[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Earth is Scorched with Heat Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman Vibe Shift A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound. Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks Questioning the Big Bang James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go Early humans had sex with chimps O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp. Biblical Contradictions (Alleged) Catholic Church Praising Lucifer Raising the Knife One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make.. Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship) Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war: {Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture. Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY Bible Help Libertysflame Database Updated Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit! Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney. Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End? What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery! 2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years 2024 and beyond in prophecy Questions This Speech Just Broke the Internet This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God! The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’ The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Business See other Business Articles Title: Muslim flight attendant: I was suspended for not serving alcohol Source: CBS URL Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/muslim- ... t-expressjet-airlines-alcohol/ Published: Sep 3, 2015 Author: CBS Staff Post Date: 2015-09-06 09:37:11 by cranky Keywords: None Views: 44479 Comments: 251 A Muslim flight attendant filed a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claiming she was suspended from her job for not serving alcohol, which is against her religious beliefs, CBS Detroit station WWJ-AM reports. Lena Masri, an attorney for the Council on American-Islamic Relations Michigan, said Charee Stanley followed management's directions, working out an arrangement with her coworkers to accommodate passenger requests for alcohol. However, Masri said, ExpressJet Airlines put Stanley on administrative leave after another attendant filed "an Islamophobic complaint" that referenced Stanley's head scarf. "We notified ExpressJet Airlines of its obligation under the law to reasonably accommodate Ms. Stanley's religious beliefs," Masri said at a news conference in Farmington Hills on Tuesday. "Instead, ExpressJet close to violate Ms. Stanely's constitutional rights, placed her on administrative leave for 12 months, after which her employment may be administratively terminated." Masri said the arrangement Stanley had with other attendants to serve alcohol for her had been working out fine since Stanley converted to Islam about a month after becoming a flight attendant for ExpressJet. "I don't think that I should have to choose between practicing my religion properly or earning a living," Stanley said. "I shouldn't have to choose between one or the other because they're both important." Contacted by WWJ-AM for comment, airline spokesman Jarek Beem responded with the following statement: "At ExpressJet, we embrace and respect the values of all of our team members. We are an equal opportunity employer with a long history of diversity in our workforce. As Ms. Stanley is an employee, we are not able to comment on her personnel matters." The Islamic-relations council is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization with the mission "to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding." Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Comments (1-84) not displayed.       .       .       . #85. To: TooConservative (#71) Marriage is something between two and God. The state has no authority to authorize it or prohibit it, nothing it can grant. A "marriage license" is REALLY a license to be able to take a certain set of tax breaks, and to get survivors benefits for Social Security et al. Truth is, we are reaping the bitter fruit of Christian abandonment of their faith. Back when Christians were the vast majority, in a democracy they had the moral duty to make their civil laws BE God's laws, and to have a Christian society living under Christian law, which they instituted. But that's not what Christians did. Christians were greedy and power hungry, so they behaved just like ancient Jews did - enforcing those parts of the law they liked, but disregarding everything they found inconvenient. And the trouble with THAT is that God didn't set up his Law as a TEST, "can they do it all?", but as the NECESSARY STRUCTURE for people to be able to all function happily and in health over the long haul. The result of all of this has been to neuter Christianity and turn it into a Sunday social club, whose members even think that God's law should not be THE law, because, you know, separation of Church and state...(in other words: because Christians don't REALLY want to live under God's law. They want to live under their own laws but be assured of a happy afterlife.) The clerk? Judges? How many imperial officials were Christians in the First Century? Vicomte13  posted on  2015-09-07   8:05:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #86. To: sneakypete (#82) God made Adam and Eve. We are all decendants of them. I guess that makes Cain and Abel MoFO's,right? Even evolutionists say we all have a common ancestor. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   8:20:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #87. To: sneakypete (#76) Did your faggot relatives die of aids? Did they spread their fag disease to others? A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   8:21:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #88. To: sneakypete (#80) Hey "fag gene carrier" Please show us where Kentucky law says she has to marry two faggots. You can't because there are no laws. You're such a dumb ass and a piece of shit. