[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: God's Economics In His Own Words
Source: Genesis through Revelation
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 23, 2015
Author: God
Post Date: 2015-07-23 11:41:25 by Vicomte13
Keywords: None
Views: 2636
Comments: 33

The roots of economics: Of natural law, order, energy, the elements, the cosmos, sky-sea-and land, plants, animals and humans, reproduction, food, the serpent, and the tree of knowledge of function and dysfunction; the imposition scarcity, of the need for clothing, and of potential medical needs.

ELOHIYM [the Powers]: "Or [order or light] will exist."

"Day." "Night."

"A sheet will exist in midst of the waters, making separate waters to waters."

"Skies."

"The waters from under the skies will be bound up into one area and the dry ground will be seen."

"Land." "Seas."

"The land will make sprout shoots, stems making sowing seed, produce tree making produce of his kind with his seed in him, upon the land."

"Luminaries will exist in [the] sheet [of] the skies to make separate between the day and between the night, and they exist to [make] signs and to [make] appointed [times], and to days and years, and the luminaries exist in [the] sheet [of] the skies to make light upon the land."

"Swarmers will swarm the waters, living beings, and flyers upon the land will much fly upon [the] faces [of the] sheet [of] the skies."

"Reproduce! And increase! And fill the waters in the seas! And flyers, increase in the land."

"The land will make go out kind[s] of living beings, beasts and treaders, and living land beings [of] their kind[s]."

"We will do human in [the] image [of] us, like the likeness [of] us, and he ruled in fish [of] the sea and in flyers [of] the skies, and in the beast, and in all the land, and in all [of] the treader treading upon the land."

"Reproduce! And increase! And fill the land! And subdue her! Rule in fish [of] the sea and in flyer [of] the skies and in all living treading upon the land."

"Look! I gave all stems sowing seeds that [are] upon [the] faces [of] all the land. And each produce tree[s] that in him sowing seeds; to you [it] will exist for food. And to all living [in] the land, and to all flyer [of] the skies, and to all living treading upon the land: all green stems to food."

YHWH: "You will eat from all tree[s] of the garden. And from [the] tree [of] the discernment [of] functional and dysfunctional - you will not eat from him, given that in [the] day you eat from him: die, you will die."

YHWH ELOHIYM: "Not functional is the human [as] a stick {i.e.: a single branch]. I will do to him help, like opposite him."

The woman, quoting Elohiym to the serpent regarding the Tree of Discernment of Function and Dsfunction: "You will not eat from him, and you will not touch him, otherwise you will die."

YHWH: "Where [are] you?"

"Who made face-to-face to you that you [are] naked? From the tree which I did much direct you except from him to eat: you will eat."

"What this did you do?"

"Given that you did do this, spit-upon [are] you from all the beast and from all the living. Upon your belly you will walk and power you will eat all the days of your living. And hostility I will set down between you and between the woman and between your seed and between her seed. He will fall upon your head, and you will fall upon his heel."

"Make increase - I will make increase your (singular) hardship and your (singular) pregnancy; in distressing pain you (singular) will bring forth sons; and to your (singular) man you (singular) [will be] following, and he will regulate in you."

"Given that you hearkened to [the] voice [of] your woman and you will eat from the tree from which I did much direct you, saying you will not eat from him, the ground [is] spitted-upon in your crossing-over; in hardship you (masculine singular) will eat her all days you live. And bramble and thistle she [the land] will make spring up to you, and you ate stem[s] [of] the field. In sweat [of] your noses you (masculine singular) will eat bread until you turn back to the ground, given that you [are] powder and to powder you will turn back."

YHWH ELOHIYM: "Though the human existed [a] like one from us, to know functional and dysfunctional, and now otherwise he will send his hand and take also from Tree [of} the Livings and ate and lived to distant time."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#5. To: All (#0) (Edited)

The first post covered Genesis 1:1 through 3:24. To continue -

Qayin begins the violence in the land by killing Hevel. God finally decides to drown his wind (spirit) from all flesh in the land specifically because of the violence.

YHWH to Qayin (acquired = 'Cain'), regarding Hevel (vanity, whiff = 'Abel'):

"To what (why) did he flare up to you, and why did your faces fall? [Do] not. If you will make do well, lift up. And if you will not make do well, opening to failure [is] stretching out. [He (Abel) is] following you, and you will regulate [rule] in him."

"Where [is] Hevel your brother?"

"What you did do [the] voice of your brother's bloods [is] crying out to me from the ground. And now spitted-upon [are] you from the ground which parted her mouth to take your brother's bloods from your hand. Given that, you will serve the ground [but] she will not make her strength add to you. Staggering and nodding you will exist in the land."

{Note: Qayin did not go "to the land of Nod", he was "staggering and nodding in the land".}

"For (to avoid) this, all killing Qayin, seven times will he be made avenged."

Male and female he (Elohiym) did fatten them, and he will much kneel at them, and he will call out their title "Human" in the day they be fattened. (Gen 5:2)

YHWH: "My wind will not moderate in the human to distant time; he [is] flesh. And his days were one hundred and twenty years." (Gen 6:3)

"I will wipe away the human which I did fatten upon [the] faces [of the] ground, from human[s] to beast to treader and to flyer [of] the skies, so that I am comforted given that I did do (make) them."

