[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Salon, Guardian blame “right-wing” for Paris jihad attacks Outrageous, but not surprising. The enemedia is aligned with the jihad force. As the jihad heats up in the West, the media is becoming more clumsy and desperate in its attempts to deflect attention away from the jihad and back to its favorite bogeyman, “right-wing extremists.” Now, even when the evidence of Islamic jihad responsibility is everywhere, as it is with the Paris attacks, “journalists” still find ways to put the blame on the “right-wing” that they hate far more than they do bloodthirsty jihadis, whom they don’t dislike at all. “Salon: Paris jihad massacre shows that ‘right-wing’ needs to ‘moderate their rhetoric,” by Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch, November 14, 2015: The American Left is beyond parody. Apparently Salon would have us believe that the Paris jihad massacre happened because “the right wing media” criticized the Black Lives Matter movement. Islamic jihad? Warfare against unbelievers? The Islamic State’s stated imperative to murder French civilians? Only greasy Islamophobes take such things seriously: everyone knows Fox News and Ben Carson are the real culprits! “And so the hate speech begins: Let Paris be the end of the right’s violent language toward activists,” by Chauncey DeVega, Salon, November 13, 2015: In a still developing situation, the city of Paris, France, is under attack by terrorists armed with guns and explosives. Many dozens of people have been killed. A still undetermined number of people have been wounded. The terrorists took dozens of hostages in a concert hall. French police and military forces have been deployed. There is mayhem and blood in the streets of Paris…. In the United States, the right-wing media and movement conservatives have for decades consistently used eliminationist and other violent rhetoric to describe liberals, progressives and other people with whom they disagree. As was seen in the recent attacks on a Charleston-area black church, and other violence by right-wing anti-government militias, such rhetoric does not float in the ether of the public discourse, harmless and unacknowledged. No, it does in fact lead to action. In recent months, the right-wing media has used language such as “terrorism” and “violent,” or that the latter is “targeting police for murder” to describe the Black Lives Matter movement. Such bombastic and ugly screeds–which are wholly unfounded, with no basis in empirical reality–have also been used by right-wing opinion leaders to describe the African-American students who are fighting against racism at Yale and the University of Missouri… Real terrorists have killed people in the streets of Paris. The right-wing media needs to take note of that fact and moderate their rhetoric and abusive language accordingly. Given the American right-wing’s casual habit of using violent language to describe their foes, and to gin up fear and anxiety among the movement conservative base, the Fox News’ right-wing echo chamber and its elites should be ashamed given the death and destruction that terrorism actually reaps in practice. And from The Guardian: Guardian: After Paris jihad, ‘far-right groups may well fuel more hatred,'” by Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch, November 14, 2015: The Guardian doesn’t worry about the Islamic State presence in France. It isn’t concerned about how many Islamic State sympathizers are living in France now. It couldn’t care less how many more jihadis will enter France via the refugee crisis. No, the Guardian is only concerned about the sole matter that worries the Western intelligentsia: will “far-right groups” exploit this jihad massacre to “fuel more hatred”? I.e., will those who believe in free societies start calling attention to the jihad threat again? “Paris attacks leave France in trauma, fearing for the future,” by Natalie Nougayrède, Guardian, November 13, 2015: …Muslims in France will now increasingly fear being associated with fanaticism and terror. Populist, far-right groups may well fuel more hatred. After Charlie Hebdo, thousands of French soldiers were dispatched across the country to secure key installations, schools, train stations, institutions…. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest After Charlie Hebdo, thousands of French soldiers were dispatched across the country to secure key installations, schools, train stations, institutions…. But did nothing other than that... Like rounding up the perps or maybe start sending the Muzzies back home to the sandbox, nah not going to happen... Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians! #2. To: no gnu taxes (#0) Nothing new about this. The right represents individual freedom,and there is nothing the left hates more than individual freedoms. In this,they obviously identify with Islam,where nobody has rights but the rulers. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them. #3. To: no gnu taxes (#0) "Salon, Guardian blame “right-wing” for Paris jihad attacks" I blame it on the YouTube video.
#4. To: Willie Green (#0) Enjoy, this is right in your wheelhouse, Willie Boy. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #5. To: SOSO (#4) It's Bush & Cheney's fault...
