[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Education Title: Colorado Court Rules Use of Public Funds for Private Schools Is Unconstitutional DENVER — Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools. The split decision to throw out the voucher program in Douglas County, Colorado’s third-largest school district, was a blow to conservative education advocates and those who want to redefine public education to funnel tax dollars directly to families who then choose the type of schooling they want for their children. The state’s Supreme Court ruled against the district’s voucher program, which was passed in 2011, saying it violated a plank of the State Constitution that explicitly prevents public money from going to schools “controlled by any church or sectarian denomination whatsoever.” “This stark constitutional provision makes one thing clear,” Colorado’s chief justice, Nancy E. Rice, wrote in the court’s opinion. “A school district may not aid religious schools.” The ruling’s immediate effect will be to prevent the district from giving vouchers to families to send their children to any private school, including secular ones. The court’s decision will also stop other school districts around Colorado from pursuing similar voucher programs. School officials in Douglas County, just south of Denver, signaled that the district would appeal the case directly to the United States Supreme Court, with the hopes of weakening laws here and in other states that block public money from flowing to religious schools. More than a decade ago, the federal Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution could not prohibit the use of public vouchers to pay for religious schools in Cleveland. Douglas County’s voucher program, called the Choice Scholarship Pilot Program, created 500 scholarships of about $4,570 each. The funds could have gone to any of 23 district-approved “private school partners” — 16 of which were religious. The vouchers were at the heart of a series of conservative reforms that have transformed Douglas County into an educational battleground in recent years, pitting teachers’ unions, civil liberties groups and liberal parents against conservative families, a majority conservative school board and a group backed by the billionaire conservative Koch brothers. In addition to vouchers, Douglas County’s school board has embraced merit-based teacher pay and charter schools. Conservative supporters say the policies have put the district in the vanguard of school reforms. Opponents say the efforts are chipping away at pillars of public education and have made Douglas County a hostile place for teachers. With the court’s decision on Monday, the state’s largest teachers’ union claimed victory. “We’re incredibly gratified that the state’s Supreme Court recognized that public dollars should stay in public schools,” said Kerrie Dallman, president of the Colorado Education Association. Many states are moving forward with programs that allow families to apply public money toward private school tuition. According to the American Federation for Children, a nonprofit group that supports school vouchers, there are now 46 programs in 23 states and Washington, D.C. They include tax credit scholarships, in which private individuals or companies can earn tax credits for donating to scholarship funds, and education savings accounts that allow families to use tax dollars to pay for a range of educational services, including private schools, tutors and home schooling materials. In Colorado, opponents challenged the vouchers soon after they were approved, halting the program as the lawsuit moved through the court system. Civil liberties groups that hailed Monday’s ruling said it drew a clear border between public money and private faith. “Parents are free to send their children to private religious schools if they wish, but the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed today that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it,” read a statement by Mark Silverstein, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, which represented some of the challengers. But proponents of vouchers said the religious-funding prohibitions in Colorado discriminated against families on the basis of religion, and violated their constitutional rights. “The question now is whether a state can specifically target and exclude” religious schools from getting voucher funds, said Michael Bindas, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, which represented parents fighting for the vouchers. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest DENVER — Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools. Shouldn't that be, "... a voucher program that allowed
#2. To: Willie Green (#0) “Parents are free to send their children to private religious schools if they wish, but the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed today that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it,” Great! Using that same logic, those parents who send their children to non- public schools should not be forced to pay for public schools. Right?
#3. To: Willie Green (#0) Bull. S***. The monopoly, the subversive swindle that has "public school" is itself....UN-CONSTITUTIONAL.
#4. To: misterwhite, Willie Green (#2) Great! Using that same logic, those parents who send their children to non- public schools should not be forced to pay for public schools. *SWOOSH* (Nothing but net.) Don't expect Willie or ANY liberal to refute that kind of clear-headed logic.
#5. To: misterwhite, releghunter, CZ82, Stoner, Bob Celeste, We The People (#2) “Parents are free to send their children to private religious schools if they wish, but the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed today that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for it,” How much longer must We-the-Sane be compelled to keep on swallowing this propagandist swill? Once again, we allow an activist court of a few subverted judges to supersede and side-step the Peoples' authority on matters of law which should be decided through LEGISLATION. The parents ARE "taxpayers"! OUR taxes are confiscated as the Indoctrinaires teach Commie 101, Hate Whitey 101, Sodomy 101, and Victimhood & Oppression 101 -- yet, these fascists believe we ought to be DOUBLE taxed for rejecting their Leftist, perverted indoctrination masquerading as "education"?? Enough is a enough!
#6. To: Liberator (#5) "yet, these fascists believe we ought to be DOUBLE taxed" The bulk of my property taxes go to the school district. I have no children attending school. Yet I pay. Now, the same people who see nothing wrong with that are the first ones to support say, a toll road, using the argument, "Only the people using the road will pay for the road. And that's fair".
#7. To: misterwhite (#2) Using that same logic, those parents who send their children to non- public schools should not be forced to pay for public schools. Who would pay for public schools for children whose parents who do not pay for any school? They have to take your money before they can redistribute it.
#8. To: Liberator (#5) How much longer must We-the-Sane be compelled to keep on swallowing this propagandist swill? Once again, we allow an activist court of a few subverted judges to supersede and side-step the Peoples' authority on matters of law which should be decided through LEGISLATION. You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school?
#9. To: nolu chan (#7) "Who would pay for public schools for children whose parents who do not pay for any school?" Probably the same people who pay for the healthcare of children whose parents who do not pay for any healthcare.
#10. To: Pericles (#8) You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school? On what insane basis?
#11. To: nolu chan (#7) They have to take your money before they can redistribute it. Under the guise of "The greater good." (as only Fascist-Dems and statists see it.)
#12. To: Liberator (#10) Colorado’s highest court on Monday struck down a voucher program that allowed parents in a conservative suburban school district to use taxpayer dollars to send their children to private schools. Do you read English?
#13. To: misterwhite (#6) (Edited) The bulk of my property taxes go to the school district. I have no children attending school. Yet I pay. Can you be more specific about your point? Do you favor compulsory taxation of a public school system that indoctrinates leftist-socialist "education"? WHILE enjoying a unionized monopoly? It's insane. And no, I do NOT believe the school tax is a fair system. It provides NO choice. Public roads are not biased...unless ALL roads lead into Camden or Baltimore ;-)
#14. To: Pericles (#12) What part of "court" or "activist judiciary" don't you understand? STATES. LEGISLATURES. ENACT. STATE. LAWS. (Hello.)
#15. To: Pericles (#8) You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school? Again I will ask -- ON WHAT BASIS WHATSOEVER?? Are you able to answer this simple request?
#16. To: Liberator (#13) "Do you favor compulsory taxation of a public school system that indoctrinates leftist-socialist "education"? Based on my post, did I give you the impression that I'd favor compulsory taxation of a public school system that indoctrinates conservative education? Two separate issues.
#17. To: Liberator (#15) You would let your taxes pay for a Sharia Muslim school? If the law allows for tax payer funded vouchers to private religious schools that means Muslim sharia schools can get them also. I did not think I would have to spell it out to you.
#18. To: Liberator (#11) Under the guise of "The greater good." For the children. It is a moral imperative.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|