ELOHIYM: "[The] conclusion [of] all flesh came to my faces, given that violence filled the land from their faces. Look! I am damaging (destroying) them [from] the land." (Gen 6:13)

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-23   14:04:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: All (#5)

Synopsis so far: WHAT GOD SAID, CREATION TO THE FLOOD (Gen 1:1-6:13) The roots of economics: Of natural law, order, energy, the elements, the cosmos, sky-sea-and land, plants, animals and humans, reproduction, food, the serpent, and the tree of knowledge of function and dysfunction; the imposition scarcity, of the need for clothing, and of potential medical needs. Qayin begins the violence in the land by killing Hevel. God finally decides to drown his wind (spirit) from all flesh in the land specifically because of the violence.

ELOHIYM [the Powers]: "Or [order or light] will exist." "Day." "Night."

"A sheet will exist in midst of the waters, making separate waters to waters." "Skies."

"The waters from under the skies will be bound up into one area and the dry ground will be seen." "Land." "Seas."

"The land will make sprout shoots, stems making sowing seed, produce tree making produce of his kind with his seed in him, upon the land."

"Luminaries will exist in [the] sheet [of] the skies to make separate between the day and the night, and they exist to [make] signs and to [make] appointed [times], and to days and years, and the luminaries exist in [the] sheet [of] the skies to make light upon the land."

"Swarmers will swarm the waters, living beings, and flyers upon the land will much fly upon [the] faces [of the] sheet [of] the skies."

"Reproduce! And increase! And fill the waters in the seas! And flyers, increase in the land."

"The land will make go out kind[s] of living beings, beasts and treaders, and living land beings [of] their kind[s]."

"We will do human in [the] image [of] us, like the likeness [of] us, and he ruled in swimmers [of] the sea and in flyers [of] the skies, and in the beast, and in all the land, and in all [of] the treader treading upon the land."

"Reproduce! And increase! And fill the land! And subdue her! Rule in swimmers [of] the sea and in flyer [of] the skies and in all living treading upon the land."

"Look! I gave all stems sowing seeds that [are] upon [the] faces [of] all the land. And each produce tree[s] that in him sowing seeds; to you [it] will exist for food. And to all living [in] the land, and to all flyer [of] the skies, and to all living treading upon the land: all green stems to food."

YHWH: "You will eat from all tree[s] of the garden. And from [the] tree [of] the discernment [of] functional and dysfunctional - you will not eat from him, given that in [the] day you eat from him: die, you will die."

YHWH ELOHIYM: "Not functional is the human [as] a stick {i.e.: a single branch}. I will do to him help, like opposite him."

The woman, quoting Elohiym to the serpent regarding the Tree of Discernment of Function and Dsfunction: "You will not eat from him, and you will not touch him, otherwise you will die."

YHWH: "Where [are] you?"

"Who made face-to-face to you that you [are] naked? From the tree which I did much direct you except from him to eat: you will eat."

"What [is} this you have done?"

"Given that you did do this, spit-upon [are] you from all the beast and from all the living. Upon your belly you will walk and powder you will eat all the days of your living. And hostility I will set down between you and between the woman and between your seed and between her seed. He will fall upon your head, and you will fall upon his heel."

"Make increase - I will make increase your (singular) hardship and your (singular) pregnancy; in distressing pain you (singular) will bring forth sons; and to your (singular) man you (singular) [will be] following, and he will regulate in you."

"Given that you hearkened to [the] voice [of] your woman and you will eat from the tree from which I did much direct you, saying you will not eat from him, the ground [is] spitted-upon in your crossing-over; in hardship you (masculine singular) will eat her all days you live. And bramble and thistle she [the land] will make spring up to you, and you ate stem[s] [of] the field. In sweat [of] your noses you (masculine singular) will eat bread until you turn back to the ground, given that you [are] powder and to powder you will turn back."

YHWH ELOHIYM: "Though the human existed like one from us, to know functional and dysfunctional, and now otherwise he will send his hand and take also from Tree [of] the Livings and ate and lived to distant time."

YHWH to Qayin (acquired = 'Cain'), regarding Hevel (vanity, whiff = 'Abel'):

"To what (why) did he flare up to you, and why did your faces fall? [Do] not. If you will make do well, lift up. And if you will not make do well, opening to failure [is] stretching out. [He (Abel) is] following you, and you will regulate [rule] in him."

"Where [is] Hevel your brother?"

"What you did do [the] voice of your brother's bloods [is] crying out to me from the ground. And now spitted-upon [are] you from the ground which parted her mouth to take your brother's bloods from your hand. Given that, you will serve the ground [but] she will not make her strength add to you. Staggering and nodding you will exist in the land."

"For (to avoid) this, all killing Qayin, seven times will he be made avenged."

Male and female he (Elohiym) did fatten them, and he will much kneel at them, and he will call out their title "Human" in the day they be fattened. (Gen 5:2)

YHWH: "My wind will not moderate in the human to distant time; he [is] flesh. And his days were one hundred and twenty years." (Gen 6:3)

"I will wipe away the human which I did fatten upon [the] faces [of the] ground, from human[s] to beast to treader and to flyer [of] the skies, so that I am comforted given that I did do (make) them."

ELOHIYM: "[The] conclusion [of] all flesh came to my faces, given that violence filled the land from their faces. Look! I am damaging (destroying) them [from] the land."

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-23   16:25:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: redleghunter, SOSO, A K A Stone, All (#7)

Sticking for a moment to the words God spoke from creation to the Flood, we find a parallelism. God didn't say much, but what he said stuck, even the order he said it.

The FIRST commandment God gave as Reproduce (repeated for emphasis: Increase!, and repeated yet again "Fill the land!") - the sheer power of the human sex drive was the first thing put into us after life itself.

