[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: Because to two accusatons, I will answer questions
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 7, 2015
Author: Pastor Bob Celeste ACP
Post Date: 2015-05-07 13:16:39 by BobCeleste
Keywords: ACP
Views: 25214
Comments: 103

Biff Tannen made this accusation: “Many things, probably most, of the things you claim about God and Christianity are not in the bible.”

A Pole made this accusation: “Because you make things up that are not in the Scriptures.”

In both instances I replied to them asking them to show even one example of the accusation, neither has done so, but, because of the accusation, I have opened a thirty day email account with HushMail.com I will answer any question dealing with my theology or any non prophecy question regarding the Bible.

The email address is biblequestions@hushmail.com

Don’t believe Biff Tannen or A Pole, ask your own questions and judge for yourself.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 56.

#15. To: BobCeleste (#0)

I will answer questions.

I have a question for you.

Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   18:37:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Gatlin (#15)

Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?

email the question to: biblequestions@hushmail.com

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-05-07   19:36:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: BobCeleste (#17)

Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?

email the question to: biblequestions@hushmail.com

What is your reason for not answering my questin on the forum here?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   20:24:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Gatlin, y'all (#19)

What is your reason for not answering my questin on the forum here?

True chutzpah from a guy that hides behind the bozo function, to avoid answering uncomfortable questions.

tpaine  posted on  2015-05-07   20:35:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: tpaine (#21)

True chutzpah ...

Absolutely!

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   20:45:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Gatlin (#22)

Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?

I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'.

What's your opinion?

tpaine  posted on  2015-05-07   20:58:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: tpaine (#23)

Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?

I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'.

What's your opinion?

I don't have an opinion, but I do have a fact.

Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   21:11:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Gatlin (#26)

I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'.

What's your opinion?

I don't have an opinion, ---

The why did you pose the question? I'd bet you have an agenda, -- correct?

--- but I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court.

So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds.

tpaine  posted on  2015-05-07   22:47:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: tpaine (#34)

So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds.

And our rule of law also provides for the settlement of disputes between people based on a legal contract. Marriage is a legal contract. If there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in-laws.

So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-08   0:07:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Gatlin (#37)

-- I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court.

So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds. -- What's your point?

--- our rule of law also provides for the settlement of disputes between people based on a legal contract.
Thank you, Capt Obvious.
Marriage is a legal contract.
So you and big brother govts would have it. The 1st amendment says you should make no laws concerning such religious matters.
If there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in- laws. --- So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract.
Where did you get your law degree? - Mumbo Jumbo University?

tpaine  posted on  2015-05-08   8:21:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: tpaine (#45)

Thank you, Capt Obvious.

It’s Major Gatlin….and you are most welcome.

Marriage is a legal contract.

That is not what big brother governments and I will have it….that is what the rule of law has it.

The 1st amendment says you should make no laws concerning such religious matters.

That is true. And it is true that marriage is still a legal contract. Therefore, if there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in- laws. --- So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract.

Where did you get your law degree? - Mumbo Jumbo University?

I have no law degree….”but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express the other night.”

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-08   10:01:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Gatlin (#49)

Thank you, Capt Obvious.

It’s Major Gatlin….and you are most welcome.

It's obvious to most here that you're not an officer and gentleman, gatlin...

Marriage is a legal contract. ---- That is not what big brother governments and I will have it….that is what the rule of law has it.

No, it's a religious ceremony. The 1st amendment says you should make no laws concerning such religious matters.

That is true. And it is true that marriage is still a legal contract.

Such 'laws' are a violation of the 1st.

Therefore, if there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in- laws. --- So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract.

Where did you get your law degree? - Mumbo Jumbo University?

I have no law degree….

Obviously.

tpaine  posted on  2015-05-08   13:10:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 56.

#62. To: tpaine (#56)

Thank you, Capt Obvious.

Gratias, Sergeant “I know nothing” Schultz.
(Paraphrasing “I know nothing” from the Socratic paradox "ipse se nihil scire id unum sciat" in Latin).
No doubt you'll do the same for someone else.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-08 15:53:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 56.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com