Title: Stunning Testimony: 9/11 eyewitness heard repeated explosions in WTC7 prior to collapse of towers Source:
Intellihub URL Source:https://www.intellihub.com/stunning ... 7-prior-to-collapse-of-towers/ Published:Jul 2, 2015 Author:Intellihub News Post Date:2015-07-03 09:10:32 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:5248 Comments:18
“One individual told me to leave and leave right away”
(INTELLIHUB) — Over the years the alternative media has interviewed numerous 9/11 eyewitnesses, each with a compelling story that added another piece to the puzzle in the endless search for the real story behind one of the worst terror attacks in history.
Perhaps the most stunning eyewitness statements are those from Barry Jennings, an emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority who passed away in 2008 at the age of 53.
Before backtracking on his statements after intense pressure and attacks by the mainstream media, Jennings gave a detailed interview to filmmaker Jason Bermas. What he revealed has become one of the most important pieces of evidence indicating some sort of controlled demolition of WTC7.
“I’m just confused about one thing, and one thing only, why World Trade Center 7 went down in the first place… I heard explosions.”
In the interview Jennings describes arriving on the 23rd floor of the WTC7 building shortly after the first tower was hit and seeing it empty with coffee still hot and half eaten sandwiches laying about.
He then goes on to describe hearing explosions inside the building prior to the collapse of either tower and reveals that there were dead bodies in the buildings blown out lobby.
Interestingly, Jennings was actually interviewed by ABC7 on the morning of 9/11 shortly after he was able to get out of WTC7. In the clip he specifically mentions the explosions he heard. (remember these were explosions going off BEFORE the towers collapsed)
It is important to note that Jennings was a victim of an intense amount of harassment after his statements were released to the public and the BBC subsequently decided to do an attack piece.
While no one knows for sure, it is highly likely that this harassment at least played a part in his untimely death.
What do you think?
Is this the smoking gun eyewitness testimony that further confirms that World Trade Center 7 was destroyed through a controlled demolition?
Intellihub News is a leading independent news agency covering a wide range of issues including globalism, the increasing police state, and the control of media by a small number of corrupt corporations.
Yada, yada, yada - cops are gods, government is our savior, potheads should be killed.
Same bleating as always from one of LF's submissive sheep.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.†- Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
cops are gods, government is our savior, potheads should be killed.
Only in your drug loving mind have I ever preached this. I'm 1,000% more fair and balanced then you. I've posted articles against government welfare, I've posted articles were cops are idiots and unlawful... and I've publicly stated here on LF about a thousand times I'm in favor of legal weed. You have never posted an article against weed, in favor of LE or were government did a good job.
You are a troll.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
I question you GrandIsland for the various comments you issue almost hourly. So let's go to root-cause analysis:
Government Trolls Are Using ‘Psychology-Based Influence Techniques’ On YouTube, Facebook And Twitter
By Michael Snyder, on July 1st, 2015
Have you ever come across someone on the Internet that you suspected was a paid government troll? Well, there is a very good chance that you were not imagining things. Thanks to Edward Snowden, we now have solid proof that paid government trolls are using “psychology-based influence techniques” on social media websites such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. Documents leaked by Snowden also reveal that government agents have been conducting denial-of-service attacks, flooding social media websites with thinly veiled propaganda and have been purposely attempting to warp public discourse online. If we do not stand up and object to this kind of Orwellian behavior, it is only going to get worse and worse.
In the UK, the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG) is a specialized unit within the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). If it wasn’t for Edward Snowden, we probably still would never have heard of them. This particular specialized unit is engaged in some very “questionable” online activities. The following is an excerpt from a recent piece by Glenn Greenwald and Andrew Fishman…
Though its existence was secret until last year, JTRIG quickly developed a distinctive profile in the public understanding, after documents from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had engaged in “dirty tricks” like deploying sexual “honey traps” designed to discredit targets, launching denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms, pushing veiled propaganda onto social networks and generally warping discourse online.
We are told that JTRIG only uses these techniques to go after the “bad guys”.