And when Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree, of the knowledge of function and dysfunction, the very first dysfunction that awakened in them was sexual shame: they realized they were naked, they put together makeshift clothing of fig leaves, and they hid from the Creator because they were naked. The first commandment was paralleled by the first dysfunction after the Fall.

The punishment God imposed on Eve was that now her childbearing would be in great pain.

The second commandment was dietary: what to eat. In the Garden, man and woman simply stretched forth their hands to eat the fruit of the trees, as God ordained they should. But once the fall came, God prescribed to Adam that now the ground would be "spat upon" on account of him. Whereas before, every green plant and all of the fruits of the trees were for man's use, in the garden, now the land would not be functional to man. Now thistles and thorns, inedible things, would come from the soil. Now, instead of fruit of the trees, man would eat the shoots and woody stems (herbs) of the ground, and man would have to coax it out of the ground.

What was easy before, and functional, now was dysfunctional.

And with the need for clothing and the need to work for food begins scarcity of resources. In Paradise, resources were not scarce. Man still had a job, and woman beside him: to tend the garden, to rule the animals. This was a pleasant, non-violent task, done naked, in a world of endless food - stretch forth the hand and eat.

But now, dysfunction springs forth. Now, man feels he needs clothing, and now instead of simply eating the fruit of the garden, he must work the land, and it is set against him. Instead of sweet fruit eaten raw, he must work to bring forth woody-stemmed herbs and eat the sprouting grasses like animals, and now he must make them into bread. It's harder. The economy principle of scarcity has entered the world as the result of dysfunction.

And soon enough, dysfunction builds upon dysfunction. For the rulership of the animals still allowed for the ease of eating milk, but Cain killed Abel, not for greed, but out of spite. Dysfunction breeds dysfunction. Violence increases, and God decides to baptize the world, washing it of the shedding of blood, by removing the breath from the nostrils of every land animal, including man, by drowning.

After the Flood, we find God telling Noah that the land is no longer cursed. Thus, we have the archetype of baptism.

In six chapters God's words have been spare, but they carry the weight. And those natural laws God pronounced, and the consequences God ordained for dysfunction, remain the law to this day.

Shame, the scarcity of food, and the potential for human violence driven both by need and by simple spite and wounded pride - and the need to provide for security against that - establish the fundamental particles that underpin economic scarcity and that drive the base of human activity.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-25   21:29:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Vicomte13, redleghunter, A K A Stone, All (#15)

Shame, the scarcity of food, and the potential for human violence driven both by need and by simple spite and wounded pride - and the need to provide for security against that - establish the fundamental particles that underpin economic scarcity and that drive the base of human activity.

Wow, that's some stretch, kinda like a shaggy dog story.

SOSO  posted on  2015-07-25   22:03:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: SOSO (#16)

Shaggy dog story? Shame is spoken of directly: Adam and Eve hid because they were naked. The scarcity of food is spoken of directly: indeed, it is the SENTENCE God imposes on Adam for eating from the tree.

The spite of Cain is spoken of directly. God speaks of it to him, tells him not to be so crestfallen and angry, to buck up, and Abel will follow him. Instead, Cain goes right out and kills Hevel.

Shame, scarcity and violence from spite. No shaggy dog story there, no "stretch" - it's right THERE is the very words of Scripture.

This is the problem in a nutshell: Scripture can say something directly, and men will deny that's what it says and substitute their own desires for it.

It's why Christianity is fading everywhere: the dishonesty of men.

Anyway, God said what he said, and what he said was sparing in terms of words, and clear as a bell. There isn't anything ambiguous in what he said so far. I'm going to quote him again, in totum and in order, and then move on to the next thing he says.

The roots of the economy of the world are contained in the few spare words God said in the first six chapters of Genesis: food, clothing, reproduction and the rising potential for violence from spite: these are the very things that drive the bulk of human activity and expenditure.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-26   16:05:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: All (#22)

What God said, so far:

ELOHIYM [the Powers]: "Or [order or light] will exist." "Day." "Night."

"A sheet will exist in midst of the waters, making separate waters to waters." "Skies."

"The waters from under the skies will be bound up into one area and the dry ground will be seen." "Land." "Seas."

"The land will make sprout shoots, stems making sowing seed, produce tree making produce of his kind with his seed in him, upon the land."

"Luminaries will exist in [the] sheet [of] the skies to make separate between the day and the night, and they exist to [make] signs and to [make] appointed [times], and to days and years, and the luminaries exist in [the] sheet [of] the skies to make light upon the land."

"Swarmers will swarm the waters, living beings, and flyers upon the land will much fly upon [the] faces [of the] sheet [of] the skies."

"Reproduce! And increase! And fill the waters in the seas! And flyers, increase in the land."

"The land will make go out kind[s] of living beings, beasts and treaders, and living land beings [of] their kind[s]."

"We will do human in [the] image [of] us, like the likeness [of] us, and he ruled in swimmers [of] the sea and in flyers [of] the skies, and in the beast, and in all the land, and in all [of] the treader treading upon the land."

"Reproduce! And increase! And fill the land! And subdue her! Rule in swimmers [of] the sea and in flyer [of] the skies and in all living treading upon the land."

"Look! I gave all stems sowing seeds that [are] upon [the] faces [of] all the land. And each produce tree[s] that in him sowing seeds; to you [it] will exist for food. And to all living [in] the land, and to all flyer [of] the skies, and to all living treading upon the land: all green stems to food."

