The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: Club for Growth Action to Trump: You Sue Us, We'll Sue You Back
Source:
National Review
URL Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/corne ... well-sue-you-back-jim-geraghty
Published: Sep 26, 2015
Author: Jim Geraghty
Post Date: 2015-09-26 08:54:45 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 19460
Comments: 92
Attorneys for Club for Growth Action, a political arm of the Club for Growth, sent a letter to the Trump Organization’s General Counsel Thursday threatening a counter-suit if Trump sues their organization. “If Mr. Trump brought suit on the baseless grounds stated in your letter, Club Action would not hesitate to seek sanctions for abusive litigation under Federal Rule 11 or equivalent rules and, depending upon the forum, under statutes that deter Strategic Litigation against Public Participation (anti-SLAPP statutes),” the letter states. “Stripped of its purple adjectives, your letter makes two complaints against Club Action. Both complaints are untrue, and neither comes close to the type of knowing and malicious falsehood the First Amendment requires a public figure such as Mr. Trump to establish.” At the heart of the issue is the Club for Growth Action ad stating that Trump “supports higher taxes.” Trump’s lawyers say he no longer holds the position the ad refers to, and will soon be unveiling a plan to lower taxes. (Trump has said, however, he intends to target the “hedge fund guys” who he feels aren’t paying their fair share.) Perhaps the more interesting contention from the Club is this: You accuse the Club for Growth of trying to “extort” a million dollars from Mr. Trump in return for its political support. Nonsense. Club Action reports it was Mr. Trump who, last spring, asked to meet with the Club. During the meeting requestsed by Mr. Trump, as reflected in the attached letter to Mr. Trump, the Club’s Mr. [David] McIntosh made clear that the Club and Mr. Trump had important areas of policy disagreement. However, some areas of policy agreement also were identified. Mr. Trump asked how he could support the Club and, upon being informed that a donation would be appreciated, invited Mr. McIntosh to send a follow-up letter through Mr. Lewandowski, who also attended.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
#2. To: TooConservative (#0)
... one million dollars could make all that go away:
Trump told them he wanted to support the Club. So they sent a fundraising request to his campaign manager. I've never known the Club to compromise, no matter who the donor is. Notice they specifically pointed out that they disagree with Trump on some political matters up front. Trump knew that they weren't going to ever endorse him if he didn't embrace the Club's strict agenda. Just as a general matter, the Club is quite consistent in applying its standards to both donors and to pols that it donates to. The pols, in particular, have to toe the line on the Club's agenda. Sounds like Trump wanted their endorsement and thought he could just buy them off since that is typical with many of these groups. The Club is tougher than that. If Trump just wants to write a check and get an endorsement, the Heritage Action group would be a better bet for him. But the Club's endorsement carries a lot more weight which is why Trump was interested to begin with. And Trump at least knows that a lot of us can be swayed to a candidate if they can secure the Club's support.
So if Trump You're stupid if you believe that.
No, they would have thanked him and highlighted areas where Trump agrees with them. I've never seen them adopt any donor's position. The donors adopt the Club's positions. And any pol that gets Club money has to toe the line, in particular on the annual roll call votes that they have held for the last decade or so. These are the ones where they try to defund pork for various congresscritters. It is a major reason why the Beltway GOP doesn't like them. Well, that and running candidates in primaries against their RINO incumbents (like Cochrane in Mississippi in 2014).
As I said. They would NOT have run the negative ads had Trump "contributed". A shakedown by any other name.
There are no replies to Comment # 20. End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"... the Club’s Mr. [David] McIntosh made clear that the Club and Mr. Trump had important areas of policy disagreement. However ..."
#8. To: misterwhite (#2)
#14. To: TooConservative (#8)
"Trump told them he wanted to support the Club. So they sent a fundraising request to his campaign manager."
paid the bribe "donated" one million dollars, they still would have run those negative ads about him. Because they're "consistent in applying their standards".
#16. To: misterwhite (#14)
So if Trump paid the bribe "donated" one million dollars, they still would have run those negative ads about him. Because they're "consistent in applying their standards".
#20. To: TooConservative (#16)
"No, they would have thanked him and highlighted areas where Trump agrees with them."
Replies to Comment # 20.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]