"Astronomers have pushed NASA's Hubble Space Telescope to its limits by finding what is likely to be the most distant object ever seen in the universe. The object's light traveled 13.2 billion years to reach Hubble, roughly 150 million years longer than the previous record holder. The age of the universe is approximately 13.7 billion years."
"The object's light traveled 13.2 billion years to reach Hubble, roughly 150 million years longer than the previous record holder. The age of the universe is approximately 13.7 billion years."
If we started off with some Big Bang singularity 13.7 billion years ago, and this object is now 13.2 billion light years away, that means that it averaged close to light- speed away from us?
Given that objects in our universe are accelerating away from each other, how does any object average near light-speed?
Unless ... it popped into existence 13.2 billion years ago 13.2 billion light-years away, and its light is just now reaching us.
Given that objects in our universe are accelerating away from each other, how does any object average near light-speed?
Actually if you study new data on the big bang hoax. You would know that the universe isn't accelerating away from each other. But in multiple directions. Which many non creationist scientists say the big bang is a big pile of crap.
Yes. As though all the objects in the universe are on the surface of a balloon and someone is inflating the balloon.
The universe is increasing in size, and all the objects are speeding away from each other to fill it. Some say the opposite -- all the objects are speeding away from each other and the universe is expanding to accomodate them.
The Big Bang theory is possible if the universe popped into existence on a very large scale, not from a single point.
