[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: Hillary e-mail exchange debated kick-starting Palestinian protests to pressure Israel Pickering wanted a game-changer. He may have belatedly provided one: In a Dec, 18, 2011, email, former U.S. ambassador to Israel Thomas Pickering suggested that Clinton consider a plan to restart then-stalled peace negotiations by kickstarting Palestinian demonstrations against Israel. Pickering described the effort as a potential game changer in the region, recommending that the United States undertake a clandestine campaign to generate unrest. Clinton requested that his email be printed. What will change the situation is a major effort to use non-violent protests and demonstrations to put peace back in the center of peoples aspirations as well as their thoughts, and use that to influence the political leadership, Pickering wrote. Pickering addressed the letter to Hillarys chief of staff Cheryl Mills, who promptly forwarded it to her boss. Hillary sent the note to aide Monica Hanley with the instruction to Pls print, presumably for further review. Hanley made news earlier this week for a dressing-down she received from Hillary in one e-mail exchange for misinforming her of the name of an ambassador, although it turned out that she had been given bad information by others in State about Tunisias Rafik Abdessalem. In case no one already knew this, Pickering emphasized the need for covert action: Gee, I wonder how many other foreign protests were facilitated by the State Department? Were any others sparked against American allies in that region? One has to wonder after reading this how much the State Department might have had to do with some of the Arab Spring protests, too. (In fact, at one point Pickering says that the effort must be just like Tahrir Square, a mention that might interest our allies in Egypt.) This e-mail thread doesnt indicate whether Hillary took Pickerings advice, but she certainly appeared to take it under advisement. And while the e-mail itself wasnt classified, its yet another example of how these kinds of communications can harm American interests when transmitted in the open. This would be enough to create a massive backlash among our allies, and in fact may still do so. Pickering emphasizes that Hillary should work with women in the territories to minimize the chance of the protests turning violent. Thats a risky bet anywhere in the region, but particularly in this part of the world. Pickering seems more worried about a violent Israeli response the chances are much less that force would be misused against them, but Pickering later writes that the dangers are not small of an Israeli overreaction. It apparently never occurs to him that this kind of protest might make for a convenient screen for more violent forces in the West Bank and Gaza, in an attempt to force the Israelis to react and then get castigated for their response. Some allies, eh? This exchange confirms the tendency of the Obama administration to treat Israel with arrogance, if not outright hostility. This e-mail doesnt raise legal issues, but it raises serious political issues, especially for Hillary Clintons orientation toward Israel and the Obama administrations dealings with Iran in 2009. When protesters filled the streets in Iran, peacefully demonstrating against a rigged election and demanding an end to the mullahcracy, Obama and the White House went out of their way to ignore it, even at one point accepting the results of the election. The Green Revolution faltered and failed thanks to Obamas desire to gain a meaningless and dangerous agreement that will all but certify Iran as a nuclear-weapons state. Where was Pickering then? And for that matter, where was Hillary Clinton? Poster Comment: Morissey has done a ton of these Hitlery stories lately. Good reporting. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: TooConservative (#0)
(Edited)
That sounds like Hillary on her ongoing mission of enabling chaos and destruction. Trump is absolutely correct in calling her an enabler, but he didn't go far enough with his application of the term. Whenever there is opportunity to jam a countercultural screwdriver in the gears of anything, Hillary can be counted on to support it. Hillary was chosen to be SOS by Obama because they are two of a kind. The same is true of Kerry. I wish I were advising Trump. He's missing too many opportunities to start a revolution in this country that will clean out the leftist counterculturalists.
Currently, this country is suffering from a sustained condition of unrecognized Clinton, Bush, Kerry, and Obama assisted suicide. It's Trump's job to get on the pulpit and get people to recognize it. If he does, he'll win the presidency. If he doesn't, they and their minions will continue to loosen the plug on life support for this country with their smiling verbal tuberculosis.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|