[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: The Affirmative Action Army Meets The Minority Occupation Government–And That Means Waving Goodbye To Syria
A post by military blogger “Hognose” at WeaponsMan.com features a picture of Lloyd Austin, the 4-star General in charge of US Central Command, Official_CENTCOM_SealCentral here means Central Asia. WikiPedia says that CENTCOM’s area of responsibility includes Afghanistan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Uzbekistan, and Yemen. That means that General Austin, who is the first African-American to head CENTCOM, is responsible for doing something about Syria, like, say, training locals who might want to fight on the side of the US. Here’s how he’s been doing. How Badly Has Training Syrian Rebels Gone? You won’t believe how badly. The commander of US Central Command, Lloyd Austin, spilled a fact which shocked the Washington Post a little. That fact can be sliced a few different ways, but it comes down to this: the program to train non-ISIL, non-Assad combatants for Syria is, like every other aspect of Austin’s and the Administration’s incoherent Syria policy, a failure of staggering proportions. Its result? Single digits of fighters in Syria. Low single digits, like five. Or maybe only four. It’s not only a failure as a program, Austin can’t even place any confidence in the numbers describing the outrageous dimensions of the failure. The Washington Post, usually willing to carry water for the Administration and its political generals, finds itself, without any water to carry, reduced to reporting like an old-style paper: In comments that appeared to shock even many of those involved in Syria policy elsewhere in the government, Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, the head of the U.S. Central Command, told Congress on Wednesday that only “four or five” trainees from the program, a $500 million plan officially launched in December to prepare as many as 5,400 fighters this year, have ended up “in the fight” inside Syria. There are a couple different ways of looking at that metric. For instance, if you want to know what value for money the Administration’s politicized Syrian-training program produces, you could compare the cost of a trained fighter in Syria to the cost of, say, the military education of General Austin: we know the number’s $100 million for each ragtag Syrian. Or we can look at the success percentage of the training program, which has delivered 5 of 5,400 promised combatants: that would be 0.092%, which would put it right in the mainstream for government programs. But wait! Those numbers are presuming the ill-informed Austin’s high bound of 5 Syrians is right. If it’s 4, they cost us $125 million each, and 0.074% success rate, which is said aloud as “Seventy-four thousandths of a percent.” Do you dare ask who has been fired? Who has been held accountable? Who was denied a bonus? You know, don’t you, the answer to these questions. [More] It’s me, not Hognose, pointing out the affirmative action factor here. I don’t think that given the current explosion in the Middle East, the job of CENTCOM commander should be given to a guy who is the “first African- American ” to hold the job, because as a beneficiary of Affirmative Action, he’s automatically going to be less competent than someone who isn’t, and if they put a white General in that slot, they could relieve him when he fouled up like this. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest #1. To: nativist nationalist, GarySpFc, CZ82 (#0) GEN Lloyd Austin has a lot of experience in the region. He was the MNC-I commander (3 star level) and USF-I commander (4 star level) in Iraq before closing shop there. So if there was any 'affirmative action' done by the Army it was done when Austin was assessed on active duty as a young LT. He has the experience for the region in the right jobs so that is what the Army and Joint staff counts when recommending people for these commands. Austin has little to work with no doubt. He is trying to get an army not beholden to Assad or AQ or ISIS which is difficult to do when all of the above have the power to coerce or recruit young men in their formations. The 'freedom front' has no land or infrastructure or 'safe haven' in order to train. Unless they are using Jordan. Even if it is Jordan, someone has to go out and recruit young men, most of which have probably raced to the European border by now, or won't leave a Jordanian or Lebanese refugee camp. So Austin's mission is compromised from the get go. Add to that the administration will not allow SF or any other type of training units to enter the war zone to help with training and recruiting. The only thing I would blame Austin for is if he has not looked Obama in the eye and said "you are asking the impossible of me." We all know whatever is out there in this NATO backed "free Syrian" movement is for political showmenship with the Obolo administration. They need a talking point that they are doing 'something' about Assad and AQ and ISIS. But they are really doing nothing. Nothing because most people in the US don't want to get involved in another Arab/Muslim civil war. Now if Christians were killing Muslims over there, THEN you would see a determined air campaign and the 101st Airborne, 82nd Airborne and 1st Cav Division there within two weeks fully equipped. But Gen Austin? My dealings with him and his staff were brief. Met him twice. He is polite, well educated and a very good commander from the reports of his staff. IMO he was handed a rotten egg and told to make a three layer cake. To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood, and has made us kings and priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.---Revelation 1:5b-6 #2. To: redleghunter (#1) Unbelievable! He really has turned this into a Third World country. Error, indeed, is never set forth in its naked deformity, lest, being thus exposed, it should at once be detected. But it is craftily decked out in an attractive dress, so as by its outward form, to make it appear to the inexperienced … more true than truth itself—Irenaeus, Against Heresies Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|