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   8:23:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #89. To: SOSO (#79) Then she should resign. The oath she took was to obey the law, whatever and whenever if is passed. How it ends for her is very much in the air. It's hard for me to beleive that she has gained any points with God for refusing to rendering to Caeser what is Caeser's. A state sanctioned marriage is nothing more than a civil union. There is nothing spiritual or religous about it. A state license is not a sacrament, it's in essence a civil contract. Gays will still exist. And just like straights gays will still live together in a sexual relationship. Religions should leave civil union marriages to the stae and deal with a Holy Union (or whatever you wish to call it) that has spiritual and religious dimensions and significance. As for the Muslim flight attendant, her complaint is still pure BS. You've gone to the dark side. You support tyranny. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   8:24:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #90. To: sneakypete (#75) Suppose the first three were to other women,and now she has sworn off tuna,and wants to slide up next to you? How long has it been since you got any pussy? Sounds like your sex fantasy. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   8:26:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #91. To: sneakypete, Fred Mertz, nativist nationalist (#78) Marriage #1 hubby was not the father of her twin boys - marriage #3 hubby was. Marriage #2 hubby adopted the twin boys that weren't his. Then she married #3 hubby, the father of the twin boys. I am curious if hubby #2, having adopted the twins, got stuck with child support for them when Kim married their birth-father (hubby #2). Since he adopted them, he would be their father legally and the birth-father's obligation would be terminated. So unless their birth-father (hubby #3) did adopt them when he finally married their mother, then hubby #2 (adoptive father) would be on the hook for child support. Sounds like the ultimate cuckservative ripoff by hubby #3. Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-07   9:06:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #92. To: redleghunter, TooConservative (#16) So do the supporters of the KY county clerk who won't issue sodomy marriage licenses also support this Muslim's right to refuse serving alcohol as part of her legally prescribed job duties? Yes I support this Muslim woman. We have Baptists who work in our local restaurants waiting tables. One lady a family friend will not serve alcoholic beverages at the restaurant. Too easy, the assistant manager a Catholic serves the drinks. The Muslim woman should also not serve pork sandwiches on the flight. Just like when vegans refuse to even handle meat. I think we are clouding the issues . In one case it is an employee of a private business and in the other case we have an elected public official sworn to uphold the law. I see great areas of concern when a public official refuses to uphold the law....aka the lawless adm of the emperor . Let's say for example that one of our conservative candidates who have supported Kim Davis wins the elections and properly declares that sanctuary cities violate Federal immigration laws. Then a municipal official ,citing their faith and command to welcome the stranger and alien in your midst ( Leviticus 19:34 ),decides to use the pretext of religious liberty to violate the law ...and further claims any action taken against them is a 'persecution of Christianity' . How would that President then address the contradiction? Davis should've resigned .That was the correct course of action. But if she wants to be a martyr for the cause fine .But she was wrong in telling her deputies that they could not issue the licenses even if they had no moral objection to it. Let's say a Muslim director of the Dept of Motor Vehicles refuses to issue licenses to women ,and also instructs all the clerks in his office to likewise refuse . There is the real slippery slope of this issue . Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? tomder55  posted on  2015-09-07   9:08:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #93. To: tomder55 (#92) Davis should've resigned Liberal piece of shit position. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   9:15:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #94. To: tomder55 (#92) There is the real slippery slope of this issue . Sounds like you are talking about your boy friend and vaseline. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   9:16:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #95. To: tomder55, redleghunter (#92) We have Baptists who work in our local restaurants waiting tables. One lady a family friend will not serve alcoholic beverages at the restaurant. Too easy, the assistant manager a Catholic serves the drinks. She makes her living off a saloon whose customers are drawn there to drink alcohol to which she objects. She is only particular about handling alcohol herself, not taking money from the sale of alcohol to others. And there are no other local dry restaurants where she could work? Or do the drinkers just tip better and she wants in on the cash? So could this Baptist woman, who presumably objects to prostitution as well as serving alcohol, work as the cashier in a brothel, as long as she doesn't have to do any whoring herself? Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-07   9:21:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #96. To: tomder55, nolu chan (#92) But she was wrong in telling her deputies that they could not issue the licenses even if they had no moral objection to it. No she wasn't. That is the law. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   9:23:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #97. To: TooConservative, redleghunter, (#57) Actually, we don't know what that county's voters think. But we do know that the Constitution establishes a Supreme Court. The Constitution does not establish a Supreme County Clerk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDBiLT3LASk Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? tomder55  posted on  2015-09-07   9:45:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #98. To: A K A Stone (#96) If you are an official of the state and you are not willing to uphold the law because you have a serious issue of conscience over a particular law, then you should resign. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? tomder55  posted on  2015-09-07   9:51:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #99. To: Vicomte13 (#84) Cain and Abel had sisters, and married them. So it was just "regular" incest? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   9:54:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #100. To: A K A Stone (#87) Did your faggot relatives die of aids? Did they spread their fag disease to others? Is your worry about AIDS why you are so obsessed with homosexual sex and other men's asses? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   9:55:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #101. To: A K A Stone (#88) Hey "fag gene carrier" Please show us where Kentucky law says she has to marry two faggots. Show ME where it says in Kentucky law that faggots aren't citizens. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   9:56:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #102. To: tomder55 (#92) The Muslim woman should also not serve pork sandwiches on the flight. Just like when vegans refuse to even handle meat. I think we are clouding the issues . In one case it is an employee of a private business and in the other case we have an elected public official sworn to uphold the law. I see great areas of concern when a public official refuses to uphold the law....aka the lawless adm of the emperor . ....... Let's say a Muslim director of the Dept of Motor Vehicles refuses to issue licenses to women ,and also instructs all the clerks in his office to likewise refuse . There is the real slippery slope of this issue . EXCELLENT points. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   9:59:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #103. To: A K A Stone (#93) Davis should've resigned Liberal piece of shit position. Yours is a un-American fascist piece of shit position,but I do thank you for finally admitting your want your religious cult to rule the country,much like Islam rules other countries. I have no trouble at all picturing you and Grand Island volunteering to work as the "modesty police". Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   10:02:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #104. To: A K A Stone (#96) (Edited) No she wasn't. That is the law. The law also says there will be no official establishment of religion in this country. BTW,there is no such thing as life after death,and you are NOT going to go to heavy,no matter how much hatred you spew to please your religious masters. You are going to die,and then rot. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   10:03:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #105. To: sneakypete (#101) I never claimed they weren't citizens. That is a another lie from you. Many lies come from you. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:05:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #106. To: sneakypete (#104) The law also says there will be no official establishment of religion in this country. And there isn't. Which is good. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:06:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #107. To: sneakypete (#101) Show ME where it says in Kentucky law that faggots aren't citizens. I don't know of any states where they recognize gay men as a particular grouping in that way. The old sodomy laws never really named any person as a sodomite, they just criminalized sodomy as a behavior. Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-07   10:07:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #108. To: sneakypete (#103) I have no trouble at all picturing you and Grand Island volunteering to work as the "modesty police". That is because you have quite an imagination. I remember when the chicks used to go topless at Caesars Creek Beach. It didn't bother me in the least. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:07:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #109. To: A K A Stone (#105) I never claimed they weren't citizens. Of course you did. How else can you explain them not having the same rights aw other citizens? Or are like Obomber and the rest of the left,and wish to create whole groups of "special affirmative action citizens" that have more rights than the rest of us? If so,you are anti-American. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   10:08:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #110. To: sneakypete (#104) BTW,there is no such thing as life after death,and you are NOT going to go to heavy,no matter how much hatred you spew to please your religious masters. You are going to die,and then rot. So says the fool. I recall another lie of yours. When you claimed you were agnostic and weren't sure if there was a God or not. You sure lie a lot. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:09:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #111. To: sneakypete (#109) (Edited) Of course you did. How else can you explain them not having the same rights aw other citizens? They have all the same rights as they should. Just not special rights to change definition to suit your families many perversions. Just like a man can't join college womans basketball teams. That isn't discrimination either. Making you not only a liar but a hypocrite. You want everything equal but not womens sports. Why is that hypocrite. I know because you are just an asshole who can't get any pussy. That is why your wife left you. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:12:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #112. To: A K A Stone (#105) "I never claimed they weren't citizens." He thinks that's relevant because he thinks citizens should be allowed to marry whomever they want. Brother-sister. Father-daughter. Three women. Four men. 8-year-olds (hey, they're citizens!) misterwhite  posted on  2015-09-07   10:12:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #113. To: misterwhite (#112) If Pete spouted off this nonsense in the founders day. He would have been swiftly killed. He is the enemy of America. I don't even know why I let the asshole post here frankly. I guess he amuses me. Or I am just to nice and fair minded. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:14:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #114. To: TooConservative (#107) The old sodomy laws never really named any person as a sodomite, they just criminalized sodomy as a behavior. There was even a famous case in Texas back in the late 60's or so where local cops were spying on a family for unstated reasons,and actually filmed the husband having anal sex with his wife while bent across the coffee table in their living room. They never did gather any evidence the couple were guilty of anything else,but they took them to trial for sodomy in the state court,and they got sentenced to 10 years in prison. IIRC,the film they used while peeping through the crack in the Venetian blinds was used as evidence in court,and there never was any legal explanation for why they were peeping in on and filming private citizens in the privacy of their own home. The Playboy Foundation and Hugh Hefner are the ones that brought this case to light and financed the appeal that got them out of prison. My best guess is they pissed off some local political official that wanted something they were refusing to sell cheap. Local authorities got away with a lot of crap back in the pre-internet days,when they could keep stuff like this private. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   10:14:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #115. To: A K A Stone (#108) I remember when the chicks used to go topless at Caesars Creek Beach. It didn't bother me in the least. LOL! I think you may be admitting to more than you intended. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   10:16:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #116. To: sneakypete (#109) Or are like Obomber and the rest of the left,and wish to create whole groups of "special affirmative action citizens" that have more rights than the rest of us? Mirror meet the Peter. Peter wants special rights for faggots. Because he has loads of faggots in his family. His words not mine. You and Obama agree on the faggots. I don't agree with anything Obama did. He is 100 percernt wrong on everything. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:16:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #117. To: sneakypete (#115) LOL! I think you may be admitting to more than you intended. It's the truth. They used to go topless back in the 90's or early 2000's. I only witnessed two of them. My wife told me about them. It didn't bother me in the least. I like tits. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:18:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #118. To: tomder55 (#98) If you are an official of the state and you are not willing to uphold the law because you have a serious issue of conscience over a particular law, then you should resign. What you are saying is that Christains can't be part of the government. Sorry for the course language. You deserve more respect. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:21:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #119. To: A K A Stone (#111) NYSlimes, 2010: Transgender Man Is on Women’s Team Expect a lot more of this. If you can't make it as a male college ball player, just claim tranny status and get a full scholarship to play as a woman (but don't take the drugs or get the surgery). And you do get to shower with the female players (unfortunately mostly lesbians). Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-07   10:22:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #120. To: A K A Stone (#116) Peter wants special rights for faggots. Because he has loads of faggots in his family. His words not mine. Once again you are proving yourself to be a liar. Produce ONE quote where I claim to have "loads of faggots in my family" or admit you are a lair. You are also delusional about your cult "owning marriage". Marriage existed BEFORE Christianity. If anything Christianity "stole" it. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) sneakypete  posted on  2015-09-07   10:23:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #121. To: sneakypete (#120) You said you had lots of homosexuals in your family. I'm not going to search for it. We all read it. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:28:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #122. To: A K A Stone (#121) I'm not going to search for it. We all read it. I don't recall it, not here or at LP or at TOS. I recall sneaky from all 3 sites, going back to the late Nineties or so. Not that I read every post he has made. Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-07   10:30:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #123. To: TooConservative (#122) Ask Grand Island or White sands or maybe even cz82. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:32:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #124. To: TooConservative (#122) When I reminded him in the past his typical response was always something like you have fags in your family too. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:33:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #125. To: TooConservative (#119) NYSlimes, 2010: Transgender Man Is on Women’s Team Maybe Mike Tyson should make a comeback. As a womans boxer. He should go to the olympics. I'm sure the Peter sneaker would support it. I mean we are all equal. There is nothing different between men and women. A K A Stone  posted on  2015-09-07   10:34:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply         .       .       . Comments (126 - 251) not displayed. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com