[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

WORLD WAR III
See other WORLD WAR III Articles

Title: Why Israel Is Going To Bomb Iran
Source: prophecynewswatch.com
URL Source: http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/211.html
Published: Jul 21, 2015
Author: Michael Snyder
Post Date: 2015-07-21 11:22:23 by Don
Keywords: None
Views: 19337
Comments: 95

Why Israel Is Going To Bomb Iran

July 21, 2015 | Michael Snyder Share this article

Thanks to Barack Obama, it is only a matter of time before Israel feels forced to conduct a massive military strike against Iran’s nuclear program. When that happens, Iran will strike back, and hundreds if not thousands of missiles will rain down on Israel. This exchange will likely spark a major regional war in the Middle East, and that could end up plunging the entire planet into chaos. If Barack Obama was attempting to prevent such a scenario from playing out, he failed miserably.

Personally, I think that the deal that was just made with Iran is absolutely horrible. Perhaps you disagree. Perhaps you believe that it is the greatest piece of diplomacy of all time. But it doesn’t really matter what any of us think. If this deal was going to work, it had to be strong enough to convince Israel that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons has been completely stopped. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sworn that he will never, ever let Iran get a nuclear weapon, and he has pledged to use military force if necessary.

So what Barack Obama needed was a deal that would calm Israeli nerves while satisfying the Iranians at the same time. Such a deal may have theoretically been impossible, but that is what it was going to take to prevent war. Instead, Obama has made a deal which has utterly horrified the Israeli government. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even called it “a license to kill“. So now the odds that war will happen have gone way up, but Barack Obama is too busy congratulating himself to notice.

And it isn’t just the Israeli government that has responded very negatively to this deal.

One recent survey found that a staggering 74 percent of Israelis do not believe that this deal will prevent the Iranians from developing a nuclear weapon.

A different survey discovered that 47 percent of Israelis would now support a military strike against Iran and only 35 percent of Israelis are currently against one.

Of course the Israeli government would very much prefer not to have to bomb Iran. Before resorting to military action, the Israeli government will certainly try to encourage the U.S. Congress to derail this deal. And we should probably expect to see more covert action against Iran’s nuclear program.

But in the end, those methods will almost certainly not be enough. At that point, the Israeli government will have a decision to make, and I think that the following exchange between Netanyahu and Steve Forbes gives us some insight into what Israeli officials are thinking right now…

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: I think if the deal goes through we’re in danger of war, and it might be the worst kind of war we can imagine. Because this deal will open the way for Iran not to get a bomb but many bombs. Within a decade it will be free to enrich uranium on an unlimited basis. And it will be able to make the fissile core for dozens of bombs–indeed, hundreds of bombs–which it can then put on the hundreds of ICBMs it already has.

Under this deal Iran is going to get $100 billion to $300 billion, which it will be able to use to fund its terrorism and its aggression in the region–its aim being to destroy Israel. Given Iran’s history of aggression, I’d say that this double bonanza of a guaranteed pathway to a nuclear arsenal and a jackpot of money to continue its aggression actually makes the danger of war, even nuclear war, a lot greater.

SF: You make a very important point. Even if Iran sticks to the deal, which is highly problematical, in a decade it will be a major global nuclear power, and it will have ballistic missiles.

BN: Iran is producing them, and guess what? Within a few years they will be able to reach the Eastern seaboard of the United States. And then every point in the United States. But this deal will also enable Iran to tip those missiles with nuclear weapons, with atomic bombs. And I think it’s a huge mistake to allow the foremost sponsor of terrorism in the world, Iran, to have nuclear weapons, as well as the capacity to give such weapons to its terrorist surrogates. This is a big, big mistake. Not only endangering Israel and the entire Middle East but the entire world, specifically the United States.

The mullahs, the dictators in Tehran, they call us the little Satan; they call America the big Satan. You are their ultimate target, and you should not give such a terrorist regime the weapons of mass destruction. Because I think the greatest danger facing our world is the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons. Here you have a militant Islamic state, Iran, arming itself with nuclear weapons and receiving a huge cash bonanza in the bargain. That’s a mistake.

Let there be no misunderstanding – as long as Benjamin Netanyahu is in power the Israeli government will never, ever allow Iran to build nuclear weapons.

This deal that Barack Obama just made with Iran guarantees the Iranians a path to a nuclear weapon, but the Obama administration is apparently hoping that regime change will happen before that time if they are able to kick the can down the road far enough.

But the big mistake that almost everyone in the western world is making when analyzing this deal is that they are assuming that the Iranians will actually keep their promises.

