[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Talk Radio Watch Title: Rush Limbaugh is Terrified of Barak Obama
WND Exclusive ELECTION 2008 Rush Limbaugh: Obama can't win this Radio host believes 'Operation Chaos' wreaking havoc in Democratic process Posted: April 23, 2008 2:54 pm Eastern By Joe Kovacs © 2008 WorldNetDaily
Radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh says neither Barack Obama nor Hillary Clinton can become the Democratic presidential nominee by means of getting enough votes, and claims it's because of his "Operation Chaos" to have Republican voters switch parties and disturb the primary process. "Whoever is the nominee did not win it," Limbaugh said today during his post-Pennsylvania primary analysis. "This is what everybody is missing." "Obama cannot win this by winning the primary process. He has to rely on unelected superdelegates just as she must. Both of these candidates need unelected superdelegates to be the nominee. Were it not for Operation Chaos, Obama could win this by winning the primary process. But he can't now. Nor can she. So, unelected party hacks ... are gonna choose the nominee. All the people that have voted in these primaries up to now will not be a factor." For months now, Limbaugh, the most listened-to radio voice in America, has been encouraging voters to temporarily switch their political affiliation to the Democratic Party and vote for Hillary Clinton. The idea is not necessarily to make the New York senator the nominee, but simply to wreak havoc in the party.
WND Exclusive ELECTION 2008 Rush Limbaugh: Obama can't win this Radio host believes 'Operation Chaos' wreaking havoc in Democratic process Posted: April 23, 2008 2:54 pm Eastern By Joe Kovacs © 2008 WorldNetDaily
Radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh says neither Barack Obama nor Hillary Clinton can become the Democratic presidential nominee by means of getting enough votes, and claims it's because of his "Operation Chaos" to have Republican voters switch parties and disturb the primary process. "Whoever is the nominee did not win it," Limbaugh said today during his post-Pennsylvania primary analysis. "This is what everybody is missing." "Obama cannot win this by winning the primary process. He has to rely on unelected superdelegates just as she must. Both of these candidates need unelected superdelegates to be the nominee. Were it not for Operation Chaos, Obama could win this by winning the primary process. But he can't now. Nor can she. So, unelected party hacks ... are gonna choose the nominee. All the people that have voted in these primaries up to now will not be a factor." For months now, Limbaugh, the most listened-to radio voice in America, has been encouraging voters to temporarily switch their political affiliation to the Democratic Party and vote for Hillary Clinton. The idea is not necessarily to make the New York senator the nominee, but simply to wreak havoc in the party. (Story continues below)
"The nominee will have been delivered by party hacks, unelected superdelegates," Limbaugh said, "and that is a dream come true for Operation Chaos." Limbaugh, describing himself as the commander in chief of the operation, suggested there's a way for Obama to end the ongoing process and secure the nomination, and that's to quickly acknowledge the impact of the radio strategy. "What Obama has to do is go out and say this [Hillary] win is artificial and this win is phony because of Operation Chaos. He needs to go out there and say, 'Why in the world is everybody taking this seriously? Rush Limbaugh had his listeners register as Democrats for one day to go vote for Hillary to prolong this. We're letting Limbaugh get away with making our party look like it's in a total sewer and a mess. This victory in Pennsylvania is illegitimate, is undeserved because Democrats did not vote for her. Republicans did.'" Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26. Limblow-hard practises witchcraft on his show everyday. Limblow-hard is an effeminate fat-boy who has probably never been to a shooting range and shouldered a 12 ga. or a 30-'06. None of the candidates (except Ron Paul, who is still in it) are qualified for Presidente. None of the commentators are qualified to represent the truth in this election.
#8. To: barkentine (#3) Limblow-hard practises witchcraft on his show everyday. Like to explain that?
#9. To: _Jim (#8) Like to explain that? Go here: http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=4123
#11. To: barkentine, Jim (#9) Go here: From your link. The other dimension of witchcraft, is broader and more subtle. I define it as anything we do to manipulate other people to do things against their wills in order to achieve our own self-centered desires. Manipulation is an attempt to control someone else. Control and manipulation are the practice of witchcraft. In our day we do not use witch's brew to control other people. Rather, we do such things as play on emotions, withhold affection, provoke fear, provoke guilt, intimidate with anger, lie and deceive, or use self-pity.
#18. To: A K A Stone (#11) (Edited) The other dimension of witchcraft, is broader and more subtle. I define it as anything we do to manipulate other people to do things against their wills in order to achieve our own self-centered desires. Manipulation is an attempt to control someone else. Control and manipulation are the practice of witchcraft. In our day we do not use witch's brew to control other people. Rather, we do such things as play on emotions, withhold affection, provoke fear, provoke guilt, intimidate with anger, lie and deceive, or use self-pity.
Sounds like what is practiced in an FLDS compound to keep those mind-numbed women under control.
#20. To: _Jim (#18) Sounds like what is practiced in an FLDS compound to mind-numbed women under control. So what. It's our gov't that has committed a great sin in this recent Waco II.
#23. To: barkentine (#20) So what. Oh that's right, you're a libertarian (little L). I could PROBABLY even 'fight dogs' and you wouldn't care, as long as they stayed on my property and didn't attack YOUR dog. One of those kinds of 'libertarians'. No laws. Free Michael Vic.
#24. To: _Jim (#23) Do you think Michael Vick violated any federal laws?
#25. To: A K A Stone (#24) Do you think Michael Vick violated any federal laws? It's not up for debate what I think - I'm trying to winnow out what the 'libertarian' position is for helpless creatures (certainly dogs cannot defend themselves against being involved in 'fight' circuits, so other humans seem to step in and pass laws, etc). Do you think it is okay to 'fight' dogs?
#26. To: _Jim (#25) Do you think it is okay to 'fight' dogs? No, I think it is cruel. But I don't think it is a federal matter. If a state wants to outlaw it it is fine with me.
Let me ask you this. Is it ok for the "humane society" to kill dogs?
Replies to Comment # 26. Is it ok for the "humane society" to kill dogs? Are you going to equate the two - what Michael Vick did and what the humane society does? Do you see a distinction between humane and inhumane actions here? Do you eat beef (or chicken)?
#28. To: A K A Stone (#26) But I don't think it is a federal matter. Why is it a federal matter? From: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/25/vick/index.html we have:
SUSSEX, Virginia (CNN) -- A Virginia grand jury has indicted suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick and three co-defendants on state charges of running a dogfighting ring at Vick's Virginia home Where do you get 'fed' out of that?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 26. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|