#6. To: Willie Green, All (#5)
Bwahahahahahahahaha........................... I am not surprised that you ignore of history and can only sputter leftist propaganda. Who has allowed ISIS to thrive? Who allows ISIS to continue to exist? If you do not undrestand that it is the Islamic community, especially in the Middle East and Africa then you are a hopeless apparatchik, possibly a paid one. Who slapped downed the KKK in the U.S. and told it "not in our house"? It was Christian America, that's who. The KKK has been an ineffectual group that has not perpetuated any violent acts of any scale or significance in the U.S. for decades. This came about because Christain America took care of the disease that was infecting our society. Islam has not done squat to cure the disease in its house. ISIS on every meaningful scale could be wiped off the face of the planet, especially in the ME had only the Saudis, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq, et. al., acted in active military actions ON THE GROUND in Syria, Iran and Yemen. These Islamic countries still can easily do it as they have more than what it takes to put enough boots on the ground to eradicate ISIS in Syria and elsewhere. Yet they willfully allow ISIS to perpetuate violence on their own people, people of Islam, in their own backyard. Get a clue, Willie Boy, they will not do it. It is their duty and responsibility to do it but they will not. And the Emperor Obama refuses to arm the one group in the region that is begging to take the fight on the ground to ISIS. Get a clue, Willie Boy. Obama had the opportunity to bomb ISIS almost out of existance in the early stage of its gathering while ISIS was in plain sight in open dessert. He did not do it. He would never had done it. After all ISIS is the JV and has nothing to do with Islam. Willie Boy, I am really beginning to beleive that you are an ideological shill for the left, perhaps a paid one at that. I even doubt that you believe the pap that you espouse. You may even be a government agent trying to smoke out "domestic terrorists" on the web. You are about as mainstream American as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #7. To: SOSO (#6) Who has allowed ISIS to thrive? Who allows ISIS to continue to exist? Bush & Cheney's petro-buddies... the Saudis & Kuwaitis... It's all about the Oil, stooge...
#8. To: SOSO (#6) It's like arguing with Pavlovs dog with Willie. He's a cartoon.
#9. To: CZ82 (#1) Like rounding up the perps or maybe start sending the Muzzies back home to the sandbox, nah not going to happen... In the long run genocide will make a better option. If we wait to long it will be our genocide. Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria #10. To: Willie Green (#7) It's all about the Oil, stooge... Let me know when the GOP stops sucking up to OPEC & the fossil fuel industry Really, is that why Obama and The Drats have done everything they can to put on the brakes for the U.S. becoming more energy independent, including squelching the Keyston pipeline? Get a clue, WIllie Boy. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #11. To: Willie Green, All (#7) Bush & Cheney's petro-buddies... the Saudis & Kuwaitis... Ok, Willie Boy, here is you opporunity to shine. Please explain in detail how oil figures into why Saudi, Kuwait, Iraq, and all of the other Arab oil producers in the ME, as well as Jordan, Egypt and Turkey, will not crush ISIS as they clearly can do if they wished. Convince us all about how that is related to Bush and Cheny who haven't been on the sceen or weilded any power, much less influence, for seven years during Obama administration (that's well before ISIS showed on the radar screen). Explain why Obama has refused to crush the JV team and continues to try and strangle U.S. oil and gas production and mush U.S. friendly sources of oil imports? C'mon, here's your moment. You have a captive audience. FYI - I am betting on hearing crickets from you, that or just other dumbass, knee jerk leftist talking points/proaganda. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #12. To: SOSO (#11) Willie never backs up the shit he flings here, same old same old.
#13. To: SOSO (#6) Neocons and Saudi Wahabis are joined at the hip. OK?
#14. To: SOSO (#11) The Saudis and Kuwaitis are Sunnis, and ISIS are Sunni extremists. The Saudis and Kuwaitis are also royal pussies who are afraid that they'll get drawn into civil war (just like Syria) if they actually go after ISIS... so they're happy that ISIS is preocuppied in Iraq & Syria, hoping that WE will do their dirty work for them.
#15. To: A Pole, SOSO (#13) Neocons and Saudi Wahabis are joined at the hip. OK? Yep... that too.
#16. To: Willie Green, All (#14)
What does this have to do with oil, syncophant? What does this have to do with anything other than the worries and fears of the royal PTB in the ME, appartachik? Backup the comments that you made (1) its Bush and Cheny's fault, and, (2) its all about oil. You haven't so far. I am betting that you can't. Further, Saudi, Kuwait, et.al know that if ISIS wins in Syria they are next in line, probably even if ISIS doesn't win outright. It is in their own self interest to destroy ISIS in both Syria and Iraq. Besides being pussies you think that they are stupid as well? Further, explain why Obama continues to hamstring U.S. energy indepedence by killing coal, restraining U.S. oil and gas production, and, killing the Keystone pipeline that would reduce oil imports from less friendly and/or stable governments by 800,000 bbls/day. Make you case, Wille Boy. Willie Boy, you are an intellectucal fraud that can't make your case but can only reguritate the talking points of the left. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #17. To: Willie Green (#14) The Saudis and Kuwaitis are also royal pussies ... Supported by your US tax payer dollar as America heads into complete chaos.
#18. To: SOSO, Willie Green (#16) (Edited) To: Willie Green: You scream "Catch the thief!" way too much. It is obvious that it is you who is an apparatchik, serving Neocon/Saudi interests.
#19. To: SOSO (#16) What does this have to do with oil, syncophant? Oil/gas pipelines from Iran/Iraq to Eastern Europe cut across Syria.
