plus 15 THOUSAND pieces of NYC rental property.

That was 12 MILLION in cash in 1967 dollars.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Trump

Donald Trump's grandfather Friedrich Trump died in 1918. He did not leave a trust fund for a grandson who was born 28 years after he died.

Any fictional trust fund that Trump gained the use of at age 21 would not have been an inheritance.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-03-04   0:55:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: nolu chan (#19)

Donald Trump's grandfather Friedrich Trump died in 1918. He did not leave a trust fund for a grandson who was born 28 years after he died.

Any fictional trust fund that Trump gained the use of at age 21 would not have been an inheritance.

Trust Funds travel down through the generations. Joseph Kennedy's great-grandchildren are still benefiting from Trust Funds he set up.

I do have to confess I just spent a half-hour or so looking for he web reference I originally got the $12 million dollars and 15,000 pieces of rental property from,and not only didn't find it,I did find that it was Trumps father,NOT his grandfather that left him 15,000 NYC rental properties.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-03-04   4:46:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#21)

Trump did get loans and other assistance from his father greater than the Donald's referenced $1M. For example, he was able to borrow against his future expected inheritance. The Rubio claim that Trump's business was founded on a $200M inheritance was false, and reduced last night to $100M, still false.

Trump built his Manhattan business in the 1970s. His financial situation became dire in the early 1980s. He restructured, obtained multiple loans and deferments, and was financially well off before is father's death in 1999. The bulk of the estate was divided into four equal parts. $200,000 was left for each grandchild. Trump got a got hunk of money, but nowhere near $200M or even $100M. There is no reason for Rubio to claim Trump inherited such amount, or that that is how Trump started his business.

By all accounts, Trump has amassed a multi-billion dollar fortune, and owns many major buildings and millions of square feet of prime Manhattan real estate. Trump was, indeed, given every opportunity to succeed. He was given the education opportunity and access to financing, and his father's connections. There is a great deal of wealth in the NYC area, yet few who start with wealth grow it to a multibillion dollar fortune. If Trump's business success were mediocre, there should be a glut of similarly situated real estate developer multibillionaires in NYC.

In court, the grandchildren (children of the deceased Fred Trump Jr.) reportedly sought a one fifth share of Fred Trump's estate, valuing that share between $5M and $15 million, or the entire estate beween $25M and $75 million.

http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/trumps-bitter-battle-nephew-ailing-baby-caught-middle-article-1.888562

Inside Trump's Bitter Battle, by Heidi Evans, NY Daily News, December 19, 2000, excerpt

"On March 23, Fred and Mary filed a legal objection to their grandfather's will in Queens Surrogate Court. They claimed Fred Sr. was suffering from dementia and that the will he signed Sept, 18, 1991, was "procured by fraud and undue influence" on the part of Donald, Maryanne and Robert Trump. Although they did inherit money from their father, they are seeking one-fifth of their grandfather's estate - an estimated $5 million to $15 million - what they believed would have been their deceased father's share as one of the five Trump children. But Fred Trump Sr.'s wish, as stated in his final 1991 will and the one he executed in 1984 after Fred Jr. died, was to leave the bulk of his estate in trust for his four living children: Donald, Robert, Mary-anne and Elizabeth. According to the senior Trump's wishes, Fred 3rd and Mary would be treated like all the other grandchildren. Each was left $200,000. But nine years ago, in a memo with the final draft of Fred Sr. 's will, his lawyer noted that Fred 3rd and Mary, in fact, would not be treated equally, because they could not receive their predeceased father's share of the estate. "Given the size of your estate, this is tantamount to disinheriting them," the lawyer wrote. "You may wish to increase their participation in your estate to avoid ill will in the future.

"The elder Trump was given two boxes to check, both of which would have given more money to Fred 3rd and Mary. He checked neither. When asked about this memo at a deposition taken this year, Donald Trump said he had several conversations with his dad in which the senior Trump told him he was going to leave the bulk of his estate to his four living children. Donald said he had the impression that his father was disinclined to leave Fred and Mary more because of his father's "tremendous dislike" for their mother, Linda. "I think he felt if it goes to the two children, it also maybe can go to the mother indirectly. He felt the mother was the cause of some of Fred's difficulty, and Fred had a difficult life," Donald said. Donald's sister Maryanne Trump Barry, a federal judge in Newark, said in her deposition that she was the one to review the lawyer's memo with her dad. "I talked about this [with my father] and said:

What do you want to do?

