[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Obama Wars Title: Drones over Malheur – BREAKING (“Dude, these yahoos wouldn’t know what hit them") URGENT BREAKING INFORMATIONWhile performing my own due diligence regarding the situation in Oregon (Read About It Here), I made contact with a few of my most trusted government sources. In an incredible stroke of luck, one such source, who shall remain nameless, is directly involved in monitoring the ongoing situation at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. According to my source, as so-called militia members from across the country made their way to Oregon, various assets, which were not directly identified, were readied. These assets have already been deployed to the region. Although the source would not describe the particular drones being employed, he did indicate that “High altitude surveillance platforms” are currently monitoring activity at the Wildlife Refuge Office, which is currently under occupation by the armed militiamen. “These particular assets are high altitude so they are invisible to the naked eye,” the source said. “Even at night, maybe you’ll catch a glint of light or something if it catches the moon while it turns but, for the most part, they’ll never know they are up there,” he assured me. As our conversation went deeper into probabilities and possibilities, the source made no effort to disguise his anxiety over a potential escalation on the ground. When I asked what kind of response the militia could expect if they turned their guns toward government agents, the source chuckled a little, then grew more serious. “Dude, these yahoos wouldn’t know what hit them. We already have snipers deployed to the area but,..” There was a lengthy pause. I urged him to continue. “Well, that location is very remote. There is really no risk to non-combatants if this thing goes hot. A couple of missiles and the whole thing will be over.” “Are you saying they would commit to a drone strike on the building?” I asked. “I don’t know if they would or not. But, I do know that we could,” he said. “The equipment is already staged in Washington. Authorization is just a phone call away, bro. If this thing goes live, I have no problem shooting a [expletive-deleted] Hellfire up their asses.” **** I will update if new information becomes available. Poster Comment: The first GOP candidate to get out there and take a shot at an Obongo drone, will be the next president. ![]() Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest “The equipment is already staged in Washington. Authorization is just a phone call away, bro. If this thing goes live, I have no problem shooting a [expletive-deleted] Hellfire up their asses.” The feds did it at Waco and got away with it. There is no reason for them not to do it in Oregon. The attitude is present and there is new technology to play with. Nothing is as dangerous and mindless as a bureaurocrat with a title who is programmed and eager to push buttons and kill people. This cat is ready to hit the big time. I'll bet he has a hundred prepared slogans to spout when he does it.
#2. To: rlk (#1) This time the mindset of the country is MUCH different. If they slaughter these people, it will light a fuse.
#3. To: jeremiad (#2) This time the mindset of the country is MUCH different. If they slaughter these people, it will light a fuse. No, it won't. People keep repeating this as a kind of magical thinking but I see no factual basis to believe it. People are continuing their gun buying spree but only to defend themselves, not engage in a traitorous rebellion against the feds. Lots of people would be happy for Obama to send a Hellfire missile in and blow them up. Or even use a tactical nuke if there isn't any metro fallout. I think you'd see the national media would love to murder every last one of these guys much more than they want to do anything about ISIS.
#4. To: TooConservative (#3) No, it won't. People keep repeating this as a kind of magical thinking but I see no factual basis to believe it. Magical thinking. You're exactly right.
#5. To: rlk (#1)
They got away with it in Waco because they successfully convinced the public that Koresh and co. set the fires themselves, and demonized him for their practices, as though that justified the militant actions that cost some 80 lives. Dropping a hellfire missile on the outfit in Oregon will hardly be accepted as a suicidal act on the part of the occupying ranchers. And while people on the east coast won't care, making martyrs out of them so wantonly will add sympathy to their cause in the west. (Not that Washington really understands that concept, of course, based on the drone strategies Obama has overseen in Afghanistan & Iraq). I consider the suggestion that a hellfire missile would be dropped on them to be hogwash. It's over the top flaming uttered by some ya-hoo who wants to be the first one to announce an old west gun-slinger movie response.
#6. To: TooConservative, Ben Garrison (#3) UPDATE 12:03 AM EST (Sunday) -- Oregon police identify the leaders of Cliven Bundy-linked millita sieging Fed building as Ben Garrison and Sam Hyde According to the above propaganda release from NYC, your favorite libertarian cartoonist Ben Garrison is one of the leaders of the "militia". ![]() #7. To: hondo68 (#6) According to the above propaganda release from NYC, your favorite libertarian cartoonist Ben Garrison is one of the leaders of the "militia". Funny how he's my "favorite libertarian cartoonist" when I've never heard of him before. I don't hang out at LRC or Reason very much. I would suppose there are probably 2,000-5,000 men named Ben Garrison in America. It isn't an unusual name. For instance, I know of another guy who has the same name as me and we both live in or near a pretty small town, < 10K. And I know another one that is less than 150 miles away. People with the same names are much more common than people realize, I think. "Ben" and "Garrison" are both pretty common WASPY names, even back from the era when every third boy was named Jim and every sixth boy was named John. Baby name books were a lot shorter back then apparently.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|