Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles
Title: Because to two accusatons, I will answer questions
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 7, 2015
Author: Pastor Bob Celeste ACP
Post Date: 2015-05-07 13:16:39 by BobCeleste
Keywords: ACP
Views: 25122
Comments: 103
Biff Tannen made this accusation: “Many things, probably most, of the things you claim about God and Christianity are not in the bible.” A Pole made this accusation: “Because you make things up that are not in the Scriptures.” In both instances I replied to them asking them to show even one example of the accusation, neither has done so, but, because of the accusation, I have opened a thirty day email account with HushMail.com I will answer any question dealing with my theology or any non prophecy question regarding the Bible. The email address is biblequestions@hushmail.com Don’t believe Biff Tannen or A Pole, ask your own questions and judge for yourself.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-8) not displayed.
.
.
.
#9. To: redleghunter (#8)
I guess some will have to decide which multiple email accounts they would use to send you an email:) You may even have one person send you the same question from 7 or more email accounts. The account I opened has a life of thirty days, after that it is gone, I will only be receiving mail for 7 days, I then have 21 days to answer and then it closes never to open again. Hushmail is a Canadian company that does not cooperate with NSA.
Bob always ignores my most interesting points and tries to direct focus to minutia and boilerplate nonsense. All he'll find out from this little show is how little people care what he thinks. I find him to be a shallow simpleton, at best.
Certainly not preachers involved in politics. Nevermind just because someone says they're a preacher it doesn't mean they are.
Like what? The volume of your belly-button lint? IF he ignores your snide BS, it's because he knows the nonsense YOU post is NEVER serious, never sincere. And let me add what a p*ssy you are for not pinging him. All he'll find out from this little show is how little people care what he thinks. Apparently YOU do. He called you out and now you're whining about him after having attacked his integrity. I find him to be a shallow simpleton, at best. From a guy who probably failed his GED and lives in a van down by the river?
Back it up. IF you can. And we BOTH know you CAN'T.
Problem with that? Why? Is it because a man who knows the Law of God can so easily shame the self-serving Law of secular humanist man? Just because someone says they're a preacher it doesn't mean they are. So you're calling Bob a "liar"? (but NOT posting it TO him?) Wuss.
I have a question for you. Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?
I don't think he's a liar. A simpleton, deluded. Who you find sooo inspiring, lol. Just like you miss goldi so much you could cry, or whatever gibberish you spouted back then.
email the question to: biblequestions@hushmail.com
Eh?
email the question to: biblequestions@hushmail.com What is your reason for not answering my questin on the forum here?
Please email that question to biblequestions@hushmoney.com
True chutzpah from a guy that hides behind the bozo function, to avoid answering uncomfortable questions.
Absolutely!
I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'. What's your opinion?
I just did...from a proxy in Denmark with a throwaway email address in Hong Kong.
How many of those did you supply to yukon?
I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'. What's your opinion? I don't have an opinion, but I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court.
None.
Biff Tannen: How many of those did you supply to yukon? Gatlin: None. Liar.
You "stole" yukon's account because of your association with the old rascal. You and whitesands and 22rifle (Kanary Klub Klan) traded 24 hour positions on libertypost each and every day.
You worked with another rascal, too. The admiral, AKA goatherder and ACLU lover. All of exchanged emails and details together beyond the content of the publick forum. We know what you did with yukon and harrowup. Pretty nasty stuff.
Well that dipshit didn't have the knowhow to provide himself with different emails. He couldn't even cut-and-paste right, lol. Probably took him a week to bookmark i-love-cock.com lololol
I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'. What's your opinion? The why did you pose the question? I'd bet you have an agenda, -- correct? So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds.
A few years back (maybe two) you were actually examining scriptures and making cogent points from Paul's epistles. What happened man?
"For You formed my inward parts; You wove me in my mother’s womb.” (Psalm 139:13)
Nothing's changed. I don't bother on forums generally. No one listens to anyone, for the most part, but especially regarding biblical matters. Every once in a while i get annoyed at charlatans and lash out. Getting tired of that too. It's mean and unproductive.
And our rule of law also provides for the settlement of disputes between people based on a legal contract. Marriage is a legal contract. If there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in-laws. So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract.
I see that you are back on forum. I have not received your reply to my email. While I am waiting for your reply to my email, I will ask you another question. In James 1:26...
In James 1:26... Does this: If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person's religion is worthless. Mean this: If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue (fully control bitterness or anger) but deceives his heart (believes something that is not true), this person's religion is worthless (has no good qualities and deserves contempt). Are you REALLY interested in the interpretations of scripture? And are your ad libs really your own interpretation? Or... are you just playing a game of "GOTCHA!"? Pastor Gatlin, as in the past, you've happened to cherry-pick a single verse (suspiciously like all liberals do when they play "GOTCHA!".) Except I wonder why you found it unnecessary to bother including the context of verses sandwiching James 1:26 (James, 1:21-1:25) as well as James 1:27? YOUR homework before Bob answers you is to read James 1:21-1:27 (without cheating) and see if your very same ad libs apply. You second assignment is reading James 3:13-17 (since you seem to be fascinated by James.) I'd be curious in your interpretation (or further ad libbing) in that case as well. Thanks.
