politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: 2016 Selection: 1/3 of All Campaign Donations Funded by Just 60 Elite Individuals
Source:
SHTF Plan
URL Source: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-ne ... -60-elite-individuals_08042015
Published: Aug 4, 2015
Author: Mac Slavo
Post Date: 2015-08-06 11:18:13 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1789
Comments: 6
Campaign finance reform ain’t gonna cut it. New SuperPAC rules have erased the limits on cash that donors can give to candidates, allowing the massive amounts of money to pile up even quicker. Moreover, the political donations are very revealing. There is no doubt that the will of the people has been sidelined in favor of the biggest pockets. Fewer and fewer individuals are underwriting the costs of campaigns, and making it a prerequisite to get cozy with big corporate donors, and edging out the influence of the every man. The Associated Press just reviewed the donations so far for the 2016 presidential cycle, and found stunning results – that just 60 individuals have given more than a third of the total money so far: An Associated Press analysis of fundraising reports filed with federal regulators through Friday found that nearly 60 donations of a million dollars or more accounted for about a third of the more than $380 million brought in so far for the 2016 presidential election. Donors who gave at least $100,000 account for about half of all donations so far to candidates’ presidential committees and the super PACs that support them. Already, the 2016 campaign has approached the half a billion dollar mark, and we are nowhere near the primaries, let alone the general election, which is warming up to be a record-setting massive cost – and it can’t be good for “democracy.” Tea Party favorite Ted Cruz is so far a good example of the difference that is playing out between traditional campaigning – where he it took three months of schmoozing and begging to raise about $10 million – versus the new power of SuperPACs to provide instant, major backing for choice candidates: It took Ted Cruz three months to raise $10 million for his campaign for president, a springtime sprint of $1,000-per-plate dinners, hundreds of handshakes and a stream of emails asking supporters to chip in a few bucks. One check, from one donor, topped those results. New York hedge fund magnate Robert Mercer’s $11 million gift to a group backing the Texas Republican’s White House bid put him atop a tiny group of millionaires and billionaires whose contributions already dwarf those made by the tens of thousands of people who have given to their favorite presidential candidate. The other candidates are on a similar track. Michael Krieger at LibertyBlitzkrieg raised a similar concern with his recent article: American Oligarchy – 400 Families Represent 50% of Money Raised by 2016 Presidential Candidates Thus Far. He points out the looming question surrounding oligarchy and our so-called “elections,” which operate much more like “selections” by the elite: I’ve noticed more and more people publicly admitting that the U.S. in nothing more than an oligarchy. Even former U.S. President Jimmy Carter said it last week. Meanwhile, just today, I came across the latest shocking proof of how bought and paid for “our” political system really is. We find out from the New York Times, that only 400 families account for nearly half of all spending on the 2016 Presidential election so far. The Dark Ages almost look democratic by comparison. The NY Times added: To peruse the top donors in presidential politics is to take a cross section of the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. At least 67 are billionaires or married to one, according to Forbes. Even a Princeton/Northwestern study admitted that democracy has been reduced to illusion: Our analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts… if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened. Is the system broken enough for you yet? Yes, we are a Constitutional Republic, but without a healthy democratic spirit in elections and public discourse, shortcuts are taken by those in power, the oligarchy dominates, people are turned against each other over petty issues, and our rights are reduced to char. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Just a reminder -- that's for Republicans AND Democrats.
At the risk of saying anything nice about McStain, even McCain-Feingold was better than the Court's ruling in Citizens United. The result of Citizens United was the dominance of Tycoons United over domestic politics. Citizens United was a Court error far worse than Kelo, as bad as their rulings on sodomy marriage and ObamaCare.
I've noticed that a few posters here at LF who are always pushing the European system of government/government welfare have avoided this thread like it has the plague. Guess they don't want to face the facts others have been telling them that the system they favor only benefits the oligarchy/plutocracy!! You would not known that given the article. Seems Cruz is only mentioned for the 'meager' $11M raised thus far. They could have easily mentioned the $110M Jeb has amassed or the corner on the Wall St. Banksters Hitlery has not to mention the Soros gang. The exact mention of Cruz makes me wonder who the site is beholden to. "When Americans reach out for values of faith, family, and caring for the needy, they're saying, "We want the word of God. We want to face the future with the Bible.'"---Ronald Reagan
The liberal press is better known for what they omit. Or don't report at all. Then there's no way to fact check.
The fact is that 'Citizen's United' has set the stage for the 1st time I can recall where an incumbent can be "primaried" ,and the challenger can find the funding outside of the party structure to run an insurgency campaign. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
#3. To: Deckard, redleghunter, Liberator, European style government fruit loops (#0)
“Let me see which pig "DON'T" I want to vote for, the one with or without lipstick??" Hmmmmm...
#4. To: misterwhite, liberator, CZ82, tomder55, TooConservative (#1)
Just a reminder -- that's for Republicans AND Democrats.
#5. To: redleghunter (#4)
"You would not known that given the article."
#6. To: TooConservative (#2)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]