[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: 'Schumerisms': How Harry Reid's likely successor will spar with Republicans (video) Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is likely to take over as the Senate's top Democrat when Sen. Harry Reid retires in 2016, has his own particular brand of rhetoric. White House reacts to Reid's endorsement of Schumer as his replacement Schumerisms. Expressions of a frequent partisan bent used by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is poised to become the chambers and possibly the entire partys most powerful Democrat in 2017. Lovers of vivid political language will miss Senate minority leader Harry Reid of Nevada, who announced his retirement last week. Senator Reid is infamous for his searing, pointed comments about conservatives and his regular walk- backs of those outbursts. But the loquacious Senator Schumer, who is widely expected to succeed Reid as Democratic leader, has developed his own brand of bombast that relies less on Reids personal taunts and more on sweeping indictments of his opponents purported political sins. Schumer, who served 18 years in the House before joining the Senate in 1999, is fond of labeling Republicans out of the mainstream on any number of issues. Its his way of portraying left-leaning Democrats as being in the political center a tougher case to make, since Republicans just romped to a Senate majority in the midterm elections. Schumer is second only to Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah in invoking the mainstream declaration, according to the Sunlight Foundation's "Capitol Words" tool tracking Congressional Record usage. Schumer did so with gusto during last year, when he attacked conservative Rep. Steve King (R) of Iowa for being instrumental in preventing the House from taking up the Senate-passed comprehensive immigration reform bill. The record on Republican immigration reform is clear, Schumer said. Steve King, a far- right, way-out-of-the-mainstream outlier, does not just spew hatred, he calls the shots. After the 2013 government shutdown, he bemoaned these tea party folks who are so out of the mainstream. Schumer also is a fan of summing up complex issues with the bottom line is very simple. Its a rhetorical cousin of the common-for-Capitol Hill sentence opener, let me be clear. It surfaces a lot in Schumers longtime, if largely futile, push for gun control laws. The bottom line is very simple, Schumer said earlier this month in unveiling a bill aimed at tightening loopholes allowing people on terrorist watch lists to legally buy firearms. With the new danger we have with terrorism, we have to close every loophole. On a similar Republicans-as-extremists theme, Schumer often invokes the Almighty in describing what he contends would be dire consequences resulting from GOP proposals. In late January 2011, weeks after Republicans took control of the House, Schumer proclaimed that if tea party-fueled members there held up passage of a budget, it could send the United States into God forbid
a depression. But Schumer doesnt just use the phrase to attack Republicans. In January, he sought to prod the Federal Aviation Administration for putting in lighting systems at New York airports. God forbid a crash occurs on a runway with planes hurtling in two different directions hitting one another and it still isnt installed, he warned. A final well-known Schumer verbal tic isnt an assertion its a question. During the skirmishing in February over Homeland Security Department funding and immigration, Schumer told reporters to watch what happens when Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky tried to meet the 60-vote margin needed to move the bill forward. National Journals Sarah Mimms wrote: When asked to clarify, Schumer grinned, offering a typical Schumerism: What do you think? "
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: out damned spot (#0)
There won't be any sparring. Chuckie has been doing business with them for decades. They both might pretend they are opponents for political purposes to keep their party drones in line,but they are all goombas.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when its the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Spar is another way of saying, cave, capitulate, surrender, be sodomized by, in other words treat the democrat and it's slaves as the generals treat obama.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|