Just like the U.S. government, the Iranians have a very long track record of blatantly lying. And they were caught lying even in the midst of these recent negotiations. The National Council of Resistance of Iran produced evidence that the Iranians were enriching uranium intended for nuclear weapons at a site known as “Lavizan-3” just outside of Tehran. But even after this information came out, the Iranians and the Obama administration just continued with their negotiations as if this facility did not exist.

This is how utterly incompetent the Obama administration is. The Iranians were hiding things and blatantly lying to us before the negotiations were even completed. And the truth is that it is possible that Iran might already have developed nuclear weapons.

Let us hope that this is not the case, but if reports about Lavizan-3 are accurate, the Iranian nuclear program may be far more advanced than any of us have been led to believe.

Sadly, most people in the western world end up believing what they want to believe about Iran instead of what the facts on the ground actually tell us.

Not too long from now, I believe that we will see some sort of “trigger event” which will motivate the Israeli government to finally conduct a massive military strike against the Iranian nuclear program. Israel has a history of conducting these kinds of assaults, and the Israeli military has been preparing for just such an attack for a very long time. The following comes from a recent article by Joel C. Rosenberg…

Israel has used surprise military force twice to neutralize foreign nuclear programs. In 1981, the Israeli Air Force attacked and destroyed Iraq’s nuclear facilities. Then in 2007, the Israelis attacked and destroyed a Syrian nuclear facility being built with the help of the North Koreans. An attack on Iran’s facilities would be far more complex, and the possible retaliatory blowback could be horrendous. But yet, the Israelis certainly have the capability to do what they need to do, and they’ve been preparing for years for that moment. Given Israel’s historic track record, it is possible Israeli leaders will come to the point of feeling they have no choice but to launch attacks on Iran.

And just because Iran has made a “deal” with us, the American people should not assume that we have now become “friends” with the Iranian government.

In fact, the president of Iran recently led a march through the streets of Tehran during which the crowds were chanting “death to America”…

“Even over the weekend, as Iran continued to receive more and more concessions at the negotiating table, Iranian President Rouhani led a march of hatred in the streets of Tehran in which the masses cried, ‘Death to America! Death to Israel!‘” Netanyahu said, describing Iran’s recent “Al Quds (Jerusalem) Day” in an address to the Knesset Monday.

What a horrible thing to want. Even though I am very pro-Israel, I would never wish death to Iran. The Iranian people work hard, they take care of their families, and most of them want peace.

Unfortunately, Iran is run by a cadre of radical Islamic nutjobs that are obsessed with wiping the nation of Israel off the face of the planet.

For a long time, Israel and Iran have been on a collision course, and now time is running out.

War is coming to the Middle East, and it is going to be absolutely horrifying.

Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/211.html#MKTEqFyXZdWdhM1S.99

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-10) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#11. To: Vicomte13 (#7)

They can't effectively attack Iran without US permission.

Even with U.S. permission, there would be a welcoming party. Iran shares a border with Russia, and stealth tech does not work against top Russian and Chinese radar. This mission would also depend on Russian non-cooperation with Iran.

Even then, in air refueling is necessary. Downing the tankers (refitted 707's) would effectively take out the Israeli aircraft.

The Iranian targets are spread out all over the place, underground, and fortified. It is not a drop and run mission with one target. They will need to fly in enemy airspace for a considerable time.

As Iran has not started a war in centuries, Israel would be condemned. Israel is edging toward a shunning as happened to South Africa.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-22   19:48:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: nolu chan (#9)

It is self-defense when Iran has said it wants to destroy Israel and the nut-case leader wants very much to have nuclear weapons.

Don  posted on  2015-07-22   20:27:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Stoner (#10)

God is still protecting Israel.

Don  posted on  2015-07-22   20:27:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Don (#12)

It is self-defense when Iran has said it wants to destroy Israel and the nut-case leader wants very much to have nuclear weapons.

That is ridiculous. What would be self-defense is what Israel would have to do next.

And Israel would need divine intervention.

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/06/israel-jerusalem-post-conference-dagan-ashkenazi-iran-attack.html#

Why didn’t Netanyahu attack Iran?