YHWH: "You will eat from all tree[s] of the garden. And from [the] tree [of] the discernment [of] functional and dysfunctional - you will not eat from him, given that in [the] day you eat from him: die, you will die."

YHWH ELOHIYM: "Not functional is the human [as] a stick {i.e.: a single branch}. I will do to him help, like opposite him."

The woman, quoting Elohiym to the serpent regarding the Tree of Discernment of Function and Dsfunction: "You will not eat from him, and you will not touch him, otherwise you will die."

YHWH: "Where [are] you?"

"Who made face-to-face to you that you [are] naked? From the tree which I did much direct you except from him to eat: you will eat."

"What [is} this you have done?"

"Given that you did do this, spit-upon [are] you from all the beast and from all the living. Upon your belly you will walk and powder you will eat all the days of your living. And hostility I will set down between you and between the woman and between your seed and between her seed. He will fall upon your head, and you will fall upon his heel."

"Make increase - I will make increase your (singular) hardship and your (singular) pregnancy; in distressing pain you (singular) will bring forth sons; and to your (singular) man you (singular) [will be] following, and he will regulate in you."

"Given that you hearkened to [the] voice [of] your woman and you will eat from the tree from which I did much direct you, saying you will not eat from him, the ground [is] spitted-upon in your crossing-over; in hardship you (masculine singular) will eat her all days you live. And bramble and thistle she [the land] will make spring up to you, and you ate stem[s] [of] the field. In sweat [of] your noses you (masculine singular) will eat bread until you turn back to the ground, given that you [are] powder and to powder you will turn back."

YHWH ELOHIYM: "Though the human existed like one from us, to know functional and dysfunctional, and now otherwise he will send his hand and take also from Tree [of] the Livings and ate and lived to distant time."

YHWH to Qayin (acquired = 'Cain'), regarding Hevel (vanity, whiff = 'Abel'):

"To what (why) did he flare up to you, and why did your faces fall? [Do] not. If you will make do well, lift up. And if you will not make do well, opening to failure [is] stretching out. [He (Abel) is] following you, and you will regulate [rule] in him."

"Where [is] Hevel your brother?"

"What you did do [the] voice of your brother's bloods [is] crying out to me from the ground. And now spitted-upon [are] you from the ground which parted her mouth to take your brother's bloods from your hand. Given that, you will serve the ground [but] she will not make her strength add to you. Staggering and nodding you will exist in the land."

"For (to avoid) this, all killing Qayin, seven times will he be made avenged."

Male and female he (Elohiym) did fatten them, and he will much kneel at them, and he will call out their title "Human" in the day they be fattened. (Gen 5:2)

YHWH: "My wind will not moderate in the human to distant time; he [is] flesh. And his days were one hundred and twenty years." (Gen 6:3)

"I will wipe away the human which I did fatten upon [the] faces [of the] ground, from human[s] to beast to treader and to flyer [of] the skies, so that I am comforted given that I did do (make) them."

ELOHIYM: "[The] conclusion [of] all flesh came to my faces, given that violence filled the land from their faces. Look! I am damaging (destroying) them [from] the land."

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-26   16:07:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Vicomte13 (#23)

I haven't seen any economics in this thred.

No answers to any questions.

Just you cutting and pasting. And correcting what is said to be Gods word.

The thread is not as advertised.

I'll get back to you if you ever respond to what Pastor Butch said. I'll go with Pastor Butch as you can't refute anything he says.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   16:14:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: A K A Stone (#24)

You go with Pastor Butch. I haven't listened to him. I've been focused on what I said I was going to focus on, and on life off the Board, and I'll stay focused on it.

I'm about to move to Noah's Ark, which is the next thing God says.

The words that God says are fundamental.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-26   20:20:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Vicomte13 (#26)

You go with Pastor Butch. I haven't listened to him.

God put it on my heart to make sure you listen to the complete audio.

He said he doesn't want you to be willingly ignorant.

Just relaying what God put on my heart.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   20:26:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 27.

#28. To: A K A Stone (#27)

God put it on my heart to make sure you listen to the complete audio.

He said he doesn't want you to be willingly ignorant.

Just relaying what God put on my heart.

Ok. Based on that endorsement, I will listen to the video and let you know what I think.

I am not willingly ignorant, or willfully either. I'll listen. I'll comment. Then I will return to the theme of Economics according to God.

It starts at Genesis. Each word God said lays down economic planks that will determined everything else later on: food, clothing, housing, the problem of violence.

The next thing God said after what I've quoted above are the instructions to Noah regarding the Ark. I was going to skip over them with only a brief comment, because God's design specs regarding the Ark are tedious, detailed, and don't contain any obvious economic or moral content.

But then I thought about it and realized that God does not let words fall lightly. On five occasions in the Bible, God is deadly dull and thudding in his precise specifications, spelling things to be built out detail by detail. This makes for dull reading, but it highlights something that's pretty important. The details are not themselves important to us, but the fact that God went into precise minutiae: how long this was to be, how many knobs that was to have, precisely how the loops were to be looped, what artwork would be where: it demonstrates the precision with which God speaks.

