Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Obama Shocked By Disastrous Economic News…Blames Man Made Global Cooling
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://redstatements.co/obama-shock ... lames-man-made-global-cooling/
Published: May 31, 2015
Author: Steven Ahle
Post Date: 2015-05-31 08:08:33 by out damned spot
Keywords: Obama, shocked, economy
Views: 1056
Comments: 19
The White House is in a state of shock today after receiving word that the US is halfway to a new recession. They were so dazed, they actually blamed Man Made Global Cooling. The GDP for the first quarter was originally announced as a gain of .2%. Today that number was revised to a drop of .7%. The definition of a recession is when the GDP comes in at a negative number for two quarters in a row. That means we are officially halfway to a new recession. The delicious irony is that after Obama decided to honor our troops by having his picture taken eating ice cream and declaring that global warming is a bigger danger to the US than ISIS, he blamed the bad numbers on extremely cold and snowy weather. (His administration also believes Patriots are a bigger danger than ISIS..DHS determines that people who love their country and constitution are more dangerous than ISIS.) That’s right. The incredibly late winter weather that included tons of snow and bitterly cold weather , which was cause by global warming (chuckle) destroyed The One’s perfect economy. Illegal aliens don’t know where their next food stamp is coming from. Jason Furman, the Chairman of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, also said that if congress would only pass the TPP, it would lead to more exports and a better economy. Really? We can compete abroad with countries who let the market decide on prices and labor costs as our country moves to a $15 dollar “living wage” for the few people left with jobs. I think it’s more likely we would improve the ecomies of the other countries in the TPP, than our own. It will also allow Obama to bring in an unlimited amount of new immigrants. WARNING. WARNING. DANGER DANGER. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is Really About Opening Borders Without Control. The administration urges all voters to ignore the economy behind the curtain.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: out damned spot (#0)
How long before people who work part time insist on a "living wage" They have to "live" also. If they only work 20 hours per week, shouldn't they get $30 an hour? To be fair? Where's the equality?
WHAT? Where does it say that?
This administration is so f'ed up, their MO is to use the John Belushi excuse: in the Blues Brothers, Belushi kept making up excuses, no matter how absurd. In all fairness though, one must remember that the de industrialization of the US started a long time ago. We are now reaping the results of that. Obama is NOT helping the economy, but he did not start it. The economy today is a result of Free Trade, NAFTA, GATT, WTO, etc, etc, etc. We cannot have a vibrant economy and a trade surplus, when we do note make anything. And this clown wants another Trade Deal to do more damage, and he wants to bring in all the parasites of the world??? All of those that promoted, voted for all those one sided trade deals, are economic traitors, and should all be hanging from tall trees, with a short rope! Our national economy is cooked, and is due for a massive implosion. When it hits, it will make the German Wiemar Republic look like boom times.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Congress is considering whether to give President Obama the power to fast- track the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a sweeping international regulatory agreement the White House describes as "rules for the world's economy" — and the U.S. TPP regulates everything from the environment and energy (climate change, anyone?) to minimum wages, food and, most notably, immigration. If approved, the Trans-Pacific Partnership would have the force of a treaty. Its regulations would override U.S. law. With fast-track trade promotion authority (TPA), only a simple majority in both houses of Congress, not a two-thirds supermajority in the Senate, would be needed for approval. Congress could not change any of the rules in it, and the White House would not be obligated to follow any directives Congress offers on what those rules should look like. ADVERTISEMENT The Trans-Pacific Partnership includes an entire chapter on immigration. It is a Trojan horse for Obama's immigration agenda. thehill.com/blogs/pundits...l/238574-trade-agreement- is-a-trojan-horse-for-obamas-immigration
This article calls your group the big government wing of the Republican party. Which I believe to be an accurate description of your views. The establishment GOP-backed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), recently touted by the White House as the “most progressive trade agreement in history,” is also a “Trojan horse” to advance Obama’s “unrestricted immigration” agenda, according to political insiders and critics who have studied the secretive scheming. With the Big Government wing of the Republican Party currently plotting to empower the Obama administration with fast-track Trade Promotion Authority to make it easier to impose the TPP and other radical agreements on the American people, opponents are warning that the White House immigration agenda may become all but impossible to stop. Critics say Congress must refuse to empower Obama on the issue. www.thenewamerican.com/us...em/20710-obama-gop-trade- scheme-includes-unrestricted-immigration
By the way. Why do you support the bill? I mean specifically what does it say in the bill that makes you support it?
"(U.S. Trade Representative) Froman: We are not negotiating anything in TPP that would require any modification of U.S. immigration laws or system, or visa systems, and TPP will explicitly state that it will not require any changes to countries’ immigration laws or procedures. The 11 other countries are making offers to each other in the area of temporary entry, but we have decided not to do so." Your turn. Since, as you say, there is an entire chapter on immigration to work with, point out the part that declares open borders.
Not much of a secret then, huh? And a good trick, since the agreement hasn't been finalized.
I never said I supported the bill. That would be ridiculous, since the bill hasn't been written and no one knows what's in it. Your turn. Why do you oppose it? Tell me what's in it that you oppose. You don't know. You're objecting to something you know nothing about.
Nope. I want the government to keep it's hands off private businesses. Now, how to you propose to keep businesses here when they want to move off-shore? You'll use the force of government to keep them here. So, who favors big government?
