[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: Woman Fined For Feeding The Homeless Tells Police: ‘This Is My Church and This Is How I Pray’
Joan Cheever was recently stopped and cited by police for the “crime” of feeding the homeless. But this a San Antonio woman accused police of infringing on her free exercise of religion, which requires her to feed the homeless. Cheever said that she received a citation Tuesday for literally nothing other than feeding the homeless. She now faces a penalty that could reach up to $2,000. But Cheever told the officers who arrived at the scene to ticket her, that she has “a legal right to do this.” Police officer Mike Marrota disagreed. To him, whatever the state says, goes… even if it contradicts the Constitution that he swore to uphold. Cheever told Texas Public Radio, that when Officer Marrota asked what she meant by that statement, she cited the state’s own Religious Freedom and Restoration Law, which reaffirms her Constitutional right to religious liberty. Since her religion tells her that it is an obligation to feed the homeless, citing her for doing so is a violation of the Constitution, as well as the Religious Freedom and Restoration Law. “I have a law degree, I gave them, memorandums of law telling them why they can’t do this,” Cheever explained to Mic. “I don’t believe that the anti-gay use of Religious Freedom and Restoration Law was appropriate,” she explained further. That’s because she claims religions to not require people to not serve people they disagree with. But they do, however, require them to feed the homeless.
That’s part of the reason why Cheever started a nonprofit called The Chow Train. “With me and the chow train, I don’t care if you’re gay or straight, Jew Buddhist, Communist, Christian, the only thing we care about is, are you hungry,” she said. The 501(c)(3) organization serves food to San Antonio’s homeless population every Tuesday. But the cops were not moved by the religious act of charity. They “said ‘Ma’am, if you want to pray, go to church.'”
She quickly retorted: “I was raised Catholic, I still consider myself Catholic. This is my church and this is how I pray.” The officers were again unmoved. They cited Cheever for serving food without a permit. As it turns out though, she did have a permit that is up to date and valid. That permit says she absolutely can serve food. She showed a copy to the officers. “They didn’t really know what to charge me with,” she added. Officer Marrota didn’t back down. He basically said “tell it to the judge,” saying that she could present this permit in court on June 23. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest #1. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0)
BAD COP - No Donut!
#2. To: All (#0) “I was raised Catholic, I still consider myself Catholic. This is my church and this is how I pray.” Matthew 25: 34,35 34"Then the King will say to those on His right, 'Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in;
#3. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0) I just told my girlfriend about this - she said: "If she has a permit from the government,I said: "I feel that she has 7 (seven) permits:" If a Bazooka Joe bubble gum wrapper is needed in addition, I can certainly supply one, but only if needed.
#4. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0) I like the picture of the Officer wearing the cheesy, sissy bicycle helmet. Not exactly "Electroglide In Blue" Si vis pacem, para bellum #5. To: Stoner (#4) I like the picture of the Officer wearing the cheesy, sissy bicycle helmet. Looks like he's never gone hungry a day in his life. Guess it's OK for police officers to get free donuts, but a crime to feed the truly needy.
#6. To: Chuck_Wagon (#3) "I feel that she has 7 (seven) permits:" Good post, I agree completely. She certainly has her priorities straight.
#7. To: Orwellian Nightmare, Stoner (#6) Our next question should be: "Does this nice lady serve cheesecake?"
#8. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0) Cops still showing off their low IQs I see, imagine that. “Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.†#9. To: Chuck_Wagon (#3) "If she has a permit from the government, they should leave her alone". I agree. Unfortunately, she didn't. From another article: "Cheever has a food permit for her mobile truck, but she was cited for transporting and serving the food from a vehicle other than that truck."
#10. To: CZ82 (#8) "Cops still showing off their low IQs I see, imagine that." How so?
#11. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0) Officer Lardass is a bike patrol officer? LOL He has the same girlish figure as Chris Christie.
#12. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#0) I would not want to be that cop.
