[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: ‘Debate is very important,’ Paul says [Rand dropping out?] CONCORD, N.H. – Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is confident he will be on the primetime Republican debate stage Tuesday, but if he falls short, he will make an announcement this week about what comes next. Asked Saturday by the Globe specifically if he would drop out of the race for president if he didn’t qualify for the main-stage GOP debate, Paul said: “We will make an announcement, on that, on Tuesday.” Later Saturday, Matt Chisholm, New Hampshire communications director for the Paul campaign, insisted his candidate was in the race to win. He said Paul’s quote referred to whether he would participate in a secondary debate on Tuesday if he didn’t qualify for the main-stage event. CNN, the host of Tuesday’s debate, is requiring candidates to have a national polling average of at least 3.5 percent or at least 4 percent in one of the early-voting states of New Hampshire or Iowa in order to participate in the main GOP debate. Those with weaker polling will be invited to participate in a separate debate earlier in the evening. According to RealClear Politics’ polling average, Paul is currently at 2.2 percent nationally, 2.7 percent in New Hampshire, and 4 percent in Iowa. With 14 major candidates remaining in the fight for the party’s nomination, Paul reiterated how crucial it is to be on the stage. “It’s very important,” he said during a campaign appearance at New England College’s Concord branch. “We’re hoping that they will give the same and equal and fair treatment that they gave to Carly Fiorina the last time.” . . . Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest I think his father's name hurt him. I am surprised he did not do better than 3%. In my opinion if he talks common sense the RP supports call him a tool and if he leans to ct land people ignore him. He just can not win!
#2. To: Justified (#1) In my opinion if he talks common sense the RP supports call him a tool and if he leans to ct land people ignore him. He just can not win! In a nutshell. His non-interventionism just isn't well-timed overall. Not in the GOP. Even if he managed to win Iowa by some miracle, where would he go from there? He isn't doing too well in NH and they seem to like Christie more there.
#3. To: TooConservative (#0) ‘Debate is very important,’ Paul says Really? We've had four so far. Other than the MSM playing games with their gotcha questions and telling us who "won", why were they important?
#4. To: TooConservative (#2) In a nutshell. He was my first choice a bit over a year ago. He is an honorable man. I still like him. He came across badly in the debates. He will run again.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|