[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Leak a document Title: Damn Buckeroo you're not really this stupid are you? The Iowa caucus means nothing for the Democrats other than some changing campaign strategy. Iowa Democrats are 1 in 15 to GOPers. Even Ron Paul brought in more popular vote than ALL democrats combined. 5 Posted 2008-01-05 22:49:00 by buckeroo Poster Comment: I may want Ron Paul to win. But only a moron would think that he pulled more votes than all the democrats combined. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Even Ron Paul brought in more popular vote than ALL democrats combined. He's talking about the Iowa Caucus. If the 1:15 ratio is correct, I'd say it's possible. But I don't know what the exact numbers and totals for the caucus are. The point he appears to be making is that demokrats are an endangered species in Iowa. It's lopsided towards the GOP wing of the state party. "If America is destroyed, it may be by Americans who salute the flag, sing the national anthem, march in patriotic parades, cheer Fourth of July speakers - normally good Americans who fail to comprehend what is required to keep our country strong and free - Americans who have been lulled into a false security (April 1968)." ---Ezra Taft Benson, #2. To: Buckeroo (#1) If yer gonna talk bad about him, you at least oughtta ping him...MUD "Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, #3. To: barkentine (#1) I assume these numbers are correct. Someone please correct me if it is wrong. Thursday, January 3, 2008 Iowa Wrap Up http://www.groupnewsblog.net/2008/01/iowa-wrap-up.html Total Voter Turnout (approximate) 356,000
Percentage of total vote 24.5% Obama 20.5% Edwards 19.8% Clinton 11.4% Huckabee (R)
#4. To: Mudboy Slim (#2) The title pinged him. But thanks for doing it again. He wont show up. He don't hang out at sites where his advesaries posts aren't deleted. I'll give buck this much though. He would make a better president than Hillary.
#5. To: barkentine (#1) The point he appears to be making is that demokrats are an endangered species in Iowa. It's lopsided towards the GOP wing of the state party. If they are endangered than why did so many more people vote in the crap caucus?
#6. To: barkentine (#1) I changed the title to give him the benefit of the doubt.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#0) Without even reading the article, the correct answer is: Yes, and probably dumber. ![]() #8. To: A K A Stone (#5) If they are endangered than why did so many more people vote They have been "skeered to death" that socialism may be reduced or go away. Old geezers don't want Ron Paul. They want their socialists/communists: Huckster, ROM-Kneed, Judy-ani, 'Cane, Hitlery, Mama, Eddy, et al, ad nauseum. "If America is destroyed, it may be by Americans who salute the flag, sing the national anthem, march in patriotic parades, cheer Fourth of July speakers - normally good Americans who fail to comprehend what is required to keep our country strong and free - Americans who have been lulled into a false security (April 1968)." ---Ezra Taft Benson, #9. To: barkentine (#8) They have been "skeered to death" that socialism may be reduced or go away. Old geezers don't want Ron Paul. Ron Paul is the only one I will vote for out of the dem/reps. But since terrorist organizations like fox news leaves him out of debates I may have to vote third party. If they cheat Mr. Paul out of the nomination I would hope that he runs third party.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|