International News
See other International News Articles
Title: 'I'm sorry': Historic moment Tony Blair FINALLY apologises for Iraq War and admits in TV interview the conflict caused the rise of ISIS
Source:
DailyMail
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... tonishing-apology-TV-show.html
Published: Oct 24, 2015
Author: Simon Walters and Glen Owen and Martin B
Post Date: 2015-10-25 04:34:01 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 4158
Comments: 37
Tony Blair has finally said sorry for the Iraq War – and admitted he could be partly to blame for the rise of Islamic State. The extraordinary confession by the former Prime Minister comes after 12 years in which he refused to apologise for the conflict. Blair makes his dramatic ‘mea culpa’ during a TV interview about the ‘hell’ caused by his and George Bush’s decision to oust Saddam Hussein. In the exchange, Blair repeatedly says sorry for his conduct and even refers to claims that the invasion was a war ‘crime’ – while denying he committed one. Blair is asked bluntly in the CNN interview, to be broadcast today: ‘Was the Iraq War a mistake?’ He replies: ‘I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong. ‘I also apologise for some of the mistakes in planning and, certainly, our mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you removed the regime.’ Challenged that the Iraq War was ‘the principal cause’ of the rise of Islamic State, he said: ‘I think there are elements of truth in that. 'Of course you can’t say those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015.’ In the ‘trial by TV’, respected US political broadcaster Fareed Zakaria accuses him of being President Bush’s ‘poodle’ over the conflict. Blair’s confession comes a week after The Mail on Sunday published a bombshell White House memo revealing for the first time how Blair and Bush agreed a ‘deal in blood’ a year before the invasion. A 2002 briefing note from US Secretary of State Colin Powell to the President showed Blair had secretly pledged to back the conflict – while telling MPs and British voters that he was seeking a diplomatic solution. In his CNN interview, Blair candidly asks for forgiveness for his blunder in not realising ‘what would happen once you removed the regime’. The admission makes a mockery of the statement in the Powell memo that Blair would ‘demonstrate [to Bush] that we have thought through “the day after” ’ – a reference to the consequences of invasion. However, the bloody chaos in the region continues to this day. And in a separate development, former Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett has revealed that he challenged Blair before the war about avoiding chaos after Saddam’s downfall. Lord Blunkett says Blair failed to give him such ‘reassurances’ – and instead placed blind faith in the two main ‘hawks’ in the US administration, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Lord Blunkett also vented his fury that Sir John Chilcot, who is leading the long-delayed inquiry into the Iraq War, had failed to ask him to give evidence. 'I will not apologise for the conflict. I believe it was right.' House of Commons 2004 ‘I don’t think we should be apologising at all for what we are doing in Iraq. We should be immensely proud. I can’t take responsibility for people sending car bombs into a market place.’ TV interview , 2007 I may have been wrong, but I did what I thought was right for our country.’ When he resigned as PM, 2007 [If he had known there were no WMDs] ‘I would still have thought it right to remove Saddam.’ TV interview, 2009 ‘It was a headline question. It had to have a headline answer. Answer “Yes” and I knew the outcome: “Blair apologises for war”, “At last he says sorry”. I can’t say sorry in words; I can only hope to redeem something from the tragedy of death, in the actions of a life, my life, that continues still.’ Memoirs , 2010 ‘When people say to me, “Do you regret removing him”, my answer is, “No – how can you regret removing somebody who was a monster?” ’ TV interview , 2013 ‘Given my front-row seat at these events, I am mystified Chilcot has not asked me to provide either oral or written evidence,’ Lord Blunkett told The Mail on Sunday. ‘I would have thought that over the six years the inquiry has been going on, Sir John would have found the time to ask the then-Home Secretary what he knew.’ Blair’s confession about the Iraq War and the rise of IS is in stark contrast to his repeated refusal to shoulder the blame for the conflict, or its long term consequences. In 2004, he told MPs: ‘I will not apologise for the conflict. I believe it was right.’ He stuck to his hard line in 2007, saying: ‘I don’t think we should be apologising at all for what we are doing in Iraq.’ Remarkably, Blair himself predicted how the apology U-turn he finally makes today would be reported. In his 2010 memoirs, he explained why he had so far refused to say ‘yes’ when asked if he was sorry, because he knew it would prompt damaging headlines. ‘Answer “Yes” and I knew the outcome: “BLAIR APOLOGISES FOR WAR”, “AT LAST HE SAYS SORRY”. I can’t say sorry in words.’ His apology is bound to prompt claims that he is trying to head off the scathing criticism of his handling of the Iraq War expected to be included in Chilcot’s findings. All the key figures, including Blair and other senior Labour politicians, are understood to have been given notice of the broad thrust of Chilcot’s verdict on them, expected to be made public next year. As a master of public relations and media manipulation, Blair may have calculated that since Chilcot is likely to accuse him of major errors of judgment, it is better for him to volunteer an apology now, rather than be forced to do so if, as seems certain, Chilcot’s damning assessment gives him little choice. The former Prime Minister’s decision to make his apology in the US, as opposed to the UK, is also significant. Far from presenting his apology in a harsh critical light, CNN interviewer Zakaria, a personal friend of Blair, showers praise on him for being the only interviewee in the programme who ‘took responsibility for Iraq’ on camera. Most of the others involved in the show, senior US political and military figures, blamed each other. The Colin Powell memo – which this newspaper found among declassified US State Department documents while searching through a cache of Hillary Clinton’s recently released emails – was written in March 2002, a week before Mr Blair met Mr Bush for a summit at his ranch in Crawford, Texas. In our report, which made headlines around the world, we revealed that Powell had said Blair ‘will be with us’ should the US take military action in Iraq and that the ‘UK will follow our lead’. Blair would handle ‘public affairs lines’ for persuading people that Saddam posed a real threat – in fact, after the war, it was discovered Blair’s claims following the Crawford summit about Iraq’s ‘weapons of mass destruction’ were false. Lord Blunkett told The Mail on Sunday yesterday how he challenged Blair during Cabinet meetings prior to the war about the level of post-conflict planning for Iraq. As one of Blair’s most loyal Ministers, Lord Blunkett said he repeatedly sought reassurances that the US had a coherent plan to govern Iraq after the fall of Saddam. He added: ‘I did not receive that reassurance. Tony was not able to say what was going to happen when combat operations were over. He just decided to trust Cheney and Rumsfeld. ‘With the benefit of hindsight, we now know that they had decided to embark on the complete de-Ba’athification of Saddam’s Iraq by dismantling the entire Government infrastructure. ‘This led to the disintegration of any form of functioning government, creating a complete power vacuum. Terrorists infiltrated Iraq and stirred discontent. ‘I am not seeking to scapegoat Tony Blair; we were all collectively to blame for deluding ourselves into believing that we had much greater sway over Washington.’ Lord Blunkett echoed calls for Chilcot to release an interim copy of his findings immediately or ‘risk his entire exercise being entirely discredited’. Significantly, in the CNN show, host Zakaria gives his own apology, telling viewers that he regrets his own initial support for the war. He says he changed his mind after watching the post-war turmoil unfold and witnessing the bloody rise of IS. Viewers may draw the conclusion that Blair came to the same decision for the same reason.
(1 image)'I'm sorry': Historic moment Tony Blair FINALLY apologises for Iraq War and admits in TV interview the conflict caused the rise of ISIS
BLAIR'S 'MEA CULPA' COMES AFTER 12 YEARS OF NON-APOLOGIES
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#3. To: TooConservative (#0)
The timing of this article couldn't be better for Trump or, to put it another way, worse for Jeb!
Trump will no doubt exploit this, given his own opposition to the Iraq war from (I think) 2004. That isn't all that uncommon however. The country was in a war fever after 9/11. As mentioned even Zakaria favored the invasion at the time. For many people, the failure to find a working nuclear weapons program at al-Tuwaitha or evidence of substantial bioweapons stockpiles or research or facilities was what led to disillusionment with the entire war. Trump was like that, so were a lot of other people. Trump, never afraid to make headlines, is fortunate to have gone on record with his big mouth and he happens to benefit from that now, 11 years later. Lucky stiff. I'm wondering if Trump will wait to use this against Bush, perhaps to do it onstage to his face to finish him off as a competitor. Trump hates the Bushes with some real passion. It isn't just business, it's personal for him. It's been clear from early on that Trump intends to make sure Bush is not the GOP nominee, even if Trump himself isn't the nominee.
You're such a cameleon. You said repeatedly that he was doing this so Bush WOULD be the nominee. You said he was doing it so that when he (Trump) dropped out Bush would be the only one standing. So it wasn't clear from the start to you. So quit pretending you say it clearly from the start. What was clear to you from the start was that Trump wasn't going to run. He wasn't going to file papers. He wasn't going to make the cut for the debate. Trump was finished after McCain comment. Trump was finished after Meagan Kelly had blood coming out of her whatever. What was clear to you didn't happen. On the other hand I was right. I said Trump would rise to the top. He did. I said he would file his paperwork both times. He did. I said McCain wouldn't hurt him. It didn't. There was blood coming out of Megans whatever. Comment didn't bother me. I was right it didn't hurt him. So you wanna bet Trump becomes President? My track record of predicions is better then yours. If you were smart you'd just agree with me at this point.
I'll take the rest of the field. How much?
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: buckeroo (#3)
The timing of this article couldn't be better for Trump or, to put it another way, worse for Jeb!
#6. To: TooConservative (#4)
It's been clear from early on that Trump intends to make sure Bush is not the GOP nominee,
#7. To: A K A Stone (#6)
So you wanna bet Trump becomes President?
Replies to Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]