#13. To: misterwhite (#9) "Cheever has a food permit for her mobile truck, but she was cited for transporting and serving the food from a vehicle other than that truck." I don't recall Jesus ever saying we needed a permit to feed the hungry.
#14. To: TooConservative (#11) Officer Lardass is a bike patrol officer? LOL Why would a porker like that even be assigned to bike patrol?
#15. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#13) "I don't recall Jesus ever saying we needed a permit to feed the hungry. The City of San Antonio did, however.
#16. To: misterwhite (#15) "I don't recall Jesus ever saying we needed a permit to feed the hungry. I'd say that obeying Jesus and not some arbitrary decree is a higher priority for some folks.
#17. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#16) "I'd say that obeying Jesus and not some arbitrary decree is a higher priority for some folks." If obeying Jesus means distributing food, then surely that must include getting a license. How can you do His will in the City of San Antonio without one?
#18. To: misterwhite (#17) How can you do His will in the City of San Antonio without one? My take on this that in this case,is that God's Law supersedes the petty and arbitrary licensing rules. She has a permit, but the city decided to make an example out of her.
#19. To: misterwhite (#17) If obeying Jesus means distributing food, then surely that must include getting a license. Since when have you been reincarnated as one of the Pharisees? You would have challenged the "legality" of Jesus' healing of the sick and dying on the Sabbath I suppose?
#20. To: Orwellian Nightmare, misterwhite (#13) I don't recall Jesus ever saying we needed a permit to feed the hungry. Of course not. But in MW's world, you'd need a permit and license to sh**.
#21. To: Chuck_Wagon (#3) Good post, Chuck.
#22. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#2) Amen, brutha.
#23. To: Liberator, misterwhite, Orwellian Nightmare (#19) Since when have you been reincarnated as one of the Pharisees? Have you forgotten? This is the same guy who was cheering a kid's lemonade stand being shut down for not having a "permit". I doubt that there is any aspect of our lives that he doesn't want to see controlled by the government. “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul![]() Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.Paul Craig Roberts#24. To: Orwellian Nightmare (#18) "My take on this that in this case,is that God's Law supersedes the petty and arbitrary licensing rules." My take on this is that God's Law of feeding the hungry includes getting a license to make that possible. "She has a permit, but the city decided to make an example out of her." Read my post #9.
#25. To: Deckard, misterwhite, Orwellian Nightmare (#23) I doubt that there is any aspect of our lives that he doesn't want to see controlled by the government. MW's a political enigma. At times he makes great sense. On the subject of personal sovereignty, he's more Doug Neidermeyer:
#26. To: misterwhite (#24) My take on this is that God's Law of feeding the hungry includes getting a license to make that possible. Your theory on "law" renders common sense impossible. Do you understand how ridiculous you are on this one?? Official permission from the State in cases of helping suffering, hungry people is transcended by God's Law. Were you at the scene when Jesus turned some fish and bread into a banquet to feed the thousands, you'd have ordered a Roman Legion to confiscate the food, arrest Jesus and remind Him that "from now on" ALL His "miracles" would be subject to "prior permission from Pilate."
#27. To: Liberator (#25) " On the subject of personal sovereignty, he's more Doug Neidermeyer: " ROFLMAO !! If memory serves, at the end of the movie, it said he had gone to Viet Nam, and was killed by his own troops, LOL. Si vis pacem, para bellum #28. To: Liberator (#26) "Official permission from the State in cases of helping suffering, hungry people is transcended by God's Law." Obviously not.
#29. To: Liberator (#26) " Do you understand how ridiculous you are on this one?? " He would never understand that! Si vis pacem, para bellum #30. To: Liberator (#21) Good post... Why, thank you.
#31. To: Chuck_Wagon (#3) "2) Her up to date and valid permit that says she absolutely can serve food." BZZZZZZT! Wrong! "Cheever has a food permit for her mobile truck, but she was cited for transporting and serving the food from a vehicle other than that truck."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|