[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Religion Title: How many Tashfeen Maliks have we brought in? Earlier today, the FBI revealed that Tashfeen Malik, the female Muslim immigrant behind the terror attack in San Bernardino, had expressed her allegiance to ISIS in a Facebook post during the attack. Many on the right will immediately focus on the threat posed by ISIS. And undoubtedly ISIS is a big threat. But as Ive pointed out before, ISIS is merely the latest reflection of the broader problem: rampant pan-Islamic supremacism throughout the Muslim world inspired by cyber-Jihad. This was unlikely a command-and-control style ISIS attack. This was an attack perpetrated by a Muslim extremist from Pakistan we let in through our front door just last year and granted a green card this past July. Tashfeen Maliks role in the San Bernardino attack demonstrates why why Islamic immigration in general is more of an existential threat than ISIS infiltration. It is also why vetting for ISIS terrorists is a complete non- sequitur to the issue at hand. Even if these individuals could be vetted for ties to professionally trained terrorists, investigators will miss the majority of Islamic terrorists who have not yet engaged in terror but harbor the views that will come to fruition after settling in America. There is no way to vet strict Sharia adherence and ascertain if the immigrant truly hates our national and cultural values, or worse, will potentially engage in terror activity. As the Tashfeen story indicates, this is much larger than immigration from Syria or ISIS infiltration. Any number of devout Islamists throughout the Middle East could share the views of ISIS or Al Qaeda; inspiring them to commit terror attacks on our soil once we credulously let them through our front door. This is the exact modus operandi Al Qaeda has encouraged in their Inspire magazine. They have largely moved beyond command-and-control infiltration attacks and are encouraging individual Jihadis living or emigrating to western countries to carry out attacks. Its no surprise this terror couple had followed the blueprint of bomb making detailed in Inspire magazine. Before Thanksgiving, I posted a report showing how weve admitted 680,000 immigrants from predominantly Muslim countries in the five years between 2009 and 2013. We also bring in over 150,000 foreign students from that region every single year. The trajectory for both is growing faster than any other origin of immigration. What is so disconcerting is that the government has not published any data since 2013 and has still refused to release the 2014 DHS yearbook on immigration statistics. So the American people have quite literally no idea how many security threats we have admitted from the Middle East over the past two years. Likewise, the public does not know how many other Tashfeen Maliks got through the same counter-terrorism screenings she did. There is no monthly data on green cards that is publically available. How many more Tashfeens are there among the 200,000 immigrants weve admitted from Pakistan since 2001? Sadly, it appears that Republicans have no intention to address even the Syrian refugee issue in the upcoming budget bill, much less the broader problem of immigration. Poster Comment: How many more Tashfeens are there among the 200,000 immigrants weve admitted from Pakistan since 2001? After seeing the spectacle of this idiot burning himself while burning our flag, anyone with a lick of common sense would know that importing Porkistanis was a bad idea, but America's ruling class imported 200,000 of these sub-human lifeforms. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
The crux of the issue has always been rampant pan-Islamic supremacism. I've away been puzzled by the twisted terminology meant to insinuate a nonexistant difference. ISIS is no deferent than a dozen other organizations or brotherhoods doing the same thing for the same ultimate goals with memberships that cross back and forth among groups offering support and for opportunity to impose violent oppressive jihad. They are all batallions in the same over-all army for the same purpose.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|