[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: Cops Shot Unarmed Georgia Woman in the Head, Admired Their Marksmanship, Prevented First Aid After An awful story in Georgia about a fatal 2010 police shooting as investigated by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Channel 2 Action News, illustrates many of the structural and systemic problems in policing and police discipline, not just in Georgia but around the country. 35-year-old Caroline Small took police on a low-speed chase that ended with her Buick Century in a ditch on its rims. The two cops who followed her shot her, claiming they feared for her life because she could drive the car, which was without tires now, down the narrow path between her and them . After shooting her in the head, the cops are caught on their cameras talking about their marksmanship. A subsequent investigation of the incident cleared them of wrongdoing but the investigation by the Journal-Constitution found a number of problems:
Both cops remain employed as police officers in Georgia and were never disciplined. Video shows them waving off a former EMT who witnessed the shooting and was trying to offer first aid. Last year a federal judge threw out a wrongful death suit by the family because, she said, the cops said they felt Small was a threat and so killed her lawfully. Small's interaction with cops began when someone saw her sitting in her car in a parking lot and called police about suspected drug use. The factors that contributed to the "nothing to see here" approach in Georgia are not unique to that state. Police shootings are universally investigated by someone substantively connected to law enforcement—be it the police department's own internal affairs department, state investigators, or outside prosecutors. Police shootings are generally protected by law not only if a reasonable threat existed, but if the cop involved perceived a threat. The system of law enforcement privileges—things like treating disciplinary files as private personnel records and employment as a police officer as a public service privilege—meanwhile, ensures obfuscation can prevent transparency and accountability. In the last year, incidents of police brutality have received more and more attention, but the burgeoning police reform movement still focuses on the issue on a case-by-case basis. It draws more attention to individual cases of brutality and the ancillary issue of racist cops rather than the systemic problem of police brutality. Those systemic problems are created by a set of privileges extended to police officers and law enforcement by the government that can be revoked by them as well. The prosecution of the six cops accused of killing Freddie Gray, for example, may feel like a victory to protestors, but every protection those cops enjoyed, including waiting 10 days to give an official statement and remaining on the city payroll with termination proceedings impossible until a conviction is secured, other cops will continue to enjoy. The lucrative system can remain intact for police officers, prosecutors, and other government officials, and all it cost was the prosecution of six cops. Read the whole heart-wrenching piece about Caroline Small here. Via the Twitter feed of Radley Balko.
Ed Krayewski is an associate editor at Reason.com (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5. I am starting to think there is something behind all these White cops killing blacks. Revenge maybe? Or perhaps they are sick and tired of watching cops getting crucified for arresting black thugs and then watching the liberal, hate themselves and their race, white judges turning them loose time after time.
#3. To: BobCeleste (#2) I am starting to think there is something behind all these White cops killing blacks. Revenge maybe? Or perhaps they are sick and tired of watching cops getting crucified for arresting black thugs and then watching the liberal, hate themselves and their race, white judges turning them loose time after time. I don't know and don't care. What I do care about is a certain segment of government that is armed by the taxpayer and seem to have official permission to murder citizens. It doesn't matter if you are black or white,young or old,male or female. You should have a reasonable right to expect to not be murdered by agents of the state.
#4. To: sneakypete (#3) It doesn't matter if you are black or white,young or old,male or female. You should have a reasonable right to expect to not be murdered by agents of the state. Exactly. Just like our dawgs. SAVE OUR DAWGS FROM THE POLICE STATE!!!
#5. To: buckeroo (#4) Exactly. Just like our dawgs. SAVE OUR DAWGS FROM THE POLICE STATE!!! I'm not sure I understand your point there,but I will say that if you kill my dog and don't kill me at the same time you have just made a fatal mistake.
Replies to Comment # 5. I'm not sure I understand your point there I was adding to your earlier statment:
It doesn't matter if you are black or white,young or old,male or female. You should have a reasonable right to expect to not be murdered by agents of the state. Don't forget the dawgs. You apparently filled in the point ...
but I will say that if you kill my dog and don't kill me at the same time you have just made a fatal mistake.
#9. To: sneakypete (#5) " I will say that if you kill my dog and don't kill me at the same time you have just made a fatal mistake. " Agree wholeheartedly!!
End Trace Mode for Comment # 5. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|