Many say that the Scripture are vague generalities regarding moral content: the "Watchmaker God" gave a few general rules and then stepped back. But the detailed specifications of the Ark, the Meeting Tent and its accouterments, and the Temple vision of Ezekiel tell the opposite story: God is precise. And lest we think that in his precision he is not directive, we need only look to the two sons of Aaron who, at the consecration of the Meeting Tent, did what they thought expedient and put incense on a censer and burnt it, to add something to the ceremony. God immediately reached out of the altar with fire and killed them on the spot - and then he forbade Aaron to leave the tent or to break off the seven days of consecration. God's instructions about holy things are precise, and when men deviated from them slightly, he killed them on the spot.

We should keep that in mind when we read God's law, what God had to say about things. A few times in Scripture he warns men not to add or to take away. This is why I think it's very important to see precisely what God said, in the precise Hebrew, and to think for extended periods on it.

Something simple like the law of reproduction, which is directly given twice, the first two commandments given to mankind (Reproduce! Increase!), and whose implications follow in the next two commandments (Fill the land! Subdue her!) - we are inclined to just glide past that, but it is in fact fundamental to everything.

First, it explains the sheer power of the human sex drive, which leads men and women astray. The sex drive isn't an accident - it's the first two commandments given to man AND the animals. Sex is the Prime Directive, of God, to animals and man. We are not supposed to RESIST the sex drive, we are supposed to obey it. But we're supposed to obey it in ways that meet God's moral requirements. And that, in turn, brings into play all of the moral laws regarding fornication and adultery, sodomy and birth control and abortion; also land law and the law of charity, as a full land that produces babies has to feed those babies - but the law against murder means that killing them is not a godly option...which may force a change of ideas about the social order and property, in order to obey God's laws regarding reproduction and violence.

The economic implications of a few words of God are vast, and human logic of trying to fit what God said into the world as we think it should be ordered is very much like the mistake of Aaron's sons. Rather, we must fit the structures of the world we make, our governance and laws and social structure, to fit what God said.

And we need to know what God said WITH PRECISION. He didn't spew out pages and pages of explanation. He's God, the King, the Lord, the Creator. He said a few direct words. It is our role to hear them as spoken, and to treat them as we would treat directions from the President and CEO of the companies for which we work. If he says "Don't swear at work", and we cuss at work, can we be surprised if we get punished for that.

Consider the traditional belief: God said "Don't eat from that particular tree", two people did, and now every man and every animal since then, without exception, has to die for it. Now, I would assert that the text does NOT in fact say that, and that the traditional belief regarding death and the tree is an error, an addition to the text, but most people accept the traditional belief. Certainly the traditional belief regarding death establishes that what God says in a few words is absolutely literally binding, and that when God says something, he MEANS just exactly that, without deviation.

God said don't eat from the tree - and tradition says that all death came from two people eating from the tree.

God said fill the land. The Tower of Babel was destroyed and people scattered because they chose to remain clumped together as one people instead of filling the land.

God said "Reproduce!" "Increase!" Thereby establishing the Prime Directive for human activity. Can we be surprised, then, that the societies that once led the world, having taking up contraception with a will only 55 years ago, are now collapsing everywhere, being flooded with immigrants from fecund civilizations that follow God's first and second commandment. The disappearance of the white man everywhere in the world is the result of contraception. He is being replaced in the land by others who reproduce. Reproduce, increase and fill the land are the first three commandments.

Not suggestions - commandments. They are the first purpose of human life. To refuse to reproduce, increase and fill the land is not a "choice", it's a belligerent defiance of God's first three commandments. It is eating the fruit of the tree.

The wages of sin is death. Can we be surprised that White civilization, which everywhere embraced contraception - defying the Prime Directive to Reproduce, Increase and Fill the Land - is now everywhere in decline, dying out and being replaced? This is not an accident. It is the judgment of God. It was always inevitable.

God said to reproduce, increase and fill the land. Those are the first three commandments, given directly. They will be given four more times in the Bible. They're not optional - God gave you a body, and gave you a PURPOSE for that body. If you refuse to reproduce, increase and fill the land with it, you are trying to wrest control of your body from its owner. You will fail, you will die. And if your civilization refuses to have babies, then as you die out, you will be replaced in the land by other people who DO follow God's Prime Directive.

The emptying out of Europe and America of whites, thanks to contraception, and the filling up of those lands with Middle Easterners and Latin Americans, thanks to their fecundity, is not an accident. It is the judgment of God for defiance of his commandments, and it is the reward from God for fulfilling those commandments.

And there is NOTHING that we can do to resist it. Nothing. The single sole solitary thing we can do is to stop defying God and have babies, lots of babies.

And if our economic system, as configured, cannot handle that, then our economic system is itself evil, set up contrary to the principles of God, and we need to completely restructure our concept of economics, money, property, land and transactions in order to permit men and women to fulfill the prime directive from God: to reproduce, increase, fill the land and subdue her.

THAT is what human civilization is about: obeying God. We're dying out because we've turned from the commandments - the basic biological commandments, and MADE IT about accumulating wealth, comfort, entertainment, enrichment, status.

To afford those things at a level exceeding what is good for us physically and spiritually, we have cut off reproduction, turning sex into the ultimate recreational activity in life and entertainment. And the net result of grasping this fruit of dysfunction and eating it is dysfunction, which expresses itself in a growing population hole, which then fills up with people from elsewhere who have lots of children, in accordance with God's commandments, and who are filling the land - "Our" land - and subduing it with their numbers - with God's blessing.

If you do not see the economics in "Reproduce! Increase! Fill the land! Subdue her!" you have scales on your eyes.

The American immigration/abortion/moral debate is directly concerned with the first four commandments God gave.

