[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Humor
See other Humor Articles

Title: Housing Subsidies: A Play in One Act
Source: Weekly Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs ... idies-play-one-act_934046.html
Published: Apr 29, 2015
Author: Ike Brannon
Post Date: 2015-04-30 07:06:16 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 2675
Comments: 4

Bob: I've got an idea for a new government program to help homeowners.

Ray: Alright, what'd you have in mind? 

Bob: Hear me out. The government should send people a check every year to people who own a home--you know, to help them cover their costs a bit.

Ray: I’m not saying no, but why would we do that?

Bob: Home ownership is GOOD! Mom, apple pie, American flag, all that. People owning their own homes is good for America--people behave better when they own a home, right?

Ray: I thought it was the other way around, that people who behave better are more likely to have the wherewithal to buy a house. 

Bob: Tomato, tomahto, right? We’re talking about the same thing, essentially.

Ray: No one says "tomahto," Bob.

Bob: Whatever. What about my idea? 

Ray: The thing is, we don’t have a lot of money at the moment--if you hadn't noticed we’re running a $600 billion deficit, and that’s only going up the next few years. 

Bob: We don’t have to give it to all homeowners, just a select group.

Ray: Oh. Well, maybe if it could be done in an affordable... 

Bob: The wealthiest ones. 

Ray: Pardon?

Bob: The checks should go mainly to the wealthiest homeowners, and the subsidy should increase with income and home value so that the richest people in the priciest houses get the biggest benefit. 

Ray: You lost me.

Bob: Oh, I wasn't aware you were against home ownership.

Ray: Of course I'm for home ownership! Don't you dare question my fidelity to the importance of home ownership!  It’s just that your plan sounds like it will cost a lot of money.

Bob: The way we keep costs down in my plan is to not give anything to the middle-class folks.

Ray: What?

Bob: Okay, we can give a few middle class folks a token sum, but most of the money would go to the wealthy people in big houses. I’m very insistent on this.

Ray: I don’t follow, but tell me how much you think this'll cost.

Bob: Seventy-five billion dollars next year, and about a trillion dollars over the next decade.

Ray: Gee, that sounds like a lot, Bob. You know, we have a lot of other things we can do with that kind of money. I’m not saying that increasing home ownership isn’t worth doing...

Bob: Oh, my plan won’t help anyone actually buy a home--all it will do is increase property values and help people buy bigger homes than what they've got now.

Ray: Come again?

Bob: Under my plan, people who are on the cusp of being able to afford a home would get nothing. 

Ray: Uh huh.

Bob: The subsidy won’t kick in until we get to the income levels at which people can already afford a home.

Ray: How, precisely, would your homeownership subsidy formula work?

Bob:  A middle-class family in Peoria buying a $200,000 house would get maybe $2,000 a year.

Ray: Okay...

Bob:  Families earning less than that, or buying cheaper houses, wouldn’t get a subsidy at all.

Ray: But…

Bob: And rich people living in a mansion in Greenwich would get $25,000 a year.

Ray: ...

Bob: I know. It’s great, isn’t it?

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE DO SUCH A THING? THIS IS LUNACY!

Bob: This is the mortgage interest deduction in a nutshell.

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: We must protect it at all costs.

END SCENE

Ike Brannon is an economist in Washington DC.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: TooConservative (#0)

getting rid of this:Amendment XVI.

    The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

will resolve the problem!

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-30   7:53:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BobCeleste (#1)

Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   8:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

"Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction."

Now's not the time to be debating the mortgage deduction, not with home prices and interest rates as low as they are.

In 1991, the middle class was responsible for 50% of all mortgage deductions. Today it's 25%.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-04-30   10:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

Amid increasing signs (like the shocking 0.2% GDP growth) that any "recovery" is solely caused by loose money policy by the Fed and primarily benefits the 1% at the cost of increasing the debt load which is directly responsible for much of the economic stagnation, getting rid of the mortgage deduction will prevent the ultra-rich from funding more McMansions on the public treasury.

If we can't cut welfare to the rich, we can't cut it at all.

The same goes for ag subsidies like ethanol and other Big Ag policies, for solar-wind subsidies, for the federal flood insurance program and the many other welfare-for-the-rich schemes invented by Big Gooberment.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   10:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com