His words were, 'Forget about it. Forget about it.'

He had no intention of treating them as one of his children - none."

nolu chan  posted on  2016-03-04   15:09:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: nolu chan (#22)

The Rubio claim that Trump's business was founded on a $200M inheritance was false, and reduced last night to $100M, still false.

Well,he gets partial credit for it because his father left his children $200 million when he died. Donald's cut would have been $40 million,but when he had to borrow money from his family to survive when he was going under with the casion,hotel,etc,etc.

Plus he and his accountants managed to "wash" a lot of his personal debts into the Chapter 11 bankruptcies he initiated.

There is no reason for Rubio to claim Trump inherited such amount, or that that is how Trump started his business.

I am no bigger fan of Rubio than I am Trump,but what probably happened was his research geek read that Trump's father left an estate of 200 million,and got mixed up about Donald managing the execution of the will with Donald being the only beneficiary of the will. The fact that Trump pulls huge numbers out of his ass at will also plays into this. I know I have read multiple reports of him inheriting 200 million from his father,when the truth was that was the total value of the estate,not what Donald ended up with. ESTIMATES are that he got around 40 million,which would have been a even cut. BTW,I really,REALLY hate to use the term "ONLY 40 million dollars". Especially in 1968 dollars. That's a whole damn HEAP of money.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-03-04   16:39:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: sneakypete (#24)

Well,he gets partial credit for it because his father left his children $200 million when he died.

The grandchildren were left $200K each.

Trump's share of the main estate was one fourth, not one fifth.

The grandchildren (children of the non-inheriting, previously deceased, son) litigated "seeking one-fifth of their grandfather's estate - an estimated $5 million to $15 million." Do the math. The total estate would have been $25 to $75 million. Trump's share would have been about $6M to $19M before tax.

The grandchildren involved in litigation would not have been inspired to low-ball the figure they were seeking. Every competing news rag is inspired to inflate the figure higher and higher. I have seen estimates ranging as high as $400M, but nothing to back them up.

Rubio used a make believe figure in both debates and in between the debates.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-03-04   20:40:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: nolu chan (#30)

The grandchildren (children of the non-inheriting, previously deceased, son) litigated "seeking one-fifth of their grandfather's estate - an estimated $5 million to $15 million." Do the math. The total estate would have been $25 to $75 million. Trump's share would have been about $6M to $19M before tax.

Forbes estimates his share of the will came to $40 million. Maybe the kids didn't get equal splits,maybe he hosed them on management fees,or maybe there were other considerations neither of us is aware of,but I tend to believe Forbes. This sort of thing is their whole reason to exist,and they are well-versed and connected in the northeast.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-03-04   20:49:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

#33. To: sneakypete (#31)

Forbes estimates his share of the will came to $40 million. Maybe the kids didn't get equal splits,maybe he hosed them on management fees,or maybe there were other considerations neither of us is aware of,but I tend to believe Forbes. This sort of thing is their whole reason to exist,and they are well-versed and connected in the northeast.

Can you provide a link to where Forbes asserted that Trump's share of the inheritance was worth $40 million, please. My search for such a claim by Forbes has been unsuccessful.

The following is from your preferred source — FORBES.

http://www.forbes.com/profile/donald-trump/

#324 Donald Trump
Follow (708)
Real Time Net Worth As of 3/5/16
$4.5 Billion
Entrepreneur, Personality
Age: 69

Source Of Wealth: television, real estate

Self-Made Score: 5

- - - - - - - - - -

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2014/10/02/the-new-forbes-400-self-made-score-from-silver-spooners-to-boostrappers/

Oct 2, 2014

The New Forbes 400 Self-Made Score: From Silver Spooners To Bootstrappers

1: Inherited fortune but not working to increase it: Laurene Powell Jobs

2: Inherited fortune and has a role managing it: Forrest Mars Jr.

