[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
How To Title: Jeb Bush Claims That Creating Encryption Harms America from the wanna-try-that-one-again? dept Sometimes you have to wonder if the various political candidates are trying to lose the knowledgeable techie vote. Chris Christie has been strongly pro-surveillance, and it's not hard to guess where he would come down on the whole "backdooring encryption" debate. However, few of the other candidates have been directly asked about that -- though that may be changing. Jeb Bush has now stated that he's against encryption, because, apparently it harms America. This is, of course, mostly deeply wrong, while also partially right, but for the wrong reasons. First of all, if we want Americans to be safer we should be demanding more encryption, not less. It is a confused state of mind that, just as we keep hearing about more and more data being leaked and hacked into whether by individual malicious hackers or, potentially, nation states, thinks the "answer" to this is somehow less security, rather than more. However, in a weird way, Bush is actually correct. In some instances, encryption actually does make the government's job harder. But that's a feature, not a bug. Bush should, perhaps, listen to his brother's former Homeland Security Secretary, Michael Chertoff who recently came out against backdooring encryption, noting: ... we do not historically organize our society to make it maximally easy for law enforcement, even with court orders, to get information. We often make trade-offs and we make it more difficult. If that were not the case then why wouldn’t the government simply say all of these [takes out phone] have to be configured so they’re constantly recording everything that we say and do and then when you get a court order it gets turned over and we wind up convicting ourselves. So I don’t think socially we do that.This is an important point that Jeb Bush (and many folks in favor of backdooring encryption) don't seem to get. Separately, from Bush's quote, it appears he's not even familiar with the details of the debate (not that this stops him from opining ignorantly about it). By saying that merely "making" encryption is bad for America, he's just wrong. The debate isn't about making encryption. It's about whether or not encryption should be (or, realistically, can be) compromised via some sort of backdoor. Experts have explained why this actually makes us all worse off, but it's rather disturbing that people like Jeb Bush have summarized the "we should backdoor encyrption" side of things as "we should be against encryption." Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Jeb Bush Claims That Creating Encryption Harms America Nonsense. Encrypting is an act of love. There are three kinds of people in the world: those that can add and those that can't #2. To: cranky, Deckard (#1) What he really is saying you the peons should not be encrypted. Government and the ptb must be encrypted to keep peons from knowing the truth.
#3. To: Justified (#2) Hey - remember that episode - you were walking home from And a little while after you got home, Mom asked:
#4. To: Deckard (#0) Jeb Bush has a feather up his ass a little further than his finger can reach. He's desperately attempting to create or find any issue that will get him an impressive image of doing something to get the nomination. If shit were brains, nobody in that entire family would have enough to fart.
#5. To: rlk (#4) Jeb Bush has a feather up his ass a little further than his finger can reach. He's desperately attempting to create or find any issue that will get him an impressive image of doing something to get the nomination. If shit were brains, nobody in that entire family would have enough to fart. Despite all of that, he will still be the next POTUS. “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul![]() In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.Paul Craig Roberts#6. To: Deckard (#5) Jeb Bush is just following his BIG BROTHER, GWBush for the US Patriot Act and his daddy: a CIA control freak called GHBush. What else do you expect in an oligarchy?
#7. To: rlk (#4) " If shit were brains, nobody in that entire family would have enough to fart. " LOL!!! Someone please tell my why I should GAS what he, or any of his family has to say. Si vis pacem, para bellum #8. To: Stoner (#7) Someone please tell my why I should GAS what he, or any of his family has to say. You sure have a bad attitude you really do need to care more, I'm sure the oligarchy isn't happy with you!! :)
#9. To: CZ82 (#8) " I'm sure the oligarchy isn't happy with you!! " Good! F EM!!! Si vis pacem, para bellum #10. To: Stoner (#9) They won't like that attitude either, shame on you!! :)
#11. To: CZ82 (#10) " They won't like that attitude either, shame on you!! " Yes. If I were Catholic, I would be running to confession, LOL Si vis pacem, para bellum Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|