#20. To: Willie Green, A Pole, All (#19) Oil/gas pipelines from Iran/Iraq to Eastern Europe cut across Syria. These pipelines would make Eastern Europe (Ukraine) less dependent on Russian energy exports. That's why Putin is propping up Bashar al-Assad in this civil war. Your claim is that Saudi et. al are afraid to destroy ISIS in Syria because of Russia? Are you f*cking kidding? потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #21. To: Willie Green, A Pole, All (#20) Oil/gas pipelines from Iran/Iraq to Eastern Europe cut across Syria. These pipelines would make Eastern Europe (Ukraine) less dependent on Russian energy exports. That's why Putin is propping up Bashar al-Assad in this civil war. You do realize that ISIS is a threat to Assad, don't you? You do realize that Russia's biggest bet in the ME is on Iran not Syria, don't you? You do realize that Russia, Assad and Iran oppose ISIS, don't you? You do realize how ridcules both of you appear, don't you? So again please tell us all why the Saudis et.al in the region will not vigorously join the fight against ISIS in Syria and Iraq? AFter all is not the enermy of their enemy their friend? потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #22. To: SOSO (#20) Your claim is that Saudi et. al are afraid to destroy ISIS in Syria because of Russia? Are you f*cking kidding? That's your misinterpretation, not mine. As far as I'm concerned, the corrupt, royal Saudi pussies are afraid religious whacknuts in their own country will start a civil war if they go after ISIS.
#23. To: SOSO (#21) You do realize that Russia, Assad and Iran oppose ISIS, don't you? And they're also opposed to the Turks and Saudis and Kurds and Jordanians and French and Germans and Ukrainians and... And you do realize that there are far more than just two sides to the Syrian Civil War, don't you?
#24. To: SOSO (#20) Your claim is that Saudi et. al are afraid to destroy ISIS in Syria because of Russia? Are you f*cking kidding? Saudis are sponsoring ISIS, and you know it very well. So you root for ISIS.
#25. To: SOSO (#21) So again please tell us all why the Saudis et.al in the region will not vigorously join the fight against ISIS in Syria and Iraq? You support ISIS and Saudis.
#26. To: A Pole, SOSO (#25) Here is a beheading in Saudi Arabia.
#27. To: All (#26)
#28. To: Willie Green (#19)
#29. To: Willie Green (#22) As far as I'm concerned, the corrupt, royal Saudi pussies are afraid religious whacknuts in their own country will start a civil war if they go after ISIS. You claimed that it was all oil related and even spewed nonesense about the pipelin thru Syria to bolster your point. Do you even know what you say? потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #30. To: A Pole, Willie Green (#24)
If you two weren't total morons you would understand that this is exactly what I said. The Saudis et.al will never lift a finger against their cousins, even to help a friend. And totally forget about a stranger. Yes, the ME is a sh*t hole of a multipilicity of intersts athat often end up with enemies being friends against anoyther enemy. But the bottom line it is Islam against the rest of thw world. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #31. To: A Pole (#25)
F*ck off , you total moronic POS. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #32. To: SOSO (#30) "Saudis are sponsoring ISIS, and you know it very well. So you root for ISIS." You are trying to cover up Saudi sponsorship of ISIS.
#33. To: SOSO, A Pole (#31) You support ISIS and Saudis. A Pole is right... your incessent efforts to spin and deflect the truth serves to empower ISIS.
#34. To: A Pole (#32) You are trying to cover up Saudi sponsorship of ISIS. Do you not understand English? I have stated quite plainly that Saudi will not do anything of any significance to destroy or even thwart ISIS. I have been saying all along that it is the moral responsibility of Saudis and the other Islamic nations in the region to deal with ISIS in a decisive manner with their boots on the ground. I have been saying that they will not do this because of the Islamic ideology of my brother over my cousin, my cousin over my friend, my friend over a stranger. They will never support a stranger even when their brothers, cousins and friends are flithy scum murderers. BTW, the last I heard is that the head of ISIS is an Iraqi. Instead of spewing your stupid pap about this being about oil, try to understanding what is being said to you. This a war of ideology, of culture, or intolerant religious belefs and desire for world domination, not economics. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #35. To: Willie Green (#33)
Ah, Tweedly Dee chimes in with the usual leftist tactic of blaming others for what they do themself. Ping #33, moron. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #36. To: SOSO (#34) Instead of spewing your stupid pap about this being about oil, Did I say anything about oil?
#37. To: A Pole (#36) Did I say anything about oil? Yes. #18. To: SOSO, Willie Green (#16) (Edited)
To: Willie Green: What does this have to do with oil, syncophant? What does this have to do with anything other than the worries and fears of the royal PTB in the ME, appartachik? You scream "Catch the thief!" way too much. It is obvious that it is you who is an apparatchik, serving Neocon/Saudi interests.
A Pole posted on 2015-11-15 4:26:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply потому что Бог хочет это тот путь #38. To: SOSO (#37) SOSO to: Willie Green: What does this have to do with oil, syncophant? I quoted your words where oil is mentioned, you silly and did not correct your spelling, BTW. You syncopate.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|