[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: Donald Trump: The rat that roared Stop waiting for Donald Trump to blow up. The bombastic billionaire isn't going to explode. He's going to shrivel up. Trump's fatal flaw isn't his oversized ego, but his undersized character. America can love an irreverent blowhard — even a foul and boorish one like Trump. But a blowhard can't get away with whining and being thin-skinned. Trump is proving himself to be a thin-skinned whiner, rather than the magnanimous braggart whose image he has cultivated. Trump's appeal is a mystery to much of the press — both the conservative media and the left-leaning mainstream media. Part of it is his hawkish (if deeply inconsistent) rhetoric on immigration, an issue the elites of both parties like to avoid. Part of his appeal comes from his inchoate (but not ultimately wrong) rants against the corruption of Washington politics. But his unapologetic offensiveness — the very trait the media has been counting on to sink Trump — is also part of his appeal. At every turn, media elites ask him, basically: Won't you publicly apologize for some thing you've said? That was Megyn Kelly's question to him, specifically about nasty personal things he had said about women. NBC's Chuck Todd asked him if he was allergic to apologizing. Trump's answer to Todd was perfect: "No. I apologize when I'm wrong." Today, we're supposed to apologize — grovel, even — for nearly everything. Make one bad joke on Twitter, and you're expected to prostrate yourself before the social media mob. The list of forbidden joke topics is expanding toward infinity, as comedians from Jerry Seinfeld to Trevor Noah to Amy Schumer learn daily. Heck, Democratic politician Marty O'Malley even had to apologize for saying "all lives matter." Even if you don't do anything wrong, you're supposed to apologize for your privilege: white privilege, male privilege, straight privilege, upper-middle-class privilege. Simply identifying as your actual biological gender counts as "privilege" today. In this suffocating, absurd, oppressive environment of political correctness, Trump looks like a free and brave man, saying what he wants and refusing to apologize. The people who support him see him as unchained, and they want to be like him. So his bombast won't bring him down, because it's self-reinforcing. Even the truly foul, vulgar and idiotic things he says (of course, today we use only the less descriptive and more political descriptors such as "offensive") only serve to bolster his image as a pariah in an age of political correctness. None of that can bring Trump down. What will bring him down is the fact that criticism instantly turns him into a thin-skinned whiner. His reaction to Megyn Kelly was telling. When confronted with his demeaning and dumb comments about women, Trump didn't simply say, I'm too busy making America great again to worry about your petty speech police. He complained to Kelly about "the way you have treated me." Awwwww. The bombastic reality TV star entering into politics has been criticized by a media figure. Poor baby. He then spent days on Twitter just complaining about Fox. For example: "Other networks seem to treat me so much better than @FoxNews." A man who stands behind what he says but apologizes when he's wrong sounds admirable and appealing. Trump doesn't do that. After his weird attacks on John McCain's service in Vietnam and suffering as a POW, Trump gave mealy-mouthed non-credible, quasi-defenses. As Rich Lowry wrote in National Review, "For someone who prides himself on being the bold truth-teller, Trump has a penchant for trying to litigate his way out of his controversial statements." Trump is willing, at least, to stand up for his whining. "I am a whiner," he said on CNN Tuesday morning, "and I'm a whiner and I keep whining and whining until I win." This rings familiar if you've followed Trump. He's found success by gaming bankruptcy law, failing to repay debts, exploiting his crony connections, whining, and working the refs. And so the picture of the man comes into focus: Trump is Victor Hugo's Monsieur Thenardier: "We know where the wind is blowing. Money is the stuff we smell. And when we're rich as Croesus, Jesus! Won't we see you all in hell!" Trump is another sewer rat in American industry. He wants to be another sewer rat of American politics. And he promises to make the U.S. the sewer rat of the world. The media has waited for Trump to flame out. He may instead simply scurry away. Timothy P. Carney, The Washington Examiner's senior political columnist, can be contacted at tcarney@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears Tuesday and Thursday nights on washingtonexaminer.com. Poster Comment: He is pretty whiny, by his own admission.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 46. "As Rich Lowry wrote in National Review, "For someone who prides himself on being the bold truth-teller, Trump has a penchant for trying to litigate his way out of his controversial statements." No, Rich, Trump has a penchant for going after the media, and individuals in the media, when they misquote him, take his words out-of-context, or lie about what he said. And you don't like that. YOU'RE the media, dammit, and no one is supposed to insult anyone who "buys ink by the barrel", right? They're supposed to kiss your ass and beg you not to write bad things about them. Screw that, Rich. You disgust Trump and the rest of us more than the good-old-boy network in Washington, DC.
#4. To: misterwhite (#3) "As Rich Lowry wrote in National Review, "For someone who prides himself on being the bold truth-teller, Trump has a penchant for trying to litigate his way out of his controversial statements." Trump is a lawsuit troll. He likes to sue writers if they don't agree with his claims of net worth. Or if they mention his four bankrupties. He sues old widows to seize their property for himself.