3: Inherited fortune and helping to increase it marginally: Penny Pritzker

4: Inherited fortune and increasing it in a meaningful way: Henry Ross Perot Jr.

5: Inherited small or medium-size business and made it into a ten-digit fortune: Donald Trump

6: Hired or hands-off investor who didn’t create the business: Meg Whitman

7: Self-made who got a head start from wealthy parents and moneyed background: Rupert Murdoch

8: Self-made who came from a middle- or upper-middle-class background: Mark Zuckerberg

9: Self-made who came from a largely working-class background; rose from little to nothing: Eddie Lampert

10: Self-made who not only grew up poor but also overcame significant obstacles: Oprah Winfrey

- - - - - - - - - -

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2015/11/01/criticism-of-donald-trump-the-businessman-you-didnt-build-that-right-wing-edition/

Opinion

The Little Black Book of Billionaire Secrets

NOV 1, 2015

Criticism Of Donald Trump, The Businessman: 'You Didn't Build That', Right Wing Edition

John Tamny
FORBES STAFF

Back in 2003, and in a meeting with a prominent Los Angeles residential property developer who lived in a stunningly large house in Beverly Hills, I was awoken to the harsh reality of commerce in the 21st century. Probably the 20th century too. While this developer said all the right things about limited government, he freely acknowledged that his own immense wealth was to some degree a function of his skill at finessing the endlessly complicated political bureaucracy that erects all manner of barriers to home construction in Los Angeles.

The above rates mention in light of all the criticism on the right about the source of Donald Trump’s wealth. The commentary is overdone, confused, and sounds rather left wing for it creating the impression that Trump isn’t supremely talented as a businessman.

Up front, it should be said that this column is not a defense of Trump the politician. As past columns going back years have made plain, Trump’s alleged policy positions whereby he would pursue very large tariffs on Chinese goods are more dangerous – and it’s really not even close – than any policy broached by our last two failed presidents, George W. Bush and Barack Obama. And then if we ignore what a southern wall would mean in terms of government growth, Trump’s ideas on immigration would, if possible, be even less successful than the ill-fated “drug” war. Still, the various criticisms of Trump’s wealth are once again wrongheaded.

First up is the commentary about Trump being a “crony” developer. The view that he’s not a real Republican in light of how he used government to get projects completed and funded is not completely fair. Implicit there is that Trump himself invented political corruption, not to mention the palm-greasing that defines residential and commercial development in major cities. Let’s be serious. As anyone who has merely tried to complete a home add-on knows very well, doing anything in real estate requires the navigation of a pretty gruesome sausage factory. Imagine then, what it’s like for developers to get the permitting for, and to ultimately complete, tall buildings in Manhattan.

Speaking of Manhattan, that’s where Trump made his name. Nothing against his father’s achievements in the outer boroughs, but as evidenced by the prices of real estate on what is arguably the richest island on earth, Trump hit the big time in one of the most competitive developer markets in the world. That he achieved in the biggest of the big leagues (as Ken Auletta put it about the Manhattan part of New York City, “For those with talent, this city is the final test”) speaks very well to his business acumen. The talk about how Trump started on 1st, 2nd or 3rd base thanks to the money his father passed on to him is sour grapes. It’s a big, big deal to thrive in the Manhattan property market.

And what about the Trump name? It’s been pointed out that Trump doesn’t build anymore as much as he lends his great brand name to big projects. In return for the right to slap Trump on buildings, The Trump Organization earns many millions. It’s assumed that the brand “Trump” alone is worth quite a lot of money, maybe billions. About this, was “Trump” a brand name when Fred was the family’s most talented real estate developer? Certainly not. That Trump the brand is worth a lot of money is almost seen as a pejorative when in fact it should remind us of Donald Trump’s enormous savvy as a businessman. Valuable brands are hard won, and while the Donald inherited Trump, it wasn’t worth much when he inherited it.

- - - - - - - - - -

nolu chan  posted on  2016-03-05 02:28:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com