The inability to see if fatal - the poison spreads. The refusal to change once one has seen is idolatry. Truth is, most white people prefer their economic and political values over God's. Which is why our civilization behaves as it does. Which is why, in turn, we are dying out and being replaced in the land by people who DO reproduce and increase, and who ARE filling the land - land we call "ours", but that all belongs to God. Part of their "subduing" the land is subduing us, who are already in the land, through political control. We see it coming, and we're powerless to stop it except by knuckling under to God and doing it his way.

We cannot understand his way, or even know that he HAS a way, if we won't focus on precisely what HE said.

Which is what I am doing.

I can take a detour to listen to Pastor Butch, to satisfy your burden. And I shall. Now. And I won't write more until I have.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-27 09:34:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#27)

Ok, I listened. I agree with almost everything that he said. The place where he deviates a bit from reality is in insisting on the English meanings of the word "Day", and "Light" (and also "Darkness", by implication). and thereby forcing, in effect, a 24-hour day on the word "day".

So now let's clear that up.

First, he's right that the geological ages as described by scientific theory do not line up with the Genesis record. He's right that evolution does not explain the origins of life. He's right that the "General Catacyclsm" theory not only doesn't work as a matter of the fossil record, but also doesn't work on the Biblical record either.

He's right overall: Genesis DOES describe the origins of the world, through specific creation in a relatively short period of time.

He's an intelligent man who teaches much truth, and means to teach the whole truth. It's a shame that I could not sit down with him privately and show him the missing pieces of his understanding, that make it all much clearer. The missing pieces are found in the text itself, not simply in the Hebrew words, but in the pictographic sentences that form those words.

He mentions the writing system of the Chaldeans/Babylonians. Yes, they had a writing system. But the Bible was not written in that system. It was, instead, written using the Old Canaanitic/Phoenician pictographs, which were themselves derived from the Egyptian hieroglyphs. This is important, for each letter of a pictographic word is not a phonetic letter (although it CAN be). Rather, each letter is ITSELF a word, and the "words" formed by the pictographs are themselves in fact sentences.

The thing about Genesis which renders it an utter miracle in the Creation account is that the pictographic sentences that comprise each word of surface Hebrew themselves give a great deal of data about what is going on. The writing is a holographic fractal. When we read in translation words like "Day" and "Light", we see very simple concepts. In the Hebrew, however, these are not simply words (which mean more than just "day" and "light" - they are words that are first used BEFORE God specifically defines them, and they are words themselves composed of pictographs which form a sentence, and which describe what is going on.

A single example. The first word of the Bible, "Bereshiyt", is traditionally translated as "in the beginning", but it doesn't really mean that. It is, as a stand alone word, more like the word "Capitulo" at the top of a chapter heading. And the word ITSELF is composed of pictographs which, when read as a sentence, read "In head God divided in two pointing to the Cross". The word "God" contained in the word is a pictographic singular, El, but when the word "God" first appears as a separate word, it is as "Elohiym", a plural.

In other words, within the "Beginning" and before time unravels, the very first word of the Bible states the begetting of the Son by El, the Father. It's right there, in plain sight, to those who read Hebrew pictographs. Which is pretty much nobody. The Hebrew letters of the post-Babylonian captivity are stylized Aramaic letters, and no longer the pictographs. Jews do not read the pictographs, or even know they ARE pictographs. Our letters are derived from these also, and WE don't know they are pictographs.

Yet, they are. And in those pictographs we see what "light", and "day" meant, and we see the original conditions. Genesis doesn't start or read the way that the pastor thinks it does, exactly. The "Day- Epock" theory is right, in a sense, though the days are of indeterminate length.

Likewise the word we translate as "light" is "Or", and it means order. "Day" is a period of "or" - which can be both simple light, but also a period of order. "Good" and "evil" are not there, what is there is function (ordered-ness) and dysfunction (disorder, chaos, entropy, tending back towards the "mem", which can be waters, but before so defined, "waters' is a chaos of matter and not simply H2O.

It's not particularly confusing, really. We could go through it.

When the words are read right, theology changes only slightly. The most important word that really does make a theological difference is the word that we translate as "forever". It is not "forever". It is "to a distant/unknown time". And that really DOES make a difference. The fact is that God never promises the land to the Hebrews "forever". He only promises it "to a distant time", based on their good behavior. This is so very clear from the text, and from what actually HAPPENS to them.

The problem with reading "forever" where it does not appear, is that then you end up with a strange apparatus of trying to hold TWO covenants operant at the same time…that Jesus is for the world, but if one were a Jew and followed the Law perfectly, that that too would guarantee things under the Mosaic covenant, because "forever". Except that "forever" is not there.

So, it is important to get this right. And it does affect economics.

Consider how much energy is spent by Christians trying to uphold the concept of a reconstituted Israel "because 'forever'", when not only is forever not there in the text, but what IS in the text is the final judgment, by God, on Israel of the covenant, and the annunciation of a new and everlasting covenant, which is the ONLY way to the Father. Getting "forever" wrong leads to spending billions trying to raise a dead corpse that God Himself killed.

Of course, that comes much later, and we can stick to Genesis for now and move forward. Still, little nuances in Genesis make a great deal of difference later.

