[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Corrupt Government Title: FBI Neglect of San Bernardino Crime Scene Fits a Pattern The shocking sight of journalists storming into the apartment of the San Bernardino terrorists, less than 48 hours after the attack, was apparently allowed by the FBI, which handed the apartment back over to the landlord, who let the media in with a crowbar.CNN had a reporter on the scene, but its own analyst Harry Houck was shocked, calling it a “screw-up.”
While the journalists’ behavior was disturbing, it fit a pattern: the Obama administration is careless about, or is reluctant to find, evidence of terrorism. For example, the government has done almost nothing with the treasure trove of intelligence information it recovered during the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound in May 2011. Stephen F. Hayes of the Weekly Standard has waged a lonely battle to force the government to take the intelligence seriously–intelligence that could disrupt terror networks and prevent future attacks around the world. “They haven’t done anything close to a full exploitation,” perhaps only 10%, he quoted one analyst in May 2015. The following year, after the Benghazi terror attack–which the Obama administration insisted was a protest over a YouTube video–the FBI arrived on the scene several weeks later, after terrorists and curious locals had enjoyed the opportunity to roam the scene and remove or change whatever they wanted. Fox News reported on Oct. 5, 2012 that an FBI team had waited for weeks before visiting the consulate, and that they stayed only briefly. (To this day, Democrats insist a video explanation was plausible.) Now, the FBI has released a crime scene to the landlord, to the media, and even to a local dog, according to CNN. It is certainly possible that investigators were able to obtain and remove all of the evidence they needed. But how can they know they will not need to return? How do they prevent evidence from being tainted, moved, lost–or possibly even being planted? Now, they cannot. Houck puts the FBI’s behavior down to incompetence. Perhaps the truth is that the government is just not interested. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22. "It is certainly possible that investigators were able to obtain and remove all of the evidence they needed." Ya think? Gosh, thank you for allowing for that "possibility".
#4. To: misterwhite (#3) Ya think? Gosh, thank you for allowing for that "possibility". Since Comey already divined there's no evidence either Farook and Malik were part of a terror cell or network or had any outside assistance, further investigation probably isn't necessary. As long as any disgruntled employee, unfairly targeted by white bigots, and his
#6. To: cranky (#4) Comey already divined there's no evidence either Farook and Malik were part of a terror cell or network I was wondering what a "terror network" is? Do they have to have a team charter to qualify as one? A mission statement? T-Shirts with their network logo on the front? Maybe their co-conspirators reported to be coming and going at their residence/bomb factory didn't meet the "network" requirements, so there was no need to dust for fingerprints or reconstruct shredded documents.
#7. To: Roscoe (#6) The reporters looted the apartment.the landlord took a crowbar to gain entrance and let in the reporters.
#8. To: Don (#7) Good luck trying to provide known information to a box of rocks.
#21. To: Fred Mertz, Don, Roscoe, cranky, misterwhite, CZ82, buckeroo, sneakypete, Orwellian Nightmare, (#8) The entire fiasco was being stage-managed by the highly dubious (and CIA-connected) CNN operative, Anderson Cooper, who is then flanked by CNN junior ‘reporter’ Stephanie Elam who clearly states, “I was the first person who walked into this room [bedroom] and saw how it was before everyone started touching it… I don’t want to show you these ID’s over here [as the camera pans over and shows them] just because I don’t want to show you those addresses on there, but I do believe they belong to the mother based on the ages that were there.” So Elam had access and tampered with the entire crime scene. If it were a real federal crime scene, then this would be a violation of numerous state and federal laws, including a violation of the family’s rights to privacy. In addition, under California state law, all media members and public present are in violation of breaking and entering, vandalism and as well as theft in the event that any personal items were removed from the scene. NOTE: The fact that no one who participated in media this free-for-all today has been either arrested or charged – is proof that the home is not a real federal crime scene at all. It was nothing more than a dramatic set, staged for TV cameras.
#22. To: Deckard (#21) NOTE: The fact that no one who participated in media this free-for-all today has been either arrested or charged – is proof that the home is not a real federal crime scene at all. The crime scene was some distance away. The FBI returned control of the suspects' dwelling to the landlord who in turn opened it up to the press, afaik.
Replies to Comment # 22. There are no replies to Comment # 22.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 22. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|