Ben Caspit
ISRAEL PULSE
June 8, 2015
TRANSLATOR
Danny Wool

Participants in the Jerusalem Post's fourth annual conference in New York on June 7 never imagined that they would find themselves under public cross-examination over the actions of Israel’s political and security services during the tense days of 2010, when the government contemplated a military assault on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Sitting on the panel were former Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi; former Mossad Director Meir Dagan; two former heads of the National Security Council, Maj. Gen. Giora Eiland and Maj. Gen. Uzi Dayan; and senior columnist Caroline Glick. Moderating the panel was the Jerusalem Post’s editor-in-chief, Steve Linde. The much talked-about argument broke out toward the end of the discussion, when Glick, who is known for her hawkish, right-wing views, claimed that in 2010, two members of the panel “were given an order to prepare the military for an imminent strike against Iran’s nuclear installation, and they refused.”

[...]

This dialogue in New York, about five years after the fact, reveals just the tip of the iceberg of what was taking place behind closed doors during those long, tense months in the conference rooms of Israel’s top defense leadership. All the heads of the various security forces were unanimous in their opinion that an Israeli attack on Iran would be a historic mistake that could result in disaster. At the same time, however, decisions in Israel are made by the political leadership. The defense establishment is then expected to carry them out without hesitation. On the other hand, to follow through with a perilous, strategically historic move such as attacking Iran, any Israeli prime minister would want the support of his defense leadership, or at least the chief of staff.

[snip]

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-22   20:40:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Don (#13)

God is still protecting Israel.

Then they do not need to attack Iran.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-22   20:41:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: nolu chan (#9)

They have had air-air refueling capabilities for quite sometime, KC 135s, KC130s, and supposedly some converted 767s (can't really confirm or deny that last one).

There was also supposed to have been an arms deal done back in 2013 where we supplied them with KC135s, V22 Ospreys, upgraded radar for their F15s, assorted other weaponry. Don't exactly know how much of this deal went down.

If push came to shove I would bet the Saudis would let the Israelis overfly their airspace. They are in just as much danger as the Israelis with the "neighborhood nutcase" mullahs of Iran having nuclear play toys.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-07-22   20:45:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: nolu chan (#15)

Why not? God still acts through people. Go back over the wars Israel has fought since 1948.

Don  posted on  2015-07-22   21:36:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: CZ82 (#16)

If push came to shove I would bet the Saudis would let the Israelis overfly their airspace.

I doubt bookies could even list that one on the board. The odds against the Saudis getting involved is slim and none.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-22   21:53:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Don (#17)

Why not? God still acts through people.

I thought God would be able to defend Israel without sanctioning an unlawful attack on Iran. I could be wrong.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-22   21:54:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: nolu chan (#19)

Self-defense is always lawful.

Don  posted on  2015-07-22   22:08:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Don (#20)

Self-defense is always lawful.

When you take the first act of aggression, it is not self-defense. Israel attacking Iran would be an act of aggression, just like the other acts of Israeli aggression condemned by the United Nations.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-23   0:07:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: rlk, Vicomte13 (#1)

The European penal colony of Israel is not long for this world it seems.

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   0:23:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Vicomte13, Don, TooConservative, GarySpFc, CZ82, liberator (#3)

Israel will not be permitted to bomb Iran anytime soon.

They cannot get there without flying over territory controlled by NATO or US allies, and the US will not permit it.

I would gather given your USN background you know the regional airspace over there as well as I do.

As it stands now getting to Iranian airspace is not a bridge too far. Syrian airspace is spotty given their war against the Jihadists and following that path, Iraqi airspace is a void except where US forces are deployed. Saudi Arabia has also indicated at times they would look the other way. Going that way only the US presence in the Persian Gulf could give the Israelis up.

So the US would have give them up.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   0:39:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: redleghunter (#23) (Edited)

Saudi Arabia has also indicated at times they would look the other way.

The Saudis let us build those remote desert airbases there. They could just let Israel use them, a perfect stopover on the way to Iran.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-23   0:51:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: nolu chan (#5)

Israel has been talking about this for decades. It will not bomb Iran because it lacks the military ability to pull it off and does not desire to lose its Air Force.

I think they can stage an air campaign which takes down Iran's integrated air defense. I don't think Israel will get the effects required to dismantle the Iranian nuclear program. All the critical stuff is buried deep in mountains.

What Israel can do is go after potential delivery vehicles (missiles) factories or assembly plants. That is challenging targeting as the Iranians can spread those assets out and keep them mobile. Saddam was good at moving the Al Samoud assembly facilities around and I'm sure the Iranians learned from that.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   1:03:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: nolu chan (#9)

707. The Iranians need only take out the 707's and the Israeli aircraft will not return to Israel.

Israel has talked but not acted for a reason. A very good reason. They do not have the capability to do it without lots of help.