Because it is part of a global government they are setting up. Just like NAFTA GATT etc. Obama hates America. What makes you think he would do anything right. He is wrong 100 percent of the time. That is a documented fact.
I think you said you support it in the past. I'm not going to hunt it down though. I could be wrong.
Tariffs. That is smaller government they obeying the WTO. We didn't elect the WTO. You want them to rule over us. Now more global government bullshit. You support it if you know it or not.
It's a trade agreement between 12 countries. Give that there are 195 countries in the world, it's hardly a global anything. "Obama hates America. What makes you think he would do anything right." A Republican-controlled House and a Republican-controlled Senate have 60 days to vote on whatever Obama proposes. Write your Congressman and tell him how you want him to vote. But, if you want any credibility, wait until you read it first. Not that it matters to you what it actually says. But others will be fooled into thinking that you gave it careful thought.
So. Use the force of government to impose tafiffs on imports, thereby raising the cost of goods for Americans. Yeah. That's what Americans want, all right. And where do all those tariff revenues go? Why, to the federal government. Making it what? Bigger. And what will other countries do in return? Tariffs, making our products more expensive, thereby reducing exports and manufacturing. And all this so some union thug can make $60 an hour producing $20 worth of product. You're a one-man wrecking crew, aren't you?
I spoke out on Fast Track Authority. I also spoke out on the differences between a treaty and the "Congressional-Executive Action" authorized by FTA.
That was the system in place that allowed America to rise above all other nations. Since you traitors have had your GATT, NAFTA etc. The economy and Americas standing in the world has diminished. Yes making foreign goods is good. That way we can make in in America and the people here will have jobs. You would rather sell out your countrymen so you can purchase slave goods.
Tariffs would replace the income tax giving citizens some money in their pockets. It would encourage businesses to move back the the US and employ citizens once again. We can't have 94.000,000 out of work. The unemployed are not all lay abouts. Most I know want a job. They want to be middle class again. Having had my hours reduced to part time status, I certainly want full time employment! The middle class used to pay taxes. Now we have 1/2 supporting the other 1/2 half. Isn't better to have Americans working and paying into the system? Businesses cry about their tax burden...well, the money has to come from somewhere. You can't outsource the jobs then complain that half aren't paying taxes. Besides, stats were done a couple of years ago. Produce would rise 5 cents. Nike makes shoes in China. They enter the US at $5.00 a pair. While selling them at $95, I think there is plenty of room to pay American workers and still make a killer profit. I want to see my nation thrive again. Why should businesses move off shore and get to ship goods back in for nothing? The globalists are using the money they save to buy our politicians! They in turn sell us out even more. We live in a Corpocracy! Our traitorous politicians make deals that favor the globalists while giving our citizens the shaft. Sovereignty goes out the window. Our nation dies with each new atrocious treaty.
You forgot the sarcasm tag. "It would encourage businesses to move back the the US and employ citizens once again." Think about it. Wouldn't it be easier to reduce or even eliminate corporate income taxes, do away with minimum wage, reduce EPA and OSHA regulations, eliminate affirmative action and quotas, and reform our tort laws? Then we'd be on an equal footing with foreign competitors. We'd end up with greater employment and low prices rather than greater employment and high prices. Right?
"as our country moves to a $15 dollar “living wage”
#2. To: out damned spot (#0)
"It will also allow Obama to bring in an unlimited amount of new immigrants. WARNING. WARNING. DANGER DANGER. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is Really About Opening Borders Without Control."
#3. To: out damned spot (#0)
" The White House is in a state of shock today after receiving word that the US is halfway to a new recession. They were so dazed, they actually blamed Man Made Global Cooling. "
#4. To: misterwhite (#2)
#5. To: misterwhite (#2)
#6. To: misterwhite (#2)
WHAT? Where does it say that?
#7. To: A K A Stone (#4)
(Edited)
"It is a Trojan horse for Obama's immigration agenda."
#8. To: A K A Stone (#5)
"according to political insiders and critics who have studied the secretive scheming"
#9. To: A K A Stone (#6)
"Why do you support the bill? I mean specifically what does it say in the bill that makes you support it?"
#10. To: A K A Stone (#5)
"This article calls your group the big government wing of the Republican party. Which I believe to be an accurate description of your views."
#11. To: misterwhite (#9)
Your turn. Why do you oppose it? Tell me what's in it that you oppose.
#12. To: misterwhite (#9)
I never said I supported the bill.
#13. To: misterwhite (#10)
Now, how to you propose to keep businesses here when they want to move off-shore? You'll use the force of government to keep them here. So, who favors big government?
#14. To: A K A Stone (#11)
"Because it is part of a global government they are setting up."
#15. To: A K A Stone (#13)
"Tariffs."
#16. To: A K A Stone (#12)
"I think you said you support it in the past. I'm not going to hunt it down though. I could be wrong."
#17. To: misterwhite (#15)
So. Use the force of government to impose tafiffs on imports, thereby raising the cost of goods for Americans. Yeah. That's what Americans want, all right.
#18. To: misterwhite (#15)
Use the force of government to impose tafiffs on imports, thereby raising the cost of goods for Americans.
#19. To: out damned spot (#18)
"Tariffs would replace the income tax giving citizens some money in their pockets."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]