Is THAT "gibberish" and the extent of you response? REALLY? Lol...what a space cadet. I'll reach back out to your Mother Ship tomorrow.
Yeah. Those wet noodles sting. OUCH! Getting tired of that too. It's mean and unproductive. It's just...Biffy being Biffy. I don't bother on forums generally. No one listens to anyone, for the most part, but especially regarding biblical matters. Your prerogative to "listen" to "biblical matters." OR ignore them. But how would *you* know who listens to what if you just admitted that you "don't bother on forums generally"?
[...] Like magic rosary beads, "holy" water," statues, candles, Marian idoltry, and repeated magic incantations? Wait a minute. Bob Celeste and you claim to follow Luther's doctrine of Sola Scriptura (Bible Only). If a Muslim claiming to be devout drinks alcohol I have right to point to him that he is inconsistent but I still retain moral right to drink and to think that alcohol is good (in moderation of course) Re "rosary beads" - Good for repetitive prayers. Do you pray for prolonged time? Do you make up you own prayers over half an hour or so? Re "holy" water - created object can be blessed and sanctified as in "Then the Lord said to him, 'Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground." Re "statues" - God ordered holy statues to be put in the Solomon's Temple Re "candles" - candles are an traditional offering, especially that over most of the Christian/Jewish history electric bulbs were hard to come by. Re "Marian idoltry" - She said "For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed" and you want to be excluded from those generations? She is blessed among the woman as is blessed the Fruit of Her womb. The seed of Eve has crushed the head of the serpent, the Child of the New Eve and New Eve Herself full of grace and Allpure. Those who dishonor Mother, dishonor the Son. Re repeated magic incantations. Do you consider Lord's Prayer or Psalms as magic incantations?
Gatlin, here is the original post, in it you will see that I am not going to answer questions here, only by email, the reason for that is simple, the best questions are th9se asked in private. Biff Tannen made this accusation: “Many things, probably most, of the things you claim about God and Christianity are not in the bible.” A Pole made this accusation: “Because you make things up that are not in the Scriptures.” In both instances I replied to them asking them to show even one example of the accusation, neither has done so, but, because of the accusation, I have opened a thirty day email account with HushMail.com I will answer any question dealing with my theology or any non prophecy question regarding the Bible. The email address is biblequestions@hushmail.com Don’t believe Biff Tannen or A Pole, ask your own questions and judge for yourself.
That would be because you have not emailed the question to me: the address is: biblequestions@hushmail.com Email a question and I will answer it. But only for today and the next five more days.
So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds. -- What's your point?
I am REALLY interested in what Bob has to say about this, not you. Play is defined as engaging in activity for enjoyment and recreation rather than a serious or practical purpose. I am not playing, I am engaged in a serious or practical purpose. A pastor is defined as a minister in charge of a Christian church or congregation. Ergo, I am no pastor since I am not in charge of a Christian church or congregation. And I feel that going on the internet and filling out a form would not make me an ordained minister, as some folks feel it does. In fact, quite a number of folks feel it does. The Universal Life Church alone has pronounced more than 18 million pastors since it was founded. The organization ordains 10,000 people a month as pastors….free online. There are many others organizations such as the Church of Spiritual Humanism, the Rose Ministries….just to name a couple. Even the Temple of Earth which describes itself as a “religion-free religion” and “The World’s First Religion for Atheists” offers instant ordination online for free. Wow….just WOW! Biff Tanner said: “Just because someone says they’re a preacher it doesn’t mean they are.” Other folks will say that in their eyes, just because someone is legally ordained (in some states and jurisdictions) as a minister (pastor or preacher) instantly on the internet doesn’t make them a minister (pastor or preacher). Some will agree with these other folks. “Shit happens” according to Forrest Gump. Nothing just happens with me. Furthermore, I do nothing suspiciously. There can be a wonderful feeling when your wonder, curiosity or strong desire to know or learn something is satisfied….especially if is about a question you found interesting or important, or have spent a lot of time and energy trying to answer. But as there can be sickness, misery, loneliness, suffering, devastation and heartache in life….there can also be disappointment. A disappointment in life can be a bitch. The effects of frustration, exhaustion, lack of time for other activities, and loss of interest are the negative effects of homework. Assigning unnecessary homework with the absence of its value is an increased burden where the evidence of positive effects isn’t just dubious; it’s nonexistent. Homework is defined as a task assigned to students by their teachers to be completed outside the class. You are not my teacher, I am not a student and I never do anything without class. As has been said: “Disappointments in life can be a bitch.” You have my most sincere welcome.
I sent you an email with a question, but I received no answer.
I sent an email to that address and received no answer. I tried again with the same negative result. I sent a test message to the email I used and it works fine. Just forget the whole thing... Thanks anyway...
It’s Major Gatlin….and you are most welcome. That is not what big brother governments and I will have it….that is what the rule of law has it. That is true. And it is true that marriage is still a legal contract. Therefore, if there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in- laws. --- So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract. I have no law degree….”but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express the other night.”
Comments (50 - 103) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYou are a brave man Bob. I can imagine the spam you are going to get.
#10. To: redleghunter (#8)
#11. To: Logsplitter (#1)
#12. To: Biff Tannen, Bob Celeste, redleghunter (#10)
(Edited)
Bob always ignores my most interesting points...
#13. To: Logsplitter, Bob Celeste (#1)
I'm pretty sure it was you who once posted that preachers should never be trusted.
#14. To: Biff Tannen (#11)
...preachers involved in politics.
#15. To: BobCeleste (#0)
I will answer questions.
#16. To: Liberator (#14)
#17. To: Gatlin (#15)
Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?
#18. To: BobCeleste (#2)
...accusatons ... questions...
Well I guess I've got to ask - 'Have you stopped beating your wife?'
#19. To: BobCeleste (#17)
Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?
#20. To: Gatlin (#19)
#21. To: Gatlin, y'all (#19)
What is your reason for not answering my questin on the forum here?
#22. To: tpaine (#21)
True chutzpah ...
#23. To: Gatlin (#22)
Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?
#24. To: BobCeleste, Biff Tannen (#20)
Please email that question to biblequestions@hushmoney.com
#25. To: Gatlin (#24)
#26. To: tpaine (#23)
Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online?
#27. To: Biff Tannen (#25)
How many of those did you supply to yukon?
#28. To: Gatlin, liberator, Deckard (#27)
Gatlin: I just did...from a proxy in Denmark with a throwaway email address in Hong Kong.
#29. To: buckeroo (#28)
(Edited)
NO, I'M NOT!
#30. To: Gatlin (#29)
#31. To: buckeroo (#30)
(Edited)
LIAR!
#32. To: Gatlin (#31)
#33. To: Gatlin (#27)
#34. To: Gatlin (#26)
I don't have an opinion, ---
--- but I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court.
#35. To: Biff Tannen (#10)
#36. To: redleghunter (#35)
#37. To: tpaine (#34)
So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds.
#38. To: BobCeleste (#37)
Does this:
If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person's religion is worthless.
Mean this:
If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue (fully control bitterness or anger) but deceives his heart (believes something that is not true), this person's religion is worthless (has no good qualities and deserves contempt).
#39. To: Gatlin, BobCeleste (#38)
I will ask you another question.
#40. To: Biff Tannen (#16)
#41. To: Biff Tannen, redleghunter (#36)
Every once in a while i get annoyed at charlatans and lash out.
#42. To: Liberator, BobCeleste, Biff Tannen (#5)
A Pole made this accusation: “Because you make things up that are not in the Scriptures.”
Like magic rosary beads, "holy" water," statues, candles, Marian idoltry, and repeated magic incantations?
#43. To: Gatlin (#19)
#44. To: Gatlin (#38)
I see that you are back on forum. I have not received your reply to my email.
#45. To: Gatlin (#37)
-- I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court.
--- our rule of law also provides for the settlement of disputes between people based on a legal contract.
Thank you, Capt Obvious. Marriage is a legal contract.
So you and big brother govts would have it. The 1st amendment says you should make no laws concerning such religious matters. If there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in- laws. --- So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract.
Where did you get your law degree? - Mumbo Jumbo University?
#46. To: Liberator, BobCeleste, Biff Tanner (#39)
Are you REALLY interested in the interpretations of scripture?
And are your ad libs really your own interpretation?
The ad libs are not my own interpretation, they are dictionary definitions of the words….really. Or... are you just playing a game of "GOTCHA!"?
Pastor Gatlin…
As in the past, you've happened to cherry-pick a single verse (suspiciously like all liberals do when they play "GOTCHA!".)
Except I wonder why you found it unnecessary to bother including the context of verses sandwiching James 1:26 (James, 1:21-1:25) as well as James 1:27?
YOUR homework …
Thanks.
#47. To: BobCeleste (#43)
#48. To: BobCeleste (#44)
biblequestions@hushmail.com
#49. To: tpaine (#45)
Thank you, Capt Obvious.
Marriage is a legal contract.
The 1st amendment says you should make no laws concerning such religious matters.
Where did you get your law degree? - Mumbo Jumbo University?
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]