Don't count out some Saudi "assistance" in the matter of refueling. Stranger things have happened. The Saudis are probably more upset about the nuke deal than Israel. Plus all the attacks would not have to be via aircraft. Israel has ballistic missiles too.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   1:08:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: TooConservative, redleghunter (#24) (Edited)

Israel will not bomb Iran because it can't get the job done. Iran's nuclear facilities are separated and well defended and even if bombed - they are made from small components that can be reconstituted.

Lastly, it would give Iran cover to move into a more open role in Iraq and in Syria - maybe invade into Syria with Revolutionary Guards. Israel may find Iranian divisions on the Golan Heights in short order if they bomb.

Look guys, the reason the USA is hot to get this nuke deal done is because the USA is retreating from the Middle East but can't outright say it. In retreating they want to get the best deal they can get from Iran before they go - Iran being the true super power in the region it seems. Because while Shia are a minority everywhere in Islam, in the middle east they are a majority or a plurality and that includes populations inside Saudi Arabia and large parts of the Arabian peninsula.

If Israel bombs Iran it would be to force the USA to stay. Israel is not so much afraid of a nuclear Iran but afraid that if the USA leaves the middle east behind in favor of a Pacific preoccupation then Israel loses importance in American politics and thus loses influence.

Israel is that mistress that is being set aside in favor of the hotter Asian one and she may go Fatal Attraction rabbit killing on the USA to get Uncle Sam to stay in bed.

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   1:12:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Don, nolu chan (#12)

It is self-defense when Iran has said it wants to destroy Israel and the nut-case leader wants very much to have nuclear weapons.

Why do some Americans keep thinking Israel is the 51s state - the USA does not even have a defense treaty with this nation and a segment of the American political class is willing to start WW3 for them.

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   1:20:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: nolu chan (#18)

Look at the Arab nations looking the other way when Israel attacked the Iraqi reactor.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   1:20:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: redleghunter (#26)

Don't count out some Saudi "assistance" in the matter of refueling. Stranger things have happened.

I rank it up there with Turkish assistance. Saudi assistance does not happen without Royal consent. Royal assent invites a Royal beheading.

Israel firing ballistic missiles at Russia's back yard in not wise. They do not carry enough payload to put a dent in fortified underground facilities.

The biggest threat to Israel is being ostracized. Israel could be destroyed without a shot being fired at it.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-23   1:27:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: redleghunter (#29)

Look at the Arab nations looking the other way when Israel attacked the Iraqi reactor.

That was one small strike at Iraq and get out. This would require a massive strike on dozens of targets. Israel can't do it without U.S. involvement, which is why they have not done it. If Israel goes, everyone in creation will know that the U.S. greenlit the operation.

One might consider why the U.S. has not done it themselves, or greenlit an Israeli operation.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-23   1:40:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: redleghunter (#26)

Don't count out some Saudi "assistance" in the matter of refueling. Stranger things have happened. The Saudis are probably more upset about the nuke deal than Israel. Plus all the attacks would not have to be via aircraft. Israel has ballistic missiles too.

And are very adept at infiltrating agents into other countries/organizations.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-07-23   7:36:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Pericles (#28) (Edited)

Why do so many Muslims want a world Caliphate?

Don  posted on  2015-07-23   7:37:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Don (#33)

Why do so many Muslims want a world Caliphate?

...and why are they on the same side with the USA and Israel in Syria?

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   8:31:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Pericles (#27)

Israel will not bomb Iran because it can't get the job done. Iran's nuclear facilities are separated and well defended and even if bombed - they are made from small components that can be reconstituted.

They could if they stockpiled their bombs on those Saudi bases and the Saudis and other Arab emirates tossed their stockpiles in as well.

Israel has quite a stockpile of ground penetrator bombs, mostly sold to them by us. I'd bet they have developed their own as well.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-23   9:52:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: TooConservative (#35)

They could if they stockpiled their bombs on those Saudi bases and the Saudis and other Arab emirates tossed their stockpiles in as well.

Israel has quite a stockpile of ground penetrator bombs, mostly sold to them by us. I'd bet they have developed their own as well.

The centrifuges are the key component and they are the size of a water heater and are cheap to make and operate so Israel would fail even if it bombed Iran for 30 days.

And then Iran, can be free to produce weapons grade uranium with centrifuges spread out over the entire country - maybe one per house.

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   10:04:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Pericles (#36)

The centrifuges are the key component and they are the size of a water heater and are cheap to make and operate so Israel would fail even if it bombed Iran for 30 days.