Thanks for having me listen to that lecturer. He was good.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-28 02:19:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: A K A Stone, redleghunter (#27)

Let's look at Genesis with fresh eyes. What the pastor says on the take AKA Stone posted above is true: Genesis is the most important book of the Old Testament. He gives two good reasons: (1) Every New Testament author cites it, and (2) It sets up the conditions for understanding everything else. I'll give a third: the first 11 chapters of Genesis, from Creation to the Tower of Babel, give the history of all of mankind, and within that history God gives a few laws that have always applied to all of mankind and still do. These are not the laws of Moses - they precede Moses by thousands of years. These laws were not revealed through the Jews. They were, rather, revealed directly to all of mankind (at the time) by God himself. When we read the rest of the Old Testament, we are very aware that it is addressed to Hebrews, specifically. They are given specific promises, in a specific land, for specific reasons. But when we read the first 10 chapters of Genesis, there are no Hebrews: the first of them has not yet been born. There's no Pharaoh either. There are the common ancestors of all of humanity, and God is addressing the Chinese and Hawaiian Islanders' ancestors just as much as he is addressing the ancestors of Abraham, Isaac and Moses.

The Jewish law only ever applied to Jews, but the Law of Genesis applied, and still applies, to every human. So, if you want to know history, you have to read the whole Old Testament. If you want to understand the mind of God in statecraft and economics, you have to read the entire Old Testament. But if you want to know what LAW from God actually binds you, all you have to do is read the first ten chapters of Genesis, two of the Gospels (either Matthew or Luke, and John), the first have of the Acts of the Apostles, and Revelation.

It is true that mankind is not bound by the Jewish Law, but it is not true that mankind is not bound by law. We are. The part of the Old Testament that contains all of the laws of God to which all are bound is the first few chapters of Genesis.

The first chapter even contains the laws by which matter and energy are bound.

Shall we parse that first chapter in particular detail, to be sure we really understand the language correctly and see more than we usually see of what is going on there?

I think we should, for at least two reasons. One is that seeing the depth of detail contained in the language and the pictographs that compose the language, we gain a great deal of confidence that this incredibly dense and insightful text was inspired by God very directly. A second reason is that in Genesis 1, in particular, God defines words. Sometimes he uses a word a few times, and then LATER defines it to mean something precise. We must realize that and see it clearly, if we really want to understand Genesis. An example: the word "ha'aretz" is defined by God to mean "dry land" in the second day, but it appears twice before that, in the description of the initial conditions.

This word is traditionally translated into English as "earth", but that's a particularly deceptive translation for us today, because when we hear the word "earth", we don't think of "land" (as opposed to sea and sky), we think of a PLANET. So when we read the traditional "God created the heavens and the Earth), we think of skies and planets. But what the text really says is "the skies and the land" - and both the word "skies" and "land" are given specific meanings by God several sentences later. So these words "hashamayim" ("skies") and "ha'aretz" ("land") will be ASSIGNED the specific meanings of "the sky above" and "dry land" by God only later. When they FIRST APPEAR, they DON'T mean that, because those things haven't been MADE yet. They DO mean something, though, but what they mean isn't defined in the surface words, the things that are translated.

Rather, what "hashamayim" and "ha'arets" mean BEFORE God assigns them the meanings of "skies" and "land" is actually shown hieroglyphically by the pictographs that compose these two words in Hebrew. Once they are DEFINED, by God, as simply meaning "Skies" and "land", that is what they mean. But before that, the words are not simply words, but SENTENCES of pictures that show the conditions.

OR - and this is the hard part, to accept that there is an OR meaning to it all - the first sentence of Genesis consists of the first two lines, not just one, and it is a "capitulo", a synopsis of what follows.

Whether it is one or the other is not clearly knowable, because the word that is translated as "created" is the word "bara", and it doesn't really mean created at all. It means "fattened", or more abstractly, "made more substantial".

This is why one cannot drive spikes into the ground and say "Genesis 1:1 MEANS thus and so", because actually, it CAN mean several things, all interrelated, and all evincing the same things, but quite different.

Most important theologically, within the pictographic sentences of the first line of Genesis is the division of the godhead into at least two pieces, and pluralization of the word we translate as "God" - a plural that nevertheless takes a singular verb. Also present is the ruach elohiym, the "wind" or "spirit" of God (plural) - the "Holy Spirit", and this is a feminine noun, giving meaning to the words "in God's image he made them - male and female he made them". God's image in the Hebrew is presented with distinctly feminine words as well as masculine. The Spirit of God is feminine. So is, later, the "shekinah" - the Glory of God. It is immensely important for the way that we understand God to understand that within the Scripture itself God presents God's facets as masculine and feminine. Thus, while the word "YHWH" is a masculine singular imperfect verb: "He will exist", and it is therefore correct to refer to "The Lord" as "HE", the Holy Spirit, the Ruach Elohiym, is correctly addressed only as "SHE", because it is only a feminine noun.

If that is offensive - that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are present in Genesis 1, it should not be. They are. Jews and Muslims and those who think they already know Scripture but do not may be offended, but those who seek Truth should delight.

Likewise, that the Father is a He, the Son is a He, but the Holy Spirit is a She is what the text SAYS, plainly. It's not debatable. But Christian tradition (in different languages) has called the Holy Spirit "He" for years. That is not what Scripture says however. It is not an "innovation" to call the Holy Spirit "She". It is the only correct reading of Hebrew Scriptures. The Christians are in error when they refer to the Holy Spirit as "He". The Spirit in Hebrew is feminine, and can only correctly be referred to by the feminine pronoun. It is incorrect to address the Father or the Son as "He", and it is incorrect to address the Holy Spirit, or the Spirits of God, or the Glory of God, as "he". They are "She".