JTRIG’s domestic and law enforcement operations are made clear. The report states that the controversial unit “currently collaborates with other agencies” including the Metropolitan police, Security Service (MI5), Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), Border Agency, Revenue and Customs (HMRC), and National Public Order and Intelligence Unit (NPOIU). The document highlights that key JTRIG objectives include “providing intelligence for judicial outcomes”; monitoring “domestic extremist groups such as the English Defence League by conducting online HUMINT”; “denying, deterring or dissuading” criminals and “hacktivists”; and “deterring, disrupting or degrading online consumerism of stolen data or child porn.”
Particularly disturbing to me is the phrase “domestic extremist groups”. What does someone have to say or do to be considered an “extremist”? For example, the English Defence League is a non-violent street protest movement in the UK that is strongly against the spread of radical Islam and sharia law in the UK. So if they are “extremists”, how many millions upon millions of ordinary citizens in the United States would fit that definition?
When conducting operations against “extremists”, psychology-based influence techniques are among the tools that JTRIG uses to combat them online. The following comes from one of the documents that was posted by Greenwald and Fishman…
In other words, these government trolls try to mess with people’s minds.
And here is another document that was posted by Greenwald and Fishman that talks about how JTRIG uses YouTube, Facebook and Twitter to accomplish their goals…
It is very disturbing to think that some of the people that we may be interacting with on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are actually paid government agents that are purposely trying to feed us propaganda and misinformation.
And of course this kind of thing does not just happen in the United Kingdom. In Canada, it has been publicly admitted that the government uses paid trolls to warp Internet discourse. The following comes from Natural News…
You’ve probably run into them before — those seemingly random antagonizers who always end up diverting the conversation in an online chat room or article comment section away from the issue at hand, and towards a much different agenda. Hot-button issues like illegal immigration, the two-party political system, the “war on terror” and even alternative medicine are among the most common targets of such attackers, known as internet “trolls” or “shills,” who in many cases are nothing more than paid lackeys hired by the federal government and other international organizations to sway and ultimately control public opinion.
Several years ago, Canada’s CTV News aired a short segment about how its own government had been exposed for hiring secret agents to monitor social media and track online conversations, as well as the activities of certain dissenting individuals. This report, which in obvious whitewashing language referred to such activities as the government simply “weighing in and correcting” allegedly false information posted online, basically admitted that the Canadian government had assumed the role of secret online police.
You can actually watch a video news report about what is happening up in Canada right here.
Needless to say, the U.S. government is also engaged in this kind of activity as well. For instance, the U.S. government has actually been caught manipulating discourse on Reddit and editing Wikipedia. When it comes to spying, there is nobody that is off limits for our spooks. It just came out recently that we even spied on three French presidents, and they are supposed to be our “friends”.
All of this is very disturbing to me. Why can’t they just leave us alone and let us talk to one another? Why do they have to spy on everything that we do and purposely try to manipulate public discourse? Why do they have to be such control freaks?
What do you think? Please feel free to join the discussion by posting a comment below…
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Psst: tater is one of the worst trolls on the Internet, so it makes sense he or one of his many friends play the game of "innocence.". What makes him great, however, is because he pleads "innocence"; I just love the slapp happy comedy schtick the obvious troll creates.
GrandIsland - Have you shined your 50,000 dumaflaschers today because you have absolute faith in US government? Really, you have 50,000 primers placed on a shelf in a dark, damp basement in NewYork?
Someone who has knowledge about a crime or dramatic event through first-hand experience via any of the senses.
Do not place any accuracy or reliability on eyewitness reports.
Eyewitness testimony is fickle and, all too often, shockingly inaccurate.
Eyewitness misidentification is the greatest contributing factor to wrongful convictions proven by DNA testing, playing a role in more than 70% of convictions overturned through DNA testing nationwide.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
After listening to Barry Jennings' interview, he said he was told not to look down by his rescuers while in the lobby of WTC7. His claim was because there were bodies on the floor.
I hate to discuss something that happened nearly 14 years ago, but were there any deaths in WTC7?
p.s. I don't trust Google when I search for the answer.
They are in Pa. Try and keep up with past conversations.
I don't trust the government... I have no problem at all taking up arms against anyone or anything that tries to disarm me or steal from me. I just trust the civilian population WAY less than I do government. My house is 99% more likely to be unlawfully entered by some drug addled, criminal shitbird then government.
I came into this world covered in another's blood... I have no fucking problem going out the same way.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح