International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Trump Is Right on Trade
Source:
VDare
URL Source: http://www.vdare.com/articles/trump-is-right-on-trade
Published: Feb 19, 2016
Author: Pat Buchanan
Post Date: 2016-02-19 12:05:16 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 725
Comments: 7
Republican hawks are aflutter today over China’s installation of anti- aircraft missiles on Woody Island in the South China Sea. But do these Republicans, good free-traders all, realize their own indispensable role in converting an indigent China into the mighty and menacing power that seeks to push us out of Asia? Last year, China ran up the largest trade surplus in history, at our expense, $365 billion. We exported $116 billion in goods to China. China exported $482 billion worth of goods to us. Using Census Bureau statistics, Terry Jeffrey of CNSNEWS.com documents how Beijing has, over decades, looted and carted off the greatest manufacturing base the world had ever seen. In 1985, China’s trade surplus with us was a paltry $6 million. By 1992, when some of us were being denounced as “protectionists” for raising the issue, the U.S. trade deficit with China had crossed the $10 billion mark. In 2002, it crossed the $100 billion mark. In 2005, the $200 billion mark. In each of the last four years, Communist China has run an annual trade surplus at the expense of the United States in excess of $300 billion. Total trade deficits with China in the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama era? $4 trillion. Total U.S. trade deficit in 2015—$736 billion, 4 percent of our GDP. To understand why Detroit looks as it does, while the desolate Shanghai Richard Nixon visited in ’72 is the great and gleaming metropolis of 2016, look to our trade deficits. They also help explain America’s 2 percent growth, her deindustrialization, her shrinking share of the world economy, and the stagnation of U.S. wages as manufacturing jobs are replaced by service jobs. Those trade deficits also explain the rise of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Yet, with the exception of Trump, none of the GOP candidates seems willing to debate, defend or denounce the policies that eviscerated America—and empowered the People’s Republic. Workers, however, know what our politicians refuse to discuss. They are being sold out for the benefit of corporate elites who pay off those politicians with the big cash contributions that keep the parties flush. Politicians who play ball with Wall Street and K Street know they will be taken care of, if they are defeated or when they retire from public office, so long as they have performed. Free trade is not a zero-sum game. The losers are the workers whose jobs, factories and futures are shipped abroad, and the dead and dying towns left behind when the manufacturing plants shut down. America is on a path of national decline because, while we have been looking out for what is best for the “global economy,” our rivals have been looking out for what is best for their own nations. Consider OPEC, which is reeling from the oil price collapse. Russia is colluding with Saudi Arabia and Iraq to cut production to firm up the market and prevent prices from falling further. This is pure price fixing, but we all understand self-interest. What might a U.S. national-interest-based trade policy look like? Controlling the largest market on earth, we might impose on foreign producers a cover charge, an admissions fee, a tariff, to get into our market. Example: Impose a 20 percent tariff on foreign cars entering the USA. This might raise the cost of a Lexus or Mercedes produced and assembled abroad from $50,000 to $60,000. However, if Lexus or Mercedes buys or makes all their parts in the USA and assembles all their cars here, no tariff. Their cars could still sell for $50,000. This would be a powerful incentive to shift production here. As an added incentive, all tariff revenue could be used to reduce or eliminate corporate taxes in the USA. Between the Civil War and World War I, under Republicans, the U.S. became the world’s greatest industrial power and a wholly self-sufficient nation. How? We taxed foreign goods entering the United States, but did not tax the profits of U.S. companies or the incomes of U.S. workers. The difference between economic patriots and globalists who inhabit corporate-funded think tanks and public policy institutes is that the latter think of what is best for their corporate benefactors and the global economy. The former put America and Americans first. Academics revere Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Richard Cobden. But none of them ever built a great nation. Patriots look to Alexander Hamilton and those post-Civil War Republicans who built the greatest national industrial powerhouse the world had ever seen. Indeed, what great nation did free trade ever build? As father of a united Germany, Chancellor Bismarck said, when he decided to build Germany on the American and not the British model, “I see that those countries which possess protection are prospering, and that those countries which possess free trade are decaying.” So it is true today. Unfortunately, it is America, now wedded to the fatal dogma of free trade, that is decaying. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#3. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Yup, and without Trump the present presidential campaigns would become another grinning and evasive affability contest. That's why we need Trump, as irritating as he may occasionally be.
Yup, and without Trump the present presidential campaigns would become another grinning and evasive affability contest. That's why we need Trump, as irritating as he may occasionally be. The question what will Trump think of these issues next year or the year after that or the year after that......... Will he again become against it before he was for it? Trump has changed his seemingly position on very important issues as easily as he exchanged wives.
Like it or not, and apparently you don't, Trump has started a dialogue on issues which other candidates are to frightened, unwilling, or incompetent to address. This is apt to start a sorely needed revolt in this that will persist after he leaves office. I'll take it over a continuation of the incompetence the other defunct lieing establishment candidates are offering.
#6. To: rlk (#5)
There is no dialogue on anything only demogagory punctuated by and a whole bunch of "believe me" and "I will make America great again". Different words for the same P.T. Barnum BS as Obama's hope and change. "This is apt to start a sorely needed revolt in this that will persist after he leaves office." And just when I thought I saw the height of Dollar Donald useful idiot delusion you raised the bar with that comment. Are you that blind to reality? Against Trump Hillary will 90%+ of the black vote, 65+% on the Latino vote, 60+% of the Asian vote and at least 50% of the remaining women vote. Just who is left to start and more importantly finish your Trump revolution? Trump will ride off into the sunset laughing his ass of and pocketing money from the deals Hillary has promised to pay him to make sure that she won the election. I would put more faith in seeing Elvis alive than in believing that Dollar Donald is anything less than a clown shill, a plant foil to make Hillary look as the better choice as people scream "anyone but Trump" in the general election either head to head or $ Donald's 3rd party run.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYet, with the exception of Trump, none of the GOP candidates seems willing to debate, defend or denounce the policies that eviscerated America
#4. To: rlk, nativist nationalist, All (#3)
Yet, with the exception of Trump, none of the GOP candidates seems willing to debate, defend or denounce the policies that eviscerated America
#5. To: SOSO (#4)
The question what will Trump think of these issues next year or the year after that or the year after that......... Will he again become against it before he was for it? Trump has changed his seemingly position on very important issues as easily as he exchanged wives.
Replies to Comment # 5. Like it or not, and apparently you don't, Trump has started a dialogue on issues which other candidates are to frightened, unwilling, or incompetent to address.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]