Should that matter? No, it shouldn't. But if it DOES matter to somebody, this is a classic example of a man insisting on sticking with his ancient man-made tradition over against the literal, clear, unambiguous language of Scripture. Genesis is not ambiguous in the original language: the Holy Spirit is "She". That's why "in God's image" is both male and female. It fits together nicely.

But long tradition has called the Spirit "He", and men will dig in on their traditions and be in error, rather than follow what God said.

It is not PLEASANT to read Scripture literally, because one finds a lot of errors and detritus collected in one's cherished traditions.

Consider the Nicene Creed, said in Church at ever mass. The part "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son* (*THE historical point of contention between the Catholics, who say this, and the Eastern Orthodox, who say that the Holy Spirit proceeds exclusively from the Father alone, and not from the Son). With the Father and Son HE is adored and glorified. HE has spoken through the Prophets."

No. SHE has spoken through the prophets. SHE. The Hebrew word is SHE, not He.

Yes, in Greek pneuma is neutral, not feminine, and in Latin, it is masculine. But these are translation issues. If gender matters at all - and the traditions all say it does - then the gender of the elements of the godhead matter. El is a he. Eloah is a she. God's messengers are "he's". God's glory and God's spirit are "she's".

This SHOULD be a delightful discovery, because it clears up the question over the passage in Genesis that says "in God's image he created them, male and female he made them". If God is a "he", how are females in "his" image. The answer is that God is both he and she, not abstractly, but literally in Hebrew, component by component. The reason we say "he made them" is because Elohiym, the unitive plural "God" is a plural, and in a plural group of male and female elements, one uses the male pronoun.

It all makes perfect sense - the plurality of the word "God" in Hebrew (particularly when one reads the letter-pictures of the first word and sees the division of the godhead internally before time) - and the masculine and feminine elements that compose that pluralized elohiym. It makes sense in the Hebrew, but note well: the JEWS would reject all of this, claiming that God is a monad (even though the Hebrew Scripture says the opposite). And Christians, many of them, would reject all of this as "novel", even though it is in the black and white letters of Genesis and is thousands of years old. "Allowing" the "she" in the godhead strikes a death blow to a certain traditional sexism that is not, in fact, part of the truth revealed by God, but that is very much a part of Jewish, Christian (and Muslim) traditions...and Jesus tells us all about our propensity to love our traditions so much we walk out on God.

If one comes into Genesis with a clear head, an open mind, and the willingness to accept whatever is found there as truth, then one finds the explanation of both the origins of the universe there, and insight into the internal "structure" of the godhead. We already know from Revelation that God is not simply a tri-unity, a Trinity, but is at least a nine-unity, for Revelation tells us flatly that God has Seven Spirits, not just one. And the Torah tells us also there is the Shekinah - the Glory of God - which is itself an entity appertaining to God, just as the spirit is. There is also "Sophia", Wisdom, who was alongside of the Father during creation, and who is a "She".

This is not polytheism, and it's not henatheism. It is a precise understanding of terms, and understanding the only-partially-revealed complexity of the godhead. Still, there are TWO revelations of this: one is what is written in the Hebrew. The other are the traditions of Jews, Muslims and different branches of the Christians. And these things conflict with each other. The only true one is the one that is actually written. It's THERE, in the words and pictures, and understanding it makes the Scriptures make a great deal more sense, for it means that the different names of God that appear in specific places and circumstances actually have MEANING. They are not simply synonyms for each other, but they indicate the face of the divine personality that is acting.

I try to convey these things without being argumentative, but I'll admit it's hard. It's not hard because I have an atrocious personality either. I don't. I have a fixed, stubborn personality - a Basque mind. I'm merely standing for the visible, written, truth, unchanged since written. But I am keenly aware (through long experience) that men's approach to God is really to worship the idol of their traditions, which RESEMBLES the real God who reveals himself in Scripture, and yet who differs in some subtle or important ways.

Example: the pastor's speech, which was excellent, falls into the traditional error of saying that God did not create bad things. That is false. God says himself that he does just precisely that. He said it directly in Isaiah, in the most explicit way: "I create evil". Of course, the word "evil" itself is a Greek philosophical abstraction. Hebrew is extremely concrete, and God spoke concretely. There is neither "good" nor "evil" in the Hebrew God spoke to reveal the truth. Rather, there is "function" - that which works - and "Dysfunction" - that which does not work.

When one speaks of "evil", in particular, one speaks as though there were a force of nature itself called "evil", a "think" that works bad works. Not so! There is, rather, a lack of order, a breakdown of order, a derailing of things, making them not to work. The scientific term for the tendency towards disorder is "entropy". Entropy is a fundamental law of nature, and it, too, was created by God. God never said that he made things not to fall apart: men say that in their traditions, but God never, ever says that.

What the serpent did in the Garden was to PRECIPITATE dysfunction, by inducing the woman to do that which was dysfunctional. Through the dysfunctional act, death resulted - indeed it came into the world - but that does not mean that the SOURCE of the dysfunction was the act, like the release of dark energy in some dark spell. That is the way Christian tradition and Jewish tradition and Muslim tradition treat it, but once again, what God actually SAYS in the text is a little different.

It's not COMPLETELY different. It isn't as though the tradition will lead people into a pit. But the tradition does lead to some misunderstanding that can be pretty profound, and Scripture reads clearly and less mysteriously when it is taken with the clarity and precision that God delivered it.

So let's do that. Let's parse Genesis 1 for a bit. It will serve us well, because it will define so many words we will use again and again.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-28 09:34:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com