#5. To: TooConservative (#4) "Trump is a lawsuit troll." And yet you claim he has nothing in common with the average American. See? "Or if they mention his four bankrupties." Only when they don't also mention his hundreds of successes, resulting in him becoming a multi- billionaire. "He sues old widows to seize their property for himself." Oh, please. He didn't have legal standing to do that. But the City of Atlantic City did. Trump offered that old widow $1.9 million (plus a free lifetime residence on any of his properties) for a house she paid $20,000 for. That old widow got greedy and asked for $5 million. Her house ended up on the auction block.
#6. To: misterwhite (#5) Trump offered that old widow $1.9 million (plus a free lifetime residence on any of his properties) for a house she paid $20,000 for. That old widow got greedy and asked for $5 million. Her house ended up on the auction block. There is always... the rest of the story. Have you noticed on LP or on LF, the bigger your agenda, the more you post articles or statements that lack "the rest of the story" TC isn't bad. He's a more well rounded poster than Deckard, Hondo and Bucky... but his anti Trump agenda might leave him leaving out "the rest of the story". Kinda like claiming some drug addled turd bag, that tried to run over an officer, was shot and killed for a tail light. lol
#9. To: GrandIsland, Deckard, buckeroo, TooConservative (#6) (Edited) TC isn't bad. He's a more well rounded poster than Deckard, Hondo and Bucky... Thanks for the ping, agenda shill. You're more of a pointy pinhead doughnut munching jack booted thug, tard.
#10. To: hondo68 (#9) Thanks for the ping Show me were I must ping you in the forum rules.... oh, it's common courtesy to ping you? Since when did you deserve or earn that?
#11. To: GrandIsland (#10) Have you ever eaten a doughnut while driving a squad car? How about slurpin' a kup o' koffee while driving a squad car?
#13. To: buckeroo (#11) Have you ever eaten a doughnut while driving a squad car? How about slurpin' a kup o' koffee while driving a squad car? Both, actually. I've even toasted a $4,500.00 Panasonic lap top PC by accidentally pouring a 24 ounce Sunoco coffee on the keyboard.
#15. To: GrandIsland (#13) Both, actually. I've even toasted a $4,500.00 Panasonic lap top PC by accidentally pouring a 24 ounce Sunoco coffee on the keyboard. You mean you charged the publick for your own negligence of duty while willful destruction of publick property?
#16. To: buckeroo (#15) You mean you charged the publick for your own negligence of duty while willful destruction of publick property? look up the definition of "willful", Bucky... it's how you learn. lol
#17. To: GrandIsland (#16) Slurpin' koffee & eating doughnuts in a squad car while on duty is "willful" violation of formal policies and procedures. You should think about all the shenanigans you think you got away with costing the publick perhaps MILLIONS. I wager you were asleep in some back alley, too. Yeah, right behind Ike's Korner store catering to bums like you sucking down cheap wine "in the publick interst."
#18. To: buckeroo (#17) Slurpin' koffee & eating doughnuts in a squad car while on duty is "willful" violation of formal policies and procedures. My assigned patrol car was my office. You drank your Coffee in your office... and so did I. It was not a policy violation the eat or drink in a patrol car... unless the drink was alcoholic.
#19. To: GrandIsland (#18) Oh, I see... sitting in a squad car for 7.99 hours out of an 8.0 shift eating doughnuts & slurpin' koffee hiding from your real patrol duties give you an "out" of policy and procedures. Of course, you were right there in case of a publick riot or if some REAL crininal came your way, correct? How many dawgs did you murder in the name of the "doughnut GAWD?"
#22. To: buckeroo (#19) Only shot and killed one dog. It was a st. Bernard and it later tested rabid. It had already bit one person. Do you need a big liberal tissue?
#32. To: GrandIsland (#22) Only shot and killed one dog. It was a st. Bernard and it later tested rabid. It had already bit one person. So you had to shoot with your right hand while holding your donut in your left hand? : )
#43. To: TooConservative (#32) I shoot right handed... but every time I go to the range, I practice weak hand shooting... in case I lose the use of my strong hand in a firefight... not for holding a donut.
#44. To: GrandIsland (#43) ... in case I lose the use of my strong hand in a firefight... not for holding a donut. C'mon, you can't be a real cop if you can't quick-draw a jelly donut while firing at a puppy. : )
#45. To: TooConservative (#44) Don't be a tool, TC
#46. To: GrandIsland (#45) I'm just trying to have fun with the donut thing.
Replies to Comment # 46. #47. To: TooConservative (#46) So does Bucky. You don't wanna be known as having the same maturity level as him, do ya? I probably eat as many donuts a year as you or less. I probably average between 1-5 donuts a year. I never have them in my house, I never go to donut places to buy them. I might pick one up at a function I'm at... or offered one while a guest at someone else's house.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 46. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|