You understate the difficulty of making quality centrifuges. Iran abandoned their old designs and built much better but more complex ones a few years ago.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-23   10:13:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: TooConservative (#37) (Edited)

In war crude and rude will do. Also, if any radioactive fall out occurs on Iranian sole they would then have an excuse to dirty bomb Israel

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   10:14:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: nolu chan (#31)

One might consider why the U.S. has not done it themselves, or greenlit an Israeli operation.

Of course now an irrelevant point as the US signed a treaty with Iran.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   10:51:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: redleghunter (#39)

It is likely the higher-ups in the U.S. Government are on the same side as the Islamic crazies.

Don  posted on  2015-07-23   12:54:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Don (#40)

It is likely the higher-ups in the U.S. Government are on the same side as the Islamic crazies.

Which means Israel would be unwise to attack IMO. I think they know there will have to be a catalyst event towards them before they would attack solo.

That's not saying Israel will do something...I think they will but work the clandestine networks instead. I also think eventually Israel will do something and the US will vote along with the UN security council to condemn Israel. That seems to be the next move for the Obolo junta.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   14:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: redleghunter (#41)

I think you are correct that the U.S. Will turn against Israel, and it will be the last straw for this Nation.

It doesn't matter for Israel if every nation turns against Them. God will look after them. The bad news is for the U.S. Israel's enemies will be destroyed.

Don  posted on  2015-07-23   14:29:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: nolu chan (#21)

Who has taken the first act of aggression?

Don  posted on  2015-07-23   15:18:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Don (#43)

Who has taken the first act of aggression?

The title of the article being discussed is, "Why Israel Is Going To Bomb Iran."

If Israel does that, it will be an act of aggression.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-23   15:31:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: nolu chan, Don (#44)

Iran and Persia have not started / initiated a war in centuries. The Iran/Iraq war was started by Iraq.

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   15:33:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Pericles (#45)

Iran and Persia have not started / initiated a war in centuries. The Iran/Iraq war was started by Iraq.

Like all large nations, Iran does fight wars by proxy. Hezbollah comes to mind and the years the Iranian Quds spent within Saddam's Iraq preparing militias to overthrow him.

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.---John 1:17

redleghunter  posted on  2015-07-23   15:38:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: redleghunter (#39)

One might consider why the U.S. has not done it themselves, or greenlit an Israeli operation.

Of course now an irrelevant point as the US signed a treaty with Iran.

Not really.

The mission is so unjustifiable and fraught with military and political danger, Israeli attempts to get the U.S. to do it have failed for decades. Even Bibi's order to prepare for such an attack failed with his own military.

Now that President Obama has entered into an Executive Agreement with Iran, if Israel chooses to start a war it cannot finish, it should not expect the U.S. to engage in WW3 to finish it for them. Note that it is not a treaty entered into by the U.S.

Israel has no ground warfare capability against Iran. A flyover is highly problematic. If they get away with a flyover once, they can hardly expect to do it repeatedly by using neutral or unfriendly airspace.

Israel cannot afford to keep all its young men mobilized for a prolonged war. While Israel has missiles, so does Iran. Due to the miniscule size of Israel, missile strikes against a few cities (Tel Aviv, Haifa) would cause more hurt for Israel than Israel can inflict on Iran. Very bad for Israel would be a missile that misses Iran.

Israel is going to have to learn to stop coveting their neighbors' land, and get used to the idea of a Palestinian state, which is coming.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-23   15:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Pericles (#45)

The leader of Iran has said over and over what he intends to do to Israel and you say he has done nothing. You have either lost your mind or you get your paycheck from the Islamic terrorists. Which one is it?

Do you know what Lincoln said about not being able to fool all of the people all of the time?

Don  posted on  2015-07-23   16:00:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: redleghunter (#46) (Edited)

Like all large nations, Iran does fight wars by proxy. Hezbollah comes to mind and the years the Iranian Quds spent within Saddam's Iraq preparing militias to overthrow him.

So Iran is a rational player and not about to directly initiate a war in hopes of luring the Mahdi down? (and we can't really determine other than with bias who started these bush wars (not the president but the term) first either.

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   16:01:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: nolu chan (#47)

That land belongs to Israel now, in the past, and in the future. there will be a very destructive war that will settle the issue: Armageddon.

Don  posted on  2015-07-23   16:04:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Don (#48) (Edited)

The leader of Iran has said over and over what he intends to do to Israel and you say he has done nothing. You have either lost your mind or you get your paycheck from the Islamic terrorists. Which one is it?

He was not the leader of Iran but the president and he is no longer in office and he was misquoted - he said Israel's Zionist regime will end the way apartheid South Africa's regime ended. So who pays to have you spread lies I should add?

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-23   16:05:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (52 - 95) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com